Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 16PR0264
Modify comments view for Case # 16PR0264

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 16PR0264 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: OTTERDALE STORAGE - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/21/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 00 06/22/16 07/13/16 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 AMENDED* 11/21/16 DLD 706-2031
FIRE DEPT.--: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 COMPLETE 11/17/16 AWB 717-6167
HEALTH DEPT.: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 ******** ********
HOUSE NUMBER: 01 09/02/16 09/26/16 COMPLETE 09/23/16 AMJ 768-7549
MAPPING/GIS-: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 COMPLETE 11/18/16 AMJ 768-7549
POLICE DEPT.: 01 09/02/16 09/26/16 ******** ********
PLANNING----: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 COMPLETE 11/17/16 WST 768-7566
TRANSPORT.--: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 COMPLETE 11/22/16 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 AMENDED* 11/16/16 A B 768-7450
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 03 11/15/16 11/21/16 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS RD/14421 MIDLOTHIAN
SUBMISSION DATE : 06/22/16
PLAN DATED : 06/09/16
REVIEW DATE : 07/07/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER 16-0164 SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. PLEASE PUT UTILITIES CONTACT MIKE LARSON, P.E. 748-
1338, LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV ON THE COVER SHEET.
3. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT UNTIL THE PENDING ZONING CASE IS
APPROVED ALLOWING AN EXCEPTION FOR THE ONSITE SEPTIC
SYSTEM, UTILITIES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO APPROVE THE PLANS AS
SUBMITTED. ADDITIONALLY, SHOULD THE EXCEPTION FOR ONSITE
SEPTIC NOT BE APPROVED, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WILL LIKELY BE
GENERATED REGARDING A PROPOSED SEWER CONNECTION,
EXTENSIONS, LATERALS, ETC.
4. SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING WATER MAINS WITH
SIZE, MATERIAL, AND COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER ON ALL APPLICABL
PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS THAT DEPICT EXISTING CONDITIONS OR
A CONNECTION. YOU MAY EMAIL
SWAVAILABILITY@CHESTERFIELD.GOV TO OBTAIN AS-BUILT
INFORMATION.
5. THE MATERIALS LIST ON THE COVER SHEET SHOULD BE
BROKEN OUT BY PRIVATE AND PUBLIC FOR WATER AND SEWER. ANY
MATERIAL RELATED TO A SEPTIC SYSTEM NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED
AS PRIVATE.
6. PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION IDENTIFIED IN STANDARD
UTILITY NOTE #4 ON THE COVER TO REFLECT 350', THE ELEVATIO
BELOW WHICH 80 PSI OF PRESSURE WILL BE EXCEEDED.
7. PROVIDE THE SITE'S PHYSICAL ADDRESS ON THE COVER
SHEET.
8. PROVIDE A MISS UTILITY NOTE ON THE COVER SHEET.
9. REVISE THE INDEX TO IDENTIFY SHEET C-4 AS "UTILITY
PLAN".
10. AS-BUILT DATA INDICATES THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING
ONSITE 16" X 12" TEE, 12" VALVE, AND 12" STUB NEAR THE
PROPOSED WATER TIE-IN. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING WATER LINE AND FITTINGS. IF
THE EXISTING STUB IS NOT SUITABLE FOR THIS PROJECT, PLEASE
INDICATE THE EXTENT AND TYPE OF PROPOSED TIE-IN, INCLUDING
EXISTING VALVE(S) TO BE USED FOR ISOLATION PURPOSES.
11. STORM STRUCTURES (AND OR OTHER UTILITY STRUCTURES)
SHOULD BE LABELED IN PLAN VIEW.
12. PLEASE VERIFY AND ENSURE THAT BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AN
SUBSURFACE FEATURES WILL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPOSE
WATER LINE EASEMENT.
13. PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM
WILL BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED.
14. IF AN EXISTING WELL IS PRESENT ON THE RESIDENTIAL
SITE, PLEASE SHOW ITS LOCATION AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
NOTE: "TO BE ABANDONED PER VDH REQUIREMENTS".
15. INDICATE PROPOSED SEPTIC LINES AS "PRIVATE".
16. PLEASE INDICATE A MINIMUM OF 10' HORIZONTAL (EXTERIOR
TO EXTERIOR) SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER
(SEPTIC).
17. PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE DOMESTIC AND
IRRIGATION LINES. THE COUNTY'S RECOMMENDED PRACTICE IS TO
HAVE A SERVICE LINE ONE SIZE LARGER THAN THE METER. IN
THIS CASE, A 1" SERVICE LINE WOULD BE TYPICAL.
18. THE IRRIGATION LINE WILL REQUIRE A REDUCED-PRESSURE
PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
CUSTOMER-SIDE OF THE METER (AND OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT).
PLEASE CALLOUT THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ON THE PLAN SHEET.
19. PROVIDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED WATER LINE.
20. SHOW PROPOSED WATER LINE CROSSINGS IN THE STORM
PROFILES.
21. INDICATE THE VERTICAL SCALE FOR PROFILES.
22. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF MIKE LARSON
(LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED
ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLA
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PREPARATION OR
RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE BID PROPOSAL
SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED UTILITIES
CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
23. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS). ONE ADDITIONAL ROLLED SET WILL BE REQUESTED AFTER
THE PROJECT IS RELEASED TO CONSTRUCTION TO BE USED FOR AS-
BUILTS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS RD/14421 MIDLOTHIAN
SUBMISSION DATE : 09/02/16
PLAN DATED : 08/29/16
REVIEW DATE : 09/15/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
COMMENTS : 2ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PROVIDE RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR THE SECTION OF DUCTILE
IRON PIPE IN FILL (APPROX. STA. 13+60, WL-A). ALSO
CONSIDER THE LENGTH OF RESTRAINT REQUIRED FOR THE
HORIZONTAL BEND LOCATED WITHIN THE FILL.
2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS (ON THE PLAN OR SEPARATELY) FOR
JOINT RESTRAINT. TEST PRESSURE NEEDS TO BE 150 PSI AND TH
SAFETY FACTOR MUST BE 1.5:1.
3. THE EXISTING VALVE AT THE WATERMAIN TIE-IN IS SHOWN AS
PROPOSED (BOLD). PLEASE REVISE THE APPEARANCE OF THE VALV
TO MATCH OTHER EXISTING SYMBOLS (GREY/SHADED).
4. A 12"X45D BEND IS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS AT THE
LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TIE-IN. DUE THE PRESENCE OF THE
8"X12" REDUCER, THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A NEED FOR 12"
BENDS. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE IF NEEDED.
5. THE MATERIAL QUANTITY LIST APPEARS TO CONTAIN A NUMBER
OF ERRORS. IT IDENTIFIES A 16"X8" TEE WHICH IS NOT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS; THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED HYDRANTS SHOULD BE
THREE; 45D BENDS, SERVICE LINE PVC, AND THE PRIVATE RPZ
BACKFLOW PREVENTER ARE OMITTED. PLEASE REVISE THE MATERIA
LIST AS NEEDED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS RD/14421 MIDLOTHIAN
SUBMISSION DATE : 10/24/16
PLAN DATED : 10/20/16
REVIEW DATE : 10/28/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. VERIFY AND INDICATE MINIMUM COVER FOR WATERLINE A, FRO
STA. 14+00 - 15+50. REVISE THE DEPTH OF THE PIPE, IF 3.5'
OF COVER IS NOT PROVIDED.
2. THE RPZ BACKFLOW PREVENTER MUST BE LABELED AS PRIVATE
IAL QUANTITIES LIST ON THE COVER AND SHOULD BE SEPAR
3. THE EXISTING 12" VALVE IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE E
16" X 12" TEE ON WATERLINE A IS STILL SHOWN BOLD. I
SHOULD BE REVISED TO MORE CLOSELY MATCH THE APPEARANCE OF
E EXISTING VALVES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE
IT SHOULD BE REVISED TO MORE CLOSELY MATCH THE APPEARANCE
THE EXISTING VALVES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF MIDLOTHIAN TURNP
E.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E. / 804-748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS RD/14421 MIDLOTHIAN
SUBMISSION DATE : 11/15/16
PLAN DATED : 11/14/16
REVIEW DATE : 11/17/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW - APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE: 06/09/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 06/23/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 07/19/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, DEDICATE 50' OF R/W ON
THE EAST SIDE OF OTTERDALE WOODS RD, MEASURED FROM THE
CENTERLINE. DEDICATION SHALL BE MADE FREE AND UNRESTRICTE
TO & FOR THE BENEFIT OF COUNTY. (PROFFERED COND 5 OF CASE
16SN0692)
2. EXTEND THE ADDITIONAL LANE OF PAVEMENT ALONG EASTBOUND
LANES OF RT 60 TO OTTERDALE WOODS RD FOR FULL LANE WIDTH
(12'). PROVIDING A TAPER TO AVOID SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS IS
NOT ACCEPTABLE. (PROFFERED CONDS 7A & 7D)
3. EXTEND THE ADDITIONAL LANE OF PAVEMENT ALONG EASTBOUND
LANES OF RT 60 EAST OF THE ACCESS TO A LOGICAL TERMINUS.
THIS EXTENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT FULL LANE WIDTH (12').
DO NOT PROVIDE A LANE TAPER AS SHOWN. (PROFFERED COND 7A)
4. PROVIDE A 200' STORAGE & 200' TAPER FOR THE RIGHT TURN
LANE INTO THE ACCESS. (PROFFERED COND 7B)
5. SIDEWALK SHALL EXTEND ALONG ROUTE 60 FOR FULL LANE WIDT
AREA. ALSO, SIDEWALK NEEDS TO EXTEND TO OTTERDALE WOODS RD
AND BE PROVIDED WITH HANDICAP RAMP. (PROFFERED COND 7C)
6. LABEL THE COUNTY'S CLASSIFICATION FOR RT 60 & OTTERDALE
WOODS RD (MAJOR ARTERIALS) PER COUNTY'S THOURGHFARE PLAN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE: 08/29/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 09/07/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 09/19/16
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW: YES (SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL ONLY)
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - OTTERDALE WOODS RD
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIO
50' ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF OTTERDALE WOODS RD, MEASURED 50
FROM THE CENTERLINE. (P.C. 5 OF CASE 16SN0692)
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/20/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/27/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 11/02/16
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW: YES (SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL ONLY)
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - OTTERDALE WOODS RD
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIO
50' ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF OTTERDALE WOODS RD, MEASURED 50
FROM THE CENTERLINE. (P.C. 5 OF CASE 16SN0692)
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/14/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/16/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR
REVIEW DATE: 11/22/16
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW: YES (SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL ONLY)
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION - OTTERDALE WOODS RD
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIO
50' ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF OTTERDALE WOODS RD, MEASURED 50
FROM THE CENTERLINE. (P.C. 5 OF CASE 16SN0692)
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0264
ADDRESS----------------
LATEST PLAN DATE-------6/9/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------6/22/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------1
REVIEW DATE------------7/12/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- INCLUDE WITH THE 2ND SUBMISSION
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT YET SUBMITTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE
A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH
COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED
EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET EACH
REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL
LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
1. PROVIDE THE PROJECT SITE PLAN CASE NUMBER (16PR0264) IN
THE LOWER RIGHT-HAND CORNER.
2. IDENTIFY THE DEVELOPMENT AREA OF THE COUNTY WHERE THE
SITE IS LOCATED: EMERGING GROWTH.
3. PER SEC. 19.1-342, A 50-FOOT SETBACK (PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING C) IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO OTTERDALE WOODS
ROAD. LANDSCAPE "A" IS PROVIDED WHERE IT SHOULD BE
LANDSCAPE "C".
4. PER SEC. 19.1-238, SHOW DIMENSIONS OF ALL PARKING SPAC
AND A BUMPER BLOCK SHOULD BE ADDED IN THE HANDICAP SPA
.
5. PER SEC. 19.1-317 A, B, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF
RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDI
MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION
AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIP
N IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON TH
GROUND. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE CONSISTENT
T EXHIBITS B-1, B-2, AND B-3 OF ZONING CASE #16SN0692.
6. PER SEC. 19.1-205, PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN WITH
CUTSHEETS. ALL LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL
TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW FRO
ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
7. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN PER SEC. 19.1-246, 19.1-247,
19.1-250, 19.1-250.D., 19.1-251, 19.1-252
8. PER SEC. 19.1-342, SHOW LANDSCAPE OPTION "C" WITHIN THE
50' SETBACK ALONG U.S. ROUTW 60.
. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK SHOULD BE CONNECTED FROM WHERE IT
IS SHOWN AT THE ENTRANCE ON U.S. ROUTE 60 PERPENDICULAR
TO THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THE SIX (6) PARKING SPACES.
10. THE TITLE SHEET C-1 STATES THAT PUBLIC SEWER WILL BE
USED. RATHER, IT WAS UNDERSTOOD THAT AN ON-SITE SEPTIC
SYSTEM AND DRAINFIELD WOULD BE USED. CHANGE THIS NOTE
AND SHOW CLEARING FOR THE DRAINFIELD AREA.
11. ADD A NOTE FOR PROFFER #2 ON THE TITLE SHEET STATING:
"PER ZONING CASE 16SN0692 THE ONLY PERMITTED USE IS A
MINI-STORAGE FACILITY. NO STORAGE UNIT SHALL VE USED F
15. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E., LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE CERTIFIE
BY A STATE OF VIRGINIA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
NURSERYMAN OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER. TITLE SHEET STATING:
PER ZONING CASE 16SN0692 THERE SHALL BE NO OUTSIDE
STORAGE."
13. ADD A NOTE FOR PROFFER #11 ON THE TITLE SHEET STATING
"PER ZONING CASE 16SN0692 THE HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL
BE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6:00 A.M. AND 10:00 P.M.
14. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS F
HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED
POLICY, AND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19.1-246, THE DESIGN
OF PARKING AREAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN TO
MINIMIZE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN MATURING
LANDSCAPING AND THE VISIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FIRE
HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO HIGH POWER TRANSMISSION LINES,
SITE LIGHTING, AND VISIBILITY FOR MOTORISTS EXITING
PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED TO DETERMIN
THAT SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING LOT PLANTING AREAS
EXISTS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19.1-253 WITH
FIRE HYDRANTS AND RELATED UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICTS
WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES AND SITE LIGHTING.
15. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E., LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE CERTIFIE
BY A STATE OF VIRGINIA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
NURSERYMAN OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER.
16. PER SEC. 19.1-211, ANY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BASIN VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC
LOCATED IN AN EMPLOYMENT CENTER DISTRICT SHALL BE
LANDSCAPED OR OTHERWISE IMPROVED SO THAT THE FACILITIE
ARE VISUALLY ENHANCED. IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE
LANDSCAPING OF SLOPED EDGES ABOVE FULL WATER ELEVATION
IN ADDITION, FOUNTAINS (WET PONDS, CURVILINEAR POND
FORMS, VARIED CONTOURING OF LAND FORMS (DRY PONDS), OR
OTHER ENHANCEMENT METHODS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME
PLAN REVIEW. WHERE FENCING IS PROVIDED, IT SHALL BE OF
AN ORNAMENTAL DESIGN. THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE IN ADDITI
TO, AND SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH, OTHER REQUIREMENTS F
BASIN DESIGN, ACCESS OR MAINTENANCE.
THIS COMPLETES THE 1ST REVIEW ****************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0264
ADDRESS----------------
LATEST PLAN DATE-------8/29/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------9/2/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------2
REVIEW DATE------------9/14/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- INCLUDE WITH THE 2ND SUBMISSION
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT YET SUBMITTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE
A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH
COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED
EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET EACH
REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL
LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
1. PROVIDE THE COLOR AND MATERIALS OF THE 8' SECURITY FENC
2. A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY SIGNAGE
SIGNAGE IS NOT APPROVED WITH THIS SITE PLAN REVIEW.
3. WHY IS THERE AN "OPEN SPACE EASEMENT" IN THE 50-FOOT
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE C NEXT TO OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD?
4. BE ADVISED THAT NOT CONNECTING TO PUBLIC SEWER IS PENDI
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVAL ON 9/28/16.
5. ADD A NOTE PER THE PROFFERS STATING THAT "NO STORAGE UN
SHALL BE USED FOR OFFICE OR DWELLING PURPOSES."
6. WILL THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY BE VISIBLE TO T
PUBLIC?
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0264
ADDRESS----------------
LATEST PLAN DATE-------10/20/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------10/24/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------3
REVIEW DATE------------11/10/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---SUBMITTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE
A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH
COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED
EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET EACH
REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL
LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
1. (REPEAT COMMENT) PROVIDE THE COLOR AND MATERIALS OF
THE 8' SECURITY FENCE. NOTES SAY DETAILS ARE ON PAGE
C-20, BUT IT ISNT THERE.
2. ADD ZONING CASE #16SN0732 TO THE SITE SUMMARY NOTES ON
THE TITLE SHEET, AND IN PARENTHESIS BESIDE NOTE #9 ON
THE TITLE SHEET.
3. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL FOOT-CANDLE
ILLUMINATIONS EXCEEDING 0.5 ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. PER
SEC. 19.1-205.A., THE DIRECT OR REFLECTED ILLUMINATION
OF EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLE
ABOVE BACKGROUND, MEASURED AT THE LOT LINE OF AN
ADJACENT A, R, R-TH, MH OR R-MF PROPERTY.
4. THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWING EIFS ON AN UPPER PORTION OF
BUILDING #6. THE EXTERIOR FACADES OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON EXHIBITS B-1, B-2 AND B-3 PREPARED
BY GMF+ ASSOCIATES AND DATED APRIL 11, 2016 PER ZONING
CASE #16SN0692. THE ELEVATIONS IN THESE EXHIBITS SHOW
A BRICK FACADE. THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHOULD BE
SHOWN AS BRICK AND NOT EIFS.
**********************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0264
ADDRESS----------------
LATEST PLAN DATE-------11/14/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------11/15/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------4
REVIEW DATE------------11/17/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS-REQUESTED COLOR RENDERINGS
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---REQUESTED REVISIONS
REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. ANY CHANGES TO THE SECURITY FENCING WILL REQUIRE
PLANNING REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
2. PLEASE SUBMIT COLOR RENDERINGS OF THE ELEVATIONS AND
LABEL THE PART OF THE BUILDING WITH "OTTERDALE
STORAGE" AS BRICK (BUILDINGS 1,3 AND 5), AND PROVIDE
THE COLOR OF THE BRICK AND/OR A SAMPLE IF AVAILABLE.
ALSO PROVIDE THE COLOR OF THE STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOFING.
3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REVISED LIGHTING SHEET THAT SHOWS
THE FOOT-CANDLE AT NOT MORE THAN 0.5 MEASURED AT THE
PROPERTY LINE OF AN ADJACENT A ZONED PROPERTY.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE STORAGE
PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : 6/9/16
RECEIVED DATE : 6/24/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 7/8/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE NOT INDICATED TO BE NAD83 BEARINGS.
ADD THIS INDICATION TO THE NORTH ARROW.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE STORAGE
PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : 8/29/16
RECEIVED DATE : 9/9/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 9/23/16
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. WILL 7227090435 AND 7217097721 BE COMBINED INTO ONE
PARCEL WHEN THE 50' R/W IS DEDICATED?
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : OTTERDALE STORAGE
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : 10/20/16
RECEIVED DATE : 10/26/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 11/10/16
ADDRESS : 14421 MIDLOTHIAN TPKE
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE ADDRESS FOR THE MAIN BUILDING WILL BE 14421
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE AFTER THE EXISTING HOUSE IS
DEMOLISHED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : OTTERDALE STORAGE
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/14/16
RECEIVED DATE : 11/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 11/18/16
ADDRESS : 14421 MIDLOTHIAN TPKE
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE ADDRESS FOR THE MAIN BUILDING WILL BE 14421
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE AFTER THE EXISTING HOUSE IS
DEMOLISHED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0264
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
ADDRESS:
DATE OF REVIEW:7/8/16 REVIEW # 1
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
OF THE SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT SIGN FOR
THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN NEEDS
TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0264
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
ADDRESS: NOT ASSIGNED YET
DATE OF REVIEW: 9/23/16 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A DETAIL OF THE SIGN SHOULD BE ON THE SITE PLAN.
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
ADDRESS: 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 6/9/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 6/23/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 6/23/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. PROVIDE THE GATE DETAIL FOR THE GATE SECURING THE FIRE
APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD. THE DETAILS SHALL COMPLY WITH
THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, APPENDIX D,
SECTION D103.5
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
ADDRESS: 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/29/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 9/7/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 9/8/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
ADDRESS: 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/29/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/26/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/14/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: OTTERDALE STORAGE
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0264
ADDRESS: 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/14/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/17/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : JUNE 09, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : JUNE 23, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : JULY 15, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
D. TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS COVER IN SQUARE FEET (NOT
INCLUDING VDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY).
04. ALL ROOF WATER AND DOWNDRAINS MUST BE COLLECTED AND
DISCHARGED IN A NON-ERODIBLE MANNER. (CL-G&D 6)
05. THE THROAT LENGTH FOR ALL CURB DROP INLETS MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 16)
06. BOOT CONNECTORS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR ALL PLASTIC PIPES THAT TIE
INTO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. (CL-G&D 21)
07. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AT THE NOSE OF AL
RADIAL CURB AND AT ALL APPRECIABLE BREAKS IN HORIZONTA
OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. (CL-G&D 22)
08. A SEPARATE PLAN SHEET MUST BE ADDED WHICH ONLY SHOWS
ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
DEDICATED. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
(CL-G&D 30)
09. STEPS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
EVENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF CURB & GUTTER AND BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION. (CL-EC 6)
10. SAFETY FENCE (STD. & SPEC 3.01) IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. (CL-EC 15)
11. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
12. A TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN (STD. & SPEC. #3.15) MUST BE
PROVIDED TO CONVEY RUNOFF FROM THE TOP OF THE FINISHED
SLOPE TO THE BOTTOM AND THEN INTO A SEDIMENT TRAPPING
FACILITY WHERE FILL SECTIONS ARE GREATER THAN 4 FEET.
(CL-EC 32)
13. NOTES A THRU E OF MINIMUM STANDARD 16 MUST BE PROVIDED
ON THE PLANS. (CL-EC 36)
14. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN WHICH PROVIDES FOR PLACEMENT OF
EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
TRENCH WHILE SILT FENCE AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS ARE
PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE. (CL-EC 37)
15. BLANKET AND MATTING MUST BE SPECIFIED ON ALL EXPOSED
SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER THAT ARE 5 FEET OR GREATER IN
HEIGHT.
16. ALL SILT MUST BE CLEANED FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN PRIOR
TO CONVERSION TO THE SWM/BMP. A NOTE MUST BE PROVIDED
IN THE EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE. (CL-EC 41)
17. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER/BMP
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT. (CL-EC 42B)
B. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
C. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
D. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-EC 42D)
E. AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, TWO
STANDARD SIGNS MUST BE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. THESE SIGNS SHOULD STATE EITHER
"CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AHEAD" OR "TRUCKS ENTERING
HIGHWAY". (CL-EC 42E)
F. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42F)
G. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA AND WETLANDS MUST BE FLAGGED IN
THE FIELD (SURVEY LOCATED) WITH OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY
FENCE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-EC 42G)
18. A RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA DETERMINATION MUST BE
SUBMITTED TO THE WATER QUALITY SECTION FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE NEXT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL.
(CL-CBPA 2)
19. A STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED FOR
PROJECTS UTILIZING PART IIB OF THE CURRENT VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS
REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE SHEET(S):
A. ENERGY BALANCE AND OUTFALL ANALYSIS FOR EACH OUTFALL
FOR THE PROJECT
B. NATURAL VEGETATED AREA EASEMENTS FOR AREAS CLAIMED AS
FORESTED/OPEN SPACE IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET, THAT ARE
NOT ENCOMPASSED BY A BMP EASEMENT, RPA OR WITHIN A
PLANNING BUFFER/TREE SAVE AREA
C. BMP SIZE, LOCATION, AND GRADING PLAN (1"=20')
D. BMP AND OUTLET STRUCTURE PROFILE AND DETAILS. THE
PROFILE MUST SPECIFY THE WATER QUALITY, 1 YEAR,
10 YEAR,AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS WITH
THEIR RESPECTIVE VOLUMES. (CL-CBPA 4F)
E. DRAINAGE AREA MAP SHOWING:
1) DRAINAGE AREA(S) TO WHERE THE SITE OUTFALL(S) MEET
ENERGY BALANCE FOR THE CHANNEL PROTECTION ANALYSIS
AND WHERE THE SITE MEETS 10-YEAR POST TO 10-YEAR
PRE FOR FLOOD PROTECTION
2) WHERE THE SITE IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE ENTIRE
DRAINAGE AREA, OR;
3) WHERE THE UNATTENUATED FLOW IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE
FLOW AT THAT POINT, OR;
4) WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE AND ITS DOWNSTREAM ARE
REACHES A NATURAL STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM FOR
THE 2-YEAR STORM, AND WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE
AND ITS DOWNSTREAM AREA REACHES A DOCUMENTED
FLOODPLAIN (COUNTY OR FEMA) FOR THE 10-YEAR STORM
F. PROVIDE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS
G. PROPOSED EASEMENT LOCAITONS
20. RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA (RPA) LIMITS MUST BE
ESTABLISHED FROM ALL PERENNIAL WATER BODIES AND THE
ASSOCIATED CONNECTED AND CONTIGUOUS WETLANDS.
(CL-CBPA 5)
21. THE REQUIRED LINE TYPE FOR RPA DESIGNATION MUST INCLUD
THE LETTERS "---RPA---RPA---". (CL-CBPA 7)
22. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA MUST BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLA
SHEETS, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND THE
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPLIANCE SHEET(S)/STORMWATER
COMPLIANCE SHEET(S). (CL-CBPA 8)
22. SIGNAGE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL RPA AND NATURAL
VEGETATED AREAS TO REMAIN OR TO BE ESTABLISHED.
23. THE EROSION CONTROL AND CBPA COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) MUST
SPECIFY THE PLACEMENT OF PLASTIC OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY
FENCE (STD. & SPEC. 3.01 OF THE VESCH) ALONG THE RPA
LIMITS. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA AND PLACEMENT OF THE
SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE SURVEY LOCATED. (CL-CBPA 9)
24. THE ENTIRE BASIN MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. BEYOND THE 100-YEAR WSE.
OR DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER APPLIES.
(CL-CBPA 14)
25. A MINIMUM 12 FOOT WIDE RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED FROM THE
ACCESS GATE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. TH
SLOPE CANNOT EXCEED 6:1. THIS APPLIES TO BOTH SECTIONS
OF THE POND. (CL-CBPA 17)
26. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE 4 FEET OR LESS IN
DEPTH AND ONE ACRE FEET OR LESS IS SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE A SAFETY BENCH OR BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6 FOOT
HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE, HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND
MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH
ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT. (CL-CBPA 18)
27. A PROFILE VIEW MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY WHICH SHOWS ALL THE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION
INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE NECESSARY FOR ITS FUTURE
CERTIFICATION. (CL-CBPA 21)
28. THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUMES FOR WATER QUALITY AND
WATER QUANTITY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW OF
THE BASIN. (CL-CBPA 22)
29. THE TOP OF THE DAM FOR THE BMP MUST BE AT LEAST 8 FEET
WIDE. DIMENSION AND LABEL IN THE PROFILE VIEW.
(CL-CBPA 23)
30. THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS MUST
BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
31. THE SIDE SLOPES IN SWM/BMP FACILITIES SHALL BE NO
STEEPER THAN THREE TO ONE (3:1). LABEL IN THE PROFILE
VIEW. (CL-CBPA 37)
32. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR CONVERSION OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN INTO A
SWM/BMP FACILITY AFTER THE UPSTREAM AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED. ALL EXISTING SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM TH
BASIN. (CL-CBPA 39)
33. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR THE SWM/BMP FACILITY TO BE OBSERVED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. "AS
BUILT" INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE
CERTIFICATION OF THE FACILITY. CERTIFICATION IS
REQUIRED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SWM/BMP PERFORMANCE
BOND AND ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (CL-CBPA 42)
34. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
35. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
36. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
37. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
38. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SWM/BMP WHICH WILL
BE A COUNTY MAINTAINED FACILITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO
INDEPENDENTLY DOCUMENTED GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL. THE
SERVICES WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIRM SHALL INCLUDE FULL TIME
GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER.
THAT FULL TIME INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING (CL-USC 9):
A. PARTICIPATION/INPUT INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS AS
NECESSARY TO FACILITATE THE APPROVAL PROCESS OF THE
INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. (CL-USC 9A)
OBSERVATION, TESTING AND DOCUMENTATION OF:
B. SUITABLE SUBGRADES TO RECEIVE COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FIL
FOR EARTH DAM CONSTRUCTION. (CL-USC 9B)
C. THE CUT OFF TRENCH, SPILLWAY PIPE, DRAINAGE BLANKET,
RISER STRUCTURE AND CONCRETE CHUTE SPILLWAY SUBGRADES
AS APPLICABLE TO EVALUATE WHETHER SUITABLE SOIL IS
PRESENT AT BEARING GRADE TO VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION
(CL-USC 9C)
D. FILL PLACEMENT AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING TO EVALUATE/
VERIFY PROPER COMPACTION. (CL-USC 9D)
E. REINFORCING STEEL, IF REQUIRED, TO EVALUATE ITS
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
(CL-USC 9E)
39. THE FACILITY CERTIFICATION PROCESS SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY AN ENGINEERING/SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL CHOSEN BY THE
COUNTY AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. (CL-USC 10)
40. THE NAME OF THE GEOTECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL WHO WILL
PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL OF THE SWM/BMP WILL
BE FURNISHED ON THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.(CL-USC 11
41. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE BMP.
42. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING 36" CMP UNDER THE
RAILROAD AND SHOW ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS.
43. CLARIFY HOW THE SITE IS COMPLYING WITH THE BMP
SCREENING REQUIREMENT FROM THE ZONING CASE.
44. SHEET C-5:
A) LOCATE STRUCTURE 35 OUTSIDE OF THE FILL SECTION OF
THE POND.
B) LABEL AQUATIC BENCHES, FOREBAYS, CONTOURS INSIDE OF
THE POND, NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, AND
VEHICLE ACCESS.
C) PROVIDE CG-9 FOR POND ACCESS.
D) SHOW DOWNSTREAM OF OUTFALL 41.
E) IT APPEARS SOME OF THE GRADING IS IMPACTING THE
EXISTING CONCRETE DITCH ALONG RT. 60. CLARIFY HOW
THIS IS TO DRAIN.
F) THE POND SHALL BE LOCATED 100' DOWNGRADIENT OF ALL
SEPTIC FIELDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATION.
G) PROVIDE CROSS-SECTIONS FOR THE POND AND SHOW
LOCATIONS ON SHEET.
H) PROVIDE VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES NEAR STRUCTURE 17
I) MINIMIZE IMPACT TO WETLANDS.
45. SHEET C-6:
A) PROVIDE DETAIL(S) AND NOTES FOR CONVERTING SEDIMENT
BASIN TO RISER.
B) REMOVE THE GRADING CONNECTING THE 385 CONTOUR AND
PROVIDE DIVERSION DIKES INSTEAD TO CONVEY DRAINAGE
TO THE BASINS.
C) LABEL STRUCTURE NUMBERS.
D) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREA FOR BASIN.
E) MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE FOR PHASE 1 ESC ONLY.
F) PROVIDE ESC MEASURES FOR WORK WITHIN THE ROADWAY.
G) THE EXISTING CONTOURS ARE HARD TO SEE. INCREASE
LINEWEIGHTS AND ENSURE EXISTING INFORMATION IS
READABLE.
H) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR STOCKPILE.
I) PROVIDE SAFETY FENCE AROUND SEPTIC FIELD.
J) PROVIDE ESC MEASURES FOR WATERLINE.
K) AMEND NOTE 9 IN THE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE TO SUPER
SILT FENCE.
46. SHEET C-7:
A) PROVIDE FILL SLOPE DIVERSION FOR RT. 60 WIDENING.
47. SHEET C-9:
A) INCLUDE ALL DRAINAGE AREAS IN THE TABLE INCLUDING
BMP AREAS.
B) VERIFY SIZE OF DRAINAGE AREA FOR NYOPLAST C.
48. SHEET C-10:
A) SHOW AND LABEL ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND REQUIRED
SEPARATIONS.
B) SHOW AND LABEL OUTLET PROTECTION.
49. SHEET C-12:
A) IN THE WEIR DETAIL, INCREASE THE FONT SIZE.
B) PROVIDE FENCE DETAIL.
C) PROVIDE CLAY LINER DETAIL.
D) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS IN THE GABION WALL DETAIL.
E) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHOWING
THE CLAY CORE DEPTH INTO EXISTING GROUND IS
SUFFICIENT WITH ITS PROXIMITY TO WETLANDS.
F) ADJUST THE CLAY CORE TOP TO BE AT AN ELEVATION OF
382.
50. SHEET C-15:
A) PROVIDE OUTFALL 2 INFORMATION IN THE OUTFALL TABLE.
B) THE SITE AREA IN THE OUTFALL TABLE SHOULD BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLIANCE TABLE.
C) PROVIDE FOUR DECIMAL PLACES FOR LATITUDE AND
LONGITUDES.
D) IN THE COMPLIANCE TABLE, THE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
SHOULD BE 50% FOR LEVEL 1 WET POND.
E) SHOW OUTFALL POINT IN THE CONDITION MAPPING.
F) INCLUDE THE BUFFER AND ROADWAY WORK IN THE PROPOSED
CONDITION MAP.
G) SHOW AND LABEL A SITE AREA BOUNDARY LINE.
51. BMP DESIGN:
A) PROVIDE CLAY LINER.
B) PROVIDE SHORTEST FLOW PATH CALCULATIONS.
C) SHEET FLOW TO OPEN SPACE AS A BMP PRACTICE CANNOT B
USED WHEN DISCHARGING TO WETLANDS.
D) REMOVE WOODY VEGETATION FROM WITHIN 25' TO
IMPOUNDMENT SECTION AND PRINCIPLE SPILLWAY OUTLET O
THE PROPOSED BMP.
E) PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE FOR THE BMP.
F) PROVIDE GOOSE AND BIRD PROTECTION.
G) PROVIDE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES FOR THE BASIN.
H) PROVIDE WATER BALANCE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THE
FACILITY WILL NOT DRAW DOWN MORE THAN 2' DURING 30-
DAY SUMMER DRAUGHT.
52. CALCULATIONS:
A) PROVIDE SPREAD CALCULATIONS.
B) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL DITCHES AND CULVERTS.
C) PROVIDE EXISTING CONDITION ROUTING CALCULATIONS.
D) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS DEMONSTRATING THE SITES
COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING REQUIREMENT FOR 100-YEAR
POST TO 2-YEAR PRE.
E) PROVIDE 100-YEAR BREACH ROUTINGS FOR THE POND.
F) PROVIDE LEVEL SPREADER CALCULATIONS.
G) PROVIDE SEDIMENT BASIN SIZING CALCULATIONS SHOWING
COMPLIANCE WITH UPPER SWIFT CREEK STANDARDS.
H) SHEET FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR STRUCTURE 39 APPEAR TO
BE USING C-VALUE OF 0.6 INSTEAD OF 0..9 FOR ASPHALT
53. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
54. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, THE
NAME, "WALK-IN" ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF
A LOCAL REGISTERED AGENT REPRESENTING THE OWNER FOR
SERVICE OF PROCESS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE "APPOINTMEN
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS" FORM FOUND ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE.
(CL-GENERAL 12)
55. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
56. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
57. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
58. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
59. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
60. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
61. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
62. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $3,400
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : AUGUST 29, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : SEPTEMBER 06, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AT THE NOSE OF AL
RADIAL CURB AND AT ALL APPRECIABLE BREAKS IN HORIZONTA
OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. (CL-G&D 22)
04. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. THE EQUALIZING PIPES FOR THE SEDIMENT BASIN MUST BE ON
SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
05. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR CONVERSION OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN INTO A
SWM/BMP FACILITY AFTER THE UPSTREAM AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED. ALL EXISTING SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM TH
BASIN. (CL-CBPA 39)
06. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
07. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
08. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
09. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
10. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SWM/BMP WHICH WILL
BE A COUNTY MAINTAINED FACILITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO
INDEPENDENTLY DOCUMENTED GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL. THE
SERVICES WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIRM SHALL INCLUDE FULL TIME
GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER.
THAT FULL TIME INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING (CL-USC 9):
A. PARTICIPATION/INPUT INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS AS
NECESSARY TO FACILITATE THE APPROVAL PROCESS OF THE
INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. (CL-USC 9A)
OBSERVATION, TESTING AND DOCUMENTATION OF:
B. SUITABLE SUBGRADES TO RECEIVE COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FIL
FOR EARTH DAM CONSTRUCTION. (CL-USC 9B)
C. THE CUT OFF TRENCH, SPILLWAY PIPE, DRAINAGE BLANKET,
RISER STRUCTURE AND CONCRETE CHUTE SPILLWAY SUBGRADES
AS APPLICABLE TO EVALUATE WHETHER SUITABLE SOIL IS
PRESENT AT BEARING GRADE TO VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION
(CL-USC 9C)
D. FILL PLACEMENT AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING TO EVALUATE/
VERIFY PROPER COMPACTION. (CL-USC 9D)
E. REINFORCING STEEL, IF REQUIRED, TO EVALUATE ITS
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
(CL-USC 9E)
11. THE FACILITY CERTIFICATION PROCESS SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY AN ENGINEERING/SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL CHOSEN BY THE
COUNTY AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. (CL-USC 10)
12. THE NAME OF THE GEOTECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL WHO WILL
PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL OF THE SWM/BMP WILL
BE FURNISHED ON THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.(CL-USC 11
13. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO CLARIFY HOW THE SITE IS
COMPLYING WITH THE BMP SCREENING REQUIREMENT FROM THE
ZONING CASE.
14. SHEET C-2:
A) SHOW BORING LOCATIONS FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
B) SHOW EXISTING FLOW PATH USED FOR EXISTING CONDITION
ROUTINGS.
15. SHEET C-3:
A) CONTINUE THE SECURITY FENCE ALONG THE PERIMETER OF
THE BASIN BY THE WETLANDS.
16. SHEET C-5:
A) LOCATE STRUCTURE 35 OUTSIDE OF THE FILL SECTION OF
THE POND.
B) PROVIDE STORM SEWER CONNECTION FOR THE OUTFALL AT
STRUCTURE 45 TO EITHER STRUCTURE 21 OR 23 SO THAT I
DOES NOT DISCHARGE ONTO THE DRAIN FIELD. THIS WILL
REQUIRE A PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
C) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR EMERGENCY SPILLWAY.
D) PROVIDE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY FOR THE SOUTH POND.
E) CHANGE SITE NOTE NUMBER 4 TO BE FOR THE POND.
F) PROVIDE GRADING OR CURBING TO DIRECT AND ENSURE
DISCHARGE FROM THE PAVED FLUME/ RIP-RAP CHANNEL
DISCHARGES THROUGH LEVEL SPREADER IN A NON-EROSIVE
MANNER.
17. SHEET C-6:
A) PROVIDE CULVERT INLET PROTECTION FOR TEMPORARY SLOP
DRAINS.
B) CONTINUE THE FILL DIVERSIONS BY THE BASINS TOWARD
THE TEMPORARY STOCKPILE.
C) PROVIDE SUPER SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF
THE WATERLINE CONNECTION.
D) LABEL POND CONTOURS.
E) LABEL EXISTING CONTOURS.
18. SHEET C-7:
A) PIPE 40 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
B) SHOW BLANKET AND MATTING ON EXPOSED SLOPES 3:1 OR
GREATER. PARTICULARLY TOWARD THE INTERSECTION OF
MIDLOTHIAN AND OTTERDALE WOODS.
C) PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURE 49.
D) CLARIFY THE NEED FOR CULVERT INLET STRUCTURE ON
DOWNSTREAM END OF STRUCTURE 45.
19. SHEET C-10:
A) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR STRUCTURE 39 SHOULD EXTEND
WEST AND ENCOMPASS THE STRUCTURE.
B) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR NYLOPLAST C IS LISTED AS 0.11
ACRES; HOWEVER, IN PDF IT MEASURED AS 0.04 ACRES.
VERIFY DRAINAGE AREA.
C) IT APPEARS THE TC FOR DA STRUCTURE 39 RUNS UPHILL
TOWARD THE MIDDLE OF THE FLOWPATH.
20. SHEET C-11 AND C-12:
A) IN THE STR. 39-41 PROFILE, LABEL THE NWSE.
B) SHOW OUTLET PROTECTION AT THE OUTFALL OF STRUCTURES
49 AND 45.
C) PROVIDE A SOUTH POND PROFILE.
D) IN THE POND PROFILES/CROSS-SECTION SHOW LONGITUDINA
SLOPES OF 0.5-1%.
21. SHEET C-14:
A) THE TOP OF DAM IN THE CLAY CORE PROFILE DOES NOT
MATCH PLAN VIEWS. VERIFY TOP OF DAM.
B) THE BMP CALCULATIONS SHOWN DO NOT MATCH THOSE
PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. VERIFY CALCULATIONS
C) THE LEVEL SPREADER APPEARS TO BE NEARLY 2' BELOW
DOWNSTREAM GRADE. CLARIFY THE GRADING ON THE PLANS
AND HOW THE LEVEL SPREADER IS TO SHEET FLOW INTO TH
WETLANDS.
D) THE TOP OF DAM FOR THE OUTLET WEIR IN SECTION A-A
DOES NOT MATCH THE TOP IN SECTION B-B. VERIFY TOP
OF DAM.
22. SHEET C-18:
A) SHOW OUTFALL POINT IN THE CONDITION MAPPING.
B) THE VRRM SPREADSHEET PROVIDED DOES NOT MATCH WHAT
WAS PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
C) THE SITE AREA IN THE OUTFALL TABLE SHOULD MATCH THE
SITE AREA IN THE COMPLIANCE TABLE, WHICH SHOULD
MATCH THAT IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET.
D) THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION APPEARS TO BE
QUANTIFIED AS MANAGED TURF. THIS SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS AREA.
E) SHOW POND GRADING IN THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP.
23. SHEET 21:
A) LABEL THE 6:1 GRADING FOR THE ACCESS.
24. BMP DESIGN:
A) PROVIDE SHORTEST FLOW PATH CALCULATIONS.
B) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT,
INFILTRATION ON THIS SITE IS NOT FEASIBLE. SINCE
THE SHEET FLOW TO OPEN SPACE/ VEGETATED FILTER STRI
RECEIVES ITS NUTRIENT REDUCTION CREDIT THROUGH
RUNOFF REDUCTION THIS REDUCTION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED
ON THIS SITE. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE BMP THAT DOES NO
RELY ON INFILTRATION.
C) IT IS RECOMMENDED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REMAINING
WETLANDS AND BUFFER AS OPEN SPACE AND PLACE IT
WITHIN AN EASEMENT, AS REQUIRED, TO COUNT TOWARD TH
WATER QUALITY AND LESSEN THE BURDEN OF REQUIRED
NUTRIENT REDUCTION.
D) PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE FOR THE BMP.
E) PROVIDE GOOSE AND BIRD PROTECTION.
F) PROVIDE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES FOR THE BASIN.
25. CALCULATIONS:
A) CLARIFY THE STORM EVENT FOR THE FLUME CALCULATION.
B) THE ORIFICE SIZE USED IN THE ROUTINGS DOES NOT MATC
THE PLANS.
C) THE REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME FOR THE WET POND DOES
NOT MATCH THE VOLUME IN THE RUNOFF REDUCTION
SPREADSHEET.
D) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THE RECEIVING CHANNEL
FROM THE BASIN IS NON-EROSIVE FOR THE 2 AND 10-YEAR
STORMS.
26. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
27. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, THE
NAME, "WALK-IN" ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF
A LOCAL REGISTERED AGENT REPRESENTING THE OWNER FOR
SERVICE OF PROCESS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE "APPOINTMEN
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS" FORM FOUND ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE.
(CL-GENERAL 12)
28. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
29. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
30. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
31. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
32. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
33. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
34. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
35. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $3,400
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : OCTOBER 20, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : OCTOBER 25, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : NOVEMBER 07, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
04. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
05. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
06. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
07. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SWM/BMP WHICH WILL
BE A COUNTY MAINTAINED FACILITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO
INDEPENDENTLY DOCUMENTED GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL. THE
SERVICES WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIRM SHALL INCLUDE FULL TIME
GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER.
THAT FULL TIME INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING (CL-USC 9):
A. PARTICIPATION/INPUT INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS AS
NECESSARY TO FACILITATE THE APPROVAL PROCESS OF THE
INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. (CL-USC 9A)
OBSERVATION, TESTING AND DOCUMENTATION OF:
B. SUITABLE SUBGRADES TO RECEIVE COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FIL
FOR EARTH DAM CONSTRUCTION. (CL-USC 9B)
C. THE CUT OFF TRENCH, SPILLWAY PIPE, DRAINAGE BLANKET,
RISER STRUCTURE AND CONCRETE CHUTE SPILLWAY SUBGRADES
AS APPLICABLE TO EVALUATE WHETHER SUITABLE SOIL IS
PRESENT AT BEARING GRADE TO VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION
(CL-USC 9C)
D. FILL PLACEMENT AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING TO EVALUATE/
VERIFY PROPER COMPACTION. (CL-USC 9D)
E. REINFORCING STEEL, IF REQUIRED, TO EVALUATE ITS
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
(CL-USC 9E)
08. THE FACILITY CERTIFICATION PROCESS SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY AN ENGINEERING/SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL CHOSEN BY THE
COUNTY AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. (CL-USC 10)
09. THE NAME OF THE GEOTECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL WHO WILL
PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL OF THE SWM/BMP WILL
BE FURNISHED ON THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.(CL-USC 11
10. INCORPORATE THE OVERALL LANDSCAPING PLAN WITHIN THE
PLAN SET.
11. SHEET C-5:
A) REMOVE WATERLINE FROM UNDERNEATH THE ENGINEERED
LEVEL SPREADER.
B) PROVIDE SPOT SHOTS FOR THE GRADING IN THE
BIORETENTION AREA.
C) PROVIDE STRUCTURE NUMBERS FOR BIORETENTION OUTFALL
RISER AND BARREL AND INCLUDE IN STRUCTURE TABLE.
D) SHOW CLEANOUTS/OBSERVATION WELLS FOR BIORETENTION.
E) IT IS SUGGESTED TO PROVIDE A DROP INLET ALONG THE
DITCH NORTH OF BUILDING #1 AND TIE-IN TO STRUCTURE
27 TO MINIMIZE FLOW RUNNING ALONG THE EMBANKMENT OF
THE WET POND.
F) LABEL THE AREAS OF PRETREATMENT FOR THE
BIORETENTION.
G) CLARIFY THE CONCRETE FLUME NEAR STRUCTURE 15
DISCHARGING INTO THE WET POND AND PROVIDE DETAIL.
12. SHEET C-6:
A) THE NOTE SECOND FROM THE BOTTOM ABOUT THE
PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING APPEARS TO BE INCOMPLETE.
13. SHEET C-7:
A) SPECIFY IN THE CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE WHEN THE
BIORETENTION IS TO BE INSTALLED.
B) PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR THE CURB CUT INTO THE
BIORETENTION.
C) THE GRADING AROUND THE BIORETENTION AREA APPEARS TO
HAVE TWO SETS OF CONTOURS. CONSOLIDATE THE GRADING
D) IN THE BIORETENTION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE, SPECIFY
WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE BLOCKED IN NOTE 1.
E) IN THE BIORETENTION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE, SPECIFY
THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREA IS TO BE STABILIZED PRIO
TO CONSTRUCTING THE BIORETENTION.
F) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES:
BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY.
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
14. SHEET C-11 AND C-12:
A) IN THE POND PROFILES/CROSS-SECTION SHOW LONGITUDINA
SLOPES OF 0.5-1%.
B) CLARIFY IF ANCHOR LUGS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY FLUMES FOR THE PONDS.
C) CLARIFY IF THE 12" RISER CAN HANDLE A 12" OUTFALL
FOR THE BIORETENTION.
D) THE OUTFALL FOR THE BIORETENTION SHOULD BE CONCRETE
E) IT IS SUGGESTED TO PROVIDE A DI-1 OR DI-7 FOR THE
BIORETENTION OUTFALL PIPE WITH A GRATE THAT WILL BE
LESS PRONE TO CLOGGING WITH FLOATING MULCH.
F) SHOW STORM ELEVATIONS FOR THE BIORETENTION.
G) SHOW THE MULCHING AROUND THE RISER AS IS SHOWN IN
FIGURE 9.13 OF THE BIORETENTION SPECIFICATION.
H) THE WATERLINE CROSSING STORM SEWER PIPE 8 APPEARS T
BE CROSSING PIPE 6 IN THE PROFILES. ENSURE PROFILE
ARE UPDATED TO SHOW MOST RECENT UTILITY LOCATIONS.
15. SHEET C-14:
A) LABEL THE ELEVATIONS IN THE OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
DETAIL.
B) RENAME THE GRAVEL LEVEL SPREADER OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
DETAIL TO BIORETENTION TYPICAL SECTION OR SIMILAR.
C) PROVIDE A 2-4" SAND LAYER ABOVE THE 3" OF PEA GRAVE
AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS (TABLE 9.6).
D) PROVIDE 12" OF 21B STONE BELOW THE INVERT OF THE
UNDERDRAIN.
E) CLARIFY THAT THE FILTER FABRIC IS SUPPOSED TO BE
INSTALLED ONLY OVER THE UNDERDRAIN PIPE AND NOT
THROUGH THE WHOLE CROSS SECTION FOR THE
BIORETENTION.
F) IN THE ENGINEERED LEVEL SPREADER DETAIL, PROVIDE 2'
OF DEPTH FOR THE RIP-RAP.
16. SHEET 18:
A) PROVIDE LATITUDES AND LONGITUDES FOR EACH BMP IN TH
STORMWATER COMPLIANCE TABLE.
B) COMPLETE THE 10 AND 100-YEAR STORM EVENTS IN THE
STORMWATER OUTFALL TABLE.
17. SHEET 20:
A) THE STORMCEPTOR SYSTEM SHALL BE CONTAINED IN A BMP
EASEMENT STARTING 8' BEFORE THE PRACTICE AND HAVE A
ASSOCIATED 20' ACCESS EASEMENT. THE EASEMENT SHALL
CONTINUE AS A BMP EASEMENT UNTIL IT JOINS WITH THE
BMP EASEMENT FOR THE POND.
18. SHEET 21:
A) PROVIDE WITCH HAZEL INSTEAD OF BAYBERRY IN THE
BIORETENTION PLANTING PLAN.
B) THE "PV" IN THE BIORETENTION PLAN VIEW IS OBSCURED.
19. ON SHEETS C-22 AND C-23, IT APPEARS THAT A DITCH WILL
RESULT FROM THE GRADING FOR THE ROAD WIDENING. EITHER
PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE DITCH OR ADJUST GRADING T
REMOVE THE DITCH.
20. BMP DESIGN:
A) PROVIDE SHORTEST FLOW PATH CALCULATIONS FOR THE
BIORETENTION AND THE WET POND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SPECIFICATIONS (SHORTEST FLOW PATH DIVIDED BY
OVERALL FLOW LENGTH). THE EQUIVALENT WIDTH
CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE WET POND.
B) PROVIDE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES FOR THE BASIN.
C) PROVIDE BIORETENTION MEDIA SPECIFICATIONS AND
TESTING REQUIREMENTS ON THE PLANS. INCLUDE THE
P-INDEX MUST BE BETWEEN 10 AND 30 OR BETWEEN 7 AND
21 MG/KG OF P IN SOIL MEDIA.
D) PROVIDE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW FOR THE BIORETENTION.
E) PROVIDE MULTI-CELL DESIGN FOR THE BIORETENTION.
F) PROVIDE PRETREATMENT CELL AND GRASS FILTER STRIP,
GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM, OR GRAVEL FLOW SPREADER FOR THE
BIORETENTION.
G) SPECIFY NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC WITH FLOW RATE
GREATER THAN 110 G/MIN/SF ON THE SIDES FOR THE
BIORETENTION.
H) IT IS SUGGESTED THAT A CONCRETE WALL SUCH AS A
"JERSEY BARRIER" BE USED IN LIEU OF GABION BASKETS
FOR THE FOREBAY OF THE WET POND DUE TO AESTHETIC AN
MAINTENANCE REASONS.
21. CALCULATIONS:
A) THE BIORETENTION DRAINAGE AREA USED IN THE ROUTINGS
DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE DRAINAGE AREA ON THE
PLANS. ENSURE CORRECT DRAINAGE AREA IS BEING USED.
B) IT IS SUGGESTED TO REMOVE THE BIORETENTION FROM
DRAINAGE AREA A AND USE IT IN DRAINAGE AREA B IN TH
VRRM SPREADSHEET. THIS WILL ALLOW A MORE ACCURATE
REPRESENTATION OF THE VOLUME REDUCTION AND REDUCED
CURVE NUMBER THAT CAN BE USED IN THE ROUTINGS.
22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
23. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, THE
NAME, "WALK-IN" ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF
A LOCAL REGISTERED AGENT REPRESENTING THE OWNER FOR
SERVICE OF PROCESS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE "APPOINTMEN
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS" FORM FOUND ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE.
(CL-GENERAL 12)
24. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
25. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
26. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
27. THE BMPS MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
28. THE EQUALIZER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
29. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
30. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
31. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $3,400
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : OTTERDALE SELF STORAGE
ADDRESS : 51 OTTERDALE WOODS ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0264
LATEST PLAN DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : YES
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
04. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
05. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
06. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
07. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SWM/BMP WHICH WILL
BE A COUNTY MAINTAINED FACILITY WILL BE SUBJECT TO
INDEPENDENTLY DOCUMENTED GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL. THE
SERVICES WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE INDEPENDENT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIRM SHALL INCLUDE FULL TIME
GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER.
THAT FULL TIME INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING (CL-USC 9):
A. PARTICIPATION/INPUT INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS AS
NECESSARY TO FACILITATE THE APPROVAL PROCESS OF THE
INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. (CL-USC 9A)
OBSERVATION, TESTING AND DOCUMENTATION OF:
B. SUITABLE SUBGRADES TO RECEIVE COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FIL
FOR EARTH DAM CONSTRUCTION. (CL-USC 9B)
C. THE CUT OFF TRENCH, SPILLWAY PIPE, DRAINAGE BLANKET,
RISER STRUCTURE AND CONCRETE CHUTE SPILLWAY SUBGRADES
AS APPLICABLE TO EVALUATE WHETHER SUITABLE SOIL IS
PRESENT AT BEARING GRADE TO VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION
(CL-USC 9C)
D. FILL PLACEMENT AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING TO EVALUATE/
VERIFY PROPER COMPACTION. (CL-USC 9D)
E. REINFORCING STEEL, IF REQUIRED, TO EVALUATE ITS
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
(CL-USC 9E)
08. THE FACILITY CERTIFICATION PROCESS SHALL BE PERFORMED
BY AN ENGINEERING/SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL CHOSEN BY THE
COUNTY AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. (CL-USC 10)
09. THE NAME OF THE GEOTECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL WHO WILL
PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL APPROVAL OF THE SWM/BMP WILL
BE FURNISHED ON THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.(CL-USC 11
10. THE ROUTING CALCULATIONS FOR THE BIORETENTION USES A C
OF 90 INSTEAD OF 98 FOR IMPERVIOUS AREAS.
11. ON SHEET 14, THE FILTER FABRIC NOTE STATES THE FLOW
RATE FOR THE FILTER FABRIC OVER THE PIPE. THE FILTER
FABRIC FLOW RATE IS FOR THE SIDES OF THE BIORETENTION.
IN A LEVEL 2, FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ALL AROUND
THE SIDES OF THE BIORETENTION. ENSURE THIS IS
REPRESENTED IN THE DETAILS.
12. ON SHEET 18, THE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY FOR THE
BIORETENTION SHOULD BE THE TOTAL MASS REMOVAL OF 90%.
13. ON SHEET 20, PROVIDE A SEPARATE BMP EASEMENT FOR THE
HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR FROM THE WET POND EASEMENT AND
LABEL EACH EASEMENT AS SUCH.
14. SHEET 21A, REMOVE THE GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM. INSTEAD, LABE
THE GRASSED AREA AFTER THE PRETREATMENT CELL AS A GRAS
FILTER STRIP.
15. PROVIDE A SHORTEST FLOW PATH/ FLOW LENGTH RATIO
CALCULATION FOR THE WET POND, SIMILAR TO THE ONE THAT
WAS PROVIDED FOR THE BIORETENTION.
16. THE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE WATERLINE AND PIPE 8 DIFFERS
BETWEEN THE WATERLINE PROFILE AND THE STORM SEWER
PROFILE. SHOW THE CORRECT CLEARANCE ON BOTH PROFILES.
17. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
18. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, THE
NAME, "WALK-IN" ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF
A LOCAL REGISTERED AGENT REPRESENTING THE OWNER FOR
SERVICE OF PROCESS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE "APPOINTMEN
OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS" FORM FOUND ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE.
(CL-GENERAL 12)
19. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
20. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
21. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
22. THE BMPS MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
23. THE EQUALIZER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
24. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
25. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
26. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $3,400
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 16PR0264



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List