Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 17PR0189
Modify comments view for Case # 17PR0189

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 17PR0189 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: COURTHOUSE SELF-STOR - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/20/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 ******** 01/10/17 DLD 706-2031
FIRE DEPT.--: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 COMPLETE 05/08/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 COMPLETE 05/22/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 COMPLETE 06/07/17 JJD 717-6191
TRANSPORT.--: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 COMPLETE 05/19/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 AMENDED* 05/09/17 M L 748-1338
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 02 05/02/17 05/23/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COURTHOUSE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 27 N. COURTHOUSE RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 12/14/16
PLAN DATED : 12/6/16
REVIEW DATE : 12/22/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0189
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER 15-0355 SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER MAINS WITH
SIZE, MATERIAL, AND COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER ON ALL APPLICABL
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS THAT DEPICT EXISTING CONDITIONS OR
A CONNECTION. THE COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER FOR THE WATER AND
RTHOUSE IS 89-0809, THE WATER LINE ON
4. UPDATE THE MATERIALS LIST BASED ON COMMENTS BELOW. 78
010. THE PROJECT NUMBER FOR THE SEWER ON HAVERFORD LN IS
-7040.
4. UPDATE THE MATERIALS LIST BASED ON COMMENTS BELOW.
INCLUDE AN ITEM FOR MANHOLE INSERTS AND ANY TEES FOR
HYDRANTS SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS A "HYDRANT TEE".
5. SHOW ALL EXISTING ONSITE UTILITY EASEMENTS (PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE). ALL EXISTING WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS SHALL BE
LABELED WITH WIDTH, MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY, AND DEED
BOOK AND PAGE.
6. PLEASE CORRECT THE METER SIZING FORM FOR THE IRRIGATIO
METER. THERE SHOULD BE NO DOMESTIC DEMAND SHOWN, JUST THE
RRIGATION DEMAND.
7. ON SHEET C2, CHANGE THE NOTE REFERRING TO THE EXISTING
THAT THE SERVICE SHALL BE ABANDONED PER CHESTERFIELD
8. WE THINK THAT THIS IS A GOOD APPLICATION TO USE AN INT
NAL DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY INSTEAD OF AN EXTERNAL VAULT SIN
THE WATER LINE IS LESS THAN 50 FT FROM THE BUILDING. A G
E VALVE WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED AS THE POINT OF DEMARCATI
FROM PUBLIC TO PRIVATE WATER LINE. THE FDC WOULD NEED TO
E MOUNTED ON THE BUILDING. INTERNAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVES A
PREFERRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS A NEW POLICY THAT THEY WILL BE A
O THE WATER MAIN IS LESS THAN 50 FT.
9. THE METHOD OF RESTORATION FOR THE PROPOSED WATER
CONNECTION ON N. COURTHOUSE MUST BE CONFIRMED BY VDOT.
10. SHOW THE CONNECTION TO THE WATER LINE AS A CUT IN TEE
SLEEVES RATHER THAN A TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE. THE
11. IF POSSIBLE WE SUGGEST REVISING THE GRADING SO THAT T
BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FOR BUILDING 1 IS A LIT
E HIGHER. IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO RUN GRAVITY
PLUMBING FROM WHERE THE PROPOSED BATHROOM IS LOCATED TO TH
LATERAL.
12. ELIMINATE THE CLEANOUT IN THE EASEMENT ON THE SEWER L
13. REVISE THE OFFSITE SEWER SO THAT THE DROP ACROSS THE
MANHOLES IS 0.1 FT.
14. THE SLOPE OF THE TERMINAL MANHOLE RUN NEEDS TO BE 0.5
OUNTY STANDARDS.
15. THERE IS CURRENTLY ALMOST NO COVER OVER THE SANITARY
IF ADDITIONAL COVER CANNOT BE OBTAINED BY GRADING
16. PROVIDE A NOTE THAT CONFIRMING THE EXISTING MANHOLE
S FIELD LOCATED.
17. WHAT IS THE INTENDED SERVICE FOR THE SEWER LATERAL IN
MH 2? AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOW THAT 31 AND 39 N. COURTHOUS
RD ALREADY HAVE SEWER LATERALS AVAILABLE ON N. COURTHOUSE
.
18. MECHANICAL RESTRAINT IS REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL BENDS.
IRE RUN OF PIPE THROUGH THE 4 VERTICAL BENDS UNDER T
19. THE PRIVATE FIRE LINE HEADING TO BUILDING 1 IS VERTIC
LY IN CONFLICT WITH THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURE 4 AND 5. T
S CONFLICT SHOULD BE RESOLVED AND SHOW THE PIPE INT CALCUL
ION WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL USING A TEST PRESSURE OF 150
I AND SAFETY FACTOR OF 1.5.
19. THE PRIVATE FIRE LINE HEADING TO BUILDING 1 IS VERTIC
LY IN CONFLICT WITH THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURE 4 AND 5. T
S CONFLICT SHOULD BE RESOLVED AND SHOW THE PIPE
CROSSING ON THE STORM SEWER PROFILE.
20. SHOW THE PROPOSED VERIZON AND DOMINION POWER SLEEVES
ATERLINE PROFILE WITH 1.5 FT MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARA
21. EXTEND THE WATER EASEMENT FROM THE STUBOUT AT THE END
F THE LINE TO PARCEL 745-703-0256 SO THAT A SECOND TAP INT
THE 16-INCH WATER MAIN ON N. COURTHOUSE CAN BE AVOIDED. P
VIDE 5 FT OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE 16
PERMANENT EASEMENT. PROVIDE A 90 DEGREE BEND TO MOVE THE
UG AND FLUSHING HYDRANT OUTSIDE OF THE
PAVEMENT AND FENCED AREA.
22. THE RESULTS OF FIRE FLOW TEST AND THE COMPUTER
GENERATED MODEL NEED TO BE SHOWN ON A PLAN SHEET.
23. WE CHECKED THE RECORDED DEEDS FOR THE PROPERTIES ON TH
AND FOUND THAT THE PROPERTY LINES DO NOT MATCH. PLE
24. OBTAINING THE OFFSITE EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER WI
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR THESE PLANS. ELY.
21. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF MIKE LARSON
(LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE
BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE
SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
22. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COURTHOUSE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 27 N. COURTHOUSE RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 3/9/17
PLAN DATED : 3/7/17
REVIEW DATE : 3/23/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0189
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. INCLUDE MANHOLE INSERTS IN THE UTILITY QUANTITIES LIST
.
2. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE CREDIT FOR A WATER METER CO
ECTION FEE CAN ONLY BE CARRIED ON A SINGLE PARCEL. THE WA
R METER THAT IS TO BE ABANDONED ON GPIN 744-703-9575 WILL
T RESULT IN A CREDIT FOR PARCEL 745-703-3669.
.
3. PROVIDE A SECOND VALVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE 16 X 8 C
IN TEE PER COUNTY STANDARDS.
4. ON THE NOTE FOR THE ISOLATION VALVES, PLEASE INCLUDE A
EFERENCE TO SHEET C-26.
.
4. ON THE NOTE FOR THE ISOLATION VALVES, PLEASE INCLUDE A
REFERENCE TO SHEET C-26.
5. THE WATER STUBOUT TOWARDS THE LUCKY MANAGEMENT PROPERTY
HOULD CALL OUT FOR PLUG AND FLUSHING HYDRANT.
6. THE WATER EASEMENT NEEDS TO INCLUDE ALL FITTINGS UP TO
ND INCLUDING THE VALVE FEEDING THE DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK.
7. THE WATER MAIN NEAR THE TEE TO THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS
ISLABELED AS 6" ON THE PLAN VIEW.
8. INCLUDE THE SIZE, MATERIAL, AND COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER
BEL FOR THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER MAINS ON THE PROFILE
R THE SANITARY SEWER AND PUBLIC WATER LINE.
.
9. SINCE THE PRIVATE SEWER LATERAL HAS LESS THAN 3 FT OF C
ER, WE RECOMMEND THAT IT BE DUCTILE IRON.
10. THE IRRIGATION METER MUST BE AT LEAST 3 FT FROM THE S
EWALK. PLEASE ADJUST THE LOCATION AND EASEMENT AS NEEDED.
11. IF POSSIBLE, LOCATE THE DOMESTIC METER TO A LANDSCAPE
T WILL HAVE 3 FT CLEAR DIGGING SPACE. IF THE
ETER CANNOT BE RELOCATED, THEN A LICENSING AGREEMENT WILL
NECESSARY WHICH WILL INDICATE THAT IF THE CONCRETE SIDEWA
NEEDS TO BE EXCAVATED FOR THE METER, THE PROPERTY OWNER W
L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXPENSE OF RESTORATION OF THE SID
ALK.
.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : COURTHOUSE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 27 N. COURTHOUSE RD
SUBMISSION DATE : 5/2/17
PLAN DATED : 4/28/17
REVIEW DATE : 5/9/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0189
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
PLEASE SUBMIT 3 COPIES OF THE PLANS FOR USE DURING CONSTRU
ION ONCE APPROVALS FROM ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS ARE OBTAINED
THIS PLAN WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE O
SITE EASEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/06/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 12/16/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 12/28/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - REAMS RD
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. DEDICATE 45 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
REAMS RD, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THAT PART OF
REAMS RD ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY. DEDICATION SHALL BE
FREE AND UNRESTRICTED TO AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COUNTY
(PROFFERED CONDITION 14 OF CASE 16SN0701)
B. RECORD AN ACCESS EASEMENT, ACCEPTABLE TO TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO THE PROVIDE SHARED USE O
THE APPROVED ACCESS TO COURTHOUSE RD WITH THE ADJACENT
PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH (GPIN 745-703-0256). (PROFF COND 15B
ACCESS EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FROM THE COURTHOUSE R
ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY LINE WITH GPIN 745-703-0256. ACCESS
EASEMENT WIDTH NEEDS TO MATCH MINIMUM DRIVE AISLE WIDTH TO
ACCOMMODATE 2-WAY TRAFFIC (LIKELY 24'). PLAN SHOWS 20'
EASEMENT. CDOT WOULD RECOMMEND 30' WIDTH FROM END OF DRIV
AISLE TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE TIE-IN.
2. DIMENSION THE PROPOSED COURTHOUSE RD RIGHT TURN LANE &
PROVIDE A DESIGN PAVEMENT SECTION FOR THE WIDENING. CDOT
WOULD RECOMMEND PROVIDING 200' STORAGE & THE REMAINDER
BEING TAPER LENGTH.
3. ENSURE THE EXISTING BIKE LANE IS MAINTAINED & RE-
STRIPED. BIKE LANE CANNOT BE USED FOR THE RIGHT TURN LANE
4. PROVIDE 5' SIDEWALK ALONG COURTHOUSE RD AND REAMS RD FO
THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE (PROFF COND 16B).
5. LABEL THE COUNTY'S CLASSIFICATION FOR COURTHOUSE RD &
REAMS RD(MAJOR ARTERIAL) ON THE PLANS.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE: 03/07/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 03/14/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 03/30/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - REAMS RD
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
.
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. DEDICATE 45 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
REAMS RD, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THAT PART OF
REAMS RD ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY. DEDICATION SHALL BE
FREE AND UNRESTRICTED TO AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COUNTY
(PROFFERED CONDITION 14 OF CASE 16SN0701)
.
B. RECORD AN ACCESS EASEMENT, ACCEPTABLE TO TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO THE PROVIDE SHARED USE O
THE APPROVED ACCESS TO COURTHOUSE RD WITH THE ADJACENT
PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH (GPIN 745-703-0256). (PROFF COND 15B
.
DRAFT EASEMENT AGREEMENT & EXHIBIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
CDOT FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECORDATION. ENSURE A
CONTINUOUS NON-EXCLUSIVE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT IS
PROVIDED FROM COURTHOUSE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR
USE BY ADJACENT PROPERTY. EASEMENT IS SHOWN FOR OTHER
PURPOSES BUT IT SHOULD BE CLEAR IN THE ACCESS AGREEMENT
THAT ADJACENT OWNER WILL HAVE USE FROM COURTHOUSE.
.
2. HOW IS STORMWATER BETWEEN REAMS RD AND NEW SIDEWALK
BEING ADDRESSED? ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS PROVIDED IN
THIS AREA TO STORM SYSTEM.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/28/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 05/08/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 05/19/17
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - REAMS RD
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
.
1. FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL PENDING:
A. DEDICATE 45 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
REAMS ROAD; AND
B. RECORDATION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT, ACCEPTABLE TO
TRANSPORTATION DEPT, TO PROVIDE SHARED USE OF THE APPROVED
ACCESS TO COURTHOUSE RD WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY (GPIN 745-
703-0256)
.
DRAFT EASEMENT AGREEMENT & EXHIBIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
CDOT FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECORDATION. ENSURE A
CONTINUOUS NON-EXCLUSIVE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT IS
PROVIDED FROM COURTHOUSE RD TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR USE B
ADJACENT PROPERTY. ESMT IS SHOWN FOR OTHER PURPOSES BUT IT
SHOULD BE CLEAR IN THE ACCESS AGREEMENT THAT ADJACENT OWNE
WILL HAVE USE FROM COURTHOUSE RD.
.
2. SHEET C6 LAYOUT PLAN, PROVIDE HATCHING FOR REAMS RD
SIDEWALK SO IT IS CLEAR SIDEWALK IS PROVIDED WITH PLAN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
V
EMAIL------------------DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN----------- COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE------- 12/06/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------ 12/08/2016
ACEEPTED FOR REVIEW-12?14/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------ONE
REVIEW DATE------------ 1/10/2017
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW----------- NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- REQUESTED WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS-NOT APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS--- REQUESTED-PLEASE SUBMIT
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- REQUESTED-PLEASE SUBMIT
REVIEW COMMENTS:
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET T
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. THE FIRST
SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE (MONTH, DAY & YEAR),
AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS. (CL X.X REPRESENTS
CHECKLIST ITEM #)
03. PUT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER
17PR0189 IN THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
04. SHOW ANY EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED GAS, POWER, AND
TELEPHONE LINES AND EASEMENTS (IF KNOWN). SEC. 19.1-27. F.
05. REVISE SHEET C1 TO INCLUDE ALL ADDRESSES FOR THE
SUBJECT PARCELS. INCLUDE 27 & 15 N. COURTHOUSE ROAD.
06. SHEET C1: THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE NOT ZONED O-2.
PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW ZONING AS "AGRICULTURAL WITH
CONDITIONAL USE AND CONDITIONAL USE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT.
07. SHEET C1: INCLUDE GPIN# 744-703-7882 AS A
SUBJECT PARCEL.
08. SHEET C1: ADD NOTE THAT READS "THE HOURS OF OPERATION
FOR OFFICES AND INTERIOR SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSES USES
SHALL BE LIMITED TO 6:00 AM TO 10:00 PM DAILY.
09. SHEET C1 GENERAL NOTE 10: REMOVE LANGUAGE FROM PLAN
THAT READS "AND EXTERNAL STORAGE TANKS". EXTERNAL
STORAGE TANKS ARE NOT ALLOWED PER PROFFERED CONDITION 2.
PER SEC. 19-301, THE DEFINITION FOR 'STORAGE AREA, OUTSIDE
INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, AREAS USED TO KEEP
EQUIPMENT, ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS, SUPPLIES,
VEHICLES FOR REPAIR OF BODY OR ENGINE DAMAGE OR
GOODS FOR SALE WHEREBY SUCH MATERIALS REMAIN
OUTSIDE ON A CONTINUING BASIS AND MOTOR VEHICLE STORAGE.
10. SHEET C1 GENERAL NOTE 10: THE INCORRECT ZONING CASE AN
PROFFER NUMBER ARE SHOWN. CHANGE TO CASE 16SN0701
PROFFER 2.
11. SHEET C1: THE PARKING SPACE CALCULATIONS ALSO MUST
INCLUDE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OFFICE USE. ONE SPACE
PER 200 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF OFFICE SPACE
IS REQUIRED. PLEASE SHOW CALCULATION. (REF. SEC. 19.1-236)
12. SHOW ON THE PLANS ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITH OWNER
NAMES, ZONING, AND CURRENT USES. THIS INFORMATION HAS
NOT BEEN SHOWN FOR ADJACENT LOTS 1-6 LOCATED ALONG
THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. [SEC. 19.1-27. F]
13. SHEET C1: FOR THE USE DESCRIPTION LABEL USE AS
"OFFICE AND INDOOR SELF-STORAGE WAREHOUSE".
[PROFF. COND 2]
14. PROFFERED CONDITION 2 LIMITS USES TO OFFICE AND INDOOR
SELF-STORAGE. PLEASE EXPLAIN IN WRITING THE PURPOSE
OF THE INTERIOR RETAIL AREA SHOWN INSIDE BUILDING 1.
15. SHEETS C1 & C-6: PROFFERED CONDITION 3 REQUIRES A
MINIMUM OF 5,600 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE.
ON SHEET C1 LABEL THE ACTUAL GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
THAT WILL BE USED FOR OFFICE SPACE AND ON SHEET C6
HATCH OUT THE OFFICE SPACE AREA AND LABEL THE GROSS
SQUARE FOOTAGE.
16. PER SEC. 19.1-208.B), MAKE SURE ALL SETBACKS FROM
PUBLIC ROADS ARE MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF
WAY. LABEL THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ULTIMATE
RIGHT OF WAY ON ALL PUBLIC ROADS ON THE SITE PLAN, EVEN
IF THE ULTIMATE AND EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY IS THE SAME.
17. SHEET C21: PROVIDE A DUMPSTER GATE SIGN PROFILE THAT
READS "NO SERVICE BETWEEN 8:00 PM & 7:00 AM"
(REF. PROFF. COND. 12.) PROVIDE SIGN DETAIL ON PLANS
18. SHEET C1: ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLANS: "OUTSIDE
STORAGE AND ON-SITE STORAGE AUCTIONS SHALL BE PROHIBITED".
(PROFF. COND. 2)
19. PROVIDE 5' SIDEWALK ALONG COURTHOUSE RD AND REAMS
FOR THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE (PROFF COND 16B CASE
16SN0701). TO ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND SAFETY,
EXTEND THE SIDEWALK INTO THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE N. COURTHOUSE ROAD DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE.
ALL THE WAY UP TO DRIVE AISLE SERVING THE 9 PARKING SPACES
AND INSTALL CG-12. REVIEWER WILL FURTHER DISCUSS AT
STAFF/DEVELOPER MEETING.
20. IS ANY OUTDOOR PUBLIC ADDRESS OR INTERCOM SYSTEM
PROPOSED? OUTDOOR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS ARE
ALLOWED ONLY BY CONDITIONAL USE.
21. SHEET C6 & SHEET C7: REVISE PLANS TO COMPLY WITH
PROFFER 8 AND SHOW LOCATION OF THE SIX (6) FOOT TALL, DURA
VINYL FENCE. KEY FENCE SYMBOL ON LEGEND AND PROVIDE A
FENCE DETAIL ON PLANS. AT MINIMUM, POSTS ARE TO BE
6" X 6" X 8' SQUARE SPACED 6' O/C. SUPPORTS ARE TO BE
2" X 2" X 6' SQUARE SPACED 2' O/C SECURED WITH JOIST HANGE
22. IF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REQUIRES A FENCE
AROUND THE BMP, SHOW LOCATION OF FENCE ON SITE PLAN
AND PROVIDE AN ORNAMENTAL FENCE DETAIL. ANY FENCE AROUND T
BMP LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
OR VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC VIEW OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES
IS REQUIRED TO BE AN ORNAMENTAL FENCE REQUIRING
THE APPROVAL OF BOTH PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING.
23. BMPS WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
19-5 18 AS A VISUAL AMENITY. THIS WILL TYPICALLY REQUIRE
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND WHERE FENCES ARE REQUIRED,
THEY MUST BE ORNAMENTAL FENCES. FOUNTAINS AND
OR CURVILINEAR POND FORMS OR OTHER AMENITIES MAYBE
NEEDED TO MEET ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. IT APPEARS THE
BMP ADJACENT TO REAMS ROAD WILL BE A DRY POND. TO
ACHIEVE ADEQUATE SCREENING, THE INSTALLATION OF LARGE
EVERGREEN SHRUBS ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF REAMS ROAD
MAY BE REQUIRED IF REVIEWER DETERMINES THERE IS INSUFFICIE
SCREENING. PREPARE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THESE EVERGREEN
SHRUBS.
24. IDENTIFY THE BUILDING, DRIVEWAY, AND PARKING SETBACKS
FOR FRONT, SIDE, AND REAR YARDS, AND LABEL THEM ON THE PLA
ALONG WITH ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STANDARD TO BE APPLIED
THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
25. LABEL ON THE PLAN ANY SETBACK EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED
BY ZONING CASE 16SN0701.
26. ARE THERE ANY RETAINING WALLS PROPOSED. IF YES,
SHOW LOCATION ON SITE LAYOUT AND GRADING PLANS AND
PROVIDE A RETAINING WALL DETAIL. PER SEC. 19.1-320 (
RETAINING WALLS USE SAME SETBACKS AS REQUIRED FOR
DRIVES AND PARKING PER SEC. 19.1-320.1(C), AND MAY
INCREASE WHEN LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED TO INSURE 10
FEET OF PLANTING AREA FREE FROM EASEMENTS, UTILITIES,
OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES THAT MIGHT PREVENT THE
INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.)
IN ADDITION, DECORATIVE FENCING IS REQUIRED. 19.1-320:
FOR RETAINING WALL'S HAVING A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET
OR GREATER, A 4-FOOT-HIGH FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON
THE UPPER SIDE OF THE WALL. IT'S VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC,
THE FENCE SHE'LL HAVE A DECORATIVE DESIGN.
27. PER SEC. 19.1-247A1, GRADING WITHIN FRONT SETBACKS
AND BUFFERS THAT IMPACTS EXISTING VEGETATION IS NOT ALLOWE
EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION.
28. PER SEC. 19.1-262.B, USES IN BUFFERS ARE LIMITED TO
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, SIGNS, SECURITY FENCING,
UTILITIES THAT RUN PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE BUFFER,
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, AND SIMILAR USES AS APPROVED
THROUGH SITE OR SCHEMATIC PLAN REVIEW
29. SHOW DIMENSIONS OF HANDICAP PARKING SPACES AND
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AISLES.
30. SHEET C6 & C21: INSTALL BUMPER BLOCKS AT ENDS OF
PARKING SPACES BETWEEN HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE AND
ENTRANCE TO BUILDING SO THAT CARS DO NOT ENCROACH INTO
HANDICAP PEDESTRIAN PATH. SHOW BUMPER BLOCK DETAIL
ON SHEET C21.
31. SHEET C6: SHOW LOCATION OF HANDICAP PARKING SIGNAGE.
32. SHEET C1: ADD NOTE THAT READS "ALL PARKING SPACES
LEGIBLY STRIPED WITH 4-INCH WHITE LINE".
33. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS
FOR HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED
POLICY, AND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19-517(B), THE DESIGN
OF PARKING AREAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN TO MINIMIZE
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN MATURING LANDSCAPING AND THE
VISIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FIRE HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO
HIGH POWER TRANSMISSION LINES, SITE LIGHTING,AND VISIBILIT
FOR MOTORISTS EXITING PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL
BE CHECKED TO DETERMINE THAT SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING
LOT PLANTING AREA EXISTS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
SEC. 19-519 EXCLUDING ISLANDS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS AND
RELATED UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICTS WITH OVERHEAD POWER
LINES AND SITE LIGHTING.REVIEW STAFF MAY REQUIRE A SEPARAT
SHEET DOCUMENTING SIZES OF PROPOSED ISLANDS AND OTHER
INTERNAL GREEN SPACES WITHIN PARKING LOTS.
34. PER SEC. 19-518(E) AND 19-519(C), BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE (BMP) BIO-RETENTION BASINS IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS
ARE ENCOURAGED BY ALLOWING TREES USED IN THESE ISLANDS
TO BE COUNTED TOWARD PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS
AND TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR IRRIGATION IN THESE PARK
LOT AREAS.
35. SHEET C6: THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUILDING THREE
DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM 25' FOOT MINIMUM INTERIOR
SIDE YARD SETBACK. REVISE ON PLANS TO MEET THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENT AND DIMENSION AND LABEL THE SETBACK ON THE
LAYOUT PLAN. REFERENCE TEXTUAL STATEMENT 1.
36. SHEET C6: BETWEEN THE TERMINUS OF THE 45 FOOT
DRIVE AISLE AND 100' FOOT BUFFER IDENTIFIES THE 8' FOOT TA
BRICK WALL. EXPLAIN TO REVIEWER WHAT TYPE OF
FENCING OR SCREENING WILL BE PLACED IN BETWEEN THE FIRE
LANE AND ADJACENT 100-FOOT BUFFER.
37. SHEET C6: ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS TAX I
745-703-0256, THE USE AS COMMERCIAL IS INCORRECT. LABEL
PROPERTY AS VACANT.
38. SHEETS C3, C4, C5 & C6: ON ALL SHEETS CLEARLY
LABEL, DIMENSION AND SHOW ALL BUFFERS AND WITHIN EACH
50' FOOT AND100-FOOT BUFFERS ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE.
"BUFFER TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED NO GRADING OR CLEARING OF
EXISTING VEGETATION ALLOWED".
39. SHEETS C3, C4, C5 & C6: ON AL SHEETS LABEL THE
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT WITHIN EACH BUFFER
AND SETBACK. BUFFER TREATMENTS VARY DEPENDING ON
BUFFER WIDTH. REFERENCE BUFFER TREATMENT TABLES
19.1 -263. A.2.A.(IE 100' BUFFER 2.5X PERIMETER C
LANDSCAPE, 50' BUFFER 1.5 X PERIMETER C, 15' & 10'
BUFFER PERIMETER C LANDSCAPE).
40. SHEETS C2, C3, C4 & C7: ON DEMOLITION, EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND GRADING PLANS, SHOW
TREE PROTECTION FENCING ALONG ALL 50' AND 100'
BUFFERS AND KEY THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING SYMBOL
TO THE LEGEND ON EACH SHEET.
41. PREPARE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW PERIMETER/BUFFER
LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS ARE BEING ACHIEVED. HEALTHY
EXISTING TREES OR SHRUBS MAYBE CREDITED TOWARD
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS IF REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED
THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE AREA.
SEC. 19.1-262: BUFFER PROVIDED SHALL BE AN
UNBROKEN LANDSCAPE STRIP.
42. SEC. 19.1-261. PROVISIONS FOR SCREENING. DURABLE
ARCHITECTURAL WALLS OR FENCES OF COMPARABLE MATERIALS
TO THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND DESIGN TO BE COMPATIBLE
TO THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING
43. SHOW LOCATION OF ROOF ACCESS IF ANY. ACCESS
TO ROOF MUST BE INSIDE BUILDING. EXTERIOR
LADDERS NOT ALLOWED.
44. PLEASE BE ADVISED THE AREA LABELED AS "POSSIBLE FUTURE
EXTENSION" IS NOT VESTED WITH THIS SITE PLAN.
45. SHEET C26: INCLUDE THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT
ON THIS SHEET.
LIGHTING:
01.PER SEC.19.1-205, SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR
ADDITIONALLY, ON A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION
OF ALL EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, THE
BUILDING, OR ON THE GROUND AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO
CUT SHEETS FOR EACH LIGHT FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
02. PROVIDE CATALOGUE CUT SHEETS FOR EACH EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURE PROPOSED. PER PROFFERED CONDITION 10, PARKING
LOT LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED A HEIGHT OF TWENTY (20)
FEET.
03. PER SEC..1-205, SUBMIT A FOOT-CANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM
WHENEVER A SITE IS ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
DOCUMENT THAT THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT
EXCEED 0.5 FOOT-CANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE WITH THE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
04. PER SEC.19.1-205ALL LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A
DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM
DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH,
TND, OR R-MF DISTRICT OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF -WAY.
LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION
NOTE: PLEASE READ ALL COMMENTS ABOVE
SINCE SOME COMMENTS PERTAIN TO THE
DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
01. PER SEC. 19.1-253B(A), PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED
TO INCLUDE 30 S. F. OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A CALCULATION
FOR THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TIMES
30 S.F. TO DETERMINE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN
PARKING LOT. (EXAMPLE: 100 PARKING SPACES X 30
S.F. = 3000 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING LOT)
02. PER SEC. 19.1-253.C, THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN
A PARKING LOT SHALL BE 1 PER 200 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE
AREA IN THE PARKING LOT. SHOW THE CALCULATION
FOR TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES. (EXAMPLE: 3000 S.F.
LANDSCAPE AREA DIVIDED BY 200 S.F. PER TREE = 15 TREES)
03. PER SEC. 19.1-253.C, AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES
SHALL BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS
WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F.
IN SIZE. SMALL MATURING TREES SHALL BE IN ISLANDS
WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 9 FEET AND BE 150 S.F. IN SIZE.
04. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHALL IDENTIFY THE STATE REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR LANDSCAPE
DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
05. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
PER SEC. 19-517(A) AND (B), AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WHETHER THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS
A CONCEPTUAL OR DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL
SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER - SHOW SEPARATE TABULAR CALCULATION OF
REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PLANTINGS FOR EACH YARD AND/OR
BUFFER.
C. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR PLANTING OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT
AREAS (SEE SEC. D - PARKING - REVIEW COMMENTS 15-20).
D. SHOW BMP AREAS AND ADDRESS PER SEC. 19-518(I) IF
REQUIRED TO TREAT AS A VISUAL AMENITY.
E. IF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF
ALL PLANTS AND IDENTIFY EACH AS LARGE OR SMALL DECIDUOUS
TREES, EVERGREEN TREES, MEDIUM SHRUBS, AND SMALL SHRUBS/
GROUNDCOVERS. THESE MAY BE KEYED TO A CONCEPTUAL PLANT
LIST SHOWING THESE PLANT TYPES AND THE QUANTITIES OF EACH.
F. IF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SPECIFY THE
PLANTS AND THEIR REQUIRED SIZES FOR EACH OF THE PLANT TYPE
REQUIRED PER SEC. 19-518(B).
G. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
LABEL AS SUCH. SEE SEC. 19-518(D) REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TREE PRESERVATION.
H. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS
REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE SETBAC
AREA.
I. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTING FOR EACH TREE
REMOVED. THE 50' AND 100" FOOT BUFFERS MAY NOT BE
DISTURBED PER CONDITION OF ZONING.
J. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR
REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL,
GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
K. PER SEC. 19-518(C), THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE
COMPOSITION AND MIX OF VEGETATION.
L. PER SEC. 19-518(C), DECORATIVE WALLS AND FENCES,
HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, MAY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS AS DETERMINED
AT TIME OF SITE PLAN OR SCHEMATIC APPROVAL.
M. PROVIDE STANDARD COUNTY LANDSCAPE NOTES ON DETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN
N. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE AND
IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING.
06. PER SEC. 19.1-249 ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION
SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE
WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE
SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY
DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS. ONE OTHER ALTERNATIVE
IN LIEU OF IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS ARE TO PLANT DROUGHT
TOLERANT NATIVE PLANT SPECIES CHOSEN FROM THE CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY PLANT MATERIAL LIST. PLEASE CONTACT JEFF DOPP FOR
A COPY OF THIS LIST.
07. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST INCLUDE STANDARD
LANDSCAPE NOTES. CONTACT JEFF DOPP IF YOU
NEED A COPY.
08. SUBMIT TWO SEPARATE COPIES OF THE IRRIGATION AND/OR
HOSE BIB PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. SHOW ALL
CONNECTIONS TO THE MAIN WATER LINE. HOSE BIBS
SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND
IRRIGATION HEADS AND COVERAGE AREAS MUST BE
SHOWN ON A SEPARATE IRRIGATION PLAN. (CL D.13)
SEC. 19-518(E).
09. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT,
THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE
(COUNTY FORMAT) TO REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD
PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE
YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED
LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
ARCHITECTURE
01.PER SEC. 19.1-317 A, B, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF
RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION
AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE
ROOF OR ON THE GROUND.
02. DIMENSION AND LABEL THE HEIGHT OF EACH BUILDING.
PROFFERED CONDITION 6.B LIMITS BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE
LESSER OF TWO STORIES OR 30 FEET.
03. PER SEC. 19.1-317.C SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE
BUILDING. IF PAINTED, THIS MUST BE STATED ON THE
ELEVATION.
04. PER SEC 19.1-317. D. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW
THAT UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED. BUILDING ELEVATIONS NEED
TO SHOW ANY ROOFTOP UNITS. PARAPETS AND/OR SCREENS MUST
BE EQUAL IN HEIGHT TO ANY ROOFTOP UNITS, OR SITE LINE
DRAWINGS MUST BE PROVIDED TO DOCUMENT THAT THE LOWER
PARAPET HEIGHT PROVIDES COMPLETE SCREENING. VISIBLE
FAçADES SHALL NOT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS INFERIOR
IN APPEARANCE OR DETAIL TO ANY OTHER FAçADE OF THE SAME
BUILDING
05. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF METAL WALL PANELS
WITH HORIZONTAL CORRUGATIONS. PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A.
PROHIBITS CORRUGATED OR UNFINISHED METAL PANELS. PLEASE
REVISE MATERIAL TO SHOW PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL PANELS.
METAL PANELS WITH A KYNAR FINISH ARE ACCEPTABLE AND TEND
TO BE DURABLE OVERTIME AND RESIST FADING.
06. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF SYSTEMS. PLEASE REVISE AND CALL OUT AS "PRE-FINISHED"
METAL ROOFING WITH A KYNAR FINISH IS ACCEPTABLE AND TEND
TO BE DURABLE OVERTIME AND RESIST FADING. IDENTIFY COLOR.
07. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF CONCRETE BLOCK VENEER
PROFFERED CONDITION 6. A REQUIRES MASONRY SPLIT-FACED BLOC
REVISE LEGEND TO IDENTIFY THIS MATERIAL.
08. THE USE OF METAL PLANTER SCREENS WAS NOT AN APPROVED
EXTERIOR MATERIAL. PLEASE REMOVE FROM ALL ELEVATIONS.
09. THE USE OF HALF ROUND EIF'S PEDIMENTS ABOVE THE
WINDOWS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED
ELEVATIONS. APPROVED ELEVATIONS SHOW THE USE OF HALF ROUND
WINDOWS WITH JACK ARCH ABOVE.
10. INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE CORNICE MATERIAL USED ON TH
PARAPET EXTENSIONS TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED
ELEVATIONS.
11. ON ALL ELEVATION CALL OUT THE COLOR TREATMENT FOR ALL
MATERIAL.
12. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF FOUR-SIDED COLOR ELEVATIONS FOR AL
SIDES FOR EACH BUILDING.
13. SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD OF THE BRICK VENEER, GROUT AND
MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK. FOR THE PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL
AND ROOF PANELS, SUBMIT A MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEET AND COLO
SAMPLE.
14. BUILDING #1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION DOES NOT COMPLY
WITH PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A REQUIRING BUILDING ELEVATIONS
THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF WAYS AND ADJACENT
AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF
BRICK OR MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK. PLEASE REVISE
ELEVATIONS AND ENSURE THE ELEVATION
IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS
IDENTIFIED AS EXHIBIT B APPROVED UNDER ZONING CASE
16SN0701. IN ADDITION, THE SLOPED ELEVATION/ROOF LINE
ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED UNDER THE
ZONING CASE.
15. BUILDING#1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS: THE PARAPET
EXTENSION MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO MATCH THE
SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE ELEVATIONS SHOWING
BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT. SEE PROFFER.
CONDITION 6.
16. BUILDING #1 NORTH ELEVATION SHOWS IN THE BACKGROUND
THE REAR SOUTH ELEVATION MAIN BUILDING PARAPET EXCEEDING
THE HEIGHT OF NORTH ELEVATION PARAPET. BECAUSE THE REAR
SOUTH ELEVATION PARAPET WILL BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AND THE ROW, REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW
BUILDING DESIGN AND MATERIALS COMPLYING WITH THE EXTERIOR
ELEVATION REQUIREMENTS PER PROFFERED CONDITION 6 OF
ZONING CASE 16SN0701.
17. BUILDING #2 BOTH NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
DO NOT COMPLY WITH PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A REQUIRING
BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF
WAYS AND ADJACENT AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK OR MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK.
PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS AND ENSURE THE ELEVATIONS
ARE COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS
IDENTIFIED AS EXHIBIT B APPROVED UNDER ZONING CASE
16SN0701.
18. BUILDING#2 NORTH ELEVATION: THE PARAPET EXTENSION
MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO MATCH THE SOUTH AND
WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE ELEVATIONS SHOWING BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT. SEE PROFF. CONDITION 6.
19. BUILDING #2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS: THE SLOPED
ELEVATION/ROOF LINE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS
APPROVED UNDER THE ZONING
CASE.
20. WILL THE RAISED PARAPETS EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE
MAIN BUILDING PARAPETS ON THE EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS?
IF YES, SHOWFINISHED PARAPET EXTENSIONS.
21. BUILDING #3 NORTH ELEVATION. THE PARAPET EXTENSION
MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO MATCH THE SOUTH AND
WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE ELEVATIONS SHOWING BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT. SEE PROFF. CONDITION 6.
##########################################################
##########################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-JEFF DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL--------DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE------- 03/07/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------ 03/08/2017
ACEEPTED FOR REVIEW-03/09/2017
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------ONE
REVIEW DATE------------ 4/10/2017
RECOMMENDATION----NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW----------- NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- NOT APPROVED
NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL- CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS--- SEE COMMENT
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- REQUESTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN
SHEET TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT
REVIEW. THE FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN
DATE (MONTH, DAY & YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF
PLANS SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE PUT A REVISION DATE
ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING THE
SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE
ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS. (CL X.X
REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
.
03. SHEET C1 (REF. SEC. 19.1-236): THE PARKING
SPACE CALCULATIONS SHOWN FOR THE TWO DIFFERENT
USES OF A STORAGE FACILITY AND OFFICE USE NOT
ASSOCIATED WITH OR IN THE FUTURE NOT
ASSOCIATED WITH THE STORAGE FACILITY MUST BE
REVISED PER ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. THE STORAGE
FACILITY USE, REQUIRES ONE SPACE FOR EACH EMPLOYEE
(MAXIMUM ONSITE AT ANY ONE TIME) WITH A
MINIMUM OF FIVE SPACES DEDICATED FOR THIS USE
FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STORAGE FACILITY
WORKING ONSITE AT ANY ONE TIME IS FIVE EMPLOYEES.
BELOW IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE PLANS MUST SHOW.
STORAGE FACILITY USE PARKING
REQUIRED: ONE SPACE PER EMPLOYEE ONSITE AT ANY TIME
MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IS 5
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 5
.
OFFICE GSF NOT ASSOCIATED WITH STORAGE FACILITY PARKING
REQUIRED: 1 SPACE PER 200 GSF = ???? DIVIDED BY 200
= ?? PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.
NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED =??
(INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE)
.
04. SHEETC7: ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLANS: "50' AND
100' FOOT BUFFERS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED.
NO GRADING OR CLEARING OF EXISTING VEGETATION
ALLOWED.
.
05. LABELING REQUIRED PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
REQUIREMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN ONLY
DOES NOT ADDRESS PREVIOUS COMMENT.
PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24 & 39,
WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND SETBACK, FOR SHEETS C3,
C4, C6 & C7: LABEL THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENT WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND SETBACK.
BUFFER TREATMENTS VARY DEPENDING ON
BUFFER WIDTH. REFERENCE BUFFER TREATMENT TABLES
19.1 -263. A.2.A.(IE 100' BUFFER 2.5X PERIMETER C
LANDSCAPE, 50' BUFFER 1.5 X PERIMETER C, 15' & 10'
BUFFER PERIMETER C LANDSCAPE).
.
LIGHTING:
.
01.PER PREVIOUS REQUEST: PER SEC..1-205, SUBMIT A
FOOT-CANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM WHENEVER A SITE IS
ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
DOCUMENT THAT THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT
EXCEED 0.5 FOOT-CANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE WITH THE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
.
LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION
.
01. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL
IDENTIFY THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
NURSERYMAN, OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING
THE PLAN. THE ONLY NEW PLANTINGS SHOWN ON THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN ARE FOR THE INTERIOR PARKING LOT.
BECAUSE THE QUANTITY OF PLANTINGS SHOWN FOR
THE INTERIOR PARKING IS MINIMAL, PLANNING WILL
ALLOW THE PLAN TO BE PREPARED BY THE CIVIL
ENGINEER CONDITIONALLY. IF A LANDSCAPE PLAN
IS REQUIRED FOR BUFFER PLANTINGS AS OUTLINED IN
COMMENT #2 BELOW, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE PREPARED BY A STATE REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR NURSERYMAN.
.
02. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED IDENTIFIES THAT
EXISTING VEGETATION MEETS THE REQUIRED NUMBER
OF PLANTINGS WITHIN EACH BUFFER. BASED ON PLANNING
REVIEWERS FIELD VISIT AND THE USE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY,
EXCEPT FOR THE 100' BUFFER ALONG THE EAST
PROPERTY LINE, IT APPEARS THERE IS INSUFFICIENT QUANTITIES
OF REQUIRED PLANTINGS REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT
THE BUFFERS. YOU MAY EITHER HAVE A STATE REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PREPARES AND SUBMIT A DETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING ALL ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
OR LABEL THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON SHEETS L1 & L2:
"AT TIME OF COMPLETION OF CLEARING AND GRADING, ALL
BUFFERS WILL BE FLAGGED AND DEVELOPER WILL CONTACT
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR A BUFFER INSPECTION.
IF THE QUANTITIES OF HEALTHY PLANTINGS ARE INSUFFICIENT
AND THE PLANTINGS ARE NOT REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOU
EACH BUFFER, A LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE PREPARED AND
SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 19.1-27 E,
REQUIRING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE PREPARED BY A STATE
REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR NURSERYMAN. CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL LANDSCAPE PLAN IS
APPROVED AND PLANTINGS ARE INSTALLED.
.
03. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE NORTH/WEST
PROPERTY LINE DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
WIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR A RED MAPLE. PLEASE PROVIDE
A SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE THAT IS DROUGHT TOLERANT FROM THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANT MATERIAL LIST.
.
04. SHOW ALL METES AND BOUNDS ON LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REVISE
PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES IF ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS ARE
REQUIRED WITHIN BUFFERS.
.
05. BUFFER TABULATION FOR REQUIRED 10' BUFFER NOT SHOWN.
LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW PLANTING BEDS AND
.
06. BMPS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
19-5 18 AS A VISUAL AMENITY. THIS WILL TYPICALLY REQUIRE
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND WHERE FENCES ARE REQUIRED,
THEY MUST BE ORNAMENTAL FENCES. FOUNTAINS AND
OR CURVILINEAR POND FORMS OR OTHER AMENITIES MAYBE
NEEDED TO MEET ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. IT APPEARS
THE BMP ADJACENT TO REAMS ROAD WILL BE A DRY POND.
TO ACHIEVE ADEQUATE SCREENING, THE INSTALLATION OF
LARGE EVERGREEN SHRUBS ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF REAMS
ROAD MAY BE REQUIRED IF REVIEWER DETERMINES THERE IS
INSUFFICIENT SCREENING. PREPARE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW
THESE EVERGREEN SHRUBS.
07. SHOW ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT
LOCATIONS, WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER.
.
08. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT,
THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE
(COUNTY FORMAT) TO REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD
PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE
YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED
LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
ARCHITECTURE
01.ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS WERE NOT SUBMITTED WITH
THIS REVIEW. ADDRESSING PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS.
PLEASE SUBMIT ELEVATIONS. FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS
CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF ELEVATIONS. PER SEC.
19.1-317 A, B, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF RENDERINGS/
ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS
AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS
SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE
GROUND.
.
02. DIMENSION AND LABEL THE HEIGHT OF EACH BUILDING.
PROFFERED CONDITION 6.B LIMITS BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE
LESSER OF TWO STORIES OR 30 FEET.
03. PER SEC. 19.1-317.C SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE
BUILDING. IF PAINTED, THIS MUST BE STATED ON THE
ELEVATION.
.
04. PER SEC 19.1-317. D. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW
THAT UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED. BUILDING ELEVATIONS NEED
TO SHOW ANY ROOFTOP UNITS. PARAPETS AND/OR SCREENS MUST
BE EQUAL IN HEIGHT TO ANY ROOFTOP UNITS, OR SITE LINE
DRAWINGS MUST BE PROVIDED TO DOCUMENT THAT THE LOWER
PARAPET HEIGHT PROVIDES COMPLETE SCREENING. VISIBLE
FAçADES SHALL NOT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS INFERIOR
IN APPEARANCE OR DETAIL TO ANY OTHER FAçADE OF THE SAME
BUILDING
.
05. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF METAL WALL PANELS
WITH HORIZONTAL CORRUGATIONS. PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A.
PROHIBITS CORRUGATED OR UNFINISHED METAL PANELS. PLEASE
REVISE MATERIAL TO SHOW PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL PANELS.
METAL PANELS WITH A KYNAR FINISH ARE ACCEPTABLE AND TEND
TO BE DURABLE OVERTIME AND RESIST FADING.
.
06. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF SYSTEMS. PLEASE REVISE AND CALL OUT AS "PRE-FINISHED"
METAL ROOFING WITH A KYNAR FINISH IS ACCEPTABLE AND TEND
TO BE DURABLE OVERTIME AND RESIST FADING. IDENTIFY COLOR.
.
07. THE LEGEND IDENTIFIES THE USE OF CONCRETE BLOCK VENEER
PROFFERED CONDITION 6. A REQUIRES MASONRY SPLIT-FACED BLOC
REVISE LEGEND TO IDENTIFY THIS MATERIAL.
.
08. THE USE OF METAL PLANTER SCREENS WAS NOT AN APPROVED
EXTERIOR MATERIAL. PLEASE REMOVE FROM ALL ELEVATIONS.
.
09. THE USE OF HALF ROUND EIF'S PEDIMENTS ABOVE THE
WINDOWS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED
ELEVATIONS. APPROVED ELEVATIONS SHOW THE USE OF HALF ROUND
WINDOWS WITH JACK ARCH ABOVE.
.
10. INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE CORNICE MATERIAL USED ON TH
PARAPET EXTENSIONS TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED
ELEVATIONS.
.
11. ON ALL ELEVATION CALL OUT THE COLOR TREATMENT FOR ALL
MATERIAL.
.
12. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF FOUR-SIDED COLOR ELEVATIONS FOR AL
SIDES FOR EACH BUILDING.
.
13. SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD OF THE BRICK VENEER, GROUT AND
MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK. FOR THE PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL
AND ROOF PANELS, SUBMIT A MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEET AND
COLOR SAMPLE.
.
14. BUILDING #1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A REQUIRING
BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF WAYS AND ADJACENT AGRICULTURAL
AND RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK
OR MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK. PLEASE REVISE
ELEVATIONS AND ENSURE THE ELEVATIONS COMPATIBLE
AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS
IDENTIFIED AS EXHIBIT B APPROVED UNDER ZONING
CASE 16SN0701. IN ADDITION, THE SLOPED ELEVATION/
ROOF LINE ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE ELEVATIONS
APPROVED UNDER THE ZONING CASE.
.
15. BUILDING#1 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS: THE
PARAPET EXTENSION MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO
MATCH THE SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE
ELEVATIONS SHOWING BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLOR
TREATMENT. SEE PROFFER. CONDITION 6.
.
16. BUILDING #1 NORTH ELEVATION SHOWS IN THE
BACKGROUND THE REAR SOUTH ELEVATION MAIN
BUILDING PARAPET EXCEEDING THE HEIGHT OF NORTH
ELEVATION PARAPET. BECAUSE THE REAR
SOUTH ELEVATION PARAPET WILL BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AND THE ROW, REVISE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW
BUILDING DESIGN AND MATERIALS COMPLYING WITH THE
EXTERIOR ELEVATION REQUIREMENTS PER PROFFERED
CONDITION 6 OF ZONING CASE 16SN0701.
.
17. BUILDING #2 BOTH NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
DO NOT COMPLY WITH PROFFERED CONDITION 6.A REQUIRING
BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF
WAYS AND ADJACENT AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL
USES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK OR MASONRY
SPLIT FACED BLOCK. PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS AND
ENSURE THE ELEVATIONS ARE COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT
WITH THE ELEVATIONS IDENTIFIED AS EXHIBIT B APPROVED
UNDER ZONING CASE 16SN0701.
18. BUILDING#2 NORTH ELEVATION: THE PARAPET
EXTENSION MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO MATCH THE
SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE ELEVATIONS
SHOWING BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT.
SEE PROFF. CONDITION 6.
.
19. BUILDING #2 EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS: THE
SLOPED ELEVATION/ROOF LINE IS INCONSISTENT WITH
THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED UNDER THE ZONING CASE.
.
20. WILL THE RAISED PARAPETS EXCEED THE HEIGHT
OF THE MAIN BUILDING PARAPETS ON THE EAST & WEST
ELEVATIONS? IF YES, SHOW FINISHED PARAPET
EXTENSIONS.
.
21. BUILDING #3 NORTH ELEVATION. THE PARAPET
EXTENSION MUST BE FINISHED ON ALL SIDES TO MATCH
THE SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS. REVISE ELEVATIONS
SHOWING BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLOR TREATMENT.
SEE PROFF. CONDITION 6.
.
22. SHOW LOCATION OF ROOF ACCESS IF ANY. ACCESS
TO ROOF MUST BE INSIDE BUILDING. EXTERIOR
LADDERS NOT ALLOWED.
.
NOTE: ALL COUNTY AND VDOT REVIEWS WERE COMPLETED
AND EMAILED TO APPLICANT ON 4/13/17
##########################################################
##########################################################
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
REVIEWER / PHONE #-JEFF DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL--------DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE------- 04/282017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------ 05/02.2017
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------THREE
REVIEW DATE------------ 4/10/2017
RECOMMENDATION----APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW----------- YESS
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 6/2/20176/2/
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS-APPROVED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN-APPROVED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
.
01.RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN
SHEET TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT
REVIEW. THE FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN
DATE (MONTH, DAY & YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF
PLANS SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE PUT A REVISION DATE
ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
.
03. SUBMIT A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL FEE AT TIME OF
RESUBMITTAL OR TABLE REVIEW.
.
04. SHEET C-6: SHOW THE CONCRETE SYMBOL ON THE 5' SIDEWALK
ADJACENT TO REAMS ROAD. THIS MARKING HAS BEEN REMOVED
SINCE LAST SUBMITTAL.
.
05. THE BOTANICAL NAME SHOWN FOR THE EVERGREEN PRIVET
IS INCORRECT AND MANY TYPES OF THESE SPECIES MAY BE
INVASIVE AND NOT SUITABLE FOR PLANTING ZONE 7. REVIEWER
RECOMMENDS LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM-JAPANESE PRIVET. THIS
SPECIES IS DROUGHT TOLERANT OR YOU MAY CHOOSE A
DIFFERENT MEDIUM DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUB FROM THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANT MATERIAL LIST.
.
06. SHOW ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT
LOCATIONS, WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER.
.
07. SHEET L3. REVISE THE INTERNAL GREEN SPACE PROVIDED
TABULATION FROM 1,800 SF TO 1,200 SF PROVIDED.
.
ARCHITECTURE
01.PPROVIDE 2 COPIES OF RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE
BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS
IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES
SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS
SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE
GROUND.
.
02. SUBMIT A SAMPLE BOARD OF THE BRICK VENEER, GROUT AND
MASONRY SPLIT FACED BLOCK. FOR THE PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL
AND ROOF PANELS, SUBMIT A MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEET AND
COLOR SAMPLE.
03. PER SEC. 19.1-317.C SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE
BUILDING. ADD NOTE ON ELEVATIONS "JUNCTION & ACCESS
BOXES PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING BACKGROUND".
.
04. PER SEC 19.1-317. D. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED CHAIN LINK
FENCE WITH SLATS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE SCREENING FOR THE
GROUND MOUNTED UNITS SHOWN ADJACENT TO REAMS ROAD.
SCREENING CONSISTING OF VINYL LATTICE PAINTED TO CLOSELY
04. PER SEC 19.1-317. D. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED CHAIN LINK
FENCE WITH SLATS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE SCREENING FOR THE
GROUND MOUNTED UNITS SHOWN ADJACENT TO REAMS ROAD.
SCREENING CONSISTING OF VINYL LATTICE PAINTED TO CLOSELY
MATCH BUILDING BACKGROUND IS ACCEPTABLE. UNITS THAT
ARE INTERNAL TO THE SITE AND NOT VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC VIEW
ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED.
05. CONDITION 6A OF ZONING CASE 16SN0107 REQUIRES BRICK
OR MASONRY SPLIT FACE BLOCK. THE USE OF ARCHITECTURAL
BLOCK WAINSCOT SMOOTH STONE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. REVIS
PLANS TO SHOW A LIGHT TAN COLOR TREATED SPLIT FACE BLOCK
TO CLOSELY MATCH THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED UNDER ZONING
CASE 16SN0701.
06. THE PARAPET EXTENSIONS/MANSARD ROOFS ARE REQUIRED TO
BE FINISHED ON ALL FOUR SIDES AND NOT TWO SIDES AS SHOWN
.
INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE BAND BELOW THE GREEN ROOF
PARAPET EXTENSIONS. SEE ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ZONING
CASE.
.
07. INCREASE THE WINDOW REVEALS.
.
08 ELEVATIONS FACING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS:
SHEETS A1.1 & A1.3 WEST ELEVATIONS 01 &
A1.3 SOUTH ELEVATION 03 ALL HALF ROUND WINDOWS
WITH JACK ARCH ABOVE, ADD ARCHITECTURAL PEDIMENT
ABOVE THE JACK ARCH AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED ELEVATIONS.
.
09. THE FRONT ELEVATIONS (COURTHOUSE RD.) SHOW 4 INDIVIDUA
ENTRANCE DOORS. IN BETWEEN EACH DOOR EXTEND THE BRICK
TO THE GRADE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS.
########################################################
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE : 12/6/16
RECEIVED DATE : 12/16/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 1/6/17
ADDRESS : 27 NORTH COURTHOUSE RD
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. MORE THAN ONE DIRECTION OF TRAVERSE IS SHOWN.
PLEASE REVISE THE SURVEY TO SHOW ONLY ONE PATH OF
TRAVERSE.
2. ONE OF THE PARENT PROPERTY TAX-IDS IS INCORRECT.
744-703-9576-00000 SHOULD BE 744-703-9575-00000 (IT
CHANGED RECENTLY DUE TO PB 242 PG 96).
3. ONE OF THE PARENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES IS INCORRECT.
39 NORTH COURTHOUSE RD SHOULD BE 27 NORTH COURTHOUSE RD.
4. STREET ADDRESS SIGN LOCATION NOT SHOWN.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE : 3/7/17
RECEIVED DATE : 3/14/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 3/30/17
ADDRESS : 27 NORTH COURTHOUSE RD
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE : 4/28/17
RECEIVED DATE : 5/8/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 5/22/17
ADDRESS : 27 NORTH COURTHOUSE RD
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
ADDRESS: 39 NORTH COURTHOUSE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/06/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 12/19/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 12/28/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. RELOCATE HYDRANT SO IT IS NOT SO CLOSE TO THE
DEDICATED HYDRANT. MOVE APPROXIMATELY 40 FEET
TO THE EAST OF ITS CURRENT LOCATION.
2. SPRINKLER SYSTEM NEEDS TO ADDRESS THE ABILITY
TO ISOLATE EACH BUILDING FOR REPAIR WITHOUT
SHUTTING DOWN THE ENTIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
3. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
4. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
5. PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM
RUN-IN AND STUB UP, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE NOTES. SEE:
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
FOR A COPY OF THE DETAILS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
ADDRESS: 39 NORTH COURTHOUSE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 3/7/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 3/14/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 3/24/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. SPRINKLER SYSTEM NEEDS TO ADDRESS THE ABILITY
TO ISOLATE EACH BUILDING FOR REPAIR WITHOUT
SHUTTING DOWN THE ENTIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
2. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
3. PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM
RUN-IN AND STUB UP, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE NOTES. SEE:
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
FOR A COPY OF THE DETAILS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: COURTHOUSE SELF-STO
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0189
ADDRESS: 39 NORTH COURTHOUSE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/28/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 5/8/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 5/8/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. MARK THE FIRE LANE IN FRONT OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS ON
SHEET C6.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : COURTHOUSE SELF-STORAGE
ADDRESS : 39 N COURTHOUSE ROAD AND 10700 REAMS R
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0189
LATEST PLAN DATE : DECEMBER 06, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : JANUARY 10, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS COVER IN SQUARE FEET
(EXCLUDING VDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND GRAVELED AREAS)
BROKEN UP BY PHASES AND PARCELS.
04. A BENCHMARK MUST BE SHOWN WITH REFERENCE TO
MEAN SEA LEVEL. (CL-GENERAL 11)
05. INLET SHAPING IS RESTRICTED TO SITUATIONS WHERE ONE
PIPE ENTERS THE CHAMBER AND ONE PIPE EXITS THE CHAMBER
(CL-G&D 18)
06. IF TIMBERING IS REQUIRED ON THE PROJECT, IT SHOULD BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN / NARRATIVE
AND SHOULD NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE
APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. (CL-EC 2)
07. SAFETY FENCE (STD. & SPEC 3.01) IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. (CL-EC 15)
08. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
09. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN WHICH PROVIDES FOR PLACEMENT OF
EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
TRENCH WHILE SILT FENCE AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS ARE
PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE. (CL-EC 37)
10. BLANKET AND MATTING MUST BE SPECIFIED ON ALL EXPOSED
SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER THAT ARE 5 FEET OR GREATER IN
HEIGHT.
11. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY.
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
B. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42F)
12. A STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED FOR
PROJECTS UTILIZING PART IIB OF THE CURRENT VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS
REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE SHEET(S):
A. NATURAL VEGETATED AREA EASEMENTS FOR AREAS CLAIMED AS
FORESTED/OPEN SPACE IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET, THAT ARE
NOT ENCOMPASSED BY A BMP EASEMENT, RPA OR WITHIN A
PLANNING BUFFER/TREE SAVE AREA
B. INCREMENTAL DRAINAGE AREAS TO EACH BMP, AND THE LAND
COVER TYPES WITHIN EACH DRAINAGE AREA (CL-CBPA 4H)
13. VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. (CL-CBPA 10)
14. A STANDARD ES-1 ENDSECTION OR ENDWALL IS REQUIRED FOR
ALL PIPES 30 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER ENTERING AN
EXITING THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. (CL-CBPA 13)
15. THE ENTIRE BASIN MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. BEYOND THE 100-YEAR WSE.
OR DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER APPLIES.
(CL-CBPA 14)
16. A MINIMUM 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
FROM THE SWM/BMP EASEMENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR
FUTURE MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 15)
17. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE MORE THAN 4 FEET IN
DEPTH OR MORE THAN ONE ACRE FEET IN SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE BOTH A SAFETY BENCH AND AN AQUATIC BENCH, OR B
ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6-FOOT HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A
VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE,
HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE
MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT
ACCESS EASEMENT. (CL-CBPA 19)
18. A PROFILE VIEW MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY WHICH SHOWS ALL THE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION
INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE NECESSARY FOR ITS FUTURE
CERTIFICATION. (CL-CBPA 21)
19. THE TOP OF THE DAM FOR THE BMP MUST BE AT LEAST 8 FEET
WIDE. DIMENSION AND LABEL IN THE PROFILE VIEW.
(CL-CBPA 23)
20. THE 1, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS MUST
BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
21. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL, DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER'S
ACQUISITION OF THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE
PROVIDED IN A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFSET BROKER
DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIEN
OFFSETS ACQUIRED AND THE ASSOCIATED RATIO OF NITROGEN
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS AT THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
22. NOTE THAT THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS USED FOR WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE MUST BE GENERATED IN THE SAME OR
ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AS DEFINED B
THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS THE SITE.
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS OUTSIDE THE SAME OR ADJACENT
EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE MAY ONLY BE USED IF I
IS DETERMINED THAT NO NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ARE
AVAILABLE WITHIN THE SAME OR ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE. IN SUCH CASES, THE NONPOINT
NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE GENERATED WITHIN THE SAME
TRIBUTARY. PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAP SHOWING THE
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
23. THE CBPA COMPLIANCE NOTE MUST SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF
PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ACQUIRED
AND THE NAME OF THE OFFSET GENERATING FACILITY.
24. ON THE COVER SHEET, AMEND THE CBPA NOTE FOR THE OFFSET
NUTRIENTS TO BE PURCHASED PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL
INSTEAD OF LAND DISTURBANCE.
25. ON SHEET C2, THE FLOW PATH SHOULD CONSIDER THE FULL
DRAINAGE AREA INCLUDING OFFSITE AREAS.
26. SHEET C3:
A) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREA TO PROPOSED INLET 20. VESCH
ALLOWS A MAXIMUM DA OF 1 ACRE FOR INLET PROTECTION.
B) PROVIDE GRADING AND CALCULATIONS FOR PROPOSED
DIVERSION DITCHES.
C) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR PLYWOOD BAFFLE.
27. ON SHEET C4, PROVIDE OUTFALL PROTECTION FROM THE DITCH
AND STORMTECH STORAGE SYSTEM INTO THE POND.
28. ON SHEET C5, CLARIFY WHERE THE 16.8 MINUTE TIME-OF-
CONCENTRATION WAS OBTAINED FOR THE RUNOFF CALCULATION.
29. ON SHEET C6, PROVIDE MC-3 OR SIMILAR TEMPORARY CURBING
FOR THE ACCESS STUB TO THE SOUTH.
30. SHEET C7:
A) THE ROOF DRAINS SHOULD TIE-IN TO THE STORM SYSTEM A
A JUNCTION STRUCTURE.
B) THE NOTE FOR THE ROOF DRAIN TIE-IN LOCATION DIFFERS
FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
C) THE PLASTIC PIPE FOR THE STORMTECH SYSTEM WILL
REQUIRE AN EXCEPTION REQUEST BE SUBMITTED TO AND
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL.
D) THE PIPE FROM THE STORMTECH SYSTEM TO THE BMP SHALL
BE CONCRETE.
E) THE INLET TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED TURN LANE
APPEARS TO BE FACING THE WRONG DIRECTION.
F) CLARIFY HOW THE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED ACCESS I
TO MEET CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS.
G) SHOW PROPOSED AND EXISTING UTILITIES.
H) LABEL THE PIPES FOR THE BASIN AND STORMTECH
CONNECTION AND INCLUDE IN TABLE.
I) FOR THE ROOF DRAINS TO THE REAR OF BUILDING 3, SHOW
THE DISCHARGE LOCATION INTO THE BASIN AND INCLUDE
OUTLET PROTECTION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN.
J) PROVIDE DITCH CALCULATIONS.
K) IS PREFERRED THAT AT STRUCTURES WHERE PIPES CHANGE
SIZE TO MATCH CROWNS.
L) INCLUDE EXISTING INLETS AND PIPES IN THE STRUCTURE
TABLE.
31. ON SHEET C8, SHOW PERMANENT SEEDING AND SILT FENCE
OUTLETS.
32. ON SHEET C9, PROVIDE A DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE TO TH
PROPERTY LINE FROM STRUCTURE 20.
33. SHEET C13:
A) IN THE STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS THE C-VALUE FOR
STRUCTURE 2 DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS.
B) INCLUDE THE DRY DETENTION POND IN THE COMPLIANCE
TABLE.
C) INCLUDE ALL OUTFALLS IN THE OUTFALL TABLE. THERE
SHOULD BE AN OUTFALL AT PIPE 21 AND AT THE INLET
SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. PROVIDE
CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION ANALYSIS FOR THESE
OUTLETS.
D) PROVIDE SPREAD ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING INLETS AFFECTE
BY PROJECT IN VDOT ROW.
E) THE ENERGY BALANCE CALCULATIONS APPEARS TO BE
ANALYZING THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE INSTEAD OF AS EACH
OUTFALL. REVISE CALCULATIONS.
34. ON SHEET C14, USE THE 2011 SPECIFICATIONS.
35. SHEET C15:
A) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR INLET 20 SHOULD USE THE FUTUR
CONDITION FROM THE LAND USE PLAN OF OFFICE SPACE FO
THE C-VALUE IN THE CALCULATION.
B) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREA TO EXISTING VDOT INLET TO THE
SOUTH.
C) PROVIDE MORE OFFSITE CONTOURS AND PLAN FEATURES TO
VERIFY THE DRAINAGE AREAS AND C-VALUES.
D) THE UNDETAINED DRAINAGE AREA APPEARS TO BE USING A
CURVE NUMBER WHEREAS THE OTHER DRAINAGE AREAS ARE
USING C-VALUES.
E) THE BMP CAN BE CONSIDERED OPEN SPACE IN THE LAND
COVER AND VRRM CALCULATIONS.
F) THE FLOW PATH FOR THE UNDETAINED DRAINAGE AREA
SHOULD START AT THE EDGE OF THE WATERSHED INSTEAD O
THE PROPERTY LINE.
G) PROVIDE EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS TO THE OUTFALLS AND
SHOW THE EXISTING FLOW PATHS FOR THESE OUTFALLS.
36. SHEET C16:
A) PROVIDE FULL ROUTING CALCULATIONS.
B) CLARIFY THE 8.42-ACRE DRAINAGE AREA. THIS APPEARS
LARGER THAN WHAT IS DRAINING TO THE POND.
C) PROVIDE EXISTING ROUTINGS FOR THE SITE.
D) THE ROUTINGS SHOW A 1-YEAR DISCHARGE FROM THE POND
OF 0.21 CFS. THIS FLOW DOES NOT APPEAR TO ACCOUNT
FOR THE ADDITIONAL FLOW BELOW THE POND THAT IS
UNDETAINED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REACH TO THE CULVER
TO INCLUDE SITE AREA THAT IS UNDETAINED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE ROUTED SITE AREA.
E) PROVIDE ANALYSIS SHOWING THE UNDETAINED IMPROVEMENT
ALONG THE ROADWAY DO NOT CAUSE AN IMPACT TO THE
DOWNSTREAM VDOT POND AND THE POND CAN PROVIDE AT
LEAST 1' OF FREEBOARD DURING THE 100-YEAR.
37. SHEET C17:
A) PROVIDE A BOTTOM SLOPE FOR THE DETENTION FACILITY.
B) EXTEND THE RIP-RAP FOR THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY TO TH
BOTTOM OF THE FACILITY.
C) PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL ORIFICE PLATE FOR THE 2.4"
ORIFICE ON THE RISER.
D) IN THE CONVERSION NARRATIVE CHANGE ANY REFERENCE
FROM PUBLIC WORKS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.
E) LABEL THE ISOLATOR ROW.
F) SINCE THERE IS RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES DOWNSTREAM,
PROVIDE A BREACH ROUTING DURING THE 100-YEAR EVENT
FOR THE POND.
G) PROVIDE ACTUAL PROFILE AND XS OF THE POND.
38. SHEET C23:
A) PROVIDE THE ESC PROJECT NARRATIVE (CRITICAL AREAS,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION, OFF-SITE IMPACTS, ETC.).
39. ON SHEET C24, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR INLET PROTECTION
(BLOCK AND GRAVEL).
40. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
41. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
42. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
43. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
44. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
45. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
46. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
47. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
48. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
49. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
50. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $3400.
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 17PR0189



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List