Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 17PR0165
Modify comments view for Case # 17PR0165

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 17PR0165 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SC - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/22/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: PUBLIC-SEMI-PUB
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 ******** 01/24/17 DLD 706-2031
FIRE DEPT.--: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 COMPLETE 03/03/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 COMPLETE 03/02/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 COMPLETE 03/02/17 SCP 751-4321
TRANSPORT.--: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 COMPLETE 03/02/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 AMENDED* 03/02/17 TVM 751-4435
UTILITIES---: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 ******** ********
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 04 02/24/17 03/03/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
REVIEWER / PHONE #: W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN: NEW BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
SUBMISSION DATE: 12/28/16
PLAN DATED: 12/21/16
REVIEW DATE: 1/09/17
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
COMMENTS: 2ND REVIEW - NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW:
PLAT PROCESS:
1.ADD THE WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS INFORMATION/
RESULTS (SHEET HM-1; SUBMITTED SEPARATELY VIA EMAIL) TO
THE PLAN.
2.THE MSF ON SHEET C5.30 INDICATES A 2" DOMESTIC WM IS
REQUIRED BASED UPON THE FIXTURES LISTED HOWEVER THE
QUANTITIES ON SHEET C5.00 INDICATE A 3" WM WILL BE
INSTALLED. PLEASE REVISE THE QUANTITIES TO ENSURE THE CORR
METER SIZE IS SHOWN.
3. RE: COMMENT #2, THE MSF ON SHEET C5.30 INDICATES A
1" IRRIGATION METER IS REQUIRED BASED UPON THE GPM
DEMAND LISTED HOWEVER THE QUANTITIES ON SHEET C5.00
INDICATE A 5/8" IRRIGATION METER WILL BE INSTALLED. PLEASE
REVISE THE QUANTITIES TO ENSURE THE CORRECT METER SIZE IS
SHOWN.
4. RE: THE DOMESTIC MSF, PLEASE VERIFY THERE WILL BE 57
KITCHEN SINKS LOCATED AT THE SCHOOL.
4. REVISE THE TEXT ON SHEET C5.0 FOR THE 16' SANITARY SEWE
EASEMENT BY ADDING THE TERM "(FUTURE SEWER CORRIDOR)".
ADDITIONALLY, ADD THE SAME DESIGNATION FOR THE CORRIDOR TO
SHEET C5.00.
5. THERE ARE FIVE PROPOSED FH'S HOWEVER THE QUANTITIES
ONLY LIST FOUR; REVISE ACCORDINGLY.
6. PLEASE MODIFY THE "SHUT-OFF" NOTE TO INDICATE THE
EXISTING VALVE IS LOCATED ON HILMAR DRIVE.
7. PER THE ORCHARDHILL AS-BUILT AND COUNTY GIS, IT
APPEARS THE CLOSEST SHUT-OFF VALVE ALONG BEULAH ROAD FOR
THE EASTERNMOST 16" WATERLINE TIE-IN IS LOCATED AT THE
INTERSECTION OF BEULAH ROAD AND SALEM CHURCH ROAD. THIS
VALVE PLUS THE VALVE ON ORCHARDHILL DRIVE (NEAR BEULAH
ROAD) MUST BE SHUT-OFF IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS TIE-IN; PLEAS
MODIFY THE NOTE ACCORDINGLY.
8. EVEN THOUGH THIS SITE WILL BE COUNTY PROPERTY, PLEASE
PROVIDE A 16' MINIMUM WIDTH WATER EASEMENT AROUND
THE 8" WATERLINE AND ENSURE BOTH THE DOMESTIC AND
IRRIGATION WM'S ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE EASEMENT WHILE THE
DC VAULT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, A
PLAT WILL NEED TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SHOWING BOTH
PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS.
9. PLEASE REVISE THE 8" WATERLINE PROFILE BETWEEN
APPROXIMATELY STA'S 15+87 AND 20+75 TO REMOVE THE
VERTICAL TRANSITION AT STA 17+80 AND PROVIDE A 6"
MINIMUM CLEARANCE AT STA 19+38. USING CLASS 52 DI
PIPE, THE WATERLINE MAY CROSS OVER STM P10 WITH A 6"
MINIMUM CLEARANCE AND A 36" MINIMUM TOP-OF-PIPE DEPTH.
LIKEWISE, THE WATERLINE MAY CROSS UNDER STM P21 WITH A
6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE USING A "STICK" OF CLASS 52 DI
PIPE AND COMPACTED STONE. THE WATERLINE SHOULD BE
CONFIGURED TO COMPLY WITH THE ALLOWABLE DEFLECTIONS
LISTED IN DETAIL WAT-11.
10. PROVIDE A GV ON THE FIRE LINE ADJACENT TO THE TEE BUT
PRIOR TO THE DC VAULT.
11. SINCE A 2" DOMESTIC WM IS NOW BEING PROPOSED,
REMOVE DETAILS MET-8 AND MET-10 AS THEY PERTAIN TO 3"
WM'S; THEN ADD BOTH MET-7 DETAILS TO THE PLAN.
12. AS UTILITIES PREFERS MECHANICAL THRUST RESTRAINT IN LI
OF THRUST BLOCKING, THE BLK DETAILS MAY BE REMOVED FROM
THE PLAN.
13. ADD A NOTE TO THE SEWER PROFILE ON SHEET C5.20
INDICATING THE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE THE EXISTING 8" MJ
CAP AND CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SEWER USING AN MJ SLEEVE.
THE CONNECTED PORTION OF SEWER BETWEEN MH-5 AND
MH- EX 10 MUST BE ABLE TO PASS THE REQUIRED TESTING PER
THE SPECIFICATIONS.
REVISED PLAN SHEETS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN PDF FORMAT TO
PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV FOR INFORMAL REVIEW PRIOR TO A
FORMAL RESUBMISSION OF THE PLAN.
THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY UTILITIES
CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A TOTAL OF FOUR SETS OF TH
APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
ENCL:
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
REVIEWER / PHONE #: W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN: NEW BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
SUBMISSION DATE: 2/7/17
PLAN DATED: 2/6/17
REVIEW DATE: 2/9/17
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
COMMENTS: 3RD REVIEW - NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESS:
1.RE: COMMENT #2 FROM THE JANUARY 9, 2017 UTILITIES
REVIEW LETTER, IT WAS STATED IN THE RESPONSES THAT THE
REVISED UTILITY QUANTITIES ON SHEET C5.00 HAVE BEEN
UPDATED HOWEVER THE RESUBMITTED PLAN DOES NOT CONTAIN
A SHEET C5.00; HOWEVER, IT DOES HAVE TWO C5.01 SHEETS.
PLEASE REMOVE THE DUPLICATE SHEET C5.01 AND ADD SHEET
C5.00 TO THE PLAN.
2. RE: THE MATERIAL QUANTITIES ON SHEET C5.00, PLEASE LIST
THE DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE LINES, CORPORATI
STOPS, AND METER BOXES UNDER THE PUBLIC QUANTITIES AS THEY
ARE ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT AND
MUST BE REFLECTED AS PUBLIC QUANTITIES ON THE FORTHCOMING
BID PROPOSAL.
3. THE SEGMENT OF WATERLINE FROM APPROXIMATELY STA
15+71 TO STA 18+30 IS DI PIPE HOWEVER THERE IS A CALLOUT
SHOWN AT APPROXIMATELY STA 18+10 THAT INDICATES 8"
PVC, WHICH IS CONFUSING. PLEASE RELOCATE THE CALLOUT.
4. RE: UTILITY INSET 1 ON SHEET C5.02, FOR THE NOTE
"CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE AT PROPERTY
LINE", PLEASE ADD "SEE NOTE #3 ON SHEET C5.20."
5. MH-M5 IS ERRANTLY LISTED AS A MMH ON SHEET C5.20; PLEAS
REMOVE THE MMH DESIGNATION.
. RE: COMMENT #1 FROM THE JANUARY 9, 2017 UTILITIES REVIEW
ETTER, ADD THE WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS INFORMATION
ESULTS (WM-1) TO THE PLAN SET.
7. THE TREES SHOWN TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 16' SEWER EASE
NT FOR FUTURE SEWER SHOULD BE RELOCATED OUTSIDE THE EASEME
.
REVISED PLAN SHEETS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN PDF FORMAT TO
PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV FOR INFORMAL REVIEW PRIOR TO A
FORMAL RESUBMISSION OF THE PLAN. THE PLAN IS ELIGIBLE FOR
TABLE REVIEW.
THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY UTILITIES
CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A TOTAL OF FOUR SETS OF TH
APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
REVIEWER / PHONE #: W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN: NEW BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
SUBMISSION DATE: 2/28/17
PLAN DATED: 2/22/17
REVIEW DATE: 3/2/17
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
COMMENTS: 4TH REVIEW - APPROVED
THIS PLAN IS NOW APPROVABLE BY UTILITIES.
PLEASE BE REMINDED THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A
COUNTY UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO UTILITIES RELEASING THE
PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
.
THE SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION OF THE BEULAH ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL SEWER LINE INTO WINDERMERE SECTION D MUST BE
STRICTLY COORDINATED WITH THAT PROJECT (#13-0089).
.
A TOTAL OF THREE ADDITIONAL SETS OF THE FINAL APPROVED PLA
MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE
DURING CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO THE PROJECT BEING RELEASED TO
CONSTRUCTION.
.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/28/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/04/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 11/28/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, DEDICATE 45' FROM TH
CENTERLINE ALONG THE PROJECT'S FRONTAGE TO BEULAH ROAD OR
NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
2. DOES THIS PLAN REQUIRE OFF-SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
AND UTILITY EASEMENTS TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS? IF
SO, WHAT IS THE STATUS OF ACQUIRING THESE DEDICATIONS
AND/OR EASEMENTS? TYPICALLY, ANY OFF-SITE DEDICATIONS OR
EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL BY
CDOT.
3. SHOW THE PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROVIDED UNDE
THE COUNTY MANAGED PROJECT "BEULAH ROAD (KINGSLAND TO
PINELEAF) WIDENING PROJECT (UPC# 105673)." CURRENTLY,
PROJECT IS SCHEDULED FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR SUMMER 2017.
ALSO, NOTES SHOULD BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS AND IN CONTRAC
LANGUAGE TO ENSURE SCHOOL CONTRACTOR COORIDNATES WITH ROAD
CONTRACTOR ON IMPROVEMENTS.
4. WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE A SCHEDULE FOR THE SCHOOL
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. CDOT IS INTERESTED TO KNOW WHEN THIS
WORK WILL TAKE PLACE SO WE CAN COORDINATE WITH THE CDOT
PROJECT APPROPRIATELY.
5. IF SCHOOL WILL OWN THE AREA WHERE THE SWM AREA IS
PROPOSED ON SHEET R5.0, EXTEND THE SIDEWALK TO THE PROPERT
LINE (APPROXIMATELY 200'). THIS WILL LIKELY REQUIRE
ADDITONAL HANDICAP RAMPS AND STRIPING FOR CROSSWALK.
6. STATION 105+00, CALL-OUT THE CURB TURNDOWN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/21/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 12/28/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 01/19/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
.
1. PROVIDE OFF-SITE R/W AND EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS UPDATE.
OFF-SITE DEDICATIONS AND EASEMENTS ARE TYPICALLY ACQUIRED
PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL. ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARE
DEPENDENT ON ACQUISITION OF THESE OFF-SITE AREAS.
.
2. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, DEDICATE 45' FROM TH
CENTERLINE ALONG THE PROJECT'S FRONTAGE TO BEULAH ROAD OR
NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
.
3. CDOT RECOMMENDS THAT CROSSWALKS AND REFUGE ISLANDS BE
PROVIDED ACROSS BEULAH ROAD AT HILMAR AND ORCHARDHILL
INTERSECTION. CDOT HAS MADE A REQUEST TO VDOT DISTRICT TO
RECONSIDER THEIR POSITION CONCERNING THE CROSSWALK
IMPROVEMENTS. NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DATE.
.
4. PROVIDE LABELS FOR THE DIFFERNING LINETYPES WHERE ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS INTESECT WITH THE COUNTY MANAGED PROJECT.
ALSO, REVISE NOTES TO POINT TO CORRECT LOCATIONS (FOR
EXAMPLE NOTE 7 FOR EW-12 IS NOT CORRECT).
.
5. CDOT ANTICIPATES ROAD PROJECT TO BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION
THIS FALL WITH COMPLETION IN THE WINTER. BASED ON SCHOOL
SCHEDULE, IT IS LIKLEY CDOT PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED PRIO
TO SCHOOLS STARTING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER,
SCHOOLS/TIMMONS SHOULD COORDINATE WITH CDOT PROJECT MANAGE
(NATE MATHIS) ON CONTRACT LANGUAGE TO ENSURE PROJECT ARE
CORRECTLY COORDINATED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN CASE SCHEDULE
CHANGE AND PROJECTS OVERLAP.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE: 02/06/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/07/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 02/09/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
.
1. WHAT IS STATUS OF OFF-SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND UTLITY RELOCATIONS? PLAN CANNOT BE
APPROVED UNTIL OFF-SITE R/W AND EASEMENTS ARE ACQUIRED.
.
2. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, DEDICATE 45' FROM TH
CENTERLINE ALONG THE PROJECT'S FRONTAGE TO BEULAH ROAD OR
NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE: 02/22/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/27/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR
REVIEW DATE: 03/02/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
.
PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL (REPEAT COMMENT FROM EVERY
PREVIOUS REVIEW):
A. DEDICATE/ACQUIRE ALL OFF-SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT
ASSOCIATED WITH BEULAH ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.
B. DEDICATE 45' FROM THE CENTERLINE ALONG THE PROJECT'S
FRONTAGE TO BEULAH ROAD OR NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO
PROVIDE FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #: STEVE PRUSIK/ 751-4321
PLAN NAME: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: 10/28/16
REVIEW DATE: 11/28/16
LATEST SUBMISSION DATE: 10/28/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1
STATUS: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PROVIDE THE
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: SUBMITTED
LANDSCAPE PLAN: SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN: SUBMITTED
1. PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE DEPICTING THE BOUNDARY
OF THE SITE.
2. PLEASE PLACE THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN
NUMBER (17PR0165) ON THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF
EACH SHEET.
3. PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE GENERAL NOTES THAT THE PROJECT
IS LOCATED IN THE EMERGING GROWTH DESIGN DISTRICT.
4. MAKE SURE ALL SETBACKS FROM PUBLIC ROADS ARE MEASURED
FROM THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY. LABEL THE EXISTING RIGHT
OF WAY AND THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY ON ALL PUBLIC ROADS
ON THE SITE PLAN, EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE AND EXISTING RIGHT
WAY IS THE SAME.
5. PLEASE LABEL THE 50 FOOT SETBACK ALONG BEULAH
ROAD AS PERIMETER LANDSCAPE TYPE "C" ON THE SITE
LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PROVIDE THE
REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
AS NEEDED.
6. PLEASE LABEL THE 30 FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACKS ALONG
THE EASTERN AND WESTERN PROPERTY LINES AS
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE TYPE "A" ON THE SITE LAYOUT
AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
PLANT MATERIAL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS NEEDED.
7. PLEASE LABEL THE 100 FOOT SETBACK ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE AS 2.5X PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE TYPE "C" ON THE SITE LAYOUT AND
LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
PLANT MATERIAL ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS NEEDED.
8. NO SHRUBS WERE PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
PLEASE INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED SHRUBS ON THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE.
9. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL
IS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR ACCESS
AND/OR UTILITIES THAT RUN GENERALLY
PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK. THESE TREE
SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION
CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
10. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK
OR BUFFER WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES
BEING PLANTING FOR EACH TREE REMOVED.
11. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED
FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION
CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
12. PLEASE DELINEATE THE SURFACE PARKING SQUARE
FOOTAGE LANDSCAPE AREAS AND LABEL THE SQ FT
ON THE LANDSCAPEPLAN.
13. PER SEC. 19.1-249, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY.
THE COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR
HOSE BIBS WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR
AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
14. PER SEC. 19.1-205, SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
REVISIONS. ALL EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED
ON POLES TO INSURE THEY DO NOT INTERFERE WITH
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREES.
15. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF COLOR RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS
OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND
COLORS IDENTIFIED EITHER VIA PRINTS OR PDF.
ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
16. PLEASE INDICATE WHY THE PROPOSED 6 FT CHAIN LINK
FENCE AROUND THE BMP IS NOT GALVANIZED.
17. PLEASE PROVID A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER
ENCLOSURE. THE MATERIAL TO BE USED SHOULD MATCH
THE BUILDING IN MATERIAL AND COLOR.
NOTES:
1. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT
STEMS FROM DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED
REVISIONS.
2. THE FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE
(MONTH, DAY & YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS
SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE.
3. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE
AND IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY
OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #: STEVE PRUSIK/ 751-4321
PLAN NAME: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: 10/28/17
REVIEW DATE: 01/18/16
LATEST SUBMISSION DATE: 12/21/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2
STATUS: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
COMMENTS:
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: SUBMITTED
LANDSCAPE PLAN: SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN: SUBMITTED
1. PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE DEPICTING THE BOUNDARY
OF THE SITE.
2. PLEASE PLACE THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN
NUMBER (17PR0165) ON THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF
EACH SHEET IN VOLUME #4.
3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REVISION INFORMATION/DATE
IN THE TITLE BLOCK FOR EACH VOLUME IN THE PLAN SET.
NOTES:
1. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT
STEMS FROM DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED
REVISIONS.
2. THE FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE
(MONTH, DAY & YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS
SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE.
3. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE
AND IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY
OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
4. BUILDING ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
**************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #: STEVE PRUSIK / 751-4321
PLAN NAME: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: 10/28/17
REVIEW DATE: 02/10/17
LATEST SUBMISSION DATE: 02/06/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3
STATUS: APPROVED WITH COMMENTS
TABLE REVIEW: YES
COMMENTS:
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: SUBMITTED
LANDSCAPE PLAN: SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN: SUBMITTED
1. PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE DEPICTING THE BOUNDARY
OF THE SITE.
2. PLEASE PLACE THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN
NUMBER (17PR0165) ON THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF
SHEETS SL-104 THROUGH SL-106 IN VOLUME #4.
NOTES:
1. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT
STEMS FROM DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED
REVISIONS.
2. THE FIRST SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A PLAN DATE
(MONTH, DAY & YEAR), AND EACH REVISED SET OF PLANS
SHALL SHOW A REVISION DATE.
3. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE
AND IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY
OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
4. BUILDING ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
*********************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #: STEVE PRUSIK / 751-4321
PLAN NAME: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ORIGINAL PLAN DATE: 10/28/17
REVIEW DATE: 03/02/17
LATEST SUBMISSION DATE: 02/22/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4
STATUS: APPROVED WITH COMMENTS
TABLE REVIEW: YES
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: SUBMITTED
LANDSCAPE PLAN: SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN: SUBMITTED
COMMENTS:
1. PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE DEPICTING THE BOUNDARY
OF THE SITE.
NOTES:
1. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT
STEMS FROM DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT,
MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED
REVISIONS.
2. BUILDING ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : 10/28/16
RECEIVED DATE : 11/7/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 11/23/16
ADDRESS : 5377 AND 5441 BEULAH RD
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. MORE THAN ONE DIRECTION OF TRAVERSE IS SHOWN. PLEASE
REVISE THE SURVEY TO SHOW ONLY ONE PATH OF TRAVERSE.
2. NON-TANGENT CURVES EXIST ALONG THE TRAVERSE OF THE
SITE. PLEASE SUPPLY THE CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE FOR
THESE CURVES ON THE SITE PLAN.
3. THE PARCEL BOUNDARY SURVEY DOESN'T MATCH THE RECORDED
PLAT FOR 7766742779 ON DB 2107 PG 1793. WILL THEY BE
GETTING LAND FROM 7756742127?
4. THE COUNTY DOESN'T OWN THE PARCELS YET. PLEASE REVISE
THE OWNERSHIP INFO TO SHOW THE CURRENT OWNER'S NAMES.
5. LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN. THE
ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN. THIS DOES
NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SIGN.
IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A
DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE
PLAN.
6. SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. THE MATERIAL USED MUST BE MORE DURABLE THAN
WOOD.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : 12/21/16
RECEIVED DATE : 12/29/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 1/17/17
ADDRESS : 5441 BEULAH RD
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : 2/6/17
RECEIVED DATE : 2/9/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 2/10/17
ADDRESS : 5441 BEULAH RD
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CASE NUMBER : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : 2/22/17
RECEIVED DATE : 3/1/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 3/2/17
ADDRESS : 5441 BEULAH RD
STATUS : APPROVED
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/28/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/2/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/15/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
2. REMOVE FIR-A DETAIL ON PAGE C5.32. THE FIR-3A DETAIL IS
ONLY NEEDED IF THE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE ON A PRIVATE SYSTEM.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/21/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 12/30/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 1/9/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 2/6/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/8/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 2/9/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 17PR0165
ADDRESS: 5441 BEULAH ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 2/22/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/27/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 3/3/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : NEW BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDRESS : 5377 AND 5441 BEULAH ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : NOVEMBER 03, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : NOVEMBER 17, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATION FEE MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ANY
ADDITIONAL REVIEW BY THIS DEPARTMENT. (CL-GENERAL 1)
04. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
D. TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS COVER IN SQUARE FEET
(EXCLUDING VDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND GRAVELED AREAS)
BROKEN UP BY PHASES AND PARCELS.
E. PROPOSED DISTURBANCE AREA.
F. IN THE CBPA NOTES, SPECIFY THE DESIGN LEVELS FOR THE
PROPOSED SWM/BMP FACILITIES.
05. ALL ROOF WATER AND DOWNDRAINS MUST BE COLLECTED AND
DISCHARGED IN A NON-ERODIBLE MANNER. (CL-G&D 6)
06. BOOT CONNECTORS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR ALL PLASTIC PIPES THAT TIE
INTO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. (CL-G&D 21)
07. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 27)
08. THE DEED BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER OF ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. (CL-G&D 28)
09. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
10. IF TIMBERING IS REQUIRED ON THE PROJECT, IT SHOULD BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN / NARRATIVE
AND SHOULD NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE
APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. (CL-EC 2)
11. STEPS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
EVENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWER, DROP INLETS,
INLET PROTECTION, CURB & GUTTER, AND BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION. (CL-EC 6)
12. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIO
TO ALLOW ALL PROPOSED SEDIMENT TRAPS AND BASINS TO
REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL ONSITE CONTRIBUTING AREAS AR
STABILIZED. (CL-EC 7)
13. THE OFF-SITE UTILITY LINE(S) MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS WITH SILT FENCE ON THE
DOWNSTREAM SIDE. (CL-EC 38)
14. ANY SOIL STOCKPILE AREA MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLANS.
SILT FENCE MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE PERIMETER.
(CL-EC 39)
15. BLANKET AND MATTING MUST BE SPECIFIED ON ALL EXPOSED
SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER THAT ARE 5 FEET OR GREATER IN
HEIGHT.
16. ALL SILT MUST BE CLEANED FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN PRIOR
TO CONVERSION TO THE SWM/BMP. A NOTE MUST BE PROVIDED
IN THE EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE. (CL-EC 41)
17. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
1. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
2. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
3. BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY.
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
4. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA AND WETLANDS MUST BE FLAGGED IN
THE FIELD (SURVEY LOCATED) WITH OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY
FENCE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-EC 42G)
18. A RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA DETERMINATION MUST BE
SUBMITTED TO THE WATER QUALITY SECTION FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE NEXT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL.
(CL-CBPA 2)
19. A STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED FOR
PROJECTS UTILIZING PART IIB OF THE CURRENT VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS
REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE SHEET(S):
A. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY STORMWATER COMPLIANCE AND
STORMWATER OUTFALL TABLES (FOUND ON THE COUNTY'S
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE, UNDER "DOCUMENTS AN
FORMS")
B. ENERGY BALANCE AND OUTFALL ANALYSIS FOR EACH OUTFALL
FOR THE PROJECT
C. DELINEATION OF THE SOIL TYPES (INCLUDE HYDROLOGIC SOIL
GROUP) AND THE THREE LAND COVER CONDITIONS
(FORESTED/OPEN SPACE, MANAGED TURF, IMPERVIOUS)
D. BMP SIZE, LOCATION, AND GRADING PLAN (1"=20')
E. BMP AND OUTLET STRUCTURE PROFILE AND DETAILS. THE
PROFILE MUST SPECIFY THE WATER QUALITY, 2 YEAR,
10 YEAR,AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS WITH
THEIR RESPECTIVE VOLUMES. (CL-CBPA 4F)
F. INCREMENTAL DRAINAGE AREAS TO EACH BMP, AND THE LAND
COVER TYPES WITHIN EACH DRAINAGE AREA (CL-CBPA 4H)
G. DRAINAGE AREA MAP SHOWING:
1) DRAINAGE AREA(S) TO WHERE THE SITE OUTFALL(S) MEET
ENERGY BALANCE FOR THE CHANNEL PROTECTION ANALYSIS
AND WHERE THE SITE MEETS 10-YEAR POST TO 10-YEAR
PRE FOR FLOOD PROTECTION
2) WHERE THE SITE IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE ENTIRE
DRAINAGE AREA, OR;
3) WHERE THE UNATTENUATED FLOW IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE
FLOW AT THAT POINT, OR;
4) WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE AND ITS DOWNSTREAM ARE
REACHES A NATURAL STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM FOR
THE 2-YEAR STORM, AND WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE
AND ITS DOWNSTREAM AREA REACHES A DOCUMENTED
FLOODPLAIN (COUNTY OR FEMA) FOR THE 10-YEAR STORM
H. PROVIDE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS
I. ALL SWM/BMP AREAS THAT ARE TO UTILIZE RUNOFF REDUCTION
IN THE DESIGN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. IF
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS TO IMPACT THE SWM/BMP AREA,
THEN COMPOST AMENDMENTS OR UNDERDRAINS SHALL BE USED.
THESE AREAS SHALL BE MARKED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE
FIELD TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IMPACTS.
20. RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA (RPA) LIMITS MUST BE
ESTABLISHED FROM ALL PERENNIAL WATER BODIES AND THE
ASSOCIATED CONNECTED AND CONTIGUOUS WETLANDS.
(CL-CBPA 5)
21. THE REQUIRED LINE TYPE FOR RPA DESIGNATION MUST INCLUD
THE LETTERS "---RPA---RPA---". (CL-CBPA 7)
22. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA MUST BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLA
SHEETS, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND THE
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPLIANCE SHEET(S)/STORMWATER
COMPLIANCE SHEET(S). (CL-CBPA 8)
23. SIGNAGE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL RPA AND NATURAL
VEGETATED AREAS TO REMAIN OR TO BE ESTABLISHED.
24. THE EROSION CONTROL AND CBPA COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) MUST
SPECIFY THE PLACEMENT OF PLASTIC OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY
FENCE (STD. & SPEC. 3.01 OF THE VESCH) ALONG THE RPA
LIMITS. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA AND PLACEMENT OF THE
SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE SURVEY LOCATED. (CL-CBPA 9)
25. VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. (CL-CBPA 10)
26. ALL PERMITTED UTILITY LINE CROSSINGS WITHIN THE RPA
MUST MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBANCE. PERMANENT
EASEMENTS MUST BE SEEDED WITH THE APPROVED RPA NATIVE
SEEDING MIXTURES AND TEMPORARY CLEARING OUTSIDE THE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (BUT WITHIN THE RPA LIMITS) MUST BE
REPLANTED WITH WOODY VEGETATION. PROVIDE THE
APPROPRIATE SEEDING TABLE(S). (CL-CBPA 11)
27. A MINIMUM 12 FOOT WIDE RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED FROM THE
ACCESS GATE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. TH
SLOPE CANNOT EXCEED 6:1. (CL-CBPA 17)
28. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE 4 FEET OR LESS IN
DEPTH AND ONE ACRE FEET OR LESS IS SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE A SAFETY BENCH OR BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6 FOOT
HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE, HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND
MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH
ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT ACCESS. (CL-CBPA 18)
29. A 50' VEGETATIVE PERIMETER YARD IS REQUIRED AROUND
THE BASIN MEASURED FROM THE 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION OR THE DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER
APPLIES, BETWEEN THE BASIN AND ANY RESIDENTIAL PARCEL.
(CL-CBPA 20)
30. A PROFILE VIEW MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY WHICH SHOWS ALL THE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION
INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE NECESSARY FOR ITS FUTURE
CERTIFICATION. (CL-CBPA 21)
31. THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUMES FOR WATER QUALITY AND
WATER QUANTITY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW OF
THE BASIN. (CL-CBPA 22)
32. THE 1, 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS
MUST BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN
AND PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
33. A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED BETWEEN
THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT AND THE STAGED 100-YEAR
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF AN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY IS
SPECIFIED. TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED IF THERE
IS NO EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. (CL-CBPA 27)
34. THE LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO IN BMP BASINS (WATER QUALITY
SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF THREE TO ONE (3:1). CALCULATION
ARE REQUIRED PER THE METHODOLOGY OUTLINED IN SECTION
3.14 OF THE VESCH. (CL-CBPA 34)
35. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR CONVERSION OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN INTO A
SWM/BMP FACILITY AFTER THE UPSTREAM AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED. ALL EXISTING SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM TH
BASIN. (CL-CBPA 39)
36. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR THE SWM/BMP FACILITY TO BE OBSERVED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. "AS
BUILT" INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE
CERTIFICATION OF THE FACILITY. CERTIFICATION IS
REQUIRED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SWM/BMP PERFORMANCE
BOND AND ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (CL-CBPA 42)
37. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL, DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER'S
ACQUISITION OF THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE
PROVIDED IN A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFSET BROKER
DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIEN
OFFSETS ACQUIRED AND THE ASSOCIATED RATIO OF NITROGEN
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS AT THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
38. NOTE THAT THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS USED FOR WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE MUST BE GENERATED IN THE SAME OR
ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AS DEFINED B
THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS THE SITE.
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS OUTSIDE THE SAME OR ADJACENT
EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE MAY ONLY BE USED IF I
IS DETERMINED THAT NO NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ARE
AVAILABLE WITHIN THE SAME OR ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE. IN SUCH CASES, THE NONPOINT
NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE GENERATED WITHIN THE SAME
TRIBUTARY. PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAP SHOWING THE
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
39. THE CBPA COMPLIANCE NOTE MUST SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF
PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ACQUIRED
AND THE NAME OF THE OFFSET GENERATING FACILITY.
40. ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS, SHOW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
FROM THE APPROVED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR
WINDERMERE SECTIONS C AND D.
41. OVERALL IT APPEARS THE PROJECT IS BEING DESIGNED AS TW
PROJECTS WITH THE ON-SITE AREA BEING ONE PROJECT AND
THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BEING ANOTHER PROJECT. THE
STORMWATER AND ESC DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND PLANS SHOUL
BE TREATED AS ONE PROJECT IN REGARDS TO EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN AND STORMWATER DESIGN. REMOVE
REDUNDANT NOTES AND SHEETS TO SIMPLIFY THE PLAN SET.
42. SHEETS C3.00 TO C3.02:
A) PROVIDE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ROADS TO THE
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND BASINS.
B) PROVIDE VEHICULAR STREAM CROSSING FOR THE CROSSING
OF THE EPHEMERAL/INTERMITTENT STREAM.
C) SHOW MINIMIZED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PHASE 1 MEASURES
ONLY.
D) PROVIDE SUPER SILT FENCE FOR WORK ALONG WETLANDS AN
STREAMS.
E) UPDATE ESC REGULATION REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT
REGULATIONS.
F) PROVIDE CONTOUR LABELS FOR THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT
BASINS.
G) PROVIDE DETAILS AND GRADING FOR THE PROPOSED
DIVERSIONS.
H) IN THE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE, CLARIFY WHEN TO
INSTALL DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCE, AND SUPER SILT
FENCE.
I) REMOVE SILT FENCE FROM THE FLOW LINE OF STREAMS AND
PROPOSED DIVERSIONS.
J) PROVIDE MATCHLINE FOR THE INSET SHOWING THE OUTFALL
OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN.
K) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR ALL SEDIMENT BASINS,
SEDIMENT TRAPS, DIVERSION DIKES, DIVERSIONS, AND
TEMPORARY STOCKPILES.
L) EXTEND THE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR THE SEDIMENT BASIN
ACROSS THE STREAM CHANNEL.
M) SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SEDIMENT TRAP OUTFALLS.
N) MANY OF THE DIVERSION CHANNELS APPEAR TO BE RUNNING
UPHILL. ENSURE THE GRADING FOR THE CHANNEL ALLOWS
FOR POSITIVE FLOW TO THE SEDIMENT TRAP OR BASIN.
43. SHEETS C3.10 AND C3.11:
A) ENSURE THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS OUTSIDE OF THE
GUTTER PAN.
B) PROVIDE ROCK CHECK DAMS FOR ALL PROPOSED SWALES AND
DITCHES.
C) THE SILT FENCE APPEARS TO BE CROSSING INTO THE TRAP
ENSURE ALL SILT FENCE IS PLACED OUTSIDE THE TRAP.
D) PROVIDE SILT FENCE ALONG THE TOE OF SLOPE FOR THE
SEDIMENT BASIN.
E) REMOVE SILT FENCE FROM THE OUTFALL OF THE
BIORETENTION AREA.
F) PROVIDE A PHASE II SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
44. SHEET C3.20:
A) UPDATE ESC REGULATION REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT
REGULATIONS.
B) COMPLETE THE CRITICAL AREAS SECTION IN THE
NARRATIVE.
45. ON SHEET C3.22, PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL AND
ENSURE IT SPECIFIES A MINIMUM OF 2' OF VDOT CLASS 1
RIP-RAP KEYED IN OVER FILTER FABRIC.
46. SHEET C4.01:
A) SPECIFY CURB TYPE THROUGHOUT THE SITE.
B) PROVIDE RADII FOR THE OUTER CURBS ALONG THE BUS
LOOP.
C) PROVIDE BMP NUMBERING FOR THE PROPOSED SWM/BMP
FACILITIES.
47. SHEETS C5.00 TO C5.02:
A) REMOVE THE SANITARY SEWER FROM INSIDE THE CUT
BOUNDARIES FOR THE WET POND.
B) PROVIDE NOTE ON THE PLANS TO THE EFFECT OF THE
FOLLOWING: "UTILITIES CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY EE
INSPECTOR AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE FLUSHING THE
PROPOSED WATERLINE."
C) IF THE PROPOSED EASEMENT FROM THE WINDERMERE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT RECORDED PRIOR TO CONNECTING THE
SANITARY SEWER THEN OFFSITE PERMISSION WILL BE
REQUIRED.
48. ON SHEET C5.10, THE CALL OUT FOR STORM SEWER P25 REFER
TO THE PIPE AS HDPE. THIS DIFFERS FROM THE STORM SEWE
SCHEDULE. CLARIFY PIPE TYPE. RCP WILL BE REQUIRED
UNLESS AN EXCEPTION REQUEST IS SUBMITTED TO AND
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.
49. SHEETS C6.00 TO C6.02:
A) IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER THERE APPEARS TO BE TEXT
REFERENCING AN IMAGE. CLARIFY THE REFERENCE.
B) ENSURE EMBANKMENTS OR 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, IS AT LEAST 50'
AWAY FROM ANY EXISTING PARCEL WITH A RESIDENTIAL US
OR THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THE WINDERMERE
SUBDIVISION.
C) THERE APPEARS TO BE A LOW SPOT IN THE
SOCCER/RECREATION FIELD THAT DOES NOT DRAIN.
D) PROVIDE ACCESS TO ALL PROPOSED SWM/BMP FACILITIES
FROM VDOT ROW.
E) FOR ALL GRATE INLETS DRAINING GRASS AREA, SPECIFY
TOP OF INLET TO BE AT LEAST 6" BELOW SURROUNDING
GRADE TO ENSURE THE DRAINAGE AREA DISCHARGES INTO
THE PROPOSED INLET.
F) PROVIDE GRADING FOR ALL PROPOSED SWALES AND DITCHES
G) IN LIEU OF INLETS WITH SLOTS IN THE BACK ALONG THE
BUS LOOP, PROVIDE CURB CUTS WITH 2' PAVED SECTION
AND RIP-RAP TO THE SWALE AND EXTEND RIP-RAP ACROSS
THE SWALE. VERIFY WITH VDOT THAT THIS WOULD BE
ACCEPTABLE.
H) SHOW ROOF DRAINS.
I) SHOW UNDERDRAIN LOCATIONS FOR BIORETENTION.
50. ON THE SPOT ELEVATION SHEETS, INCLUDE STRUCTURE LABELS
51. SHEET C6.20 TO C6.22:
A) SHOW AND LABEL ANY UTILITY OR PIPE CROSSING WITH
REQUIRED CLEARANCE.
B) FOR THE MAIN PARKING CULVERT, TIE-IN GRADES TO THE
BACK OF THE END WALL.
C) IN THE PROFILE FOR STORM 1, S24 APPEARS TO BE
MISSING.
D) STRUCTURE OF26 SHALL BE AN END WALL INSTEAD OF END
SECTION.
E) CLARIFY IF COUNTERSINKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE 48"
CULVERT.
F) P19 SHALL BE A CLASS IV OR PROVIDE AT LEAST 2' OF
COVER.
G) S12 AND S19 DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS PER VDOT STANDARD.
H) INCLUDE OF25 IN THE TABLE.
52. SHEET C6.23:
A) LABEL THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR S6.
B) THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO DIFFERING LABELS FOR S20.
C) THE CA VALUES IN THE LABELS FOR S9 AND S24 DO NOT
APPEAR TO MATCH THE CALCULATIONS IN THE STORM SEWER
DESIGN FORM.
D) SHOW AND LABEL DRAINAGE AREA FOR BIORETENTION AND
OTHER AREAS NOT ALREADY SHOWN.
E) CLARIFY HOW THE ROOF WATER ENTERS THE WET POND AND
BIORETENTION AREAS.
F) CLARIFY HOW THE PIPED YARD AREA ENTERS THE
BIORETENTION AREA.
G) IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR S7
SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE PIPED YARD AREA TO THE
BIORETENTION.
H) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREA TO PROPOSED 48" CULVERT.
I) INCLUDE OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREAS COMING INTO THE SITE
J) THERE ARE TWO SCALE BARS PRESENT ON THE PLAN.
VERIFY SCALES.
53. SHEET C6.24:
A) PROVIDE RIP-RAP THROUGHOUT THE FOREBAY.
B) SHOW THE 6:1 ACCESS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FOREBAY.
C) THE LABEL POINTING TO THE RISER REFERS TO CLASS II
RIP-RAP. PLEASE CLARIFY.
D) LABEL THE STORM EVENT LEVELS FOR THE WET POND.
54. SHEET C6.31:
A) THE STEM FOR THE DRAW DOWN PIPE SHALL EXTEND OUTSID
OF THE TRASH RACK.
B) THE TOP OF THE CLAY CORE SHALL BE AT LEAST 1' ABOVE
THE 100-YEAR STORM EVENT.
C) PROVIDE 2' OF FREEBOARD BETWEEN TOP OF DAM AND THE
100-YEAR STORM EVENT.
D) PROVIDE SHEET REFERENCE FOR THE KNIFE GATE DETAIL.
E) PROVIDE LABELING FOR THE CROSS-SECTIONS.
F) THE OUTLET PROTECTION SHOULD BE SHOWN AT 0% GRADE.
G) INCLUDE THE 1-YEAR STORM ELEVATION AND STORAGE
VOLUME IN THE PROFILE.
H) PROVIDE A LONGITUDINAL SLOPE FOR THE BOTTOM OF THE
BASIN.
55. SHEETS C7.00 AND C7.01:
A) CLARIFY IF THE DRAINAGE AREA TO POA 1 INCLUDES THE
FULL SITE AREA FOR THE ROADWAY WORK DRAINING TOWARD
POA 1.
B) PROVIDE OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREAS THAT DRAIN INTO THE
SITE.
C) PROVIDE HATCHING FOR AND QUANTIFY THE LAND COVER
BASED ON THE THREE LAND COVER CONDITIONS AND SOIL
GROUPS IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET.
D) SHOW AND LABEL THE DRAINAGE AREAS AND THE POA FOR
ALL OUTFALLS OF THE SITE. THERE APPEARS TO BE A
TOTAL OF AT LEAST 8 AREAS.
56. ON SHEET C7.10, CLARIFY THE NOTE FOR THE BIORETENTION
TO THE NORTHEAST. THE SITE AREA SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
AS ANY AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECTS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
AND AREAS COUNTED AS OPEN SPACE IN THE VRRM
SPREADSHEETS.
57. SHEETS L1.0 TO L2.1:
A) SHOW THE ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEM ENTERING INTO THE
BIORETENTION AREA FOR THE NORTH EASTERN BIO
RETENTION.
B) ENSURE PLANTINGS ARE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
C) IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR THE WET POND, INCLUDE BLU
FLAG IN THE HIGH MARSH PLANTINGS.
D) IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR WET POND, INCLUDE
SOFT-STEM BULRUSH AND SMARTWEED OR EQUIVALENT NATIV
PLANTS IN THE LOW MARSH PLANTINGS.
E) IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR BIORETENTION AREA, INCLUD
WINTERBERRY OR ANOTHER NATIVE PLANT SUITABLE FOR
BIORETENTION.
58. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR IS-1.
59. SHEET R2.2:
A) PROVIDE A PHASE II SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
B) NOTE 11 IN THE PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
REFERS TO THE SIGN DETAIL SHEET INSTEAD OF THE
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SHEET.
C) INCLUDE NOTE IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TH
VSMP OPERATOR OR REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING.
D) ENSURE ALL NOTES REFLECT THE MOST RECENT ESC
REGULATIONS. MANY OF THE NOTES APPEAR TO BE CALLIN
FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING WITHIN 30 DAYS INSTEAD OF 14.
E) NOTE 12 OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EROSION CONTROL
NOTES SHOULD SPECIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT.
60. ON SHEET R2.3, THE PROJECT LIMITS DOES NOT APPEAR TO
MATCH THE SITE AREA USED AS REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE
VRRM SPREADSHEET. THE PROJECT LIMITS SHOULD BE FOR TH
TOTAL SITE AREA.
61. SHEETS R2.4 AND R2.5:
A) SHOW SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
B) MANY OF THE DRAINAGE AREAS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
ROAD THAT ARE IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT ARE ABSENT
FROM THE PLAN SET. ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE AREAS TO
ALL EXISTING ROAD CULVERTS, DRIVEWAY CULVERTS,
DITCHES, AND STORM SEWER SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN.
C) SHOW PROPERTY LINES, OFFSITE CONTOURS, AND OTHER
PLANIMETRICS NEEDED FOR DETERMINING DRAINAGE AREA
AND C-VALUES.
D) LABEL ROAD NAMES.
E) CLARIFY WHAT IS TO BE REMOVED SOUTH OF STRUCTURE
5-3.
F) PROVIDE LAND COVER AND SOIL GROUP HATCHING FOR THE
SITE AREA WITHIN THE ROW.
61. SHEETS R3.0 TO R6.1:
A) A QUIT CLAIM WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE VEPCO EASEMENTS
PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND DEDICATION OF
ROW.
B) PROVIDE ESC FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. INCLUD
ANY REQUIRED ROCK CHECK DAMS, INLET PROTECTION,
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION, AND OUTLET PROTECTION.
C) SOME OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES DO NOT APPEAR TO
MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. ENSURE THEY MEET
REQUIREMENTS.
D) SPECIFY OUTLET PROTECTION SIZE FOR STRUCTURE 5-6.
E) CLARIFY THE PROFILE FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE #4.
62. BMP DESIGN:
A) PROVIDE PRETREATMENT FOR THE BIORETENTION AREAS.
B) CONCENTRATED DISCHARGE INTO THE BMP MUST BE THROUGH
A PIPE. DITCHES DRAINING INTO THE POND WILL NOT BE
APPROVED.
C) PROVIDE BIORETENTION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS FOR TH
PROPOSED BIORETENTIONS.
D) ACCORDING TO THE NRCS SOILS MAPPER, THE SOILS NEAR
THE PROPOSED BIORETENTION AREAS HAVE A HIGH
GROUNDWATER TABLE. PROVIDE GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL REPOR
SHOWING THAT THE SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE IS
AT LEAST TWO FEET BELOW THE BOTTOM OF PRACTICE FOR
THE BIORETENTION AREAS.
E) BIORETENTION SHOULD HAVE A MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA OF
5 ACRES WITH 50% IMPERVIOUS.
F) PROVIDE 6' FENCING AROUND ALL BMP FACILITIES.
G) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS, ALL WOODY
VEGETATION SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN 15' OF THE
POND EMBANKMENT AND 25' FROM THE PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY
H) PROVIDE PROFILES AND CROSS-SECTIONS FOR EACH
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
I) IF SITE WATER IS TO DRAIN INTO THE POND, THE POND
WILL NEED TO BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE PROPER
FUNCTIONALITY AND SAFETY OF THE FACILITY.
J) CLARIFY GROUND COVER FOR THE BIORETENTION AREAS.
TURF OR SOD IS PREFERRED.
I) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR FOREBAY SIZING.
K) PROVIDE LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO CALCULATIONS.
L) PROVIDE SHORTEST FLOW PATH/OVERALL LENGTH
CALCULATIONS.
M) ENSURE ANY INLET RECEIVING AT LEAST 10% OF THE
DRAINAGE AREA DRAINS TO A FOREBAY.
N) PROVIDE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS.
O) PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND NARRATIVE.
P) PROVIDE SOIL BORING INFORMATION.
Q) PRETREATMENT SHOULD BE SEQUENCED FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRIOR TO THE REST OF THE BMP.
R) PROVIDE BIRD PROOFING.
S) IF THE BIORETENTION AREAS ARE USED AS A SEDIMENT
TRAP. THE BOTTOM OF TRAP MUST BE AT LEAST 1' ABOVE
THE POST CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION.
63. CALCULATIONS:
A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON STANDARD VESCH WORKSHEETS
FOR THE SEDIMENT BASIN AND TRAP DESIGN.
B) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED EROSION
CONTROL DIVERSIONS.
C) PROVIDE INLET SPREAD CALCULATIONS FOR INLETS ON
SITE.
D) PROVIDE DITCH CALCULATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED AND
EXISTING DITCHES, CHANNELS, AND SWALES AFFECTED BY
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT.
E) PROVIDE BREACH INUNDATION ROUTINGS FOR THE WET POND
F) PROVIDE TV CALCULATIONS FOR THE WET POND.
G) PROVIDE CULVERT CALCULATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED AND
EXISTING CULVERTS IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT.
H) PROVIDE ROUTING CALCULATION FOR EXISTING POND.
I) PROVIDE ROUTING CALCULATIONS SHOWING FULL
CONTRIBUTING AREAS TO POINTS OF ANALYSIS.
J) THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION TO EX POA1 DOES NOT MATCH
THE PLAN SHEET.
K) THE JUNCTION USED IN ROUTING CALCULATIONS APPEARS T
BE A PIPE INSTEAD OF OPEN CHANNEL. CLARIFY.
L) SPECIFY THE LAND COVER IN THE SUBBASIN HYDROLOGY FO
THE ROUTING CALCULATIONS.
M) THE SLOPE FOR SUB AREA A SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW
FOR EXPOND POA 2 DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
O) THE SLOPE FOR SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW FOR EXSITE
POA 2 DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
P) PROVIDE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION ANALSYSIS FOR
ALL OUTFALLS. ENSURE ANY DRAINAGE TOWARD THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ALSO SATISFIES 100 POST TO PRE
CRITERIA. ENERGY BALANCE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
DRAINAGE ENTERING A NATURAL CHANNEL UNLESS THE
LIMITS OF ANALYSIS IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE
DISCHARGE TO THE NATURAL CHANNEL.
Q) THE ENERGY BALANCE CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE USING
AN RV IN INCHES INSTEAD OF A VOLUME. SINCE THE
DRAINAGE AREAS BEING COMPARED ARE NOT EQUIVALENT,
THE ANALYSIS WILL NEED TO USE THE VOLUME OF RUNOFF
NOT THE DEPTH.
R) IN THE ENERGY BALANCE ENSURE THE RV-POST IS THE
UNATTENUATED VOLUME.
S) IN THE CALCULATIONS BOOK, THERE ARE TWO SECTION C.
T) FOR THE ONSITE HGL CALCULATIONS, IT DOES NOT APPEAR
THERE IS A COLUMN FOR INLET SHAPING. CLARIFY IF
INLET SHAPING IS PROPOSED.
U) USE THE 2011 BMP SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE VRRM
SPREADSHEET.
V) THE ENTIRE SITE (INCLUDING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS) SHALL
BE TREATED AS A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
W) IT APPEARS THERE ARE TWO DRAINAGE AREA A SUMMARIES
IN THE VRRM NEW DEVELOPMENT SPREADSHEET WITH
DIFFERING INFORMATION. PLEASE CLARIFY.
X) THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES USED FOR INLET SPREAD
CALCULATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE PROFILES IN
THE PLAN SET.
Y) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR PIPE 5-4 TO 5-5 DOES NOT MATC
THE PLAN SET.
Z) THE PIPE LENGTHS FOR 5-2 TO 5-3 AND 5-3 TO 5-4 DO
NOT MATCH THE PLANS.
AA) THE INVERT INFORMATION FOR PIPE 5-5 TO 5-6 DOES NOT
MATCH THE PLANS.
AB) PROVIDE STORM SEWER DESIGN FOR PIPE EXITING
STRUCTURE 4-1.
AC) ANY DITCH WITH A SLOPE OF LESS THAN 0.75% SHALL BE
PAVED.
AD) THE OUTFALL ANALYSIS FOR R1 SHOULD USE AN
IMPROVEMENT FACTOR OF 0.80 INSTEAD OF 0.90.
64. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
65. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
66. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
67. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (THIS IS AVAILABLE ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND FORMS WEBPAGE)
68. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
69. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
70. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
71. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
72. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
73. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4,500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : NEW BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ADDRESS : 5377 AND 5441 BEULAH ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 17PR0165
LATEST PLAN DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : DECEMBER 28, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : JANUARY 18, 2017
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
.
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
.
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
.
03. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
.
04. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL, DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER'S
ACQUISITION OF THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE
PROVIDED IN A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFSET BROKER
DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIEN
OFFSETS ACQUIRED AND THE ASSOCIATED RATIO OF NITROGEN
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS AT THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
.
05. NOTE THAT THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS USED FOR WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE MUST BE GENERATED IN THE SAME OR
ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AS DEFINED B
THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS THE SITE.
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS OUTSIDE THE SAME OR ADJACENT
EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE MAY ONLY BE USED IF I
IS DETERMINED THAT NO NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ARE
AVAILABLE WITHIN THE SAME OR ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE. IN SUCH CASES, THE NONPOINT
NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE GENERATED WITHIN THE SAME
TRIBUTARY. PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAP SHOWING THE
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
.
06. THE CBPA COMPLIANCE NOTE MUST SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF
PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ACQUIRED
AND THE NAME OF THE OFFSET GENERATING FACILITY.
.
07. SHEETS C3.00 TO C3.02:
A) SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION ROADS TO THE SEDIMENT TRAPPIN
FACILITIES.
B) PROVIDE DETAIL AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE STREAM
CROSSING.
C) THE PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOULD CONSIST OF
ONLY THE 10-12' NEEDED TO ACCESS THE AREA TO INSTAL
THE PERIMETER ESC PRACTICES AND THE DISTURBANCE
NEEDED TO INSTALL THE PRACTICES.
D) UPDATE ESC REGULATION REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT
REGULATIONS, 9VAC 25-840-40.
E) PROVIDE DETAILS AND GRADING FOR THE PROPOSED
DIVERSIONS.
F) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE RPA SIGN.
G) SWITCH NOTES 8 AND 9. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
INSTALLATION SHOULD BE ONE OF THE FIRST STEPS.
H) LABEL THE DIVERSION OUTFALLING INTO THE SEDIMENT
BASIN AND PROVIDE RIP-RAP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASI
FROM THE OUTFALL.
I) EXTEND THE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR THE WET POND
OUTFALL TO THE OUTFALL PIPE.
.
08. SHEETS C3.10 AND C3.11:
A) CLARIFY WHEN TO INSTALL BMPS IN THE CONSTRUCTION
NARRATIVE.
B) IN CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE NOTE 3, CLARIFY IF THIS I
SUPPOSED TO BE THE SITE PLAN OR ARCHITECTURAL PLAN
UNDER SEPARATE COVERAGE.
C) IT APPEARS THE OUTFALLS FOR BIORETENTION 3 ARE
DISCHARGING TO AN UNDEFINED CHANNEL. EITHER PROVID
THE OUTFALL TO THE EXISTING INTERMITTENT STREAM,
CREATE A DITCH TO THE STREAM, OR PROVIDE A LEVEL
SPREADER FOR EACH OUTFALL.
D) FOR BIORETENTION 3, EITHER EXTEND THE PIPE
OUTFALLING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WATER TO THE FOREBAY OR
PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION TO THE FOREBAY.
E) SHOW THE SANITARY LINE CONNECTING TO WINDERMERE.
.
09. SHEET C3.20:
A) UPDATE ESC REGULATION REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT
REGULATIONS, 9VAC 25-840-40.
.
10. ON SHEET C3.21, THE DROP INLET PROTECTION SHOULD BE TH
BLOCK AND GRAVEL TYPE.
.
11. ON SHEET C3.22, IN THE OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL IT
LOOKS LIKE THE OUTLET PROTECTION IS TO BE INSTALLED
HALFWAY UP THE PIPE DIAMETER.
.
12. SHEET C4.01:
A) EXTEND THE GR-2 BY THE STREAM CROSSING TO THE
DUMPSTER PAD.
B) EXTEND THE GRAVEL FOR THE MAINTENANCE ACCESS TO THE
WET POND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE WET POND.
C) PROVIDE FENCING AROUND THE BIORETENTIONS.
.
13. SHEETS C5.00 TO C5.02:
A) IF THE PROPOSED EASEMENT FROM THE WINDERMERE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT RECORDED PRIOR TO CONNECTING THE
SANITARY SEWER THEN OFFSITE PERMISSION WILL BE
REQUIRED.
.
14. SHEETS C6.00 TO C6.02:
A) IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER THERE APPEARS TO BE TEXT
REFERENCING AN IMAGE. CLARIFY THE REFERENCE.
B) PROVIDE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE BIORETENTION
FACILITIES.
C) PROVIDE GRADING FOR ALL PROPOSED SWALES AND DITCHES
D) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR.
E) ROOF DRAIN TIE-INS MUST OCCUR AT A CLEANOUT OR
JUNCTION.
F) ONCE THE ROOF DRAINS PASS UNDER A TRAFFICKED AREA
(SIDEWALK, ROAD, ETC.) IT MUST BE RCP.
G) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE SWALE FOR THE GRADING TO THE
EASTERN SIDE OF THE PROJECT BY THE PROPERTY LINE AN
DISCHARGE WITH A LEVEL SPREADING DEVICE INTO THE RP
OR PROVIDE THE SWALE TO THE CREEK TO PREVENT OFFSIT
STORMWATER FROM ENTERING THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION.
H) PROVIDE STRUCTURE NUMBERS FOR THE BIORETENTION
OUTFALLS AND INCLUDE IN THE STRUCTURE TABLE.
.
15. SHEET C6.20 TO C6.23:
A) ENSURE PIPE OUTFALLS EITHER SHOW THE REQUIRED OUTLE
PROTECTION AT 0% GRADE OR THE FOREBAY ARMORING FROM
THE PIPE OUTFALL TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED
FACILITY.
.
16. SHEET C6.25:
A) PROVIDE OVERALL DRAINAGE AREAS TO BMPS.
B) SHOW ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND ROAD STRUCTURES.
C) SHOW DRAINAGE AREAS TO ROAD STRUCTURES.
D) ENSURE THAT EACH STRUCTURE LABEL AND CALLOUT IS
UNIQUE. THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO S20 AND S16.
E) ENSURE THE NUMBERING CORRELATES WITH THE PROPER
STRUCTURE IN THE STORM SEWER AND HGL CALCULATIONS.
.
17. SHEET C6.30:
A) LABEL THE TOP OF THE IMPOUNDMENT.
B) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR EMERGENCY SPILLWAY
.
18. SHEET C6.31:
A) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.5 OF THE WET POND
DESIGN SPECIFICATION, PROVIDE A LONGITUDINAL SLOPE
AT LEAST 0.5% TO 1% FOR THE BOTTOM OF THE POND.
B) THE DRAW DOWN PIPE INVERT APPEARS TO BE BELOW THE
BOTTOM OF THE POND.
C) THE 100-YEAR ELEVATION DOES NOT MATCH THE PROVIDED
ROUTING CALCULATION.
.
19. SHEET C6.32:
A) PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AT JUNCTIONS.
B) PROVIDE HEADWALL FOR THE OUTFALL PIPE INSTEAD OF AN
END SECTION.
C) RIP-RAP THE FACE OF THE SLOPE BY THE HEADWALL AND
EXTEND THE RIP-RAP DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE
BIORETENTION FACILITY.
D) HDPE OUTFALLS FOR THE BIORETENTION FACILITIES WILL
NOT BE APPROVED. THE OUTFALLS SHALL BE A MINIMUM
15" RCPS CLASS III. IF A SMALLER ORIFICE IS DESIRE
IT SHALL BE THROUGH AN ORIFICE PLATE OR WEIR WALL.
E) LABEL THE CONTOURS.
F) EXTEND THE RIP-RAP FOR THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY TO TH
100-YEAR STORM ELEVATION.
.
20. SHEET C6.33:
A) THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE STORM EVENTS DO NOT MATCH TH
ROUTINGS PROVIDED FOR BIORETENTION #3.
B) IN THE BIORETENTION 1 CROSS-SECTION, LABEL THE WIDT
AND ELEVATION OF THE IMPOUNDMENT AND SHOW THE
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY.
C) INCLUDE THE VOLUMES FOR THE STORM EVENTS.
D) PROVIDE SHEET REFERENCE FOR THE FILTER MEDIA DETAIL
E) IN BIORETENTION 2 CROSS-SECTION, LABEL THE ELEVATIO
OF THE TOP OF IMPOUNDMENT AND EXTEND THE EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY RIP-RAP TO THE 100-YEAR ELEVATION AND AT
LEAST TO THE TOE OF IMPOUNDMENT.
F) LABEL THE SLOPES OF THE UNDERDRAINS. THEY SHOULD B
AT LEAST 0.5% TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO THE OUTFALL.
.
21. SHEET C6.35:
A) INCLUDE THE REQUIRED FLOW RATE (110 G/MIN/SF) FOR
THE FILTER FABRIC ON THE LEVEL 2 BIORETENTION.
B) CLARIFY IF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS ONLY FOR TH
LEVEL 1 BIORETENTION OR IF IT APPLIES TO THE LEVEL
TWO AS WELL.
C) IN THE LEVEL 2 SECTION, CLARIFY THAT THE RESERVOIR
LAYER MUST BE AT LEAST 12" BELOW THE INVERT OF THE
UNDERDRAIN.
D) IN THE BMP CALCULATIONS, THE RESERVOIR LAYER FOR TH
STONE IS CALCULATED AT 15"; HOWEVER, IN THE CROSS-
SECTION IT IS ONLY 12". CLARIFY WHICH IS CORRECT
AND ADJUST THE CALCULATIONS OR CROSS-SECTION AS
REQUIRED.
.
22. SHEETS C7.00 AND C7.01:
A) THE BIORETENTION AND WET POND ABOVE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION CAN BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE.
B) IN THE PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS SHOW THE EXISTING
CONDITIONS INCLUDING ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS SUCH AS
BUILDINGS OR ROADWAY AND REMOVE THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS.
C) IN THE POST-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS MAP, BIORETENTION
AND 2 ARE LABELED AS LEVEL 1; HOWEVER, IN THE
COMPLIANCE TABLES THEY ARE LISTED AS LEVEL 2.
CLARIFY.
D) IS SUGGESTED TO INCLUDE THE RPA IN THE SITE AREA AS
OPEN SPACE TO HELP LOWER THE NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS.
E) THE EQUIVALENT NITROGEN LOAD APPEARS TO BE GREATER
THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED.
F) IN THE COMPLIANCE TABLE, THE REMOVAL RATES SHOULD B
THE TOTAL REMOVAL RATE INCLUDING RUNOFF REDUCTION.
I.E. LEVEL 2 BIORETENTION SHOULD BE 90%.
G) INCLUDE THE HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATORS AS A TREATMENT
PRACTICE WITH 20% REMOVAL.
H) THE SITE BOUNDARY NEAR THE WET POND TO THE SOUTHEAS
APPEARS TO NOT FULLY ENCOMPASS THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
I) THE MS4 OPERATOR SHOULD BE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY.
J) INCLUDE E. COLI AS A TMDL.
.
23. SHEETS C7.01 AND C7.02:
A) IT APPEARS THERE IS STILL ONLY TWO OUTFALLS BEING
CONSIDERED. THE OUTFALLS FOR THE PROJECT SHOULD
INCLUDE: STATION 000+45 LEFT AND RIGHT, OUTFALL AT
5-1 (THIS DISCHARGES TO A NATURAL CHANNEL AND WILL
NEED TO COMPLY WITH ENERGY BALANCE BASED ON THE
DRAINAGE AREA PROVIDED IN THE PLANS), OUTFALL FOR
BIORETENTION 3, STATION 100+84 LEFT AND RIGHT.
B) INCLUDE THE 100-YEAR IN THE OUTFALL TABLE.
C) THE RUNOFF REDUCTION IN THE OUTFALL TABLE SHOULD BE
THE AMOUNT IN CUBIC FEET INSTEAD OF THE PRACTICE
THAT PROVIDES THE RUNOFF REDUCTION.
D) THE TWO OUTFALLS ANALYZED PROVIDE DIFFERENT TOTAL
DRAINAGE AREA BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED
CONDITIONS. CLARIFY THE DISCREPANCY.
E) INCLUDE ANY OFFSITE AREAS DRAINING INTO THE SITE.
.
24. ON SHEET C7.10, LABEL THE CONTOURS.
.
25. SHEETS L1.0 TO L2.1:
A) IT APPEARS THAT THE LANDSCAPING WEST OF THE BUS LOO
IS OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. THIS
SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS.
B) MOVE THE RIVER BIRCH AWAY FROM THE OUTFALL FOR
BIORETENTION 3.
C) CLARIFY IF THE WHOLE BOTTOM OF PRACTICE FOR THE
BIORETENTION IS TO BE THE FILTER MEDIA OR IF SOME O
THE AREA IS TO BE USED FOR EXTRA STORAGE.
D) SHOW THE OUTFALLS FOR BIORETENTION.
E) FOR THE AQUATIC BENCH PLANTING, BREAK THE PLANTINGS
BETWEEN HIGH (0-6" INUNDATION) AND LOW MARSH (6-12"
INUNDATION).
F) PROVIDE A SOD SPEC FOR THE BIORETENTION THAT IS FRE
OF CLAY AND PROVIDES THE ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF
PERMEABILITY/INFILTRATION TO ALLOW FOR THE
STORMWATER TO ENTER THE FILTER MEDIA AND MAINTAIN
THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE BIORETENTION.
.
26. SHEET R2.2:
A) CORRECT THE ESC REGULATION REFERENCE UNDER
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EROSION CONTROL NOTES.
.
27. SHEETS R3.0 TO R6.1:
A) MANY OF THE DRAINAGE AREAS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
ROAD THAT ARE IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT ARE ABSENT
FROM THE PLAN SET. ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE AREAS TO
ALL EXISTING ROAD CULVERTS, DRIVEWAY CULVERTS,
DITCHES, AND STORM SEWER SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN.
B) SHOW PROPERTY LINES, OFFSITE CONTOURS, AND OTHER
PLANIMETRICS NEEDED FOR DETERMINING DRAINAGE AREA
AND C-VALUES.
C) PROVIDE PHASE 1 ESC MEASURES.
D) PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS THAT A QUIT CLAIM WILL
BE NEEDED FOR THE VEPCO EASEMENTS PRIOR TO LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND DEDICATION OF ROW.
E) PROVIDE ESC FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. INCLUD
ANY REQUIRED ROCK CHECK DAMS, INLET PROTECTION,
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION, AND OUTLET PROTECTION.
.
28. BMP DESIGN:
A) PROVIDE LETTER FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR
THE PROJECT CERTIFYING THAT THE SEASONAL HIGH
GROUNDWATER TABLE IS AT LEAST TWO FEET BELOW THE
BOTTOM OF PRACTICE FOR THE BIORETENTION AREAS.
B) PROVIDE 6' FENCING AROUND ALL BMP FACILITIES.
C) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS, ALL WOODY
VEGETATION SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN 15' OF THE
POND EMBANKMENT AND 25' FROM THE PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY
D) IF SITE WATER IS TO DRAIN INTO THE POND AND BE USED
TO COMPLY WITH EITHER WATER QUANTITY OR WATER
QUALITY, THE POND WILL NEED TO BE INSPECTED AND
CERTIFIED TO ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONALITY AND SAFETY
OF THE FACILITY.
E) PROVIDE SHORTEST FLOW PATH/OVERALL LENGTH
CALCULATIONS.
F) PROVIDE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CLAY LINER
AND CORE.
G) PROVIDE SOIL BORING INFORMATION.
H) PROVIDE BIRD PROOFING.
I) THE CALCULATIONS USED FOR THE SURFACE AREA APPEAR T
BE USING 1.1* TV. THE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY REQUIRE
1* TV. THIS IS A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH.
J) THE CALCULATIONS ALSO APPEAR TO BE SUBTRACTING THE
VOLUME OF SURFACE STORAGE INSTEAD OF THE VOLUME
REDUCED BY UPSTREAM BMPS.
K) THE REQUIRED SURFACE AREA IS NEGATIVE IN THE
PROVIDED DESIGN CALCULATIONS. THIS CONFLICTS WITH
SEPARATE CALCULATION PERFORMED BY EE.
L) THE LEVEL TWO BIORETENTIONS MUST BE MULTI-CELLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE
PRETREATMENT CELL IS NOT CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE
MULTI-CELL DESIGN.
M) LABEL THE AREAS OF PRETREATMENT.
O) IN THE STORMWATER SUMMARY PROVIDED IN THE
CALCULATION BOOK, ENSURE THE BOOK REFLECTS CURRENT
DESIGN FOR THE PROJECT.
P) IN THE WET POND LEVEL 1 DESIGN CALCULATION, FOR THE
STAGE-STORAGE, THERE ARE TWO ENTRIES 176.
Q) PROVIDE METERED ROD FOR THE FOREBAY IN THE WET POND
S) PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE FOR THE WET POND.
T) PROVIDE WATER BALANCE CALCULATION FOR THE WET POND.
.
29. CALCULATIONS:
A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED EROSION
CONTROL DIVERSIONS.
B) PROVIDE DITCH CALCULATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED AND
EXISTING DITCHES, CHANNELS, AND SWALES AFFECTED BY
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT.
C) PROVIDE BREACH INUNDATION ROUTINGS FOR THE WET POND
D) PROVIDE CULVERT CALCULATIONS FOR ALL PROPOSED AND
EXISTING CULVERTS IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT.
E) PROVIDE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION ANALSYSIS FOR
ALL OUTFALLS. ENSURE ANY DRAINAGE TOWARD THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ALSO SATISFIES 100 POST TO PRE
CRITERIA. ENERGY BALANCE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
DRAINAGE ENTERING A NATURAL CHANNEL UNLESS THE
LIMITS OF ANALYSIS IS COINCIDENTAL WITH THE
DISCHARGE TO THE NATURAL CHANNEL.
F) EXCLUDE THE EXISTING POND IN THE QUANTITY ANALYSIS
OR INSPECT AND CERTIFY THE POND.
G) CLARIFY HOW THE EXFILTRATION RATE USED IN THE
BIORETENTION ROUTING WAS DETERMINED.
H) IT APPEARS THE VOID STORAGE WAS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR I
THE BIORETENTION STORAGE ROUTING.
I) CLARIFY THE FORESTED CONDITIONS ROUTING. THE AREAS
DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE SITE AREAS.
J) THE CURVE NUMBERS FOR THE BIORETENTION APPEAR TO BE
HIGHER THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED WITH THE VRRM
SPREADSHEET. THIS IS CONSERVATIVE APPROACH;
HOWEVER, USING THE CURVE NUMBERS FROM THE VRRM
SPREADSHEET MAY HELP TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
WATER QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS.
K) INCLUDE THE HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR FOR THE WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET.
L) IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET THERE IS A DRAINAGE AREA E
WITH AN ADDITIONAL BIORETENTION PLAN THAT ISN'T
INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET.
M) NUMEROUS ENTRIES FOR THE C AND A IN THE STORM SEWER
DESIGN DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE DRAINAGE AREA MAP
DUE TO THIS THE HGL AND INLETS WERE NOT FULLY
REVIEWED WITH THIS REVIEW.
N) SOME OF THE STRUCTURES IN THE STORM SEWER DESIGN
HAVE CARRY OVER FROM UPSTREAM INLETS LISTED IN THE
NOTES, CLARIFY HOW THIS ADDITIONAL FLOW IS BEING
DEMONSTRATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. THERE APPEARS TO
BE NO CARRYOVER CONSIDERED IN THE INLET SPREAD
CALCULATIONS AS WELL.
O) IN THE STORM SEWER DESIGN CALCULATIONS, SOME OF THE
DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURES DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE
PLANS.
P) THE STARTING WATER SURFACE ELEVATION FOR THE WET
POND ROUTING SHOULD BE 176.25 AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
Q) THE STORAGE AREA AND STORAGE VOLUME IN THE ROUTINGS
FOR THE BMP DIFFERS FROM WHAT IS PRESENTED IN THE
BMP DESIGN CALCULATIONS.
S) IN THE WET POND ROUTING THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY
ELEVATION SHOULD MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
T) THE OUTFALL IN BIORETENTION 3 ROUTING USES A 4"
ORIFICE INSTEAD OF THE 8" SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CLARIFY.
.
30. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
.
31. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
.
32. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
.
33. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (THIS IS AVAILABLE ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND FORMS WEBPAGE)
.
34. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
.
35. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
.
36. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
.
37. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERIN
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
.
38. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
.
39. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4,500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
.
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 17PR0165



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List