Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 17PR0249
Modify comments view for Case # 17PR0249

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 17PR0249 STATUS: PENDING APPROVAL
PROJECT NAME: COSBY VILLAGE - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/22/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 ******** ********
FIRE DEPT.--: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 COMPLETE 10/26/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 COMPLETE 10/26/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 COMPLETE 10/30/17 JJD 717-6191
TRANSPORT.--: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 COMPLETE 10/26/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 AMENDED* 10/26/17 M L 748-1338
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 05 10/23/17 11/01/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 5/23/17
PLAN DATED : 5/9/17
REVIEW DATE : 5/31/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER 17-0107 SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER MAINS WITH
IZE, MATERIAL, AND COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER ON ALL APPLICABLE
LAN AND PROFILE SHEETS THAT DEPICT EXISTING CONDITIONS OR
CONNECTION. YOU MAY EMAIL SWAVAILABILITY@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
O OBTAIN AS-BUILT INFORMATION.
3. INCLUDE MANHOLE INSERTS FOR ALL MANHOLES ON THE MATERI
S LIST. EACH TEE FOR HYDRANTS SHOULD BE CALLED OUT AS A "
DRANT TEE".
4. A 2.5" CORP STOP AND SERVICE LINE IS NOT AN ALLOWABLE
ZE. A 2" LINE SHOULD BE USED INSTEAD. FOR ANY SERVICES 1
INCH OR LARGER A TAP TEE SHOULD BE USED.
5. ALL 12 INCH AND LARGER WATER MAIN MUST BE DUCTILE IRON
THE WATER MAIN IN FILL MUST BE CLASS 52 WITH RESTRAINED JO
*S. OTHER WATER LINE MAY BE CLASS 51 OR 52.
6. PLEASE RE-EVALUATE THE WATER MODEL RESULTS. WE THINK
AT THEY ARE MUCH TOO CONSERVATIVE AND IT IS LIKELY THAT SM
LER WATER MAIN ON THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE WILL BE APPROPR
TE. A MORE APPROPRIATE WAY TO ESTIMATE DEMANDS IS TO CALC
ATED THE AVERAGE FLOW RATE FOR ALL CUSTOMERS BASED ON ACTU
USAGE SUCH AS NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS OR EMPLOYEES, MULTIPLY
A PEAKING FACTOR AND THEN ADD IN FIRE FLOW. NOTE THAT TH
NEEDED FIRE FLOW FOR THE GROCERY STORE IS CALLED OUT AT 17
GPM BUT THE FORM ON SHEET C4.9 INDICATES 1500 GPM. THE M
XIMUM DAY PRESSURE THAT WAS PROVIDED AS A
START POINT ALREADY INCORPORATES THE MAXIMUM DAY DEMAND IN
HE PRESSURE ZONE. FURTHERMORE, THERE SHOULD BE TWO START
INTS USED IN THE WATER MODEL ANALYSIS AS THE SYSTEM WILL B
CONNECTED AT GREENWICH WALK AS WELL AS HULL STREET. THE W
ER MODEL SHOULD ALSO INCORPORATE ANTICIPATED DEMANDS FROM
E OTHER PORTIONS OF COSBY VILLAGE THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED I
THE FUTURE. AS DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING WE WANT TO UPSIZE
HE WATER MAIN ALONG ROAD B TO 16 INCH AND WE NEED TO HAVE
STIFICATION OF THE SIZE NEEDED ON SITE.
7. WE DO NOT LIKE THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT OF THE WATER M
ERS FOR THE SMALL SHOPS. THE GROUPING OF WATER LINES SO C
SE TOGETHER WILL RESULTS IN MAINTENANCE DIFFICULTIES AND
WILL CREATE THE UNDESIRABLE CONDITION OF PRIVATE WATER LIN
CROSSING PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER MAINS. THE METERS SHOULD
LWAYS HAVE A HYDRANT DOWNSTREAM TO ALLOW DIRTY WATER TO BE
LUSHED PAST THE METERS. CURRENTLY THEY ARE ON AN OVERSIZE
STUB SERVING RETAIL 1. A MUCH BETTER ARRANGEMENT WILL BE
CONSOLIDATE THE METERS INTO A SINGLE 1.5" OR 2" METER FOR
ACH BUILDING, WHICH WILL ALSO GREATLY REDUCE THE CONNECTIO
FEES. PRIVATE SUBMETERS CAN BE INSTALLED FOR EACH TENANT
DIVIDE THE BILL IF DESIRED.
8. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR EACH TENANT SHOULD BE INSTA
*D INSIDE THE MECHANICAL ROOM FOR THAT TENANT AS IT WILL B
BETTER PROTECTED FROM ELEMENTS AND EASIER TO TEST.
9. INSTEAD OF HAVING A "BACK TAP" TYPE OF ARRANGEMENT FOR
*E DOUBLE CHECK VAULTS, THE DOUBLE CHECK VALVES CAN BE LOC
ED INSIDE EACH BUILDING WITH A BUILDING MOUNTED FDC IN THI
SITUATION SINCE THE MAIN IS ABOUT 50 FT OR LESS FROM THE B
LDING. A STANDARD BURIED GATE VALVE IS REQUIRED AS THE PO
T OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LINE AT THE EA
MENT LINE. THE DEDICATED HYDRANT SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE
ND OF THE LINE IF POSSIBLE.
10. SHOW STATIONING ON THE WATER LINE SERVING THE COMMERC
*BUILDINGS. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO LABEL THE LINES AS WA
RLINE A, B, ETC.
11. THE EXISTING STUB AT HULL STREET IS 16 INCH.
12. PROVIDE A TEE AND STUBOUT WITH FLUSHING HYDRANT AT CO
Y RD.
13. AS DISCUSSED, YOU MAY CONSIDER INSTALLING SLEEVES FOR
* DSCAPING IRRIGATION AND CONSOLIDATING SOME OF THE IRRIGA
ON METERS. A LU-IR PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM VDOT FOR PRIVA
IRRIGATION LINES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
14. THE WATER METER FOR THE GROCERY IS SHOWN WITH A "BACK
*P" ARRANGEMENT THAT IS NOT DESIRABLE. CONSIDER RELOCATIN
A PORTION OF THE WATER MAIN BEHIND THE CURB TO ALLOW ROOM
TAP THE MAIN AND SET THE METER BETWEEN THE CURB AND WATER
AIN.
.
15. THE MINIMUM RADIUS ALLOWED FOR 12" D.I. WATER MAIN WI
*PUSH ON JOINTS IS 413 FT. THERE ARE RADII SHOWN ON THE R
D B WITH 344 FT. PROVIDE BENDS AS NEEDED OR SPECIFY M.J.
PE.
16. THE WATERLINE SHOULD BE SHOWN 4 FT FROM THE FACE OF C
* ALONG ROAD B.
17. PROVIDE A HYDRANT NEAR ROAD B AND VILLAGE SQUARE PARK
*.
18. A STUBOUT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT A STRATEGIC LOCATION
*SERVE 7321 OTTERDALE RD SO THAT A TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALV
IS NOT NEEDED. PERHAPS ALONG THE WATER MAIN FOLLOWING VIL
GE SQUARE PARKWAY?
19. IF 15950 COSBY RD WILL HAVE MORE THAN 25 RESIDENTIAL
*S, TWO WATER SERVICES ARE REQUIRED. PROVIDE A STUBOUT AS
ECESSARY.
20. IT APPEARS THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY IS SET UP FOR ANOTHE
*NTRANCE ACROSS FROM LEWSISHAM DR. IF WATERLINE WILL BE E
ENDED SOUTH, A CROSS WITH TWO STUBS AND TWO FLUSHING HYDRA
S SHOULD BE PROVIDED.
21. SHOW THE WATER MAIN BEING INSTALLED AS PART OF GREENW
* WALK PHASE 1 AS EXISTING, UTILITY PROJECT NUMBER 15-0111
22. CALL OUT THE VALVE TO BE USED FOR THE WATER MAIN TIE
.
23. WILL A SEWER CROSSING OF VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY BE
NEEDED AT LEWISHAM DR? IF SO, WE RECOMMEND A STEEL SLEEVE
* INSTALLED BEFORE THE ROAD IS PAVED.
24. WILL THE SEWER CROSSING OF VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY AT
*THWALK HEIGHTS BE OPEN CUT OR A BORE? IF OPEN CUT, SHOW
E PROPOSED PAVEMENT RESTORATION. IF A BORE, SHOW THE PROP
ED BORE AND RECEIVING PITS AND CASING PIPE.. NOTE THAT AT
EAST ONE MANHOLE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 25 FT FROM THE EDGE
THE CASING PIPE TO ALLOW ROOM TO REMOVE THE PIPE. SEWER
SIDE A CASING MUST BE RESTRAINED JOINT D.I.
25. PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE THAT THE EXIST
* MANHOLE IS TO BE CORE DRILLED WITH A KOR-IN-SEAL BOOT IN
ALLED.
26. SHOW ANGLES ON THE MANHOLES. NOTE THAT MH 3 APPEARS
*HAVE AN ANGLE LESS THAN 90 DEGREES, WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED.
27. ARE MANHOLES 10-13 DEEP ENOUGH TO GO UNDER THE WETLAN
*AND SERVE THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE?
28. THERE APPEARS TO BE A VIEWPORT LINE ON SHEET C4.3 THA
*HOULD BE TURNED OFF.
29. PROVIDE 20 FT CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FROM MH 1 WEST TO
*TTERDALE RD TO FACILITATE A FUTURE SEWER EXTENSION BY OTH
30. ARE THE GREASE TRAPS FOR THE GROCERY STORE RATED FOR
*CK TRAFFIC? THE DETAIL IS NOT CLEAR.
31. ON DETAIL DES-2, THE ELEVATION FOR NOTE #4 WHERE PRVS
*E REQUIRED IS 270.
32. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL ON SHEET C4.6
* FOR 4 INCH SERVICES, WHICH IS MUCH LARGER THAN SHOWN ON
IS DESIGN.
33. THE KOR-N-TEE DETAIL IS FOR LATERALS INTO EXISTING PI
* AND WILL NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT.
34. ALL DROP CONNECTIONS SHOULD BE INTERNAL PER MAN-16, P
*SE REPLACE DETAIL MAN-10 WITH MAN-16.
35. A SEPARATE WATER METER SIZING FORM WILL BE NEEDED FOR
ACH INDIVIDUAL METER. THE FORMS MUST INCLUDE PART C, WHIC
IS CUT OFF ON THE CURRENT FORMS. ENSURE THAT ALL
HOSE BIBS ARE ACCOUNTED FOR ON THE FORMS. ONCE THE METER
ZES ARE FINALIZED, IT IS PREFERRED TO SUBMIT A PDF WITH
ALL THE METER SIZING FORMS DIRECTLY TO MIKE LARSON BY EMAI
*ATHER THAN PUT THEM ON THE SITE PLAN.
36. INDICATE THE SIZE AND MATERIAL FOR ALL WATERLINE CROS
*GS ON THE PROFILE.
37. 12 INCHES OF STONE IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON TOP OF
* ANITARY SEWER PIPE WHERE THE DEPTH OF COVER IS 14 FT OR
REATER. THIS OCCURS IN SEVERAL PLACES BETWEEN MH 4 AND MH
0.
38. SANITARY SEWER STUBOUTS ARE NOT NORMALLY DESIRABLE BU
*N THIS CASE WE WILL ALLOW A STUBOUT INTO MH 1 AS LONG AS
M.J. PLUG IS SPECIFIED.
39. SHOW VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY ON THE PROFILE BETWEEN MH
14-15. IF A CASING IS TO BE PROVIDED IT SHOULD BE SHOWN.
*
40. LABEL EACH OF THE 6" SANITARY PROFILES AS PRIVATE.
*
41. THE MINIMUM SLOPE PER PLUMBING DOE FOR 6" LATERALS IS
*04%. RETAIL 1A, 1B, AND 2A HAVE SLOPES SHOWN WITH LESS S
PE.
42. CONSIDER CONSOLIDATING THE LATERALS FOR THE NON-RESTA
*NT TENANTS.
43. LABEL THE PIPE NUMBERS AND PIPE SIZE FOR THE STORM PI
* CROSSING THE WATER AND SEWER LINES IN PROFILE.
44. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, WE PREFER THE WATER MAIN TO GO OVE
THE TOP OF A STORM PIPE AS LONG AS THE WATER LINE IS D.I.,
*ERE IS AT LEAST 3 FT OF COVER, 6" OF CLEARANCE, AND THE W
ERLINE JOINT IS CENTERED OVER THE PIPE. PLEASE EVALUATE I
THE WATERLINE NEAR STA 13+00 AND 16+50 CAN GO OVER THE STO
SEWER.
45. USE 45 DEGREE BENDS TO LOWER THE WATER LINE. THE EXT
* OF JOINT RESTRAINT MUST BE CALCULATED AND SUBMITTED TO T
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND SHOWN ON THE PROFILE.
46. SHOW ALL D.I. WATER LINE WITH AN ANGLED HATCH PATTERN
* THE PROFILE.
47. CALL OUT THE EXISTING SIZE, MATERIAL, AND PROJECT NUM
* FOR THE WATER LINE CONNECTIONS.
48. THE RESTRAINED JOINT WATERLINE IN FILL MUST BE SHOWN
*A "CLASS 52".
49. ANY PRIVATE WATERLINE CROSSINGS OF THE WATER MAIN THA
*EMAIN AFTER THE PLANS ARE REVISED MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PR
ILE AND MUST GO UNDER THE PUBLIC WATER LINE (INCLUDING SMA
SERVICE LINES). THERE ARE ALSO SOME GAS, POWER, TELEPHON
AND CABLE LINES THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PROFILE.
50. ANY PUBLIC WATERLINE STUBS THAT REMAIN AFTER THE PLAN
*RE REVISED MUST HAVE PROFILES INCLUDED ON THE PLANS.
51. THREE OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS ON THE GROCERY LOOP ARE SH
N WITH HEAVY LANDSCAPING AROUND THEM. ENSURE NO TREES
ARE IN THE PUBLIC EASEMENT AND PROVIDE A NOTE THAT THERE I
3 FT CLEAR SPACE AROUND THE HYDRANTS.
*
52 PLEASE UPDATE THE MATERIALS LIST BASED UPON REVISIONS.
*
53. THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN C3.1 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE A
*HT POST THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE WATER LINE NORTH OF
E GREASE TRAP FOR THE GROCERY STORE.
53. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF MIKE LARSON
(LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE
BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE
SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
*
54. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS). ONE ADDITIONAL ROLLED SET WILL BE REQUESTED AFTER
THE PROJECT IS RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION TO BE USED FOR AS-
BUILTS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 6/16/17
PLAN DATED : 6/16/17
REVIEW DATE : 6/21/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS TO UPSIZE THE WATERLI
FROM THE CONNECTION POINT ON HULL STREET RD ALONG ROAD B
D UP TO THE NORTHERN CONNECTION POINT ON LEWISHAM
DR FROM 12" TO 16". THE DEVELOPER WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR OV
SIZING REFUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNTY CODE. THE STUB #
ON COSBY ROAD SHOULD BE 16" WITH A 4" FLUSHING HYDRANT, AL
THE OTHER STUBS CAN REMAIN THE SAME SIZE.
2. THIS PROJECT WILL NOT USE A DETECTOR ON THE DOUBLE CHEC
*ALVES, PLEASE REVISE THE CALL OUTS AND THE MATERIALS LIST
3. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE FDC SO THAT FIRE CAN BE ASSURE
*T IS WITHIN AN APPROPRIATE DISTANCE OF THE DEDICATED HYDR
T.
4. AS DISCUSSED, LOCATE THE METERS FOR RETAIL 1 AND 2 IN T
FFIC ISLANDS AND NOT IN THE SIDEWALK.
5. THE HYDRANT AT THE END OF WATERLINE C SHOULD BE LOCATED
N THE ISLAND WITH THE METER. MAKE SURE THE VALVE FOR THE
DRANT IS DOWNSTREAM OF THE METER. A STUBOUT IS NOT NEEDED
T THIS HYDRANT.
6. A 2" FLUSHING HYDRANT AND PLUG IS NEEDED FOR EACH 8"
OR 12" WATER STUB EXCEPT FOR STUB 2.
*
7. THE VALVE FOR THE FIRE LINE TO RETAIL 2 SHOULD BE ON TH
*ASEMENT LINE.
8. THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE 4" SLEEVE AND MH 5
9. CALL OUT THE MATERIAL FOR EACH WATER LINE ON THE PLAN V
*
10. CALL OUT THE SIZE FOR THE PRIVATE SEWER LINES ON THE P
* VIEW.
11. AS DISCUSSED, RE-ALIGN THE SEWER BETWEEN MH 12 AND MH
*TO AVOID THE DOUBLE STORM CROSSING.
12. LOCATE THE MANHOLES ON THE CENTERLINE OF ROAD B WHERE
POSSIBLE
13. DELETE THE MAINLINE VALVES NEAR STA 4+50, STA 9+00, ST
*1+00, AND 30+50 ON WATERLINE A.
14. ADD TWO MAINLINE BUTTERFLY VALVES ON THE TEES AT STUB
*STUB 4, STUB 3, AND STUB 2 ON WATERLINE A.
15. THE EXISTING VALVE AT STUB 1 IS A BUTTERFLY VALVE, NOT
*GATE VALVE.
16. WILL A 12" STUB BE NECESSARY ON STUB 1 OR WILL AND 8"
SUFFICIENT?
17. MOVE THE VALVE FOR STUB 1 TO THE TEE.
18. ADD AN 8" GATE VALVE TO THE WEST SIDE OF STUB 8
*
22. IS THE SUMP PUMP ON SHEET C4.5 INTENDED FOR THE FIRE V
*T? IF SO, ENSURE THAT A POWER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED AND THA
23. THE DETAIL ON C4.6 FOR A DOUBLE CHECK IS FOR 2" AND SM
LER. USE DETAIL FIR-3 AS THE DOUBLE CHECK VAULT IS FOR 8"
IPE.
24. INCLUDE DETAIL WAT-4 FOR THE 4" BLOW OFF.
*
25. THE DETAIL ON C4.6 FOR THE ABOVEGROUND ENCLOSURE FOR T
*4" RPZ IS STILL ON THE PLANS. THIS IS MUCH LARGER THAN W
26. ON THE SANITARY SEWER PROFILES, SEVERAL UTILITY CROSSI
A. MH 1-2: STORM PIPE 714
B. MH 2-3: UGT AND UGCATV
C. MH 3-4: IRRIGATION SLEEVE
D. MH 5-6: WATER IS 8", NOT 12"
E. MH 6-7: IRRIGATION SLEEVE
F. MH 8-9: IRRIGATION SLEEVE, WATER 8" NOT 12'
G. MH 9-10: GAS AND POWER
H. MH 12-13: STORM PIPE 142
27. SHOW SELECT BACKFILL FOR THE OPEN CUT CROSSING OF VILL
* SQUARE PARKWAY (SEWER AND WATER).
28. AS DISCUSSED, SHOW THE RESTRAINT OF THE LOWERED WATER
*E PER THE EXAMPLE I SENT. ENSURE RESTRAINT IS CALCULATE
29. ALL OF THE DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN SHOULD BE SHOWN AS
*CHED, NOT JUST THE SECTION IN FILL.
30. PROVIDE A NOTE WHERE THE WATER MAIN CROSSES OVER THE T
*OF THE STORM WITH LESS THAN 1.5' CLEARANCE "CENTER THE WA
31. SHOW THE IRRIGATION SLEEVES OVER THE WATER MAIN IN PRO
*E.
32. INCLUDE PROFILES FOR THE SEWER STUBS.
33. PROVIDE A PROFILE FOR WATERLINE C.
*
34. SEVERAL VALVES ARE MISSING ON THE WATERLINE PROFILE.
*ASE ENSURE VALVES THAT ARE RELOCATED ARE INCLUDED ON THE
35. WATERLINE B PROFILE, THE TEE AT STA 4+90 SHOULD BE AN
X 8".
36. THE 2" AND 1.5" SERVICE LINES SHOULD INCLUDE A TAP TEE
AND A CORPORATION STOP
37. THE GAS AND POWER CROSSING ARE MISSING ON THE STUB 8 P
*ILE.
38. PLEASE UPDATE THE MATERIALS LIST BASED ON THE REVISION
MADE FROM THESE COMMENTS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 7/14/17
PLAN DATED : 7/14/17
REVIEW DATE : 7/19/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE PUT A NOTE AT THE METER FOR RETAIL 2 THAT THE SE
ICE LINE FROM THE MAIN TO METER IS TO BE STRAIGHT. IT IS G
PHICALLY SHOWN TO HAVE A CURVE, BUT IN REALITY THE
SIZE OF THE FITTINGS SHOULD ALLOW A STRAIGHT INSTALLATION.
*
2. THE VALVE AND REDUCER ON STUB 1 ARE CALLING FOR 8", PLE
E UPDATE TO 12" BASED ON THE RECENT COMMENT RESPONSE.
3. I CANNOT FIND THE NOTE ON C4.3 OR C4.4 THAT THE FIRE HY
*NT NEAR STA 21+00 ON WATERLINE A NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 10
FROM THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 8/8/17
PLAN DATED : 8/8/17
REVIEW DATE : 8/10/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE SUBMIT 3 SETS OF PLANS TO THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT
*CE ALL OTHER APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED.
2. THIS PROJECT IS ELIGIBLE FOR OVERSIZING REFUNDS FOR 12"
O 16" WATER LINE. THE REFUNDS WILL BE CALCULATED AT THE T
E THE UTILITY CONTRACT IS PUT TOGETHER BETWEEN THE OWNER A
UTILITY DEPARTMENT. THE OWNER WILL RECEIVE REFUNDS BASED
N 55% OF THE WATER CAPACITY COST RECOVERY CHARGES COLLECTE
UNTIL THE REFUND IS FULFILLED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 8/8/17
PLAN DATED : 8/22/17
REVIEW DATE : 8/31/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 5TH REVIEW- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE SUBMIT 3 SETS OF PLANS TO THE UTILITY
DEPARTMENT ONCE ALL OTHER APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED
THIS PROJECT IS ELIGIBLE FOR OVERSIZING REFUNDS FOR 12" TO
6" WATER LINE. THE REFUNDS WILL BE CALCULATED AT THE TIME
HE UTILITY CONTRACT IS PUT TOGETHER BETWEEN THE OWNER AND
ILITY DEPARTMENT. THE OWNER WILL RECEIVE REFUNDS BASED ON
5% OF THE WATER CAPACITY COST RECOVERY CHARGES COLLECTED U
IL THE REFUND IS FULFILLED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COSBY VILLAGE
ADDRESS : 15950 COSBY RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 10/23/17
PLAN DATED : 10/20/17
REVIEW DATE : 10/25/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0249
COMMENTS : 6TH REVIEW- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE SUBMIT 3 SETS OF PLANS TO THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT
NCE ALL OTHER APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED.
THIS PROJECT IS ELIGIBLE FOR OVERSIZING REFUNDS FOR 12" TO
6" WATER LINE. THE REFUNDS WILL BE CALCULATED AT
THE TIME THE UTILITY CONTRACT IS PUT TOGETHER BETWEEN THE
OWNER AND UTILITY DEPARTMENT. THE OWNER WILL RECEIVE REFU
S BASED ON 55% OF THE WATER CAPACITY COST RECOVERY CHARGES
OLLECTED UNTIL THE REFUND IS FULFILLED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 05/23/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 05/24/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 06/02/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
1. COORDINATE WITH TIMMONS PROJECT MANAGER ON THE OTTERDAL
CDA PLANS TO MINIMIZE ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH FUTURE
ROAD PROJECT. CDOT WANTS TO MINIMIZE SUBSTANTIAL RE-WORK
WHERE POSSIBLE FOR FUTURE WIDENING & AT COMM ENTRANCES.
.
2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. ZONING CASE 17SN0715 CONDITION 7, PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS OF
WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CDA CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD FROM TRACTS A, B, & C.
.
B. PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY & ESMTS AS SHOWN ON GOODE
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARCELS & IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ZONING CASE 97SN0242 CONDITION 3.
.
C. ZONING CASE 17SN0715 COND 5G, A PHASING PLAN FOR THE
REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, AS IDENTIFIIED IN PROFFERED
CONDITION, SHAL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY CDOT. THIS
PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT WILL REQUIRE COMPLETION OF VILLAGE
SQUARE PKY (COND 5B).
.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
THIS SITE PLAN, VILLAGE SQUARE PKY SHALL BE COMPLETED, AS
SHOWN ON SITE PLAN 08PR0289 AND 08PR0290. THIS WILL BE
NOTED IN APPROVAL LETTER FOR SITE PLAN.
.
4. RT 360 IMPROVEMENTS (SHEETS 9.0, 9.1):
A. ADDITIONAL LANE/RIGHT TURN LANE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
WIDTH OF 12' (EXCLUDING GUTTER PAN). PLAN SHOWS 11.5'.
.
B. DIMENSION R/W FROM CENTERLINE OF RT 360 TO THE PROPOSED
R/W DEDICATION. IT IS REQUIRED TO BE 100'.
.
C. ADDITIONAL LANE & RIGHT TURN LANE PAVEMENT SECTION SHAL
BE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THRU VOLUMES. IN FUTURE, RIGHT
TURN LANES WILL BECOME THRU LANES.
.
D. WITH 360 & OTTERDALE IMPROVEMENTS, TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS WILL LIKELY SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. PROVIDE
UPDATE ON SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS.
.
5. OTTERDALE RD IMPROVEMENTS (SHEETS C9.0, C9.1, C9.2):
A. PROFF COND 5A REQUIRES 12-4-4 IMPROVEMENTS ALONG ENTIRE
PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO OTTERDALE RD. WITH THIS PHASE, THESE
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO VILLAGE SQUARE PKY
INTERSECTION. REVISE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
.
B. PER PREVIOUS DISCUSSION & COMMENT PROVIDED 4/27/17,
PROVIDE 200'/200' LEFT TURN LANE ALONG OTTERDALE RD AT ROA
A. OTTERDALE RD IS A MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH A FULL ACCESS TO
COMMERCIAL. CDOT CANNOT SUPPORT A FULL ACCESS WITHOUT A
LEFT TURN LANE.
.
C. ACCESS RD RIGHT TURN LANE: BEGIN TAPER AT CURB RETURN
AND MAINTAIN 100' TAPER. USE ADDITIONAL LENGTH TO ADD TO
STORAGE. THIS SHOULD PROVIDE APPROX. 140' STORAGE.
.
D. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT, PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG SHOPPING
CENTER'S FRONTAGE TO OTTERDALE RD. THIS WOULD BE FROM COSB
RD TO ROAD A. SIDEWALK SHOULD BE LOCATED TO MINIMIZE
CONFLICTS WITH FUTURE CDA PROJECT.
.
E. CDOT WOULD RECOMMEND NO STRIPING FOR THE RIGHT TURN LAN
TAPER AREA. ULTIMATELY, THIS IS A VDOT DECISION.
.
F. BOTH RT 360 & OTTERDALE RD ARE MAJOR ARTERIALS PER
COUNTY'S THOROUGHFARE PLAN. PLEASE NOTE ON PLANS.
.
6. RECONSTRUCT COSBY RD FROM OTTERDALE TO THE PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL ACCESS (APPROX. 500') IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROPRIATE VDOT STANDARD BASED ON PROJECTED TRAFFIC
VOLUMES. R/W WILL NEED TO BE DEDICATED ALONG COSBY VILLAGE
FRONTAGE TO ACCOMMODATE IMPROVEMENTS (EXIST. PRESCR. R/W).
.
7. ACCESS NOTES-OTTERDALE: ON PLAN SHEETS SHOWING OTTERDAL
ACCESS, PROVIDE FOLLOWING NOTES TO ENSURE OWNERS/DEVELOPER
UNDERSTAND ACCESS TO BE RESTRICTED WITH FUTURE PROJECT:
.
COSBY ROAD: FUTURE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS WITH WIDENING
OF OTTERDALE RD PER THE CDA PLANS.
ROAD A (PRIVATE): FUTURE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS WITH
WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD PER THE CDA PLANS.
.
8. GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY (CASE 97SN0242) SHALL PROVIDE
SIDEWALK ALONG RT 360, OTTERDALE RD, & COSBY RD. PLEASE
ACKNOWLEDGE WHETHER THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS SITE
PLAN OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARCELS.
.
9. ADVISORY COMMENT: WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN
ROAD A & VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED
ALONG OTTERDALE RD. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS SITE
PLAN OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARCEL.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 06/16/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 06/19/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO (FAST TRACK - JDD)
REVIEW DATE: 06/23/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
CDOT PERFORMED A CURSORY REVIEW OF THIS 2ND SUBMITTAL DUE
MAJORITY OF COMMENTS NOT BEING ADDRESSED.
.
1. COORDINATE WITH TIMMONS PROJECT MANAGER ON THE
OTTERDALE CDA PLANS TO MINIMIZE ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
WITH FUTURE ROAD PROJECT. CDOT WANTS TO MINIMIZE RE-WORK
WHERE POSSIBLE FOR FUTURE WIDENING & AT ENTRANCES.
.
2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. ZONING CASE 17SN0715 CONDITION 7, PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS OF
WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CDA CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD FROM TRACTS A, B, & C.
.
B. PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY & ESMTS AS SHOWN ON GOODE
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARCELS & IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ZONING CASE 97SN0242 CONDITION 3.
.
C. ZONING CASE 17SN0715 COND 5G, A PHASING PLAN FOR THE
REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, AS IDENTIFIIED IN PROFFERED
CONDITION, SHAL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY CDOT.
PHASING PLAN (SHEET C10.5) NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO SPECIFY
WHEN PHASES 2-7 WILL BE COMPLETED. NOTE ON PLAN IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE. IF INTENT IS FOR ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO BE
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
THEN SUCH STATEMENT CAN BE PROVIDED ON THE COVER SHEET OF
THE PLANS AND SHEET C10.5 CAN BE DELETED FROM PLANS.
.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY FOR THIS SITE PLAN, VILLAGE SQUARE PKY SHALL BE
COMPLETED, AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN 08PR0289 & 08PR0290. THIS
WILL BE NOTED IN PHASING PLAN AND WILL BE REPEATED IN
APPROVAL LETTER.
.
4. RT 360 IMPROVEMENTS (SHEETS 9.0, 9.1):
A. ON TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR 360, DIMENSION ROUTE 360
RIGHT TURN LANE AS MINIMUM WIDTH OF 12' (EXCLUDING GUTTER
PAN). PLAN VIEW NOTES 12' BUT NOT TYPICAL SECTIONS.
.
B. DIMENSION R/W FROM CENTERLINE OF RT 360 TO THE
PROPOSED R/W DEDICATION (SHOULD BE MINIMUM 100').
.
C. ENSURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODS ARE ADDRESSED WITH VDOT.
.
5. OTTERDALE RD IMPROVEMENTS (SHEETS C9.0, C9.1, C9.2):
A. PER PREVIOUS DISCUSSION & COMMENT PROVIDED 4/27/17,
PROVIDE 200'/200' LEFT TURN LANE ALONG OTTERDALE
RD AT ROAD A. OTTERDALE RD IS A MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH A FULL
ACCESS TO COMMERCIAL. CDOT CANNOT SUPPORT A FULL ACCESS
WITHOUT A LEFT TURN LANE.
.
B. ACCESS RD RIGHT TURN LANE: BEGIN TAPER AT CURB
RETURN AND MAINTAIN 100' TAPER. USE ADDITIONAL LENGTH TO
ADD TO STORAGE. THIS SHOULD PROVIDE APPROX. 140' STORAGE.
.
C. PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG SHOPPING CENTER'S FRONTAGE TO
OTTERDALE RD. THIS WOULD BE FROM COSBY RD TO ROAD A.
SIDEWALK SHOULD BE LOCATED TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH
FUTURE CDA PROJECT.
.
6. IT DOES NOT APPEAR COSBY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (I.E.
SHOULDER ADDITION) ARE ADDRESSED ON PLANS PER DISCUSSIONS.
.
7. ACCESS NOTES-OTTERDALE: ON PLAN SHEETS SHOWING OTTERDAL
ACCESS, PROVIDE FOLLOWING NOTES TO ENSURE OWNERS/DEVELOPER
UNDERSTAND ACCESS TO BE RESTRICTED WITH FUTURE PROJECT:
.
COSBY ROAD: FUTURE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS WITH WIDENING
OF OTTERDALE RD PER THE CDA PLANS.
ROAD A (PRIVATE): FUTURE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS WITH
WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD PER THE CDA PLANS.
.
8. GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY (CASE 97SN0242) SHALL PROVIDE
SIDEWALK ALONG RT 360, OTTERDALE RD, & COSBY RD. PLEASE
ACKNOWLEDGE WHETHER THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS SITE
PLAN OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARCELS.
.
.
9. ADVISORY COMMENT: WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN
ROAD A & VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED
ALONG OTTERDALE RD. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS SITE
PLAN OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARCEL.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 07/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 07/14/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE (FAST TRACK - JDD)
REVIEW DATE: 07/25/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTTERDALE RD
WIDENING PROJECT MANAGER FOR TIMMONS STATING HE HAS
REVIEWED THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN IN DETAIL AND SITE PLAN
WILL HAVE NO OR MINIMUM IMPACT ON FUTURE CDA PROJECT.
.
B. ADEQUATE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS AND EASEMENTS ARE
SHOWN FOR FUTURE ROAD WIDENING. HOW WERE LIMITS OF R/W AND
ESMTS DETERMINED - BASED ON EXISTING CDA PLANS OR REVISED
PROFILE PER SITE PLAN?
.
C. OVERLAY SITE PLAN WITH CDA PROJECT TO DETERMINE WHAT CA
BE USED AND WHAT WOULD BE RE-BUILD, ASSUMING CDA PLANS
UTILIZE LOWER PROFILE OF SITE PLAN.
.
D. REVIEW IMPACTS OF PROPOSED LEFT-IN CROSSOVER FOR COSBY
VILLAGE AVE. WILL ADEQUATE DUAL LEFT STORAGE BE PROVIDED
TO NORTH IF LEFT TURN LANE ALLOWED AT THIS ACCESS?
.
E. ZONING CASE 17SN0715 CONDITION 7, PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS OF
WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CDA CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD FROM TRACTS A, B, & C. SE
COMMENT B ABOVE.
.
F. PROVIDE ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY & ESMTS AS SHOWN ON GOODE
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARCELS & IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ZONING CASE 97SN0242 CONDITION 3.
.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
THIS SITE PLAN, VILLAGE SQUARE PKY SHALL BE COMPLETED, AS
SHOWN ON SITE PLAN 08PR0289 & 08PR0290. THIS WILL BE NOTED
IN ANY APPROVAL LETTER FOR SITE PLAN.
.
3. DELETE SHEET C10.5 PHASING PLAN. ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY. SITE PLAN SHALL PROVIDE ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
REQUIRED PER ZONING CASE 17SNO0715 AND ADDRESS PHASING PLA
REQUIREMENT OF PROFFERED CONDITION 5G. CDOT WILL NOT
SUPPORT PHASING OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON SITE PLAN.
.
4. PER 6/8/17 MEETING, ENGINEER WAS TO REVIEW SIGHT
DISTANCE ALONG OTTERDALE ROAD TO IMPROVE ON PROVIDING
MINIMUM 6" CLEARANCE FOR SEEING ONCOMING TRAFFIC. IT DOES
NOT APPEAR THIS WAS ADDRESSED WITH PLAN REVISION. PLEASE
ADDRESS.
.
5. ON ALL OVERALL PLAN SHEETS & SHEET C9.2 NOTES, REVISE
NOTES AS FOLLOWS:
COSBY RD: ACCESS TO BECOME RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT WITH FUTURE
OTTERDALE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT.
ACCESS RD: ACCESS TO REMAIN RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT WITH FUTURE
OTTERDALE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT.
COSBY VILLAGE AVE: ACCESS TO BECOME LEFT-IN/RIGHT-IN/RIGHT
OUT WITH FUTURE OTTERDALE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT (THIS
ASSUMES CDA PROJECT MANAGER FINDS NO OBJECTIONS WITH
IMPACTS TO FUTURE NORTHBOUND LEFT AT VILLAGE SQUARE PKY
CROSSOVER).
.
6. SHEET C9.2, DIMENSION THE SB LEFT TURN LANE TAPER AND
STORAGE FROM OTTERDALE RD TO COSBY VILLAGE AVE.
.
7. SHOW COSBY ROAD SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS ON ROAD PLAN
SHEETS WITHIN VOLUME III.
.
8. ADVISORY COMMENT: WITH FUTURE GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY
(CASE 97SN0242) SITE PLAN, SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED
ALONG RT 360, OTTERDALE RD, & COSBY RD. NO REVISED
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT WAS NOTED IN SHEET TABLE O
PROVIDED WITH SUBMITTAL.
.
9. ADVISORY COMMENT: WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN
ROAD A & VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED
ALONG OTTERDALE RD. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS SITE
PLAN OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARCEL. NO REVISED
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT WAS NOTED IN SHEET TABLE O
PROVIDED WITH SUBMITTAL.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 08/08/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 08/09/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR (FAST TRACK - JDD)
REVIEW DATE: 08/15/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
.
A. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PROVIDED BY OTTERDALE CDA PROJECT
MANAGER STATING SITE PLAN REVIEWED AND DETERMINED IT WILL
HAVE MINIMUMAL IMPACT ON CURRENT CDA PROJECT DESIGN. REVIE
SHALL ADDRESS THE LEFT-IN CROSSOVER FOR COSBY VILLAGE & IT
IMPACT ON DUAL LEFT TURN LANES ON NORTHBOUND OTTERDALE RD
AT VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, R/W & ESMTS PROVIDED PER CURRENT
PLANS.
.
B. RIGHT-OF WAY DEDICATIONS & ESMTS AS SHOWN ON THE CDA
PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD FOR TRACTS A, B, C.
THIS INCLUDES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ESMTS AT THE
PROPOSED ENTRANCE FOR TIE-IN WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH CASE
17SN0715 CONDITION 11.
.
C. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS & ESMTS AS SHOWN ON GOODE
FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARCELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CASE 97SN0242 CONDITION 3.
.
2. PER 7/31/17 EMAIL COMMENTS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
.
A. PLAN VIEW OVERLAYING OTTERDALE RD SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENT
WITH CURRENT CDA PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. PLAN TO SHOW R/W AN
ESMTS PER CURRENT CDA PLAN. THIS IS NOT PART OF SITE PLAN
.
B. ENSURE PROPOSED COSBY VILLAGE AVE & ACCESS RD ACCESSES
TO OTTERDALE RD WILL WORK UNDER THE CURRENT CDA DESIGN.
ADDITIONAL TEMP CONSTRUCITON ESMT MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE
ACCEPTABLE TIE-INS.
.
C. PROVIDE SHCEDULE TO CDOT ON HOW DEVELOPER PLANS TO
PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SHOPPING CENTER AND VILLAGE
SQUARE PKY. INFORMATION WAS COMMITTED DURING 6/8/17
MEETING. THIS IS TO ADDRESS TIMELY CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE
SQUARE PKY.
.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
THIS SITE PLAN, VILLAGE SQUARE PKY SHALL BE COMPLETED, AS
SHOWN ON SITE PLAN 08PR0289 & 08PR0290.
.
4. ADVISORY COMMENTS:
A. WITH FUTURE GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY (CASE 97SN0242) SITE
PLAN, SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG RT 360, OTTERDALE
RD, & COSBY RD.
.
B. WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN COSBY VILLAGE AVE
VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG
OTTERDALE RD.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 08/29/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 08/31/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FIVE (FAST TRACK - JDD)
REVIEW DATE: 09/07/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED - SEE COMMENT 1
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. PROVIDE SHCEDULE TO CDOT ON HOW DEVELOPER PLANS TO
PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SHOPPING CENTER & VILLAGE
SQUARE PKY. INFORMATION WAS COMMITTED TO AT 6/8 MEETING.
SCHEDULE IS TO ADDRESS TIMELY COMPLETION OF VILLAGE SQUARE
PKY.
.
B. WRITTEN COMMITMENT FROM OWNER AND DEVELOPER THAT
DOMINION ENERGY EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR OTTERDALE CDA WILL B
PROVIDED TO DOMINION ENERGY IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER
DOMINION ENERGY EASEMENTS FOR SITE.
.
WITH ABOVE ADDRESSED, CDOT CAN SUPPORT SUBSTANTIAL
APPROVAL.
.
2. FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING:
A. RIGHT-OF WAY DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CD
PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE RD FOR TRACTS A, B, C.
.
PER DISCUSSION, TIMMONS NEEDS TO REVISE PLANS TO SHOW
LARGER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS FOR THE ACCESS TIE
INS TO CURRENT CDA DESIGN.
.
B. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ON GOODE FAMILY PARCELS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CASE 97SN0242 CONDITION 3.
.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
VILLAGE SQUARE PKY SHALL BE COMPLETED (08PR0289, 08PR0290)
INCLUDING ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN.
.
4. ADVISORY COMMENTS:
A. FUTURE GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY (CASE 97SN0242) SITE PLAN,
SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG 360, OTTERDALE, & COSBY.
.
B. WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN COSBY VILLAGE AVE
VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG
OTTERDALE RD.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/24/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: SIX (FAST TRACK - JDD)
REVIEW DATE: 10/26/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED - SEE COMMENT 1
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATIONS & EASEMENTS
.
1. FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING:
A. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN THE CDA
PLANS FOR THE WIDENING OF OTTERDALE ROAD FOR TRACTS A, B,
AND C IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING CASE 17SN0715 PROFFERED
CONDITION 11.
B. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS ON GOODE FAMILY PARCELS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ZONING CASE 97SN0242 PROFFERED CONDITION 3
INCLUDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ALONG COSBY ROAD.
.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY SHALL BE COMPLETED AS SHOWN ON SITE
PLAN CASES 08PR0289 AND 08PR0290 (IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZONIN
CASE 17SN0715 PROFFERED CONDITION 4.C).
.
3. ADVISORY COMMENTS:
A. FUTURE GOODE FAMILY PROPERTY (CASE 97SN0242) SITE PLAN,
SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG 360, OTTERDALE, & COSBY.
.
B. WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN COSBY VILLAGE AVE
VILLAGE SQUARE PKY, SIDEWALKS WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG
OTTERDALE RD.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-- DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE- 05/09/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---05/23/2017
5 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER--ONE
REVIEW DATE---05/26/2017
RECOMMENDATION---NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW----------- NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-NOT APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS -NOT APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS--- REQUESTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN-REQUESTED
CURSORY REVIEW ONLY
.
REVIEW COMMENTS:
.
01.RESUBMIT 10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. MANY OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS ARE INTERRELATED
IMPACTING SITE, LANDSCAPE AND BUILDING DESIGN.
PLEASE COORDINATE DESIGN CHANGES AMONGST ALL DESIGN
SITE PLAN.S TO ENSURE THERE ARE NO DESIGN CONFLICTS.
.
04. DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF CHECKLIST AND ZONING CONDITION
COMMENTS GENERATED WITH THIS REVIEW, A CURSORY
REVIEW WAS PROVIDED. A WEDNESDAY STAFF/DEVELOPER
MEETING IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED.
.
05. DUE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK, A PHASING PLAN MAY BE
REQUIRED. WE WILL FURTHER DISCUSS WITH SITE PLAN TEAM.
.
06. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWS MASSIVE GRADING
BEYOND THE PROPOSED ROADS AND SHOPPING CENTER.
PLANNING MAY REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: PER SEC. 19.1-2: A
MASTER SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR PROJECTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES.
A MASTER SITE PLAN SHALL NOT BE USED TO SATISFY SITE PLAN
REQUIREMENTS. THE PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED WITH SUFFICIENT
DETAIL TO ENSURE THE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY OF FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS, AVOID DESIGN CONFLICTS, AND VERIFY
GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND OTHER
APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PHASING INFORMATION
SHALL NOT BE BINDING OR UNALTERABLE. A MASTER SITE
PLAN SHALL NOT VEST RIGHTS TO DEVELOP FUTURE PHASES
UNTIL THOSE PHASES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN AN APPROVED
SITE PLAN.
.
07. PUT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER
17PR0249 IN THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
.
08. THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS TAX ID NUMBER
713-671-2000 LOCATED AT 15900 COSBY RD. IS
OWNED BY WANDA AND NORMAN SADLER. OWNER
IS NOT INCLUDED AS AN APPLICANT. PLEASE PROVIDE
PERMISSION FROM PROPERTY OWNER TO INCLUDE
PARCEL AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN.
.
12. ALL COVER SHEETS: 15900, 15910, AND 15930
HULL STREET RD ARE SUBJECT TO ZONING CASE 97SN0242
AND ARE LOCATED AND SUBJECT TO THE ROUTE 360 WEST
DESIGN DISTRICT STANDARDS. ADD THIS DESIGN DISTRICT TO
NOTE 10 AND IDENTIFY THESE PARCELS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THI
DESIGN DISTRICT. ALSO, DESIGN THE SITE PLAN FOR THESE PARC
IN ACCORDANCE TO THIS DESIGN DISTRICT. SEC. 19.1-388-390.
.
13. ALL COVER SHEETS C0.0: NOTE 16 IDENTIFIES THE USE
AS MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS USE IS NOT PART OF THE
SITE PLAN UNDER REVIEW. REMOVE USE FROM PLAN.
.
14. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS
FOR HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED
POLICY, AND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19-517(B), THE
DESIGN OF PARKING AREAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN
TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN MATURING
LANDSCAPING AND THE VISIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FIRE
HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO HIGH POWER TRANSMISSION LINES,
SITE LIGHTING, AND VISIBILITY FOR MOTORISTS EXITING
PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED TO DETERMINE
THAT SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING LOT PLANTING AREA EXISTS
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19-519 EXCLUDING ISLANDS
WITH FIRE HYDRANTS AND RELATED UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICT
WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES AND SITE LIGHTING. REVIEW
STAFF MAY REQUIRE A SEPARATE SHEET DOCUMENTING SIZES
OF PROPOSED ISLANDS AND OTHER INTERNAL GREEN SPACES
WITHIN PARKING LOTS.
.
15. MAKE SURE THAT THE "REQUIRED CONDITIONS" (AS
SPECIFIED AT THE END OF EACH ZONING DISTRICT IN THE
ORDINANCE) ARE BEING MET FOR THE USES ALLOWED.
.
16. SPECIFY ANY PROPOSED RESTRICTED USES AS ALLOWED BY
THE ZONING DISTRICT AND MAKE SURE RESTRICTIONS ARE MET ON
THE PLAN. [SEC. 19.1-53]
.
17. IF A USE INCLUDES ON-PREMISES CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL,
VERIFY THAT THE USE LIMITATIONS ARE MET FORSEPARATION FROM
PUBLIC SCHOOLS LISTED IN SEC. 19.1-52.2.
.
18 ADD NOTE ON PLANS: "ALL PARKING SPACES LEGIBLY
STRIPED WITH 4-INCH WHITE LINE".
.
19. IS ANY OUTDOOR MUSIC/OUTDOOR PUBLIC ADDRESS OR
INTERCOM SYSTEM PROPOSED? OUTDOOR PUBLIC ADDRESS
CONDITIONAL USE ONLY ALLOW SYSTEMS, AND
INTERCOMS ARE A RESTRICTED USE BEGINNING IN C-2DISTRICTS.
.
20. SHOW ANY EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED GAS, POWER,
AND TELEPHONE LINES AND EASEMENTS (IF KNOWN).
.
21. EVEN THOUGH THE PROJECT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PROPOSE BIKEWAYS AND
TRAILS, THE APPLICANT IS ENCOURAGED TO CONSIDER
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE CONNECTION TO COSBY HIGH
SCHOOL AND CONSIDER PROVISIONS FOR INTERNAL
PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT THAT
CONNECTS TO THE ADJACENT HIGH SCHOOL.
.
22. PER SEC. 19.1-202, LABEL ANY VACANT AGRICULTURAL
ZONED PROPERTY ADJACENT TO YOUR SITE, AND LIST THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY.
SETBACK AND BUFFER REDUCTIONS ARE ALLOWED IF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION IS FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL
USES. THIS WOULD APPLY FOR ADJACENT TAX I.D
713-670-6548.
.
23. PER SEC. 19.1-208.J, SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM
PROJECT BOUNDARIES AND NOT FROM SHARED INTERNAL
PROPERTY LINES FOR PROJECTS IN O, C, AND I DISTRICTS.
THIS MEANS NO INTERNAL SETBACKS WITHIN PROJECTS.
.
24. PER SEC. 19.1-208.B, MAKE SURE ALL SETBACKS ANDBUFFERS
FROM PUBLIC ROADS ARE MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT
OF WAY. CLEARLY DIMENSION AND SHOW ULTIMATE RIGHT OF
WAYS ON ALL SITE PLANS, UTILITY PLAN, EROSION CONTROLPLAN,
GRADING PLANS, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. LABEL THE EXISTING
RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY ON ALL PUBLIC
ROADS,EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE AND EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY ISTHE
SAME. ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRED TO BE TAKEN FROM THE
REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATIONS PER CONDITIONS OF
ZONING CASES 97SN0242, 06SN0215 & 17SN0715.
.
25. SHOW, LABEL, AND DIMENSION THE BUILDING/PARKING
SETBACKS, REQUIRED BUFFERS AND REQUIRED PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING ON SITE PLANS, UTILITY PLAN, EROSION CONTROL
PLAN, GRADING PLANS, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. MAKE SURE
SETBACKS ARE LABELED AS SETBACKS AND NOT BUFFERS AND
VICE VERSA.
.
26. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD. PLANS DO
NOT SHOW ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR HULL STREET ROAD
AND THE ULTIMATE ROW FOR OTTERDALE ROAD SHOWS A
VARIABLE WIDTH ROW INSTEAD OF 45' FOOT ROW
DEDICATION. REFERENCE CASE 97SN0242 FOR ROW
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS.
.
27. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD: PLANS
DO NOT SHOW, LABEL, AND DIMENSION THE BUILDING/PARKING
SETBACKS AND REQUIRED PERIMETER LANDSCAPING ON THE
SITE PLANS, UTILITY PLAN, EROSION CONTROL
PLAN, GRADING PLAN. SHOW ON PLANS AND BE SURE
SURE THE PLANS SHOW AND DO NOT CONSIDER ROW
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS PER CASE 97SN0242.
.
28. WITHIN ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS LAND
DISTURBANCE IS NOT ALLOWED. ADJUST PLANS TO DELETE
GRADING WITHIN REQUIRED SETBACKS UNLESS EXCEPTIONS
ARE ALLOWED UNDER CASE 17SN0715. ANY EXCEPTIONS
MUST BE LABELED ON GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
REF. COND. 8 OF 17SN0715. THIS CONDITION IS NOT
APPLICABLE TO 15900, 15910 & 15930 HULL STREET ROAD.
.
29. THE INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER LANDSCAPE B
WITHIN THE 10' SETBACK IS REQUIRED ADJACENT
TO THE AGRICULTURALLY ZONED PROPERTY IDENTIFIED
AS 15901 HULL STREET RD. IN ADDITION,
A MINIMUM 10' FOOT SETBACK IS REQUIRED FOR THE
DRIVEWAY SERVING THE OVERALL PROJECT. SEC. 19.1-390.
.
30. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD: SUBMIT
A LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PER COUNTY ORDINANCE.
.
31. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD: THE GRADING
PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION
WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACKS. EITHER SHOW AS A TREE SAVE
AREA OR SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING 2X THE REQUIRED
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING.
.
32. PER SEC. 19-518(D), GRADING WITHIN FRONT SETBACKS THAT
PACTS EXISTING VEGETATION IS NOT ALLOWED. ADJUST LIMITS O
DISTURBANCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCING.
.
33. SHEET C1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMO PLAN SHOWS
PROPOSED CLEARING AND GRUBBING. PLEASE SHOW
LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND ENSURE THERE IS
NO ENCROACHMENT INTO REQUIRED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS.
.
34. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND
CLEARLY LABELED AS TREE SAVE AREA. SEE SECTION 19.1-2 47
REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE PRESERVATION.
ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF -WAY SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL IS NECESSARY
TO ACCOMMODATE VEHICLE OR ACCESS AND OR UTILITIES THAT
RUN GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK.
THESE TREES SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION
CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPING PLANS.
.
35. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTED FOR EACH TREE REMO
ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR REMOV
SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL, GRADING AND
LANDSCAPE PLANS.
.
36. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARL
LABEL AS SUCH. 19.1-247
.
37. EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN BUFFERS SHALL BE PRESERVED
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. SHOW THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE, PROPOSED TREE LINE WITH TREE PROTECTION, AND
SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE SITE PLAN, EROSION CONTROL,
GRADING, AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
.
38. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS REASONABLY
DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE BUFFER AREA.
PRESERVED VEGETATION WILL BE INSPECTED AT THE TIME OF
OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO DETERMINE IS SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IS
REQUIRED. 19.1-247. A.2
.
39. IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS TO BE CREDITED TOWARD
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDE ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES IN THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATION TABLES.
.
40. SEC. 19.1-247: 3. ROOT PROTECTION ZONE DURING
CONSTRUCTION. LAND DISTURBANCE OTHER THAN FOR
ACCESS OR UTILITIES SHALL BE ALLOWED IN SETBACKS
ALONG ROADS PROVIDED THAT SUCH DISTURBANCE IS
NO CLOSER TO THE TREE THAN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE.
THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE IS A ONE-FOOT RADIUS
AROUND THE TREE FOR EACH INCH OF TRUNK DIAMETER
MEASURED 4.5 FEET ABOVE GRADE. HOWEVER, UNDER
NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE
EXTEND BEYOND THE ROAD SETBACK LIMITS.
.
41. LABEL AND DIMENSION THE REQUIRED SETBACKS ONTHE SITE
LAYOUT PLAN. MAKE SURE SPECIFIED SETBACKS
FOR CERTAIN USES ARE BEING MET AS FOLLOWS:
A USES WITHOUT BUILDINGS PER SEC. 19.1-208.D
B SOLID WASTE STORAGE AREAS PER SEC. 19.1-206
D. RETAINING WALLS PER SEC. 19.1-320 (RETAINING WALLS
USE SAME SETBACKS AS REQUIRED FOR DRIVES AND PARKING
PER SEC. 19-570.1(C), AND MAY INCREASE WHEN LANDSCAPING
IS REQUIRED TO INSURE 10 FEET OF PLANTING AREA FREE
FROM EASEMENTS, UTILITIES, OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES
THAT MIGHT PREVENT THE INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPIN
.
42. UTILITIES ARE TO RUN GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH
SETBACKS AND BUFFERS AND MAY NOT RUN PARALLEL WITHIN
REQUIRED BUFFERS AND SETBACKS. REVISE PLANS TO MEET
THIS REQUIREMENT AND LOCATE UTILITIES TO AVOID CONFLICTS
WITH LANDSCAPING.
.
43. FOR THE UTILITIES THAT CROSS THE TREE SAVE AREA,
PROVIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND PROVIDE ORANGE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE AT THOSE LIMITS.
.
44. PER SEC. 19.1-262.B, USES IN BUFFERS ARE LIMITED TO
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, SIGNS, SECURITY FENCING, UTILIT
THAT RUN PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE BUFFER, PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS, AND SIMILAR USES AS APPROVED THROUGH SITE OR
SCHEMATIC PLAN REVIEW.
.
45. REVISE THE PLANS TO PRESERVE AND INDICATE (LABEL)
THE TREE SAVE AREA. ON THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL
PLANS (AND THE NARRATIVE) PROVIDE ORANGE TREE PROTECTION
FENCE FOR THE TREES IN THE TREE SAVE AREA.
.
46. THE GRADING PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW THE REMOVAL OF ALL
VEGETATION WITHIN THE 50 FOOT REQUIRED BUFFER ADJACENT TO
OTTERDALE ROAD. CONDITION EIGHT OF 17SN0715 ALLOWS FOR
GRADING WITHIN THIS BUFFER AND ALLOWS FOR THE DIRECTOR OF
PLANNING TO MODIFY THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE LANDSCAPE
PLAN SHOWS PERIMETER C LANDSCAPING TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN
THIS BUFFER. HOWEVER, AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT,
REPLANTING OF THE BUMPER, IF CLEARED AND GRADED, BUT STILL
BE REQUIRED PER THE STANDARDS OF THE ORDINANCE. THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REQUIRES 1.5 X PERIMETER C LANDSCAPING WERE
VEGETATION DOES NOT EXIST OR WHERE IT IS APPROVED FOR
REMOVAL. REVIEWER WILL NEED TO DISCUSS WITH THE DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CONDITION TO
DETERMINE WHICH BUFFER LANDSCAPING TREATMENT WILL BE
REQUIRED.
.
47. SHEET C3.1: IDENTIFY THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE GROCERY STORE AND RETAIL BUILDINGS FOOT
TRACT C TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITION12 OF CASE
06SN0215.
.
48. CONDITION 13 B OF CASE 06SN0215, WIRES A MINIMUM
35-FOOT BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE EAST WEST ROAD. PLANS DO
NOT SHOW THIS BUFFER AND THE GRADING PLAN APPEARS TO
DENUDE THIS ENTIRE BUFFER AREA. READ CONDITION AND
DESIGN THE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLAN TO COMPLY WITH THIS
CONDITION CONDITION 13 C OF CASE 06SN0215, REQUIRES
BUFFERS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN RECORDED OPEN SPACE.
.
49. PROVIDE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENTS
.
50. PER SEC. 19.1-320 (RETAINING WALLS USE SAME
50. PER SEC. 19.1-320 (RETAINING WALLS USE SAME
SETBACKS AS REQUIRED FOR DRIVES AND PARKING PER
SEC. 19.1-320.1(C), AND MAY INCREASE WHEN
LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED TO INSURE 10
FEET OF PLANTING AREA FREE FROM EASEMENTS, UTILITIES,
OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES THAT MIGHT PREVENT THE
INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.)
RETAINING WALL SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURE COMPATIBILITY SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH
THE USE OF INTEGRATED COLOR BLOCK, OTHER MATERIAL
SIMILAR IN APPEARANCE OF THAT OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE,
OR IN EARTH TONE COLOR EXCEPT THE BULL TO THE DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING.
.
51. RETAINING WALLS SHALL CONFORM TO PARKING SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT IN WHICH LOCATED; HOWEVER,
THE SETBACK SHALL BE INCREASED WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPING DESCRIBED
IN 3. BELOW. LANDSCAPING FOR WALLS EXCEEDING 10 FEET
IN HEIGHT AND WITHIN 50 FEET OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OR
ROAD. IF THE WALL EXCEEDS 10 FEET IN HEIGHT AND IS WITHIN
50 FEET OF, AND FACING AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OR ROAD, IN
ADDITION TO REQUIRED PERIMETER YARD LANDSCAPING, ADDITIONA
EVERGREEN TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT THE BASE OF THE WALL T
BREAK UP THE VISUAL IMPACT. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE LOCATED
IN A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA THAT IS
FREE FROM EASEMENTS, OVERHEAD OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES,
OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES THAT MIGHT PREVENT THE INSTALLATION
OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. SEC. 19.1-320
.
52. FOR RETAINING WALLS HAVING A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET OR GREAT
A 4-FOOT-HIGH FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPPER SIDE
OF THE WALL. IF VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, THE FENCE SHALL HAV
A DECORATIVE DESIGN. A MINIMUM OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING
MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED BETWEEN THE FENCE AND
PARKING AREAS UNLESS THERE IS SOME OTHER PHYSICAL
IMPEDIMENT TO A VEHICLE REACHING THE EDGE OF THE WALL:
GUARDRAILS; EARTH BERMS AT LEAST 3 FEET HIGH ABOVE GRADE
ON THE APPROACH SIDE; OR O CONCRETE FILLED STEEL BOLLARDS
SPACED 4.5 FEET ON CENTER.
.
53. IF THE ENTIRE 34 ACRES IS GOING TO BE PART OF THIS SIT
A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING ALL PERIMETER AND BUFFER
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AND A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PLAN WILL
NEED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ENTIRE OVERALL PROJECT.
.
54. SHEET C3.1: PLEASE BE ADVISED THE LOCATION OF THE
FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE NOT APPROVED WITH THE SITE PLAN AND
REQUIRE SIGN PERMIT APPROVAL. ADD NOTE ON PLAN THAT READS
"FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND REQUIRE SIG
PERMIT APPROVAL".
.
55. SHEET C3.1: THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK LOCATED NORTH OF
ROAD A NEAR THE STUB ROAD APPEARS TO BE SLIGHTLY ENCROACHI
INTO THE TRAVEL LANE. SHIFT THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SHIFT
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SLIGHTLY NORTH.
.
56. SHEET C3.1: THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING WHERE
COSBY ROAD AND ROAD B INTERSECT APPEARS TO BE SLIGHTLY
ENCROACHING INTO THE TRAVEL LANE SHIFT CROSSWALK SLIGHTLY
NORTH.
.
56. SHEET C3.1: THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK CROSSING WHERE
COSBY ROAD AND ROAD B INTERSECT APPEARS TO BE SLIGHTLY
ENCROACHING INTO THE TRAVEL LANE SHIFT CROSSWALK SLIGHTLY
.
57. SHEET C3.1: ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROAD A THE VDOT
CG-12B RAMP AND THE SIDEWALK SERVING RETAIL BUILDING
ONE ARE SLIGHTLY MISALIGNED PLEASE ALIGN.
.
58. IS THERE ANY OUTSIDE STORAGE PROPOSED? IF YES,
APPROVAL FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WOULD BE REQUIRED.
PLACE NOTE ON SITE PLAN THAT READS "NO OUTSIDE STORAGE
PERMITTED". PER SEC. 19-575, OUTSIDE STORAGE INCLUDES, BU
IS NOT LIMITED TO, PARKING OF ALL COMPANY-OWNED
AND-OPERATED VEHICLES, EXCEPT FOR PASSENGER
VEHICLES AND TRUCKS DESIGNED SUCH THAT THE CARGO AREA
MAY BE ACCESSED FROM THE DRIVER'S SEAT WITHOUT EXISTING TH
CAB. PER SEC. 19-301, THE DEFINITION FOR 'STORAGE AREA,
OUTSIDE" INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, AREAS USED TO
KEEP EQUIPMENT, ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS, SUPPLIES,
VEHICLES FOR REPAIR OF BODY OR ENGINE DAMAGE OR GOODS
FOR SALE WHEREBY SUCH MATERIALS REMAIN OUTSIDE ON A
CONTINUING BASIS.
.
NOTE: OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA SHALL NOT INCLUDE OUTSIDE
DISPLAY AND CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE DISPLAY AS ALLOWED UNDER
C-2 THROUGH C-5 ZONING DISTRICTS AND CASE 17SN0715.
.
59. PER SEC. 19-301, OUTSIDE DISPLAY IS DEFINED AS ANY
AREA USED FOR, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE DISPLAY OF
EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR OTHER GOODS FOR SALE
WHEREBY SUCH MATERIALS ARE ONLY DISPLAYED OUTSIDE
FOR A PORTION OF ANY 24-HOUR DAY. CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE
DISPLAY ALLOWS 24/7 DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE FOR
SALE IF (1) IT IS SITUATED UNDER A COVERED
PEDESTRIAN WAY NOT EXCEEDING 16 FEET IN DEPTH
IN FRONT OF THE COMMERCIAL FACILITY SELLING THE
MERCHANDISE; (2) THE DISPLAY AREA DOES NOT EXCEED
MORE THAN FIVE PERCENT OF THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF
THE PRINCIPAL USE; AND (3) THE MERCHANDISE DOES
NOT OBSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. ALSO, REFERENCE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT IV. E OF CASE17SN0715.
CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE DISPLAY MAY BE PERMITTED PROVIDED
THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19-159(I)
INCLUDING THE COVERED WALKWAY. 22. VERIFY IF THERE
WILL BE OUTSIDE DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE
TO BE SOLD.
.
60. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE PHARMACY WINDOW AND THE
REQUIRED THREE STACKING SPACES (SHOW EACH AS 18' LONG BOX)
.
61. SHOW THE ONE-WAY AND DO NOT ENTER SIGNS AND
STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE PHARMACY DRIVE.
.
62. LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES
THAT DO NOT ALLOW THIS TYPE OF USE. THE GRADING PLAN AND
LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE FULL SCREENING OF THE
LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS BEHIND THE GROCERY STORE.
LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS MUST BE FULLY SCREENED
INCLUDING THE HEIGHT OF ANY DELIVERY TRUCKS.
REVIEWER RECOMMENDS A SCREEN WALL MADE OF MATERIALS
USED ON THE BUILDING. THE ENTIRE TRACTOR TRAILER / TRUCK
WILL NEED TO BE SCREENED. A DETAILED SIGHT PROFILE ELEVATI
MAY BE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
.
63. PER SEC. 19.1-318, SITES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
BUILDINGS ORIENTED SO THAT LOADING AREAS ARE SCREENED
FROM VIEW OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES WHERE SUCH A USE IS
NOT PERMITTED, OR IF ZONED A THAT THE DESIGNATED USE
IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT PERMIT LOADING
IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT PERMIT LOADING
AREAS, OR FROM ANY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY EXCEPT LIMITED
ACCESS ROADS. PER 19.1-261SCREENING SHALL BE
ACCOMPLISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
MEANS: BUILDING DESIGN; DURABLE ARCHITECTURAL WALLS
OR FENCES OF COMPARABLE MATERIALS TO THE PRINCIPAL
BUILDING AND DESIGNED TO BE COMPATIBLE TO THE
PRINCIPAL BUILDING; ORO BERMS OR OTHER LAND FORMS
WHICH ARE PART OF, OR APPEAR TO BE PART OF, THE NATURAL
TERRAIN.
.
64. THE LAYOUT HAS NO LOCATION THAT CAN PARK ADDITIONAL
DELIVERY TRUCKS AND VANS BEYOND THE TWO TRUCK DOCKS.
VERIFY THAT ADDITIONAL DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL NOT BE
ON SITE. PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN LIMITING
DELIVERIES TO THE TWO LOADING DOCKS AND LIMITING TRUCKS
ON SITE AT ANY ONE TIME TO TRUCKS THAT FIT WITHIN THE
SCREENED TRUCK AREA.
.
65. TEXTUAL STATEMENT III.A APPROVED UNDER ZONING
CASE 06SN0215 REQUIRES SIDEWALKS SHALL BE LOCATED ON
BOTH SIDES OF ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE
PROVIDED TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS WITHIN THE PROJEC
THE PLAN DOES NOT ACCOMPLISH THIS REQUIREMENT.
PER SEC. 19-668, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHE'LL CONNECT USES
WITH AN INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXTEND TO ADJACENT
PROPERTIES PER TEXT. III. B. STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRE
ALONG EACH SIDE OF ALL PUBLIC STREETS WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE
REQUIRED.
.
66. PER SEC. 19-668, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL
CONNECT USES WITHIN INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS AND
EXTEND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
.
67. THE WIDTH OF THE PLANTING AREA FOR THE PROPOSED STREET
TREES ADJACENT TO ROAD B LOCATED IN BETWEEN THE RETAINING
WALL AND THE GUARD RAIL A LAWN ROAD B IS IS NOT CONDUCIVE
FOR TREES TO GROW. IN ADDITION, THE ROOT SYSTEM WOULD BE
DETRIMENTAL TO THE RETAINING WALL. GRADING MAY NEED TO
BE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE A SUITABLE PLANTING AREA FOR THE
STREET TREES.
.
68. SHEET C3.1: REMOVE NO LOCATED NEXT TO RETAINING
WALL THAT READS 5.0 SPACES PER 1000 SF PER GROCERY STORE
STANDARDS.
.
69. THE UTILITY PLANS MUST SHOW ALL PEPPERS AND REQUIRED
SETBACKS AND RIGHT AWAY IS TO DETERMINE IF UTILITIES ARE
ENCROACHING PARALLEL INTO THESE AREAS
.
70. THE BMP SHOWN ADJACENT TO COSBY ROAD AND ROAD D
APPEARS TO ENCROACH INTO REQUIRED SETBACKS. HOWEVER,
REVIEWING CAN'T DETERMINE THIS BECAUSE SETBACKS AND
ULTIMATE RIGHT AWAY ARE NOT SHOWN. IN ADDITION, THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE THIS BMP OR THE PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO COSBY ROAD AND ROAD B. IN
ADDITION, BMP WILL NEED TO BE DESIGNED AS A VISUAL AMENITY
.
71. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS INAPPROPRIATE PLANTINGS
LOCATED WITHIN THE WET POND LOCATED ADJACENT TO ROAD B.
PLEASE WORK WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TO DESIGN
LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH SUITABLE PLANTINGS.
.
72. THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES THAT SHOPPING CARTS
BE SCREENED WHEN STORED OUTSIDE. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS
THE LOCATION OF SEVERAL CART CORRALS. PLEASE SUBMIT A
DRAWING OF THE PROPOSED CART CORRALS.
.
73. PROVIDE SPEC SHEET ON PROPOSED GUARD RAILS.
CORE-TEN (AKA WEATHERING STEEL) GUARDRAILS ARE
GENERALLY NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE TO VDOT. THIS HAS
BEEN THE PREFERRED GUARDRAIL FOR AESTHETIC PURPOSES
BECAUSE OF ITS RUST COLOR WHICH HELPS TO BLEND IT INTO
THE LANDSCAPE (AS OPPOSED TO SHINY GALVANIZED STEEL).
IN SITUATIONS WHERE AESTHETICS ARE A CONCERN, THEY
WILL ACCEPT POWDER COATED GALVANIZED STEEL IN
EARTH-TONE COLOR, BUT ITS USE IS LIMITED AND MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER.
.
74. PER SEC. 19.1-205, SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ON
A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION OF ALL EXTERIOR SITE
LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, THE BUILDING, OR ON THE GROUND
AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR EACH LIGHT FIXTURE
SHOWN ON THE PLAN. TREES ARE NOT TO CONFLICT WITH SITE
LIGHTING.
.
75. PER SEC. 19.1-205, SUBMIT A FOOT-CANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM
WHENEVER A SITE IS ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
DOCUMENT THAT THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT EXCEED
0.5 FOOT-CANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT.
.
76. PER SEC. 19.1-205, UNLESS A PROJECT IS APPROVED FOR
ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-STYLE LIGHTING, ALL LIGHT FIXTURES
SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHTSOURC
FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH,
SEC. 19-585.1(B)TRICT OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. ALL LIGHT
FIXTURES MUST BE EITHER A SHOE BOX STYLE WITH A FLAT LENS
OR HAVE FULL EXTERNAL SHIELDS (LEVEL WITH THE BOTTOM
OF THE LENS). (SEC. 19.508.3). POLE MOUNTED PARKING LOT
LIGHTING REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SHOPPING
CENTER.
.
77. THE SITE PLAN IS PART OF AN OVERALL PROJECT.
ORNAMENTAL POLE MOUNTED LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE
ONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT.
.
78. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD ARE SHOWN
AS PART OF THE OVERALL PROJECT BUT ARE NOT SUBJECT
ZONING CASE 17SN0715. ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
IS REQUIRED AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RT. 360 WEST
CORRIDOR ALSO MUST BE ADDRESSED. 19-586(A) & (B)
PER SEC.19.1-317 A, B, FOR ANY PROJECT WITH MORE
THAN ONE BUILDING, THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT
DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL
THEME. THE THEME SHALL DESCRIBE HOW EXTERIOR
MATERIALS, COLORS, ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, AND BUILDING
SCALE SHALL BE USED TO DEVELOP A CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENT FOR THE PROJECT. ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
IS REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS WITHIN THE PROJECT.
SEC. 19-585.1(B)
.
79. FOR ANY PROJECT WITH MORE THAN ONE BUILDING, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE OVERALL
ARCHITECTURAL THEME. PER SEC. 19-570(A), THE THEME SHALL
DESCRIBE HOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS, COLORS, ARCHITECTURAL
STYLE AND BUILDING SCALE SHALL BE USED TO DEVELOP A
CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR THE PROJECT.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY IS REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS
WITHIN THE PROJECT AND MUST COMPLY WITH THE ZONING CASE.
.
80. PROVIDE A SHEET SHOWING A MASTER PLAN FOR THIS CENTER.
THE PLAN SHOULD INDICATE GENERAL BUILDING MASS AND LOCATIO
AS WELL AS PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION. INCORPORA
THE INFORMATION WITH THE SHEET FOR THE PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION FOR THE WIDER AREA. SHOW THE BERMS AND SETBACK
AS WELL AS BMPS AND OTHER WATER FEATURES. THE MASTER PLAN
IS INTENDED TO SHOW AREAS AND RELATIONSHIPS OF USES AS A
IS INTENDED TO SHOW AREAS AND RELATIONSHIPS OF USES AS A
BUBBLE DIAGRAM. PROVIDE LABELS SUCH AS "FUTURE RETAIL",
"FUTURE PARKING" AND "FUTURE ENTRANCE". NOTE THAT
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN AS "FUTURE" ARE NOT VESTED WITH SITE
PLAN APPROVAL AND MAY NEED ADDITIONAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL
AND REVIEW.
.
81. 15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD: THE SITE DESIG
AND ARCHITECTURE IS REQUIRED TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE
GROCERY STORE SITE AND COMPLY WITH THE RT. 360 WEST DESIGN
DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. REVIEWER SEES SOME POSSIBLE CONFLIC
BETWEEN THE REQUIREMENTS AND WILL NEED TO DISCUSS FURTHER
HOW TO APPROACH COMPATIBILITY WITH THE GROCERY STORE SITE
WHILE ADHERING TO THE RT. 360 DESIGN STANDARDS THAT REQUIR
THE FOLLOWING:
1. THEME. THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF A PROJECT SHALL SHOW
HOW BUILDING ELEMENTS WILL BREAK UP THE MASS OF LARGE
BUILDINGS AND PROVIDE FOR A PEDESTRIAN SCALE ENVIRONMENT
BETWEEN PARKING AND BUILDINGS; BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN
ELEMENTS. THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SHALL USE BUILDING
ELEMENTS THAT INTERRUPT THE LINEAR PATTERN AND PROVIDE
LARGE SCALE FOCAL ELEMENTS AND PEDESTRIAN SCALE ELEMENTS
FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN
ELEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. THEME. THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF A PROJECT SHALL SHOW
HOW BUILDING ELEMENTS WILL BREAK UP THE MASS OF LARGE
BUILDINGS AND PROVIDE FOR A PEDESTRIAN SCALE ENVIRONMENT
BETWEEN PARKING AND BUILDINGS; BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN
ELEMENTS. THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SHALL USE BUILDING
ELEMENTS THAT INTERRUPT THE LINEAR PATTERN AND PROVIDE
LARGE SCALE FOCAL ELEMENTS AND PEDESTRIAN SCALE ELEMENTS
FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN
ELEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
BACKGROUND WALL. BACKGROUND WALL DESIGNS SHALL
INCORPORATE SIMILAR ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION OF WALLS
INCLUDING GRID PATTERN, CANOPY, ABSTRACT ORNAMENTATION,
AND CORNICE TO MAINTAIN THE CONTINUITY BETWEEN TENANTS.
VARIATION IN BUILDING WALL SETBACKS SHALL BE EMPLOYED TO
INTERRUPT BUILDING MASS; ENTRY AND TOWER FEATURES. TOWER
FEATURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO A PROJECT TO ESTABLISH
SCALE FOCAL POINTS AND INTERRUPT THE LINEAR DESIGN OFBUILD
ENTRY FEATURES SHALL EITHER BE INCLUDED AS KEY DESIGNCOMPO
TO IDENTIFY EACH TENANT AND
PROVIDE RELIEF TO THE BACKGROUND WALL, OR PEDESTRIAN CANOP
WITH A MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 250 FEET MAY BE USED BETWEEN
SIGNIFICANT ENTRY OR TOWER FEATURES;
COLORS. OVERALL DESIGNS SHALL INCLUDE VARIATIONS IN NEUTRA
COLOR SCHEMES FOR THE BUILDING BACKGROUND WITH COMPLIMENTA
COLORS TO ENHANCE THE ENTRY FEATURE DESIGN. ACCENT COLORS
BE PERMITTED TO REPRESENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE IDENTIFICAT
PARAPETS AND ROOFS. VARIATION IN PARAPET AND/OR ROOF HEIGH
SHALL BE USED TO INTERRUPT BUILDING MASS; AND
PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS. BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING AREAS,
AT LEAST FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SHALL B
USED:
DECORATIVE POST LIGHTS, ALTERNATIVE PAVING TREATMENTS AT
ENTRANCES AND/OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS, BENCHES, PLAZAS,
LANDSCAPED AREAS, WATER FEATURES, DISPLAY WINDOWS, OR
OTHER PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS.
D. NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DESIGNATED AREAS ON THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BUILDINGS SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN FEATURESSHALL
INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, ARTICULATION OF DOORS AND
WINDOWS, ARCHITECTURAL ORNAMENTATION, AND USE OFRESIDENTIA
MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BRICK OR SIDING,AND
ASPHALT SHINGLE OR SIMULATED SLATE ROOFS. THERE SHALL BE
NO VISIBLE FLAT OR SHED ROOFS LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED T
O MEET PERIMETER AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS DO NOT
COUNT TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT.
.
82. ONCE AN ARCHITECTURAL THEME IS APPROVED A 'SIGN PACKAG
WILL BE NEEDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
REFERENCE SEC. 19.1-273 B. OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE FOR SIGN
PACKAGE REQUIREMENTS. THE SIGN PACKAGE DOES NOT NEED TO
INCLUDE THE SIZE, LOCATIONS OR NUMBER OF PROJECT SIGNS.
.
83. AS A SUGGESTION ONLY, FOR THE TWO RETAIL BUILDING AND
UNITS ADJACENT TO THE OUTDOOR SEATING PATIO, CONSIDER
ADDING AN ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE ADJACENT TO THE PATIO TO
BETTER SERVE FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT USE. THIS WILLPROVIDE
A BETTER PEDESTRIAN FLOW BETWEEN RESTAURANT SERVERS,
CUSTOMERS, AND PEDESTRIANS.
.
84. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION FOR AN EXTERIOR
EMERGENCY GENERATOR, PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMER,
COMPACTOR. PROVIDE DETAILED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
THAT SHOW COMPLETE SCREENING OF THIS EQUIPMENT.
.
85. CASE17SN0715 REQUIRES THAT THE EXPOSED PORTION
OF THE EXTERIOR WALL SURFACES ON FRONT REAR AND SIDES
OF ANY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SIMILAR IN QUALITY
AS TO THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND MATERIALS.
.
86. SOLID WASTE STORAGE AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
DESIGNED PER CONDITION 1. A. (2) OF THE ZONING CASE
17SN0715 AND CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS TO MATCH THE
BUILDING IT SERVES .PLEASE REVIEW THIS CONDITION AND
DESIGN DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES ACCORDINGLY.
.
87. A-101 PROVIDE DETAILED COLOR RENDERING FOR ALL
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES.
.
87. A-101 PROVIDE DETAILED COLOR RENDERING FOR ALL
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES.
.
88. SHEET A101: REMOVE NOTE REGARDING TRASH ENCLOSURE
COMPLYING WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODES.
.
89. A-101: THE COLOR TREATMENT FOR THE DUMPSTER
ENCLOSURE DOORS MUST BE PAINTED A COLOR TOO SIMILAR
TO THE ENCLOSURE. WHITE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE COLOR.
.
90. A-101: ON THE DUMPSTER SCREEN GATES, PROVIDE A
DURABLE SIGN UP TO 6 FT. STATING "NO SERVICE BETWEEN
9 PM AND 6 AM". PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE SITE PLANS.
.
91. SK-04: PROVIDE TWO SETS OF COLORED RENDERINGS OF
ALL SIDES AND A 3-D PERSPECTIVE OF THE GROCERY STORE TO
BETTER UNDERSTAND THE LOCATION AND RELATIONSHIP OF THE
REAR LOADING AREAS WITH THE SITE. IDENTIFY ALL BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLORS. 19.1-317.
.
92. SK-04: PER SECTION 19.1-3 17. ALL JUNCTION BOXES
AND ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE EITHER INTEGRATED
INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. IF PAINTED, COLOR
TREATMENT MUST MATCH BUILDING BACKGROUND AND MUST
BE SHOWN AND LABELED ON THE ELEVATIONS.
.
93. P SK-04: ER SEC. 19.1-317. D: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT,
WHETHER ROOFTOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND
SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S AND ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS IT INTEGRAL
PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS DASHED IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND /OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO
SHOW THAT THE UNITS INCLUDING MOUNTING CURBS ARE
FULLY SCREENED.
.
94. SK-04: WHEN DESIGNING THE BUILDING PARAPETS
THE PARAPET HEIGHTS WILL FULLY SCREEN ALL ROOFTOP
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM PUBLIC VIEW,
RIGHT-OF-WAY'S AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES THAT ARE AT
A HIGHER ELEVATION. IF NEEDED REVIEW MAY REQUEST
SITE LINE DRAWINGS TO DOCUMENT THE PARAPET HEIGHT
PROVIDES COMPLETE SCREENING. VISIBLE TO SODS SHALL
NOT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS INFERIOR IN
APPEARANCE OR DETAIL TO ANY OTHER FAçADE OF THE
SAME BUILDING.
.
95. SK-04: PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS
OF ALL RTU'S.
96. SK-04: SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS.
EXTERIOR LADDER ACCESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS
SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES IN
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, AND ANY EXTERIOR ACCESS MUST
BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO THE ARCHITECTURAL
CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. IF ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE
INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING LABEL THIS INFORMATION ON
THE ELEVATIONS.
.
97. SK-04: SHOW THE SCREENING OF THE LOADING DOCK
AREA ON THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS THAT ARE TO
BE PROVIDED.
.
98. SK-04: RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ONSITE LIGHTING, PLEASE PROVIDE
INFORMATION ON INTERIOR LIGHTING OF THE BUILDING IN
RELATIONSHIP TO THE GABLE WINDOWS LOCATED ON THE
FRONT ELEVATION. INTERIOR LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE
DESIGNED TO FOCUS LIGHTING DOWN WORD SO THAT DIRECT
YOU OF LIGHT SOURCE IS NOT VISIBLE THROUGH THE
WINDOWS OF THE BUILDING.
.
99. SK-04: SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD TO INCLUDE COLOR
CHIPS, SLATE SHINGLE, STONE VENEER AND GROUT SAMPLE
AND COMPOSITE CEMENT SHAKE BOARD SIDING AND
SPLIT-FACE C.M.U.
.
100. SK-04: THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES MASONRY TO
BE ARCHITECTURAL IN STYLE. THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED
WITH THE ZONING CASE IDENTIFY THE SPLIT-FACE C.M.U
WITH ARRISCRAFT WATER TABLE SHAPE. PLEASE IDENTIFY
THE SPLIT-FACE CMU ON ALL ELEVATIONS AND SUBMIT
A SAMPLE.
.
101. SK-04: THE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MUST
CONSIST OF A KYNAR PRE-FINISHED METAL. LABEL THIS
MATERIAL ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SUBMIT A
MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEET.
.
102. SK-04: THE DECORATIVE POSTS THAT FLANK THE
LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE FRONT ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE
DECORATIVE. THE POSTS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE
PLAIN. PLEASE REVISE THE SHOW DECORATIVE POST.
REFERENCE ELEVATIONS APPROVED UNDER CASE 1
7SN0715.
.
103. SK-04: ON THE FRONT ELEVATION GABLE THAT SHOWS
THE GROCER SIGN, JUST ABOVE THE SIGN IDENTIFY THE
DECORATIVE OUTRIGGER BRACKETS.
.
104. SK-04: THE REAR ELEVATION SHOWS THE BACK O
F THE FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING PARAPET AND GABLES.
THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED
UNDER ZONING CASE 17SN0715. REVISE ELEVATIONS BY
RAISING REAR PARAPET AND POSSIBLY SIDE PARAPETS SO
REAR OF FRONT BUILDING PARAPET IS NOT VISIBLE. REVISE
ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE GABLES
TO BE FINISHED USING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT
TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES.
.
105. SK-04: IDENTIFY THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND
COLOR TREATMENT FOR THE STOOPS AND RAMPS SHOWN
ON THE RIGHT LEFT AND REAR ELEVATIONS. MATERIAL
MUST CONSIST OF SPLIT FACE CMU TO MATCH BUILDING
.
106. SK-04: ENSURE THAT EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS
EXTEND DOWN TO GRADE. REVIEWER HAS CONCERNS THAT
THIS IS NOT BEING ACCOMPLISHED ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT
SIDE ELEVATIONS.
.
107. SK-04: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT ON ALL
EXTERIOR DOORS INCLUDING OVERHEAD DOORS POWER
TREATMENT MUST BE SIMILAR ADJACENT BUILDING COLOR.
.
108. SK-04: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT OF SCUPPERS
AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT MUST BE COMPATIBLE
WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
.
109. SK-02-03: PROVIDE TWO SETS OF COLORED RENDERINGS
OF ALL SIDES AND A 3-D PERSPECTIVE OF THE GROCERY STORE TO
BETTER UNDERSTAND THE LOCATION AND RELATIONSHIP OF THE
REAR LOADING AREAS WITH THE SITE. IDENTIFY ALL BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLORS. 19.1-317.
.
110. SK-04: PER SECTION 19.1-3 17. ALL JUNCTION BOXES
AND ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE EITHER INTEGRATED
INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. IF PAINTED, COLOR
TREATMENT MUST MATCH BUILDING BACKGROUND AND
MUST BE SHOWN AND LABELED ON THE ELEVATIONS.
.
111. SK-02-03: SEC. 19.1-317. D: MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT, WHETHER ROOFTOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL
BE SHIELDED AND SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW,
RIGHT-OF-WAY'S AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND
DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS IT INTEGRAL PART
OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS DASHED IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND /OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING
TO SHOW THAT THE UNITS INCLUDING MOUNTING CURBS
ARE FULLY SCREENED.
.
112. SK-02-03: WHEN DESIGNING THE BUILDING
PARAPETS CONSIDER ALL OFFSITE GRADING AND ELEVATIONS
TO ENSURE THE PARAPET HEIGHTS WILL FULLY SCREEN ALL
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT INCLUDING MOUNTING
CURBS FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S AND ADJACENT
PROPERTIES THAT ARE AT A HIGHER ELEVATION. ALSO, IF
FUTURE TENANTS INCLUDE RESTAURANTS, DESIGN PARAPET
HEIGHTS TO FULLY SCREEN THE REQUIRED EXHAUST VENT
HEIGHTS PER BUILDING CODE. IF NEEDED REVIEW MAY
REQUEST SITE LINE DRAWINGS TO DOCUMENT THE PARAPET
HEIGHT PROVIDES COMPLETE SCREENING. VISIBLE TO SODS
SHALL NOT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS INFERIOR IN
APPEARANCE OR DETAIL TO ANY OTHER FAçADE OF THE
SAME BUILDING.
.
113. SK-02-03: PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN SHOWING L
OCATIONS OF ALL RTU'S.
.
114. SK-02-03: SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS.
EXTERIOR LADDER ACCESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL
NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES IN PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY, AND ANY EXTERIOR ACCESS MUST BE
DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO THE ARCHITECTURAL
CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. IF ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE
INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING LABEL THIS INFORMATION ON
THE ELEVATIONS.
.
115. SK-02-03: SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD TO INCLUDE
COLOR CHIPS, SLATE SHINGLE, STONE VENEER AND GROUT
SAMPLE AND COMPOSITE CEMENT SHAKE BOARD SIDING
AND SPLIT-FACE C.M.U.
.
116. SK-02-03: THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES MASONRY
TO BE ARCHITECTURAL IN STYLE. THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED
WITH THE ZONING CASE IDENTIFY THE SPLIT-FACE C.M.U
WITH ARRISCRAFT WATER TABLE SHAPE. PLEASE IDENTIFY
THE SPLIT-FACE CMU ON ALL ELEVATIONS AND SUBMIT SAMPLE.
.
117. SK-02-03: THE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MUST
CONSIST OF A KYNAR PRE-FINISHED METAL. LABEL THIS
MATERIAL ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SUBMIT A MANUFACTURER
SPEC SHEET.
.
118. SK-02-03: ADD DECORATIVE OUTRIGGER BRACKETS
.
119. SK-02-03: GABLES MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES.
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE
GABLES TO BE FINISHED CONSISTING MATERIALS AND COLOR
TREATMENT TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES.
.
120. SK-02-03: SHOW EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS
EXTEND DOWN TO GRADE.
.
121. SK-02-03: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT ON ALL
EXTERIOR DOORS INCLUDING OVERHEAD DOORS POWER
TREATMENT MUST BE SIMILAR ADJACENT BUILDING COLOR.
.
122. SK-02-03: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT OF
SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT MUST BE
COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
.
123. SK-02 & 03 RETAIL A&B: BECAUSE THE REAR
ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHLY VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, AN
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL ON THE REAR ELEVATION MUST
BE ADDED TO BREAK UP THE EXPANSE OF THE SPLIT-FACE
C.M.U. REVIEWER SUGGESTS CONTINUING THE OVERSIZE
BRICK AND ROWLOCK AT EQUAL HEIGHT FROM LEFT SIDE
ELEVATION TO REAR FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF C.M.U
AND ADD BRICK ROW-LOCK. IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED
PRE-FABRICATED METAL CANOPIES SHOWN OVER THE REAR
DOORS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE STANDING SEAM METAL
CANOPIES SHOWN OVER THE DOORS AND ENTRY WAYS
SHOWN ON THE FRONT ELEVATION. TO ADD ARCHITECTURAL
INTEREST SHOW STANDING PRE-FINISHED STANDING SEAM
METAL CANOPIES OVER ALL REAR DOORS.
.
124. SK-02 & 03 RETAIL A&B: THE PRE-FINISHED
ALUMINUM STORE-FRONT WINDOWS EXTENDING DOWN TO
GRADE DO NOT ACHIEVE THE ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENT'S
AS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS APPROVED UNDER
CASE 17SN0715. ELEVATIONS NEED TO SHOW AT MINIMUM
AN 18" TALL KNEE-WALL CONSISTING OF BRICK AND ROWLOCK
STONE VENEER.
.
125. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SHOWS OPTION 2 FOR PERIMETER
B & C LANDSCAPING. OPTION 2 REQUIRES AN AVERAGE 3'
FOOT HIGH UNDULATING BERM, DESIGNED TO PROVIDE
TOPOGRAPHICAL INTEREST YET MAINTAIN REASONABLE
VISIBILITY INTO PARKING AREAS, AND HAVING MAXIMUM
SIDE SLOPE OF 3:1 SHALL BE INSTALLED INTO THE SETBACK.
GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT ACHIEVE THESE
REQUIREMENTS. REVIEWER RECOMMENDS USING
OPTION 1. PLEASE REVISE AND MAKE SURE TO MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE FOOT NOTES IN
TABLE. 19.1-251. B. OF THE ORDINANCE.
21. LABEL THE WIDTH AND PERIMETER LANDSCAPE TREATMENT
REQUIRED FOR BOTH SETBACKS ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN.
.
126. SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS
AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS, AND SITE
LIGHTING LOCATIONS. SHOW VDOT SIGHT LINES FROM ENTRANCES.
AVOID CONFLICTS WITH UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC AND OTHER
UTILITIES.
127. PARKING LOT ISLANDS DO NOT COUNT TOWARD REQUIREDINTER
LANDSCAPING SPACE IF THERE IS NO TREE IN THEM.
.
128. INTERIOR PARKING: PER SEC. 19.1-253.C, AT LEAST 50% O
SHALL BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH A
MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL
MATURING TREES SHALL BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH
OF 9 FEET AND BE 150 S.F. IN SIZE.
.
129.SHOW ALL SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS ON LANDSCAPING PLAN.
.
130. WHETHER THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS A CONCEPTUAL ORDETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS. PLEASE BE AWARE THE ZONING
CASES REQUIRE RIGHT-OF -WAY DEDICATIONS. SETBACKS SHALL
BE TAKEN FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND REQUIRED
PLANTINGS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED SETBACKS.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER - SHOW SEPARATE TABULAR CALCULATION OF
REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PLANTINGS FOR EACH YARD AND/OR
BUFFER.
G. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
LABEL AS SUCH. SEE SEC. 19-518(D) REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TREE PRESERVATION
.
X. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL IS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR ACCESS AND/OR UTILITIES THAT RUN
GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK. THESE TREE
SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL, GRADING
AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
X. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS
REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE SETBAC
AREA.
X. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTING FOR EACH TREE
REMOVED PER SEC. 19.1-249 (C)2.
X. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR
REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL,
GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS PER SEC. 19.1-247(A)1.
X. PER SEC. 19.1-250A., THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE
COMPOSITION AND MIX OF VEGETATION.
X. PER SEC. 19.1-251. B., DECORATIVE WALLS, AND FENCES,
HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, MAY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS AS DETERMINED
AT TIME OF SITE PLAN OR SCHEMATIC APPROVAL.
.
131. PER SEC. 19.1-249, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION
SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS. THE COUNTY ALSO
ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH
A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN
AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH
A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN
AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH
DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION
IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
.
132. SHOW LOCATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES ON THE UTILITYAND
SITE LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
.
133. SUBMIT TWO SEPARATE COPIES OF THE IRRIGATION AND/OR
HOSE BIB PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. SHOW ALL
CONNECTIONS TO THE MAIN WATER LINE. HOSE BIBS
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND
IRRIGATION HEADS AND COVERAGE AREAS MUST BE
SHOWN ON A SEPARATE IRRIGATION PLAN. (CL D.13)
SEC. 19-518(E).
.
134. NO IRRIGATION OR HOSE BIBS ARE PROPOSED ON THE
SUBMITTED PLAN. THE COUNTY ACCEPTS THE USE OF DROUGHT
TOLERANT SPECIES FROM THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANT
MATERIALS LIST. WITHOUT REQUIRING AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
IF ALL SPECIES WILL BE DROUGHT TOLERANT REVISE LANDSCAPE
PLAN TO SHOW THESE SPECIES AND ADD A NOTE TO THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DROUGHT TOLERANT
SPECIES APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAVE
BEEN USED TO ELIMINATE THE IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT.
.
135. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING WHICH IS REMOVED, BECOMES
UNHEALTHY OR DIES, OR IS POLLARDED SHALL BE REPLACED
DURING THE NEXT PLANTING SEASON. 19.1-249.
.
136. INSTALLATION SURETY: PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY
OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED;O
A FORM OF SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
IS SUBMITTED IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING
THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. IF SURETY HAS BEEN SUBMITTED,THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED BASED UPON THE
APPROVED PHASING PLAN OR DURING THE FIRST PLANTING SEASON
FOLLOWING DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THE SURETY. 19.1-248. A.2
.
137. MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE: AFTER LANDSCAPING IS INSTALLED
PRIOR TO RECEIVING AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE APPLICANT SHAL
PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT) TO INSURE
REPLACEMENT OF UNHEALTHY, DYING, DEAD OR POLLARDED
LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR OF INSTALLATION. 19.1-
248.B
.
139. LARGE MATURING TREES ARE TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM
OF 15 FEET FROM LIGHT POLES.
.
140. MINIMUM SIZE FOR NON-NATIVE EVERGREEN TREES IS 7 FEET
IN HEIGHT.
.
141. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE ORNAMENTAL FENCING REQUIRED
AROUND THE BMP. COORDINATE REQUIRED HEIGHT WITH
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. CHAIN LINK FENCE IS NOT ALLOWED
.
142. CLEARLY SHOW ALL LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAP
PLAN. LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES MUST NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 15
FEET OF LIGHT POLES.
.
143. LARGE TREES MUST NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 8 FEET OF STOR
SEWER AND UTILITY LINES. SMALL TREES MUST NOT BE LOCATED
WITHIN 5 FEET OF STORM SEWER OR UTILITY LINES.
.
144. IF EXISTING TREES REMAINING IN THE TREE
SAVE AREA WILL COUNT TOWARD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
PROVIDE A NOTE THAT AN INSPECTION WILL BE HELD
AFTER GRADING IS COMPLETE IN THIS AREA TO DETERMINE
ANY ADDITIONAL PLANTS REQUIRED TO MEET THE REQUIRED
LANDSCAPE DENSITY. CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE TO ARRANGE THE
MEETING.
.
END OF FIRST REFIEW COMMENTS
#########################################################
##########################################################
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-- DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE- 05/09/2017, 6/16/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---06/16/2017
5 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER--TWO
REVIEW DATE---06/20/2017
RECOMMENDATION---NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW----------- NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-NOT APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS -NOT APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS-2ND REQUEST
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN-
MASTER PLAN PHASING EXHIBIT 6/14/17- ACCEPTABLE BUT,
A DETAILED PHASING PLAN NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED AS
PART OF THE SITE PLAN SET.
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT 6/14/17-NOT APPROVED
SETBACK & BUFFER EXHIBIT-ACCEPTABLE
.
CURSORY REVIEW COMMENTS:
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. MANY OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS ARE INTERRELATED
IMPACTING SITE, LANDSCAPE AND BUILDING DESIGN.
PLEASE COORDINATE DESIGN CHANGES AMONGST ALL DESIGN
CONSULTANTS TO ENSURE THERE ARE NO DESIGN CONFLICTS.
.
04. THE "PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT" DATED
JUNE 14, 2017 DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
TEXTUAL STATEMENT II. C. AND III. A. OF CASE
06SN0215 AND ROUTE 360 WEST DESIGN DISTRICT
ORDINANCE SEC. 19.1-390. GENERALLY, SIDEWALKS
SHALL BE LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL PUBLIC STREETS.
SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS WITHIN THE PROJECT AND THERE SHALL BE A
PEDESTRIAN EMPHASIS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
ALSO, SEC. 19-668 REQUIRES PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
SHALL CONNECT USES WITH AN INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT
AND EXTEND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
AT THE STAFF/DEVELOPER MEETING THERE WAS
DISCUSSION ABOUT PROVIDING A MEANDERING SIDEWALK
IN BETWEEN OTTERDALE ROAD AND THE TWO RETAIL BUILDING.
THIS WOULD FURTHER EMPHASIZE A PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED
COMMUNITY. ANOTHER SUGGESTION IS TO CREATE A DUAL
PURPOSE PATIO/SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE REAR OF THE
TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS. A DUAL PURPOSE
SIDEWALK/OUTDOOR PATIO WOULD CREATE AN IMPROVED
PEDESTRIAN ELEMENT, CREATE AN INVITING ENVIRONMENT
ATTRACTING CUSTOMERS AND EHHANCING THE CUSTOMER
EXPERIENCE. IN ADDITION FROM A MARKETING STAND POINT
THE TREND FOR RESTAURANTS IS TO HAVE OUTDOOR PATIOS.
PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW ALL SIDEWALKS ON
SITE PLAN, GRADING PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN
EXHIBIT. (PREVIOUS COMMENT 65 & 66).
.
05. ZONING CASE REQUIRES SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO ALL
PUBLIC ROAD. MAKE SURE SIDEWALK ALONG COSBY ROAD
CONTINUES EAST ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF A SITE PLAN
BOUNDARIES AND A CROSSWALK IS INSTALLED AT THE
INTERSECTION OF COSBY ROAD AND ROAD B.
.
06. HELP REVIEWER WERE UNDERSTAND THE SCHEDULE OF SIDEWALK
CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PARCELS FRONTING HULL STREET ROAD
BE BUILT IN PHASES? IF SO PLEASE PROVIDE A PHASING PLAN
FOR THE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION.
.
07. TEXTUAL STATEMENT III. B. CASE 06SN0215 REQUIRES
STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED OR RETAINED ALONG EACH
SIDE OF ALL PUBLIC STREETS WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED.
PLEASE REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
.
08. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 49: PROVIDE CROSS ACCESS
EASEMENT AGREEMENTS.
.
09. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 51: ON PLANS, LABEL
RETAINING WALL FENCE AS "DECORATIVE FENCE AND
PROVIDE DECORATIVE FENCE DETAIL FOR RETAINING
WALL ON PLANS. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 50: RETAINING
WALL SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE
COMPATIBILITY SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH THE USE OF
INTEGRATED COLOR BLOCK, OTHER MATERIAL SIMILAR IN
APPEARANCE OF THAT OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE, OR IN
EARTH TONE COLOR EXCEPT THE BULL TO THE DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING.
.
10. SHOW BMP'S/SWM'S AND UTILITIES ON SITE LAYOUT
SHEETS C3.1-C3.3.
.
11. PREVIOUS COMMENT 42 NOT ADDRESSED. UTILITIES
ARE TO RUN GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH SETBACKS
AND BUFFERS AND MAY NOT RUN PARALLEL WITHIN REQUIRED
BUFFERS AND SETBACKS. RELOCATE WATER AND STORM SEWER
LINES OUTSIDE OF REQUIRED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS ALONG
HULL STREET ROAD, COSBY RD. AND VILLAGE SQUARE
PARKWAY. LOCATE UTILITIES TO AVOID CONFLICTS
WITH LANDSCAPING.
.
12. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 48 BE AWARE CONDITION
13 C OF CASE 06SN0215, REQUIRES THE 35' BUFFER
ADJACENT VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY TO BE LOCATED
WITHIN RECORDED OPEN SPACE.
.
13. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 53, SUBMIT AN OVERALL
PHASING PLAN. THE MASTER PHASING PLAN SUBMITTED
DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PHASING
PLAN. PHASING PLAN NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE SITE
PLAN SET. PHASING PLAN NEEDS TO HATCH OUT, LABEL AND
CLEARLY SHOW THE BOUNDARIES OF EACH PHASE AND
SHOW THE INFORMATION REQUIRED PER ORDINANCE SEC.
19.1-26. AND PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 6.
.
14. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 57: SHEET C3.1: ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF ROAD A THE VDOT CG-12B RAMP
AND THE SIDEWALK SERVING RETAIL BUILDING ONE ARE
SLIGHTLY MISALIGNED PLEASE ALIGN.
.
15. PREVIOUS COMMENTS 62 & 63: THE PROPOSED
SCREENING OF LOADING/UNLOADING AREA FOR THE
THE GROCERY STORE IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE FOLLOWING
REASONS: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REQUIRES THE
AREA SHOWN WITH THE FENCE AND PLANTINGS TO BE A
DRAINAGE EASEMENT. PLANTINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED
WITHIN 8' FEET OF DRAINAGE PIPE. THE INSTALLATION
OF A FENCE/WALL WITHIN THIS EASEMENT REQUIRES
A LICENSE AGREEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS. IN ADDITION, THE FENCE/WALL WILL NEED
TO CONSIST OF COMPARABLE MATERIALS TO THE PRINCIPAL
BUILDING AND DESIGNED TO BE COMPATIBLE TO THE
PRINCIPAL BUILDING. THE TRUCK DOCK EXHIBIT DOES
NOT SHOW SCREENING WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN
THE ENTIRE VIEW SHED. THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS
ROADWAY WITHIN THE VIEW SHED OF RANGING FROM
268-278 AND DOES NOT PROVIDE A SITE LINE FOR
PEDESTRIANS AND MOTORIST TRAVELING EASTBOUND
WHERE THE GRADES ARE HIGHER. CONSIDERING
THESE CHALLENGES, A MINIMUM 14' TALL SCREENING
WALL DESIGNED TO BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING
MADE OF MATERIALS USED ON THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED.
THE ENTIRE TRACTOR TRAILER / TRUCK WILL NEED TO BE
SCREENED. A DETAILED SIGHT PROFILE ELEVATION MAY
BE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. IF A LICENSE
AGREEMENT WERE TO BE APPROVED AND DEPENDING
ON THE PLACEMENT OF PLANTINGS A BERM CONSISTING OF
A 3:1 SLOPE MIGHT BE AN OPTION. 2:1 SLOPE MAY BE
AN OPTION IF PLANTINGS WILL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
THE 2:1 SLOPE.
.
16. PREVIOUS COMMENT 64 WAS MEANT TO ADDRESS THE
GROCERY STORE AND NOT THE TWO OUTPARCEL BUILDINGS.
PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE SITE PLAN LIMITING DELIVERIES TO
THE TWO LOADING DOCKS AND LIMITING TRUCKS ON SITE AT
ANY ONE TIME TO TRUCKS THAT FIT WITHIN THE SCREENED TRUCK
AREA.
.
17. THE DRY DETENTION BMP SHOWN ADJACENT TO
COSBY ROAD AND ROAD D INTERSECTION DOES NOT MEET
THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING BMP'S TO BE
DESIGNED AS A VISUAL AMENITY NOR DOES IT COMPLY
WITH DESIGN STANDARDS WITH THE ROUTE 360
WEST CORRIDOR. DESIGN BMP TO BE LOCATED
UNDERGROUND. ABOVE GROUND SURFACE AREA COULD
POSSIBLY SERVE TO CREATE A COMMON AREA AS REQUIRED
IN THE ROUTE 360 WEST CORRIDOR.
.
18. THE STORM SEWER LINE SERVING THE BMP
ADJACENT TO COSBY ROAD IS ENCROACHING PARARELL
INTO 25' SETBACK. MOVE OUT OF 25' SETBACK. BASED ON
GRADING, SHIFTING STORM SEWER LINE SLIGHTLY FURTHER
SOUTH OUTSIDE FF SETBACK COULD SERVE TO
CONNECT A DROP INLET FOR THE FUTURE PARKING LOT.
.
19. . PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 71: THE LANDSCAPE
PLAN SHOWS INAPPROPRIATE PLANTINGS LOCATED WITHIN
THE WET POND LOCATED ADJACENT TO ROAD B. PLEASE
WORK WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TO DESIGN
LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH SUITABLE PLANTINGS.
.
20. THE PROPOSED GUARD RAIL CONSISTING OF WIRE ROPE
IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE THIS TYPE OF GUARD RAIL WILL
NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR MOTORISTS FROM
THE ADJACENT RETAINING WALL THAT IS 15' FEET TALL IN SOME
AREAS. PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT 73 RECCOMENDING
THE INSTALLATION OF A POWDER COATED GALVANIZED STEEL
EARTH TONE COLOR GUARDRAIL.
.
21. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 74: PER SEC. 19.1-205, SHOW
ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ON A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN
THE LOCATION OF ALL EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON
POLES, THE BUILDING, OR ON THE GROUND AND HAVE THEM
KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR EACH LIGHT FIXTURE SHOWN ON
THE PLAN. TREES ARE NOT TO CONFLICT WITH SITE LIGHTING.
.
22. PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 75:
PER SEC. 19.1-205, SUBMIT A FOOT-CANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM
WHENEVER A SITE IS ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
DOCUMENT THAT THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT EXCEED
0.5 FOOT-CANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT.
.
23. PER PREVIOUS REVIEW 76: PER SEC. 19.1-205, UNLESS
A PROJECT IS APPROVED FOR ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-STYLE
LIGHTING, ALL LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYP
THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY
ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH, TND, OR R-MF DISTRICT
OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. ALL LIGHT FIXTURES MUST BE EITHER
A SHOE BOX STYLE WITH A FLAT LENS OR HAVE FULL EXTERNAL
SHIELDS (LEVEL WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE LENS).
(SEC. 19.508.3). POLE MOUNTED PARKING LOT LIGHTING
REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER.
.
24. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT77:
THE SITE PLAN IS PART OF AN OVERALL PROJECT.ORNAMENTAL POL
MOUNTED LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRE PROJECT.
.
25. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 78:
15900, 15910, AND 15930 HULL STREET RD ARE SHOWN
AS PART OF THE OVERALL PROJECT BUT ARE NOT SUBJECT
ZONING CASE 17SN0715. ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
IS REQUIRED AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RT. 360 WEST
CORRIDOR ALSO MUST BE ADDRESSED. 19-586(A) & (B)
PER SEC.19.1-317 A, B, FOR ANY PROJECT WITH MORE
THAN ONE BUILDING, THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT
DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL
THEME. THE THEME SHALL DESCRIBE HOW EXTERIOR
MATERIALS, COLORS, ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, AND BUILDING
SCALE SHALL BE USED TO DEVELOP A CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENT FOR THE PROJECT. ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
IS REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS WITHIN THE PROJECT.
SEC. 19-585.1(B)
.
27. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 81 STATING
THEME WILL BE SUBMITTED WHEN SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED
FOR HULL STREETROAD PARCELS WILL NOT MEET ORDINANCE
REQUIREMENTS. THE ARCHITECTURAL, PEDESTRIAN, AMENITY
THEME NARRATIVE NEEDSTO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THIS SITE PLAN12PR0249 COSBY
VILLAGE SO ALL PARTIES HAVE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF
THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. IN ADDITION, THE
DEVELOPER DESIRES TO INSTALL A PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGN
ADJACENT TO HULL STREET ROAD TO SERVE THE OVERALL PROJECT
INCLUDING THE GROCERY STORE. WITHOUT THE APPROVED THEME
/NARRATIVE, THE FREESTANDING SIGN IS NOT ALLOWED BECAUSE
/NARRATIVE, THE FREESTANDING SIGN IS NOT ALLOWED BECAUSE
IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED OFF-SITE SIGNAGE THAT IS PROHIBITED
PRIOR TO SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, JEFF DOPP DISCUSSED
REQUIREMENTS WITH HARRIS INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT.
THEME. THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME OF A PROJECT SHALL SHOW HOW
BUILDING ELEMENTS WILL BREAK UP THE MASS OF LARGE BUILDING
AND PROVIDE FOR A PEDESTRIAN SCALE ENVIRONMENT BETWEEN
PARKING AND BUILDINGS; BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS.
THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SHALL USE BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT
INTERRUPT THE LINEAR PATTERN AND PROVIDE LARGE SCALE FOCAL
ELEMENTS AND PEDESTRIAN SCALE ELEMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE
DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SHALL
THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SHALL USE BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT
INTERRUPT THE LINEAR PATTERN AND PROVIDE LARGE SCALE FOCAL
ELEMENTS AND PEDESTRIAN SCALE ELEMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE
DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING AND PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SHALL
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
O BACKGROUND WALL. BACKGROUND WALL DESIGNS SHALL
INCORPORATE SIMILAR ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION OF WALLS
INCLUDING GRID PATTERN, CANOPY, ABSTRACT ORNAMENTATION,
AND CORNICE TO MAINTAIN THE CONTINUITY BETWEEN TENANTS.
VARIATION IN BUILDING WALL SETBACKS SHALL BE EMPLOYED
TO INTERRUPT BUILDING MASS;
O ENTRY AND TOWER FEATURES. TOWER FEATURES SHALL BE
INCORPORATED INTO A PROJECT TO ESTABLISH LARGE SCALE FOCAL
POINTS AND INTERRUPT THE LINEAR DESIGN OF BUILDINGS.
ENTRY FEATURES SHALL EITHER BE INCLUDED AS KEY DESIGN
COMPONENTS TO IDENTIFY EACH TENANT AND PROVIDE RELIEF
TO THE BACKGROUND WALL, OR PEDESTRIAN CANOPIES WITH
A MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 250 FEET MAY BE USED BETWEEN
SIGNIFICANT ENTRY OR TOWER FEATURES;
O COLORS. OVERALL DESIGNS SHALL INCLUDE VARIATIONS IN
NEUTRAL COLOR SCHEMES FOR THE BUILDING BACKGROUND
WITH COMPLIMENTARY COLORS TO ENHANCE THE ENTRY
FEATURE DESIGN. ACCENT COLORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO
REPRESENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE IDENTIFICATION;
O PARAPETS AND ROOFS. VARIATION IN PARAPET AND/OR
ROOF HEIGHTS SHALL BE USED TO INTERRUPT BUILDING MASS;
AND
O PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS. BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING
AREAS, AT LEAST FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS
SHALL BE USED: DECORATIVE POST LIGHTS, ALTERNATIVE PAVING
TREATMENTS AT ENTRANCES AND/OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS,
BENCHES, PLAZAS, LANDSCAPED AREAS, WATER FEATURES,
DISPLAY WINDOWS, OR OTHER PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS.
D. NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DESIGNATED AREAS ON THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BUILDINGS SHALL BE COMPATIBLE
WITH RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE. RESIDENTIAL DESIGNFEATURES
SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, ARTICULATION OF DOOR
AND WINDOWS, ARCHITECTURAL ORNAMENTATION, AND USE OF
RESIDENTIAL MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BRICK
OR SIDING, AND ASPHALT SHINGLE OR SIMULATED SLATE ROOFS.
THERE SHALL BE NO VISIBLE FLAT OR SHED ROOFS
LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO MEET PERIMETER AND
PARKING REQUIREMENTS DO NOT COUNT TOWARD THIS REQUIREMENT.
.
28. SHEETS C3.1-C3.4:REMOVE LAYOUT NOTE NUMBER
12 FROM SITE PLAN. REVIEWER IS UNFAMILIAR WITH THE
DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED WITH IN THIS NOTE AND THERE
IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THE LATEST VERSION OF THE
TENANTS SITE DEVELOPMENT MANUAL AND ASSOCIATED
DOCUMENTS WILL COMPLY WITH THE SITE PLAN,
ARCHITECTURE AND ZONING CONDITIONS.
.
29. THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH SHOWN OF 10 FEET IS
ACCEPTABLE BE AWARE YOU MAY REDUCE THE WIDTH
TO 9 FEET IF NEEDED.
.
30. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
HAS CHANGED FROM 367 TO 364. PLEASE REVISE ALL
SHEETS SHOWING THIS INFORMATION AND REVISE THE
INTERIOR SURFACE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING CALCULATION
INTERIOR SURFACE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING CALCULATION
BASED ON THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.
.
31. SHEET C3.1: THE PARKING SPACE BOUNDARY
SHOWING 200 PARKING SPACES IS INCORRECT.
REVIEWER COUNTS 201 SPACES. THE ADDITIONAL
SPACE IS LOCATED WHERE THE PLAN IS LABELED 3
PARKING SPACES WHEN THERE'S ACTUALLY 4 PARKING
SPACES. PLEASE REVISE COUNTS ON ALL SHEETS.
.
32. JUSTIFY THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED.
PER EE, MASS GRADING IS NOT ALLOWED. AN ACTUAL
DEVELOPMENT MUST BE PROPOSED FOR THE AREAS TO
THE NORTH AND SOUTH. A PHASING PLAN MAY BE
REQUIRED TO ALLOW FOR THE AREAS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
.
33. USING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO SCREEN THE GENERATOR
AND PAINTING THE TRANSFORMER ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE METHODS
OF SCREENING. SCREENING MUST CONSIST OF ADJACENT BUILDING
MATERIALS PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING BACKGROUND.
.
34. PREVIOUS COMMENT 85 NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
CASE 17SN0715 REQUIRES THAT THE EXPOSED PORTION OF THE
EXTERIOR WALL SURFACES ON FRONT, REAR AND SIDES OF ANY
COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SIMILAR IN QUALITY AS TO
THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND MATERIALS. THIS INCLUDE
ALL SIDES OF BUILDING PARAPETS AND PARAPET EXTENSIONS.
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE
GABLES TO BE FINISHED USING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT
TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES. PLEASE LABEL ON ELEVATIONS THAT
ALL SIDES OF PARAPETS INCLUDING PARAPET EXTENSIONS WILL
CONSIST OF SAME MATERIALS ON ALL SIDES.
.
35. SHEET SK.0-04: ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON SHEET:
"ROOF-TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL NOT EXCEED
HEIGHT OF BUILDING PARAPET AND ARE IN FULL RELIEF BEHIND
PARAPETS AND SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S
AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED
AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING."
.
36. SEE COMMENT 15 AS THIS RELATES TO INCORPORATING A
14' SCREENING WALL FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING AREA.
.
37. PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 99:
SK-04: SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD TO INCLUDE COLOR
CHIPS, SLATE SHINGLE, STONE VENEER AND GROUT
SAMPLE AND COMPOSITE CEMENT SHAKE BOARD SIDING
AND SPLIT-FACE C.M.U.
38. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 105.
SK-04: IDENTIFY THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLOR
TREATMENT FOR THE STOOPS AND RAMPS SHOWN ON THE
RIGHT LEFT AND REAR ELEVATIONS. MATERIAL MUST CONSIST
OF SPLIT FACE CMU TO MATCH BUILDING
.
39. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT 108.
SK-04: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT OF
SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT MUST
BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
40. SK-04: REMOVE NOTE #1. PAINT COLORS MUST
BE APPROVED AS PART OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
41. THE RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION EAST SHOWS TWO
ENTRY STOOPS COVERED WITH A GABLE ROOF. THE
COLUMNS SUPPORTING THIS STRUCTURE NEED TO MATCH
THE COLUMNS LOCATED ON THE FRONT ELEVATION OR
YOU MAY SHED STYLE CANOPY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
OTHER CANOPIES ON THIS ELEVATION.
.
42. THE PROPOSED ROOF MOUNTED "HILL HOUSE"
NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE
BUILDING. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY
REPLICATING THE FINISHES AND PROPORTIONS USED
ON THE REAR MAIN BUILDING INCLUDING PARAPET CAP,
EIFS TRIM AND EIFS. MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL FOUR
SIDES. IDENTIFY ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS.
.
43. REVISE COLOR ELEVATIONS TO SHOW "HILL HOUSE"
.
44. THE REVISED ELEVATIONS FOR THE TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS
ARE THE SAME AS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AND DO NOT ADDRESS
PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS.
IN ADDITION, THE GRADE ON OTTERDALE ROAD IS HIGHER
THAN THE BUILDING GRADES. PLEASE TAKE THIS INTO ACCOUNT
WHEN DESIGNING THE PARAPET EXTENSIONS TO ENSURE
RTU'S WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND WILL
NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING PARAPET.
.
45. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS 109 THROUGH
109 THROUGH 124.
.
46. SHEETS SK02A & SKO2B: REMOVE GENERAL NOTE #1FROM ALL
SHEETS.
.
47. SHEETS SK02A & SKO2B ADD NOTE: "ROOF-TOP MECHANICAL
.EQUIPMENT WILL NOT EXCEED
HEIGHT OF BUILDING PARAPET AND ARE IN FULL RELIEF BEHIND
PARAPETS AND SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S
AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED
AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING."
.
48. DUE TO THE SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF COUNTY AND VDOT
REVIEW COMMENTS GENERATED WITH THIS REVIEW INCLUDING
COMMENTS PERTAINING TO GRADING, UTILITY LINE LOCATIONS,
BMPS, ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS, STREET TREES AND THE
REQUIRMENT TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF POLE MOUNTED
LIGHTING A DETAILED LANDSCAPING REVIEW WILL NOT
PROVIDED WITH THIS REVIEW.
.
49. IN THE LANDSCAPE PLANS:
A) REMOVE ALL PLANTINGS WITHIN STORM WATER EASEMENT.
ANY PLANTINGS WITHIN THE EASEMENT WILL REQUIRE A
LICENSE AGREEMENT.
B) REMOVE TREES AND SHRUBS FROM WITHIN THE WET POND.
.
50. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED IN FUTURE REVIEWS
DEPENDING ON HOW THE UNRESOLVED COMMENTS FROM THIS
SUBMITTAL ARE ADDRESSED
#########################################################
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE- 05/09/2017, 6/16/2017, 7/14/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---07/14/2017
7 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER--THREE
REVIEW DATE---07/20/2017
RECOMMENDATION---NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW--------- NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-NOT APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - NOT APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS- NOT APPROVED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN- APPROVED
MASTER PLAN PHASING EXHIBIT 6/14/17- ACCEPTABLE
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT -REVISONS REQUIRED
SETBACK & BUFFER EXHIBIT- ACCEPTABLE
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. PLEASE SUBMIT A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW FEE.
.
04. REVISE THE "PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT", ALL SITE
PLAN SHEETS, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW A
5' WIDE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE NORTH SIDE OF COSBY
ROAD EXTENDING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIE
AS 15950 COSBY ROAD, UP TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
IDENTIFIED AS 15900 COSBY ROAD. ALSO, PROVIDE AND SHOW
ON PLANS A CROSSWALK ACROSS COSBY VILLAGE ROAD. REVISE
ALL SHEETS TO SHOW SIDEWALK AND REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
INCLUDE PERIMETER C LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES WITHIN
25' FOOT SETBACK. SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AND
CONSTRUCTED WITH PHASE I.
.
05. REVISE "PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT", ALL SITE
PLAN SHEETS, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW A
5' WIDE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE NORTH SIDE OF HULL STREET
ROAD EXTENDING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIE
AS 15900 HULL STREET RD. UP TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
IDENTIFIED AS 15901 COSBY ROAD. ALSO, PROVIDE AND SHOW
ON PLANS A CROSSWALK ACROSS COSBY VILLAGE ROAD.
ALSO, PHASING PLAN SHOWS THIS PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED
AS PART OF PHASE 1. THEREFORE, SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE INCLUD
ON SITE PLAN AND CONSTRUCTED WITH PHASE 1.
REVISE ALL SHEETS TO SHOW SIDEWALK AND
REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INCLUDE 2 X PERIMETER C LANDSCAPI
AND STREET TREES WITHIN 50' SETBACK.
.
06. TEXTUAL STATEMENT III. B. CASE 06SN0215 REQUIRES
STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED OR RETAINED ALONG EACH
SIDE OF ALL PUBLIC STREETS WHERE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED.
PLEASE REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT FOR
THE SIDEWALK EXTENSIONS IDENTIFIED IN COMMENTS 4 & 5.
.
07. ON THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY PLAN COLOR CODE
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS AND CROSSWALKS DESCRIBED IN
COMMENTS 4 & 5 "YELLOW".
.
08. THE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS AND CROSSWALKS DESCRIBED IN
COMMENTS 4 & 5 ARE REQUIRED TO BE PART OF PHASE 1 AND
CONSTRUCTED WITH THIS PHASE. SEE ATTACHED "MARK UP" OF
PEDESTRIAN PLAN INCLUDED WITH EMAIL.
.
09. THE COSBY VILLAGE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT
IDENTIFIES THE SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN PHASE1, PHASE II AND PHASE III. HOWEVER, THE
GRADING PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS SITE PLAN INCLUDES
ALL THREE PHASES. REVIEWER IS CONCERNED THE GRADING
PLAN FOR PHASES II AND III DOES NOT ACCOMMODATE
THE SIDEWALKS IDENTIFIED ON THE PEDESTRIAN PLAN
IN RED FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION WHEN PHASES II AND III
ARE DEVELOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES.
PLANNING WILL NOT REQUIRE THESE SIDEWALKS TO BE
CONSTRUCTED WITH PHASE 1, BUT THE SITE PLAN AND
GRADING PLAN FOR PHASES II & III NEEDS TO SHOW
ALL SIDEWALKS. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN INCLUDING
GRADING PLAN AND SHOW ON PLANS SIDEWALK
LOCATIONS WITHIN PHASES II AND III AND ADD THE FOLLOWING
NOTE ON PLANS "SIDEWALKS WITHIN PHASE II & III WILL BE
INSTALLED WHEN PHASES ARE DEVELOPED. IN ADDITION,
REQUIRED STREET TREE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE
SUBMITTED TO PLANNING FOR APPROVAL.
MAKE SURE SIDEWALK DESIGN MEETS ADA REQUIREMENTS.
.
10. SHEETS C3.1- C3.3: REVIEWER ASSUMES THE DASHED
AREAS SHOWN REPRESENT THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE SYSTEMS.
PLEASE LABEL EACH AS "UNDERGROUND STORAGE SYSTEM".
.
11. SHEET C3.1: SHOW IRRIGATION SLEEVES ON SITE PLAN TO
ENSURE INSTALLATION PRIOR TO PAVING. THERE HAVE BEEN
INSTANCES WHERE THE IRRIGATION SLEEVES WERE NOT SHOWN
ON THE SITE PLAN AND AFTER PAVING WAS COMPLETE,
DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR WAS REQUIRED TO TEAR OUT AND
REPLACE PAVEMENT TO INSTALL IRRIGATION SLEEVES.
.
12. SHEET C3.1: LABEL 14' FOOT TALL SCREEN WALL
.
13. LETTER OF AGREEMENT IDENTIFYING PROPERTY OWNERS
COMMITMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL THEME, COMPATIBILITY, AND QUAL
FOR THE COSBY VILLAGE PROJECT REQUIRES REVISIONS. JEFF DOP
EMAILED REVIEW COMMENTS TO KARLA KASSEBAUM ON JULY 24, 201
EXECUTED LETTER OF AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND DATED
PROPERTY OWNER.
.
14. THE BMP FENCING IS REQUIRED TO BE DECORATIVE AND
A MINIMUM OF 6' TALL. THE DETAIL FOR THIS FENCE
ADJACENT TO VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY. PLEASE INCLUDE AND
DESIGN TO BE A VISUAL AMENITY PER SEC. 19.1-211 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. SHOW LOCATION OF DECORATIVE 6' TALL
FENCE. PE PLAN
01. SHEETS L1.0, L2.4, L2.5, L3.1: PLEASE SEE SITE PLAN
COMMENTS 4,5 & 6 AND REVISE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND
PLANTING QUANTITIES TO INCLUDE STREET TREES AND REQUIRED
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO COSBY ROAD AND
HULL STREET ROAD WHERE THE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS ARE
REQUIRED TO BE EXTENDED TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES
TO THE EAST. THE STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING NEED
TO BE INCLUDED SINCE THEY ARE WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF PHASE 1. REVIEW WERE RECOMMENDING
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS SPECIES ONLY TO AVOID HAVING
TO EXTEND THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
.
2. PER SECTION 19.1-211 BMP/SWM ARE REQUIRED TO
BE VISUALLY ENHANCED. PLEASE CONTACT REVIEWER TO FURTHER
DISCUSS.
.
3. ON LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW LOCATION OF DECORATIVE 6' TALL
FENCE AROUND BMP'S.
.
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW BMP/SWM WET POND
ADJACENT TO VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY. PLEASE INCLUDE AND
DESIGN TO BE A VISUAL AMENITY PER SEC. 19.1-211 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. SHOW LOCATION OF DECORATIVE 6' TALL
FENCE.
.
LIGHTING PLAN
.
1. THE POLE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE
LIGHTING PLAN IS ACCEPTABLE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE OTHER
SYMBOLS FOR OTHER POLE MOUNTED LIGHTS SHOWN ON THE
LIGHTING PLAN THAT ARE NOT CLEARLY SHOWN AND ARE NOT
KEYED TO THE LUMINARY'S SCHEDULE. CLEARLY SHOW
LOCATION OF ALL POLE MOUNTED LIGHTING AND SUBMIT
MANUFACTURE CUT SHEETS FOR EACH FIXTURE AND KEY
ON LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE.
.
02. PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF ALL APPROXIMATE
BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES AND KEY ON
PLAN AND SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATION
SHEETS FOR EACH LIGHT FIXTURE.
.
GROCERY STORE ELEVATIONS
.
01. GROCERY STORE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS:
AS OF 7/25/17 REVIEWER HAS ONLY RECEIVED A
RESUBMITTAL OF A COLOR RENDERING OF THE GROCERY
STORE RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 7/21/17. NONE OF
THE MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENTS ARE LABELED.
PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILED COLOR ELEVATIONS AND
DETAILED BLACK AND WHITE ELEVATIONS, ROOF PLAN,
AND LINE OF SIGHT STUDY ADDRESSING ALL REVIEW
COMMENTS. LABEL ALL MATERIALS AND COLOR
TREATMENTS.
.
02. THE REVISED GROCERY STORE COLORED ELEVATIONS SHOWS
A SCREENING WALL. REVIEWER HAS SCALED WALL HEIGHT
AT APPROXIMATELY 12' FEET TALL. THE HEIGHT OF THE
SCREENING WALL IS REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 14'
FEET TALL AND DESIGNED TO BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE
BUILDING AND MADE OF MATERIALS USED ON THE
BUILDING IS REQUIRED. THE LENGTH OF THE SCREENING
WALL MUST SCREEN ENTIRE TRACTOR TRAILER / TRUCK.
REVISE ELEVATIONS AND IDENTIFY MATERIALS, COLOR AND
HEIGHT OF SCREEN WALL FROM FINISHED GRADE.
.
03. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON ALL ELEVATION SHEETS:
"ROOF-TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL NOT EXCEED
HEIGHT OF BUILDING PARAPET AND ARE IN FULL RELIEF BEHIND
PARAPETS AND SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S
AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED
AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING."
.
04. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER ROOFTOP OR
GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREEN FROM
PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S, AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES
AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE
BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS DASHED IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND /OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT THE UNITS
INCLUDING MOUNTING CURBS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
.
04. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER ROOFTOP OR
GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREEN FROM
PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S, AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES
AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE
BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS DASHED IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND /OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT THE UNITS
INCLUDING MOUNTING CURBS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
.
05. PER PREVIOUS COMMENT.
SK-04: IDENTIFY THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLOR
TREATMENT FOR THE STOOPS AND RAMPS SHOWN ON THE
RIGHT LEFT AND REAR ELEVATIONS. MATERIAL MUST CONSIST
OF SPLIT FACE CMU TO MATCH BUILDING
.
06. COLOR ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW "HILL HOUSE" PLEASE
SHOW ON ALL ELEVATIONS. THE PROPOSED ROOF MOUNTED
"HILL HOUSE" MUST BE DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF
THE BUILDING. THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY
REPLICATING THE FINISHES AND PROPORTIONS USED
ON THE REAR MAIN BUILDING INCLUDING PARAPET CAP,
EIFS TRIM AND EIFS. MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL FOUR
SIDES. IDENTIFY ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS. REVISE
COLOR AND BLACK & WHITE ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS TO
SHOW "HILL HOUSE".
.
07. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS. EXTERIOR
LADDER ACCESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE
VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF
WAY, AND ANY EXTERIOR ACCESS MUST BE DESIGNED IN
A MANNER INTEGRAL TO THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF
THE BUILDING. IF ACCESS WILL BE FROM THE INTERIOR OF
THE BUILDING LABEL THIS INFORMATION ON THE ELEVATIONS.
.
08. STAINLESS STEEL SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ARE NOT
ALLOWED. SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS NEED TO BE PAINTED
OR PRE-FINISHED TO MATCH THE COLOR ON THE BUILDING,
PREFERABLY THE BROWN AND NOT THE TAN. DOWNSPOUTS
DO NOT HAVE TO BE PAINTED EXACTLY TO MATCH THE CHANGING
OF ALL COLORS AS THE DOWNSPOUTS TRAVEL DOWN THE WALL.
PER PREVIOUS COMMENT; SK-04: IDENTIFY THE COLOR
TREATMENT OF SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT
MUST BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
.
09 SK-04: REMOVE NOTE #1. PAINT COLORS MUST
BE APPROVED AS PART OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
.
10. PROVIDE A SCALE ON ALL ELEVATIONS SHEETS.
.
11. PREVIOUS COMMENT 85 NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED.
CASE 17SN0715 REQUIRES THAT THE EXPOSED PORTION OF THE
EXTERIOR WALL SURFACES ON FRONT, REAR AND SIDES OF ANY
COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SIMILAR IN QUALITY AS TO
THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND MATERIALS. THIS INCLUDE
ALL SIDES OF BUILDING PARAPETS AND PARAPET EXTENSIONS.
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE
GABLES TO BE FINISHED USING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT
TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES. PLEASE LABEL ON ELEVATIONS THAT
ALL SIDES OF PARAPETS INCLUDING PARAPET EXTENSIONS WILL
CONSIST OF SAME MATERIALS ON ALL SIDES.
.
12. ADDRESS ALL PREVIOUS AND NEW REVIEW COMMENTS
ON SHEETS PCA901, SK-03 & SK-04. THESE SHEETS WERE
NOT SUBMITTED WITH THIS REVIEW.
.
13. THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES MASONRY TO
BE ARCHITECTURAL IN STYLE. THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED
WITH THE ZONING CASE IDENTIFY THE SPLIT-FACE C.M.U W
WITH ARRISCRAFT WATER TABLE SHAPE. PLEASE IDENTIFY THIS
SPLIT-FACE CMU MATERIAL ON ALL ELEVATIONS.
.
RETAIL A & B ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
.
CONSIST OF SAME MATERIALS ON ALL SIDES.TCH THE REVISED
.LACK AND WHITE ELEVATIONS PLEASE REVISE COLOR ELEVATIONS
TO MATCH. MORE SPECIFICALLY THE CONTINUATION OF THE
BRICK ON THE SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS IS NOT SHOWN ON
THE COLORED ELEVATIONS.
.
02. STAINLESS STEEL SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS NOT
ALLOWED. SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS MUST BE
PAINTED OR PRE-FINISHED TO MATCH THE COLOR ON THE
BUILDING, DOWNSPOUTS DO NOT HAVE TO BE PAINTED
EXACTLY TO MATCH THE CHANGING OF ALL COLORS AS THE
DOWNSPOUTS TRAVEL DOWN THE WALL.
PARAPET EXTENSION SHOWN. HOWEVER, THIS MATERIAL
IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE ELEVATIONS. IT APPEARS
.
04. CASE 17SN0715 REQUIRES THAT THE EXPOSED PORTION OF THE
EXTERIOR WALL SURFACES ON FRONT, REAR AND SIDES OF ANY
COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SIMILAR IN QUALITY AS TO
THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND MATERIALS. THIS INCLUDE
ALL SIDES OF BUILDING PARAPETS AND PARAPET EXTENSIONS.
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE
GABLES TO BE FINISHED USING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT
TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES. PLEASE LABEL ON ELEVATIONS THAT
ALL SIDES OF PARAPETS INCLUDING PARAPET EXTENSIONS WILL
ADJACENT MAIN BUILDING PARAPET AND CORNICE.
.
05. SK-02-03: SEC. 19.1-317. D: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT,
WHETHER ROOFTOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED
AND SCREEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW, RIGHT-OF-WAY'S AND
ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED
AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS
DASHED IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS AND /OR WALLS
USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT THE UNITS INCLUDING
MOUNTING CURBS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
.
06. THERE IS A CLARY SAGE COLORED BUILDING MATERIAL
PARAPET EXTENSION SHOWN. HOWEVER, THIS MATERIAL
IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE ELEVATIONS. IT APPEARS
THIS PARAPET IS FOR SCREENING
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND APPEARS
TO BE LOCATED NEAR THE CENTER OF ROOF. THIS
PARAPET EXTENSION DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE
AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING AS REQUIRED
PER THE ORDINANCE. ONE WAY TO ACHIEVE
ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY, ADD DIMENSION
AND APPEAR TO BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING
IS TO DESIGN THE PARAPET TO CONSIST OF EIFS
TRIM WITH A CORNICE COLOR TREATED TO MATCH THE
ADJACENT MAIN BUILDING PARAPET AND CORNICE.
.
07. RETAIL A BUILDING: THE VIEW OF THE REAR
ELEVATION FROM THE PUBLIC ROAD IS PROMINENT.
THE REAR ELEVATION IS ALSO THE LEAST DECORATIVE
AND LEAST INTERESTING ASPECT OF THE BUILDING.
TO EXPRESS ARCHITECTURAL INTEREST REVIEWER
RECOMMENDS ADDING A SECOND GABLE SIMILAR
TO THE GABLE ON THE LEFT SIDE REAR ELEVATION.
.
08. SHEETS SKR-02 & SKL02: SHOW THE PARAPET
EXTENSION LOCATION ON THE ROOF PLANS AND
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS W.
OF THE GABLES TO BE FINISHED CONSISTING MATERIALS
AND COLOR TREATMENT TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES. XES
.AINTED TO CLOSELY MATCH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
14. SK-02-03: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT
OF SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT
MUST BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND. D
.EIGHT OF BUILDING PARAPET AND UNITS ARE IN FULL RELIEF
15. SHEETS SK02A & SKO2B: REMOVE GENERAL EW,
NOTE #1 FROM ALL SHEETS.ENT PROPERTIES AND DESIGNED
TO BE PERCEIVED AS IT INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING."
.
11. SK-02-03: THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES MASONRY TO
BE ARCHITECTURAL IN STYLE. THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED
WITH THE ZONING CASE IDENTIFY THE SPLIT-FACE C.M.U W
WITH ARRISCRAFT WATER TABLE SHAPE. PLEASE IDENTIFY THIS
SPLIT-FACE CMU MATERIAL ON ALL ELEVATIONS.
.
12. . SK-02-03: THE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
AND AWNINGS MUST CONSIST OF A KYNAR PRE-FINISHED METAL.
LABEL THIS MATERIAL ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SUBMIT A
MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEET.
.
13. SK-02-03: GABLES MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES.
REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE REAR ELEVATIONS
OF THE GABLES TO BE FINISHED CONSISTING MATERIALS
AND COLOR TREATMENT TO MATCH THE FRONT GABLES.
.
14. SK-02-03: IDENTIFY THE COLOR TREATMENT
OF SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS. COLOR TREATMENT
MUST BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING BACKGROUND.
.
15. SHEETS SK02A & SKO2B: REMOVE GENERAL
NOTE #1 FROM ALL SHEETS.
#################################################
###################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-- DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE- 05/09/2017, 6/16/2017, 7/14/2017, 8/8/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---08/08/2017
5 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-FOUR
REVIEW DATE---08/09/2017
RECOMMENDATION--- NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW--------- YES
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - APPROVED -SUBMIT SETS
OF HARD COPIES
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS- NOT APPROVED-SEE COMMENTS
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN- APPROVED
MASTER PLAN PHASING EXHIBIT 6/14/17- APPROVED
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT -APPROVED
SETBACK & BUFFER EXHIBIT-APPROVED
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. PLEASE SUBMIT A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW FEE.
.
04. REVISE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT MARKING SHEETS
TO SHOW CROSSWALKS GOING FROM EAST TO WEST
ACROSS COSBY VILLAGE ROAD IN BOTH LOCATIONS
WHERE SIDEWALK EXTENSION TO PROPERTY LINE WAS ADDED.
CONTACT JEFF DOPP TO DISCUSS.
.
05.. LETTER OF AGREEMENT IDENTIFYING PROPERTY OWNERS
COMMITMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL THEME, COMPATIBILITY, AND QUAL
FOR THE COSBY VILLAGE PROJECT REQUIRES REVISIONS. JEFF DOP
EMAILED REVIEW COMMENTS TO KARLA KASSEBAUM ON JULY 24, 201
EXECUTED LETTER OF AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND DATED
PROPERTY OWNER.
LIGHTING PLAN
.
01. SHEETS E100 & E200, LIGHTING PLAN AND MANUFACTURERS
CUT SHEET 1. VIPER L SERIES: ON MANUFACTURE SPEC SHEET
KEY THE ACTUAL MODEL NUMBER THAT IS PROPOSED. LIGHT
FIXTURE MODEL NUMBER CHOSEN MUST NOT CONSIST
OF AN ADJUSTABLE ARM KNUCKLE. LIGHT SOURCE MUST BE
SHIELDED. PLEASE CONFIRM THIS IS THE PARKING LOT LIGHT
FIXTURE FOR THE GROCERY STORE.
.
02. SP1 (LED) SPECTRA LARGE SCALE: LIGHT FIXTURE MODEL
NUMBER CHOSEN MUST SHIELD LIGHT SOURCE. THE LENS
TYPE IS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE. THE
VARIOUS MODEL NUMBERS ON THE SPEC SHEET HAVE
OPTIONS OF CLEAR AND FROSTED LENSES. LENSES MUST BE A
DIFFUSED LENS OPTION SUCH AS FROSTED LENS AND KEYED
ON LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE.
. .
.
03. THE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED TO JEFF DOPP
AT OUR LAST MEETING WITH ASA HARRIS AND KARLA
KASSEBAUM FOR THE WALL PACK LIGHTS DO NOT MATCH
THE MODELS SHOWN ON THE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE ON
SHEETS E100 AND E200. ARE NOT SHOWN OR KEYED
ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S
SPEC SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED WALL PACK AND
DECORATIVE WALL MOUNTED EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES
AND KEY ON LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE. MAKE SURE MODEL
NUMBER INCLUDES THE CORRECT LENS TYPE CAPABLE OF
SHIELDING LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW.
.
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
.
1. PLEASE SUBMIT HARD COPIES OF TWO FULL SETS OF
ELEVATIONS WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL.
########################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-- DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE- 05/09/17, 6/16/17, 7/14/17, 8/8/17, 8/29/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---08/30/2017
5 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-FIVE
REVIEW DATE---09/06/2017
RECOMMENDATION--- NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW--------- YES
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS- NOT APPROVED-SEE COMMENT
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN- APPROVED
MASTER PLAN PHASING EXHIBIT 6/14/17- APPROVED
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT -APPROVED
SETBACK & BUFFER EXHIBIT-APPROVED
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. PLEASE SUBMIT A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW FEE.
.
LIGHTING PLAN
04. SHEET E100: THE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE IS NOT LEGIBLE
DUE TO PRINTING ERROR. PLEASE RESUBMIT 2 SHEETS AND
ENSURE SCHEDULE IS REVISED TO SHOW CORRECT FIXTURES.
.
SITE PLAN
.
05. PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT:
REVISE ALL SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT MARKING SHEETS
TO SHOW CROSSWALKS GOING FROM EAST TO WEST
ACROSS COSBY VILLAGE ROAD IN BOTH LOCATIONS
WHERE SIDEWALK EXTENSION TO PROPERTY LINE WAS ADDED.
CONTACT JEFF DOPP TO DISCUSS.
.
06. THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL SHOWED A NORTH TO SOUTH
CROSSWALK CROSSING OVER COSBY ROAD CONNECTING THE
GROCERY STORE SITE TO THE PARCEL FRONTING HULL STREET RD.
REVISED PLANS NO LONGER SHOW THIS CROSSWALK. PLEASE
REVISE AND SHOW ON ALL SITE PLAN SHEETS AND PAVEMENT
MARKING SHEETS.
.
07. THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL SHOWED A CROSSWALK LOCATED
AT THE INTERSECTION OF COSBY VILLAGE ROAD AND VILLAGE
SQUARE PARKWAY. REVISED PLANS NO LONGER SHOW THIS
CROSSWALK. PLEASE REVISE AND SHOW ON ALL SITE PLAN SHEETS
AND PAVEMENT MARKING SHEETS.
.
NOTE: LETTER OF AGREEMENT IDENTIFYING PROPERTY OWNERS
COMMITMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL THEME, COMPATIBILITY, AND QUAL
FOR THE COSBY VILLAGE PROJECT REQUIRES REVISIONS. JEFF DOP
EMAILED REVIEW COMMENTS TO KARLA KASSEBAUM ON JULY 24, 201
EXECUTED LETTER OF AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND DATED
PROPERTY OWNER.
##########################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-- DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL---DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER--17PR0249
PLAN DATE-05/09/17,6/16/,7/14/,8/8/17,8/29/17,9/8,10/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---10/24/2017
5 DAY FAST TRACK
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-SIX
REVIEW DATE---10/30/2017
RECOMMENDATION--- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW--------- YES
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED 9/19/2017
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - APPROVED 9/19/2017
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS- APPROVED 9/19/2017
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN- APPROVED 9/8/2017
MASTER PLAN PHASING EXHIBIT 6/14/17- APPROVED
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT -APPROVED
SETBACK & BUFFER EXHIBIT-APPROVED
.
01. IF A SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED, RESUBMIT 12
FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE
FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY
& YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A
REVISION DATE. FOR TRACKING PURPOSES, DO NOT REMOVE
PREVIOUS PLAN DATES.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
.
03. PLEASE SUBMIT A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW FEE.
.
04. PLEASE BE ADVISED VOLUME I HYDRAULICS ANALYSIS
RESULTS SHEETS C4.16 & C4.17 ARE BLANK. PLEASE SWAP
OUT THE TWO SHEETS IF UTILITIES IS AMENABLE TO SWAPPING
OUT THE SHEETS
.
NOTE: LETTER OF AGREEMENT IDENTIFYING PROPERTY OWNERS
COMMITMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL THEME, COMPATIBILITY, AND QUAL
FOR THE COSBY VILLAGE PROJECT REQUIRES REVISIONS. JEFF DOP
EMAILED REVIEW COMMENTS TO KARLA KASSEBAUM ON JULY 24, 201
EXECUTED LETTER OF AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND DATED BY
PROPERTY OWNER.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 5/23/17
RECEIVED DATE : 5/25/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 5/26/17
ADDRESS : NOT ASSIGNED YET
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. IN THE GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET C0.0 ONE OF THE OWNER
NAMES IS MISSING. 713-671-2000 IS OWNED BY NORMAN L AND
WANDA H SADLER.
2. ONE OF THE GPINS IN THE GENERAL NOTES IS INCORRECT.
711-671-8571 SHOULD BE 711-671-8511.
3. AN OVERALL OUTER BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT
PARCELS ISN'T SHOWN. PLEASE SUPPLY THE METES AND
BOUNDS FOR EVERY SEGMENT ALONG THE TRAVERSE TO INCLUDE
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE FOR ALL NON-TANGENT CURVES.
IF THE PARCEL IS TOO LARGE TO CONVENIENTLY FIT ON ONE
SHEET, A LARGER SCALE DRAWING OF THE BOUNDARY IS
ACCEPTABLE.
4. STREET ADDRESS LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN. THEY CAN BE
LOCATED ON THE BUILDINGS, ON A SIGN OR AS A PART OF A
MONUMENT SIGN. LOCATION AND MATERIAL USED MUST BE NOTED
ON THE SITE PLAN. IF YOU ARE USING A MONUMENT SIGN, A
DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN MUST BE ON THE SITE PLAN.
5. FOR ADDRESSING PURPOSES, INDICATE THE METHOD OF MAIL
DELIVERY - INDIVIDUAL DOOR DELIVERY; INSIDE BUILDING
KIOSK; OR NEIGHBORHOOD DELIVERY COLLECTION BOX UNIT
(NDCBU). IF DELIVERY IS BY NDCBU, PLACE THE LOCATION OF
EACH NDCBU KIOSK ON THE PLAN AND INDICATE WHICH BUILDINGS
WILL BE SERVED BY EACH UNIT.
6. FOR ADDRESSING PURPOSES, PRIVATE ROADS A AND B MUST BE
NAMED. STREET NAMES MUST BE APPROVED THROUGH RICHMOND
REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION STREET NAME
CLEARINGHOUSE AND/OR CRATER PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
STREET NAME CLEARING HOUSE WITH VERIFICATION SUBMITTED
TO JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL
APPROVAL.
7. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (5)
NEEDS TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED
TO SITE PLAN NUMBER 17PR0249.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 6/16/17
RECEIVED DATE : 6/20/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 6/22/17
ADDRESS : NOT ASSIGNED YET
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE OVERALL OUTER BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT
PARCELS DOESN'T CLOSE. L26 IS MISSING FROM THE LINE
TABLE AND I NEED THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FOR THE
LINES BETWEEN L15 AND L23 ALONG HULL STREET RD.
2. STREET ADDRESS LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN. THEY CAN BE
LOCATED ON THE BUILDINGS, ON A SIGN OR AS A PART OF A
MONUMENT SIGN. LOCATION AND MATERIAL USED MUST BE NOTED
ON THE SITE PLAN. IF YOU ARE USING A MONUMENT SIGN, A
DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN MUST BE ON THE SITE PLAN.
3. FOR ADDRESSING PURPOSES, PRIVATE ROADS A AND B MUST
BE NAMED. STREET NAMES MUST BE APPROVED THROUGH RICHMOND
REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION STREET NAME
CLEARINGHOUSE AND/OR CRATER PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
STREET NAME CLEARINGHOUSE WITH VERIFICATION SUBMITTED TO
JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL.
4. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER INTERSECTION (5) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE OUT TO "TREASURER,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY" AND SUBMITTED TO CAROLE CLIBORNE IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 17PR0249.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 7/14/17
RECEIVED DATE : 7/19/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 7/24/17
ADDRESS : PENDING
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE OVERALL OUTER BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT
PARCELS DOESN'T CLOSE. L104 IS TOO SHORT TO BE THE LINE
BETWEEN L21 AND L27.
2. BUILDING 1 WILL HAVE 8 ADDRESSES. BUILDING 2 WILL
HAVE 6 ADDRESSES. I RECOMMEND PUTTING THE ADDRESS
NUMBER ON OR ABOVE THE DOOR OF EACH BUSINESS.
3. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER INTERSECTION (5) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE OUT TO "TREASURER,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY" AND SUBMITTED TO CAROLE CLIBORNE IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 17PR0249. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE RECEIPT TO
JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 8/8/17
RECEIVED DATE : 8/10/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 8/16/17
ADDRESS : ASSIGNED, SEE #2 BELOW
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER INTERSECTION (5) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE OUT TO "TREASURER,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY" AND SUBMITTED TO CAROLE CLIBORNE IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 17PR0249. PLEASE EMAIL A COPY OF THE RECEIPT TO
JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
2. ADDRESSES WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:
BUILDING 1: 7100, 7106, 7112, 7118, 7124, 7130,
7136, 7142 COSBY VILLAGE RD.
GROCERY STORE: 7200 COSBY VILLAGE RD.
BUILDING 2: 7300, 7306, 7312, 7318, 7324, 7330 COSBY
VILLAGE RD.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON (N)768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 8/8/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 5
REVIEW DATE : 9/5/17
ADDRESS : ASSIGNED, SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER INTERSECTION (5) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE OUT TO "TREASURER,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY" AND SUBMITTED TO CAROLE CLIBORNE IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 17PR0249. PLEASE EMAIL A COPY OF THE RECEIPT TO
JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
=========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COSBY VILLAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0249
LATEST PLAN DATE : 10/20/17
RECEIVED DATE : 10/26/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 6
REVIEW DATE : 10/26/17
ADDRESS : ASSIGNED
STATUS : APPROVED
=========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 5/23/1
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 5/26/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 5/26/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED THRUST BLOCK DESIGN AND RODDING
DETAIL CHART FOR FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND. ALSO
PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CONCRETE AMOUNT DESIGN CHART. THRUST
BLOCKS FOR FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND SHALL BE DESIGNED
AT A MINIMUM TEST PRESSURE OF 225 PSI. THE REQUIRED
CHARTS AND DETAILS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE INTERNET FOR
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY - CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS -
DIVISION OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY -
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
2. PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM
RUN-IN AND STUB UP, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE NOTES. SEE:
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
FOR A COPY OF THE DETAILS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 6/16/1
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 6/20/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 6/20/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. PROVIDE THE FIR-1A UTILITY DETAIL ON THE PLAN.
2.ON THE UTILITY PLAN, SHOW THE GATE VALVES THAT
LEAD TO THE INTERIOR BACK FLOW PREVENTERS ON THE
SMALLER BUILDINGS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 7/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 7/17/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 7/17/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/8/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 8/9/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 8/9/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/29/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 9/1/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 5TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 9/1/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COSBY VILLAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0249
ADDRESS: 15950 COSBY ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/26/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 6TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 10/26/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.

Modify comments view for case # 17PR0249



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List