Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 16PR0244
Modify comments view for Case # 16PR0244

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 16PR0244 STATUS: PENDING APPROVAL
PROJECT NAME: BIGG IDEAS LLC - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/22/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 01 08/11/16 09/01/16 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 ******** 05/19/16 CBH 776-7836
FIRE DEPT.--: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 COMPLETE 04/25/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 COMPLETE 05/05/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 COMPLETE 05/03/17 WST 768-7566
TRANSPORT.--: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 COMPLETE 04/28/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 AMENDED* 05/11/17 LV 748-1863
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 02 04/19/17 05/10/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, P.E./748-1863
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
ADDRESS : 12912 GENITO RD.
SUBMISSION DATE : 4/27/16
PLAN DATED : 4/19/16
REVIEW DATE : 5/12/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UTILITIES PROJECT 16-0112 NUMBER SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. ADD NORTH SYMBOL TO VICINITY MAP.
3. IDENTIFY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ON COVER SHEET.
4. DARKEN EXISTING WATER, SEWER LINES, AND CORRESPONDING
TEXT TO BE CLEARLY LEGIBLE ON UTILITY PLAN. MOVE TEXT NEAR
CONNECTION POINTS TO CLEARLY SHOW CONNECTION LINES.
5. PROVIDE LOCATION OF MISS UTILITY NOTE.
6. REVISE AND/OR ADD TO UTILITY NOTES AS PER CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY STANDARD NOTES, DETAIL DES-2.
7. SHOW AND LABEL CLEARLY ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS
ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE RECORDATION INFORMATION IF
APPLICABLE.
8. CLEARLY AND LABEL ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS ON
UTILITY PLAN SHEET.
9. REVISE LOCATION OF WATER METER AND SANITARY LATERAL TO
END WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ALSO LOCATE
OUTSIDE THE PARCEL ENTRANCE.
10. PROVIDE BENCH MARK LOCATION ON UTILITY PLAN SHEET.
11. PROVIDE FLOW TEST INFORMATION RESULTS ON WATER FLOW
INFORMATION AS PER DES-5 ON WATER MODEL & FLOW CALCULATION
SHEET , CU-201.
12. PROVIDE WATER METER SIZING FORM ON PLANS AND INDICATE
IF A IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE PROPOSED.
13. PROVIDE A SANITARY CLEAN OUT ON UTILITY PLAN.
14. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF LINNETTE VASQUEZ
(VASQUEZL@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL
MUST BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT I
THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
15. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS).
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, P.E./748-1863
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
ADDRESS : 12912 GENITO RD.
SUBMISSION DATE : 8/12/16
PLAN DATED : 8/10/16
REVIEW DATE : 8/31/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. DARKEN EXISTING WATER, SEWER LINES, AND CORRESPONDING
TEXT TO BE CLEARLY LEGIBLE ON UTILITY PLAN. REVISE LABEL
FOR WATERLINE ALONG OAKLAKE CT. TO CLEARLY SHOW THE
EXISTING LINE.
2. BLOW UP AND/OR REMOVE SOME OF THE OVERLAPPING TEXT
NEAR THE WATER SERVICE AND SEWER LATERAL TO CLEARLY SHOW
CONNECTION.
3. REVISE UTILITY NOTES AS PER CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY STANDARD NOTES #4 TO INCLUDE ELEVATION AT OR BELOW
THE 225 ELEVATION.
4. SHOW AND LABEL CLEARLY ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS
ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE RECORDATION INFORMATION. REVISE SHT
# C7 TO SHOW DRAINAGE EASEMENT WEST OF THE PROPERTY AND
EASEMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTHERN PART OF THE PROPERTY NEA
OAKLAKE CT.
5. REVISE LOCATION OF WATER METER AND SANITARY LATERAL TO
END WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ALSO LOCATE
OUTSIDE THE PARCEL ENTRANCE.
6. PROVIDE FLOW TEST INFORMATION RESULTS ON WATER FLOW
INFORMATION AS PER DES-5 ON WATER MODEL & FLOW CALCULATION
SHEET , CU-201.
7. PROVIDE WATER METER SIZING FORM ON PLANS AND INDICATE
IF A IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE PROPOSED.
8. PROVIDE A SANITARY CLEAN OUT ON UTILITY PLAN. LABEL AT
END OF SEWER LATERAL.
9. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF LINNETTE VASQUEZ
(VASQUEZL@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL
MUST BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT I
THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
10. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS).
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, P.E./748-1863
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
ADDRESS : 12912 GENITO RD.
SUBMISSION DATE : 4/20/17
PLAN DATED : 4/14/17
REVIEW DATE : 5/10/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
*
1. PROVIDE LOCATION OF MATERIALS UTILITIES LIST AND LABEL
ITEMS AS PUBLIC/PRIVATE AS APPLICABLE.
*
2. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT #1, CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL
EXISTING WATERLINE AND SEWERLINE ON OAKLAKE CT.
*
3. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT #2 AND #8, REVISE SCALING
TO GRAPHICALLY CLEARLY SHOW PROPOSED SANITARY CLEAN OUT.
*
4. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT #3, REMOVE ALL UTILITY
NOTES NOT IN COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET # C7 AND C6
INCLUDING NOTE NUMBER 11.
*
5. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT # 4, SHOW AND LABEL CLEARLY
ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE RECORDATION
INFORMATION. REVISE SHT # C7 TO SHOW DRAINAGE EASEMENT WES
OF THE PROPERTY AND EASEMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTHERN PART
OF THE PROPERTY NEAR OAKLAKE CT.
*
6. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT # 5, LOCATE WATER METER AND
SANITARY LATERAL OUTSIDE THE PARCEL ENTRANCE.
*
7. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT # 6, PROVIDE FLOW TEST MAP
INDICATING LOCATION OF FLOW TEST RESULTS.AS PER DES-5 ON
WATER MODEL & FLOW CALCULATION SHEET , CU-201.
*
8. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT # 7, PROVIDE WATER METER
SIZING FORM ON PLANS AS WELL AS SEPARATE ATTACHMENT.
*
9. PLEASE SUBMIT A PDF OF REVISIONS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL
TO REVIEW ALL PROPOSED CHANGES.
*
10. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF LINNETTE VASQUEZ
(VASQUEZL@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL
MUST BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT I
THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
*
11. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS).
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/19/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 04/26/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 05/02/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE: 08/10/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 08/15/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 08/24/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 04/25/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 04/28/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
**********************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT------PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL/768-7566
NAME OF PLAN-----------BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0244
ADDRESS----------------12912 GENITO ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------4/18/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------4/22/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------1
REVIEW DATE------------5/16/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW-----------N
PLAT PROCESSING--------
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--MUST BE INCLUDED WITH 2ND SUBMISSIO
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT YET SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT YET SUBMITTED
1. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A COMPLE
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
BELOW EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
REVIEW COMMENT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS SHOW THE
REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE
ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY THE STAFF REVIEW
COMMENTS.
1. PROVIDE THE PROJECT CASE NUMBER (16PR0244) IN THE LOWER
RIGHT-HAND CORNER.
2. SHOW ON THE PLANS ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES CURRENT OWNER
NAMES AND GPIN IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS. SOME OF THE NAMES
GPIN NUMBERS LISTED DON'T APPEAR TO MATCH COUNTY RECORDS.
3. CONFIRM THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THE NOTE
SIX (6)PARKING SPACES, BUT FIVE (5) SPACES ARE PROVIDED ON
ONLY ONE (1) HANDICAP SPACE IS REQUIRED AND IT MUST BE VAN
ACCESSIBLE.
4. IDENTIFY THE DEVELOPMENT AREA OF THE COUNTY WHERE THE
LOCATED: EMERGING GROWTH AREA.
5. PER SEC. 19.1-53, OUTSIDE STORAGE SHALL BE SCREENED
FROM VIEW OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES ON WHICH OUTSIDE STOR
IS NOT PERMITTED, FROM PROPERTY ZONED A AND IS DESIGNA
BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR R, R-TH, R-MF, A, O
MH OR I-1 DISTRICTS, AND FROM PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY EXC
FROM LIMITED ACCESS ROADS.
PROVIDE NOTES AND DETAILS ON THE PLAN FOR A NINE (9) FOOT
WALL/FENCE INTENDED TO SCREEN OUTDOOR STORAGE FROM THE
ADJOINING PROPERTY TO THE WEST. SUCH WALL/FENCE SHOULD BE
DURABLE, ATTRACTIVE, AND CONSTRUCTED IN A WAY SO THAT IT
WILL NOT FAIL OR DETERIORATE AT A LATER DATE. AS POSSIBLE
EXAMPLES, A MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH A BRICK VENEER FACE
AND DECORATIVE CAP, OR A LOWER MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH
BRICK VENEER TO 3 FEET HIGH WITH BRICK COLUMNS RISING
ABOVE TO 9 FEET WITH A COMPOSITE BOARD FENCING IN BETWEEN
THE BRICK COLUMNS ATTACHED TO A STEEL FRAME.
6. PER SEC. 19-519(A), PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED
TO INCLUDE 30 S. F. OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A CALCULATION FOR THE
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TIMES 30 S.F. TO
DETERMINE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN PARKING LOT.
(EXAMPLE: 100 PARKING SPACES X 30 S.F. = 3000 S.F.
LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING LOT).
7.PER SEC. 19-519(B), THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN A
PARKING LOT SHALL BE 1 PER 200 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE AREA
IN THE PARKING LOT. SHOW THE CALCULATION FOR TOTAL
NUMBER OF TREES. (EXAMPLE: 3000 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA
DIVIDED BY 200 S.F. PER TREE = 15 TREES).
8. PER SEC. 19-519(A & B), AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES
SHALL BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH
A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL
MATURING TREES SHALL BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH
OF 9 FEET AND BE 150 S.F. IN SIZE.
9. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS
FOR HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED
POLICY, AND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19-517(B), THE
DESIGN OF PARKING AREAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN
TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN MATURING
LANDSCAPING AND THE VISIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FIRE
HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO HIGH POWER TRANSMISSION LINES,
SITE LIGHTING, AND VISIBILITY FOR MOTORISTS EXITING
PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED TO
DETERMINE THAT SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING LOT PLANTING
AREA EXISTS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19-519
EXCLUDING ISLANDS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS AND RELATED
UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICTS WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES
AND SITE LIGHTING.
10. PROVIDE SIZES OF PROPOSED ISLANDS.
11. PER SEC. 19.1-570, AREA OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED
BUILDING USED FOR THE STORAGE OF ITEMS SUCH AS, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO, EQUIPMENT, ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS
SUPPLIES, VEHICLES AWAITING REPAIR OF BODY
OR ENGINE DAMAGE,INVENTORY OF GOODS SUCH AS BUILDING
MATERIALS AT HOME CENTERS,OR PARKING AREAS FOR COMPANY
OWNED AND OPERATED VEHICLES, EXCLUDING PASSENGER VEHICLES
AND TRUCKS WHERE THE CARGO AREA MAY BE ACCESSED FROM THE
DRIVER'S SEAT WITHOUT EXITING THE VEHICLE. OUTSIDE STORAGE
SHALL NOT INCLUDE OUTSIDE DISPLAY.
12. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E., THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY
THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR
LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
13. PER SEC. 19.1-246, AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. ALL LANDSCAPING PLANS SHALL
COMPLY WITH SEC. 19.1-246
14. SEC. 19.1-249 B., ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION
SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS
MAINTENANCE COVNTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE
WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE
SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY
DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
15. SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR
ADDITIONALLY ON A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION OF
ALL EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, THE BUILDING
OR ON THE GROUND AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR
EACH LIGHT FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
16. SEC. 19.1-205, IF SITE LIGHTING IS PROPOSED, ALL LIGHT
FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE
LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
17. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE
BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS
IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION
AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE
GROUND.
18. SHOW ANY EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED GAS, POWER, AND
TELEPHONE LINES AND EASEMENTS (IF KNOWN).
19. THERE ARE FOUR (4) ADJACENT PARCELS DIRECTLY SOUTH OF
THE SEGMENT 157.59, BUT ONLY THREE (3) PARCELS ARE NOTED
ON THE SITE PLAN. ALSO, THE ZONING IS NOTED AS "NEW PCL"
ON THE ADJOINING PARCEL NOTED AS "WOODFIN ASSOCIATES LP".
THE ZONING SHOULD BE NOTED AS C-5 AND THE OWNER IS
AMERCIAN TOWER LP.
20. PER SEC. 19.1-317.D., MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND
SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS
AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2
AND I-3 DISTRICTS. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND
PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT
UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
********************************************************
END OF FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS.
************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE-------8/10/2016
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------8/11/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------2
REVIEW DATE------------9/1/2016
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT YET SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT YET SUBMITTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
RESUBMIT 10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW.
PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW
EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED
EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET EACH
REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL
LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NO
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
1. A NEW BUILDING APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN ADDED SINCE
THE LAST PLAN. PLEASE CLARIFY THE USE(S) FOR
THIS SITE. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT USES STATED
UNDER GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET 1. ONE SAYS
"OFFICE/WAREHOUSE", AND THE OTHER SAYS
"OFFICE/EQUIPMENT STORAGE". THE USES HAVE A
DIRECT IMPACT ON THE PARKING REQUIREMENT, SO IT
IS IMPORTANT FOR THE PROPOSED USE(S) TO BE
CLEAR. IF IN FACT THE USE WILL BE "CONTRACTOR'S
OFFICE, SHOP, AND STORAGE YARD, THEN REVISE THE
GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET 1 TO REFLECT THIS.
2. PROVIDE A SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH
THE ADJOINING PROPERTY.
THE FOLLOWING ARE REPEAT COMMENTS FROM THE 1ST REVIEW:
3. PER SEC. 19.1-53, OUTSIDE STORAGE SHALL BE
SCREENED FROM VIEW OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES ON
WHICH OUTSIDE STORAGE IS NOT PERMITTED, FROM
PROPERTY ZONED A AND IS DESIGNATED BY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR R, R-TH, R-MF, A, O MH
OR I-1 DISTRICTS, AND FROM PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY
EXCEPT FROM LIMITED ACCESS ROADS.
REPEAT COMMENT) AS DISCUSSED IN THE PRELIMINARY MEETING,
PROVIDE NOTES AND DETAILS ON THE PLAN FOR A NINE (9) FOOT
WALL/FENCE INTENDED TO SCREEN OUTDOOR STORAGE FROM THE
ADJOINING PROPERTY TO THE WEST. SUCH WALL/FENCE SHOULD BE
DURABLE, ATTRACTIVE, AND CONSTRUCTED IN A WAY SO THAT IT
WILL NOT FAIL OR DETERIORATE AT A LATER DATE. AS POSSIBLE
EXAMPLES, A MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH A BRICK VENEER FACE
AND DECORATIVE CAP, OR A LOWER MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH
BRICK VENEER TO 3 FEET HIGH WITH BRICK COLUMNS RISING
ABOVE TO 9 FEET WITH A COMPOSITE BOARD FENCING IN BETWEEN
THE BRICK COLUMNS ATTACHED TO A STEEL FRAME.
4. PER SEC. 19-519(A), PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED
TO INCLUDE 30 S. F. OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A CALCULATION FOR THE
TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TIMES 30 S.F. TO
DETERMINE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN PARKING LOT.
(EXAMPLE: 100 PARKING SPACES X 30 S.F. = 3000 S.F.
LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING LOT).
. PER SEC. 19-519(B), THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN A
PARKING LOT SHALL BE 1 PER 200 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE AREA
IN THE PARKING LOT. SHOW THE CALCULATION FOR TOTAL
NUMBER OF TREES. (EXAMPLE: 3000 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA
DIVIDED BY 200 S.F. PER TREE = 15 TREES).
6. PER SEC. 19-519(A & B), AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES
SHALL BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH
A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL
MATURING TREES SHALL BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH
OF 9 FEET AND BE 150 S.F. IN SIZE.
7. PER SEC. 19.1-27 E., THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY
THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN,
OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
8. PER SEC. 19.1-246, AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. ALL LANDSCAPING PLANS SHALL
COMPLY WITH SEC. 19.1-246
9. SEC. 19.1-249 B., ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION
SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE
WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE
SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY
DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
10. SEC. 19.1-205, IF SITE LIGHTING IS PROPOSED, ALL LIGHT
FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE
LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY. IF SITE LIGHTING IS NOT PROPOSED, THEN
PLEASE NOTE AS SUCH.
11. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE
BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS
IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN,
AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS
MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE GROUND.
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL / (804)768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE-------4/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------4/19/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------3
REVIEW DATE------------5/3/17
RECOMMENDATION---------NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT YET SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT YET SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT YET SUBMITTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
RESUBMIT 10 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET
TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW.
PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW
EACH COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED
EACH REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET EACH
REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL
LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NO
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
1. PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY CALCULATION FOR THE MAGNOLIA
TREE.
2. SHOW SETBACKS ON SHEET C6 FOR THE FRONT, REAR, AND
SIDE ADJOINING THE PARCEL TO THE EAST.
3. IF IT IS DESIRED TO RETAIN THE EXISTING VEGETATION
ALONG THE FRONT, SIDES, AND REAR PROPERTY LINES, TO
BE CREDITED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING, THEN LABEL
TREE SAVE AREA ON EACH SIDE. ALSO, PLANNING STAFF
WILL NEED TO EVALUATE THE SITE PRIOR TO FINAL
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT
THE LANDSCPAING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. PLEASE
CALL STEVE TUGWELL AT 768-7566 FOR AN INSPECTION.
4. IDENTIFY A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SOURCE FOR THE
SITE. THE COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR
HOSE BIBS WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ALL AREA(S) OF NEW PLANTINGS.
5. CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT SITE LIGHTING WILL BE
INSTALLED. IF YES, THEN PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN IN
COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 19.1-205.B. OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE.
6. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE
BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS
IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES
SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED
WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE GROUND.
-PER SEC. 19.1-342.C. OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
FACADES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OF UNPAINTED
CONCRETE BLOCK, UNFINISHED CORRUGATED METAL OR
UNFINISHED SHEET METAL.
-USE OF DIFFERENT MATERIALS ON DIFFERENT FACADES
SHALL BE PERMITTED, BUT INFERIOR MATERIALS SHALL NOT
BE USED ON SIDES WHICH FACE ADJOINING PROPERTY.
**************END OF 3RD REVIEW*******************
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 4/19/16
RECEIVED DATE : 4/24/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 5/11/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. COORDINATE POINTS BASED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 ARE NOT PRESENT. TWO POINTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
SITE BOUNDARY.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE : 8/10/16
RECEIVED DATE : 8/15/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 8/29/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE PARCEL BOUNDARY SURVEY ALONG OAKLAKE CT ON THE
SECOND SUBMITTAL IS NOT THE SAME AS THE FIRST SUBMITTAL.
THE CHANGE IN TRAVERSE NOW CREATES A 20' GAP SO THAT IT
NO LONGER CLOSES. PLEASE CORRECT THIS.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS, LLC
PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE : 4/14/17
RECEIVED DATE : 4/21/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 5/5/17
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. THE PARCEL BOUNDARY SURVEY IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE
SUPPLY THE METES AND BOUNDS FOR EVERY SEGMENT ALONG THE
TRAVERSE TO INCLUDE CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE FOR ALL
NON-TANGENT CURVES.
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0244
NAME OF PLAN:BIGG IDEAS LLC
ADDRESS: 12781 OAK LAKE CT
DATE OF REVIEW:5/11/16 REVIEW # 1
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT
SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
3) THE ADDRESS FOR THIS SITE HAS BEEN CHANGED TO
12781 OAK LAKE CT AS THAT IS WHERE THE ACCESS TO THE
SITE IS MADE.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0244
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS LLC
ADDRESS: 12781 OAK LAKE CT
DATE OF REVIEW: 8/29/16 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN. THE
ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN. THIS DOES
NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SIGN. IF
YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A
DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
ADDRESS: 12912 GENITO ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/19/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 4/28/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 4/28/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. ON THE UTILITY PLAN CALL OUT THE HYDRANT AT 12739 OAKLA
COURT
2. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
3. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
ADDRESS: 12912 GENITO ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/10/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 8/15/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 8/15/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
2.. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: BIGG IDEAS, LLC
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0244
ADDRESS: 12912 GENITO ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 4/25/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 4/25/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : BIGG IDEAS
ADDRESS : 12912 GENITO ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0244
LATEST PLAN DATE : 04/19/2016 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 04/26/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 05/17/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
D. TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE
04. A BENCHMARK MUST BE SHOWN WITH REFERENCE TO
MEAN SEA LEVEL. (CL-GENERAL 11)
05. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADING CONTOURS MUST
BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN AND MUST HAVE THEIR
ELEVATIONS CLEARLY LABELED. (CL-G&D 2) IT DOES NOT
APPEAR THAT EXISTING GRADES FOR ADJACENT PROPERTIES
ARE CORRECTLY REPRESENTED. FOR EXAMPLE, THE
PROPOSED BMP OUTFALLS INTO AN EXISTING CHANNEL
WHICH CONVEYS RUNOFF TO EXISTING STORM SEWER ALONG
SPECTRIM LANE.
06. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DETAILED SOILS REPORT, THE
MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWABLE ON BARE EARTH IS 3.5 FPS.
VELOCITIES BETWEEN 3.5 FPS AND 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A
JUTE LINING AND ANY VELOCITIES GREATER THAN 4.0 FPS
REQUIRE A STRUCTURAL LINING OF EITHER RIP RAP OR
CONCRETE. (CL-G&D 5)
07. ALL ROOF WATER AND DOWNDRAINS MUST BE COLLECTED AND
DISCHARGED IN A NON-ERODIBLE MANNER. (CL-G&D 6)
08. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM SEWERS, CULVERTS, DROP
INLETS AND APPURTENANCES MUST BE ASSIGNED A STRUCTURE
NUMBER AND LISTED IN TABULAR FORM ON THE PLAN SHEET ON
WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED. (CL-G&D 14)
09. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AT THE NOSE OF AL
RADIAL CURB AND AT ALL APPRECIABLE BREAKS IN HORIZONTA
OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. (CL-G&D 22)
10. DRY GUTTER IS REQUIRED WHERE RUNOFF FLOWS AWAY FROM TH
FACE OF CURB. THESE AREAS MUST BE CROSS-HATCHED AND A
DETAIL PROVIDED ON THE PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRY
GUTTER. (CL-G&D 23)
11. THE SYMBOL USED FOR DRY GUTTER ON THE PLAN VIEW MUST B
SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DETAIL FOR ITS CONSTRUCTION.
(CL-G&D 24)
12. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 26)
13. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 27)
14. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ALONG ANY STORMWATER
CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH RECEIVES RUNOFF FROM OFFSITE,
FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR REQUIRES IMPROVEMENTS ON
A DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY OWNER. (CL-G&D 29)
15. A SEPARATE PLAN SHEET MUST BE ADDED WHICH ONLY SHOWS
ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
DEDICATED. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
(CL-G&D 30)
16. A PAVEMENT DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PAVED AREAS.
(CL-G&D 34)
17. PROVIDE A BARRIER AROUND THE GRAVEL AREA TO PREVENT
GRAVEL CREEP.
18. PROVIDE THE FULL ROUTING CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
BASIN.
19. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO SHEET C4:
A. PROVIDE TC VALUES FOR PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPED RUNOFF
CALCULATIONS
B. SHOW THE FLOWPATH ASSOCIATED WITH EACH DRAINAGE AREA
(PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS)
C. CLARIFY IF AREA D IS CONVEYED TO THE PROPOSED BMP
OR TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
D. RUNOFF DOES NOT OUTFALL THE PROPERTY IN ONE
CONCENTRATED LOCATION, THUS, COMPARING THE PRE- AND
POST-DEVELOPED "SITE" RUNOFF IS NOT ACCURATE.
RUNOFF FROM DRAINAGE AREAS B AND C DO NOT CHANGE,
AND CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM ANALYSIS.
20. SHOW OUTLET PROTECTION AT THE END OF THE BMP OUTFALL
PIPE IN ON THE SITE PLAN AND GRADING PLAN
(SHEETS C5 AND C6).
===================== EROSION CONTROL ===================
21. THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SEQUENCE/NARRATIVE MUST B
DIVIDED INTO A MINIMUM OF TWO PHASES.
PHASE I SHALL SHOW THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF CLEARING TO
INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ALL PERIMETER-
CONTROL DEVICES, AND STRATEGICALLY PLACED SEDIMENT
TRAPS AND BASINS, ASSOCIATED DIVERSIONS AND DIVERSION
DIKES, AND SPOIL AND BORROW AREAS FOR THE INSTALLATION
OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
PHASE II WILL INCLUDE ALL REMAINING CLEARING, GRADING,
AND INSTALLATION OF REMAINING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES,
INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS,
AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND STABILIZATION.
(CL-EC 1)
22. IF TIMBERING IS REQUIRED ON THE PROJECT, IT SHOULD BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN / NARRATIVE
AND SHOULD NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE
APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. (CL-EC 2)
23. REVISE THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NARRATIVE ON SHEETS
C2 AND C3 AND REMOVE THE NOTE STATING: "NOTE THESE
PLANS ARE FOR CLEARING AND GRUBBING ONLY, SITE PLANS
TO FOLLOW."
24. A DETAILED SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS REQUIRED WHICH
COORDINATES THE INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF THE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WITH CONSTRUCTIO
OF THE REMAINDER OF THE PROJECT. (CL-EC 3)
25. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE CERTIFIED RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER
(CRLD) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
(CL-EC 5)
26. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE VSMP CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OPERATOR
AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR (OR AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.
27. STEPS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
EVENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWER, DROP INLETS,
INLET PROTECTION, CURB & GUTTER, AND BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION. (CL-EC 6)
28. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIO
TO ALLOW ALL PROPOSED SEDIMENT TRAPS AND BASINS TO
REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL ONSITE CONTRIBUTING AREAS AR
STABILIZED. (CL-EC 7)
29. THE DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE OUTLINED FOR EACH PHASE AND
THE SEDIMENT TRAPPING FACILITIES DESIGNED ON THE WORST
CASE SCENARIO. (CL-EC 10)
30. THE SEDIMENT BASIN(S) MUST BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STD.& SPEC. 3.14 OF THE VESCH. SEDIMENT BASIN
DESIGN CALCULATION SHEETS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL
DESIGN DATA ADDRESSED AND SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
INCLUDED ON THE PLANS. (CL-EC 11)
31. SAFETY FENCE (STD. & SPEC 3.01) IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. (CL-EC 15)
32. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
33. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR EACH STRUCTURA
EROSION CONTROL MEASURE. DETAILS CAN BE FOUND IN
CHAPTER III OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
HANDBOOK. (CL-EC 21)
34. THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF EROSION CONTROL MINIMUM
STANDARD # 1, (SEE THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL LAW AND REGULATIONS FOR FY 2013) MUST BE ADDED
TO THE PLANS AND ALL OTHER NOTES WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT
MUST BE ADJUSTED OR REMOVED. (CL-EC 25)
35. TABLE 3.31-B AND TABLE 3.32-D, FOUND IN THE CURRENT
EDITION OF THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
HANDBOOK, MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SHEETS. (CL-EC 26)
36. AN MS-19 ANALYSIS MUST BE PERFORMED AT EACH POINT OF
CONCENTRATED DISCHARGE AND AT THE DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY
LINE. THE LOCATION OF EACH ANALYSIS MUST BE SHOWN AND
LABELED ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS. (CL-EC 28)
37. THE CULVERTS DOWNSTREAM OF THE DETENTION BASIN MUST
BE ANALYZED FOR ADEQUACY BASED ON THE 10-YEAR STORM.
EXISTING INADEQUATE CULVERTS IN COUNTY EASEMENTS AND
UNDER STATE ROADS INTO WHICH A PROJECT DRAINS MUST BE
ENLARGED OR ON SITE DETENTION BASED ON THE ULTIMATE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTRIBUTING WATERSHED PROVIDED TO
ACHIEVE MINIMUM 10 YEAR PERFORMANCE OF THE PIPE(S).
A DRAINAGE AREA MAP MUST BE PROVIDED FOR BOTH ONSITE
AND OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREAS. (CL-EC 29)
38. INLET PROTECTION (STD. & SPEC. # 3.07) IS REQUIRED FOR
ALL DROP INLETS. (CL-EC 33) CLARIFY IF ANY DROP INLET
EXIST WITHIN OAKLAKE COURT.
39. THE DETAIL SHOWN FOR CURB INLET PROTECTION MUST BE
CHANGED TO THE ONE SHOWN ON PLATE 3.07-8 OF STANDARD
AND SPECIFICATION # 3.07. (CL-EC 34)
40. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN WHICH PROVIDES FOR PLACEMENT OF
EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE
TRENCH WHILE SILT FENCE AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS ARE
PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE. (CL-EC 37)
41. ALL SILT MUST BE CLEANED FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN PRIOR
TO CONVERSION TO THE SWM/BMP. A NOTE MUST BE PROVIDED
IN THE EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE. (CL-EC 41)
42. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT. (CL-EC 42A)
B. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER/BMP
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT. (CL-EC 42B)
C. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
D. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
E. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-EC 42D)
F. AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, TWO
STANDARD SIGNS MUST BE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. THESE SIGNS SHOULD STATE EITHER
"CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AHEAD" OR "TRUCKS ENTERING
HIGHWAY". (CL-EC 42E)
G. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42F)
===============CBPA/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ================
43. REVISE THE CBPA NOTE ON THE COVER SHEET TO PROVIDE
A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS SITE MEETS THE VSMP PART IIC
TECHNICAL CRITERIA (GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE OAKLAKE
INDUSTRIAL PARK CBPA PLAN).
44. A CBPA COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS
UTILIZING PART IIC OF THE CURRENT VSMP REGULATIONS.
(CL-CBPA 3) THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO B
SHOWN ON THE SHEET(S):
A. THE CBPA/MS-4 COMPLIANCE TABLE. (SEE APPENDIX D OF TH
CHESAPEAKE BAY CHAPTER IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERIN
REFERENCE MANUAL) (CL-CBPA 3A)
B. SPECIFY THE 2 YEAR, 10 YEAR,AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE
ELEVATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED BMP WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE
VOLUMES. (CL-CBPA 3C)
C. INCREMENTAL DRAINAGE AREAS TO EACH BMP, THE IMPERVIOUS
AREA WITHIN EACH DRAINAGE AREA, AND THE PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS AREA OF EACH BMP DRAINAGE AREA. (CL-CBPA 3H
D. PROPOSED EASEMENT LOCATIONS. (CL-CBPA 3I)
45. VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. (CL-CBPA 10)
46. ELIMINATE SHEET FLOW INTO THE PROPOSED BASIN.
47. CLARIFY IF THE PROPOSED BASIN IS A WET POND OR A DRY
POND. THE ORIFICE IS SPECIFIED AT THE SAME ELEVATION
AS THE BOTTOM OF THE POND.
48. THE ENTIRE BASIN MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. BEYOND THE 100-YEAR WSE.
OR DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER APPLIES.
(CL-CBPA 14)
49. A MINIMUM 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
FROM THE SWM/BMP EASEMENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY FOR
FUTURE MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 15)
50. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHEET FO
SWM/BMP EASEMENTS AND ACCESS EASEMENTS. (CL-CBPA 16)
51. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE 4 FEET OR LESS IN
DEPTH AND ONE ACRE FEET OR LESS IS SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE A SAFETY BENCH OR BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6 FOOT
HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE, HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND
MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH
ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT. (CL-CBPA 18)
52. PERFORATIONS IN THE RISER MUST BE PRECAST, NOT FIELD
MADE. PLEASE ADD A NOTE TO THE RISER DETAIL.
(CL-CBPA 26)
53. A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED BETWEEN
THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT AND THE STAGED 100-YEAR
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF AN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY IS
SPECIFIED. TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED IF THERE
IS NO EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. (CL-CBPA 27)
54. ALL BARREL AND RISER ASSEMBLIES MUST BE "O-RING"
CONCRETE PIPE, NO SMALLER THAN 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER.
(CL-CBPA 29)
55. THE EMBANKMENT MUST HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE CLAY CORE KEYE
INTO THE NATURAL GROUND. LABEL IN THE DETAIL ON
SHEET C6. (CL-CBPA 32)
56. IF THE PROPOSED BMP IS A WET POND, A GATE VALVE
(MINIMUM 12" DIAMETER) MUST BE PROVIDED TO FACILITATE
DRAINING THE BMP FOR MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 33)
57. OUTLET PROTECTION MUST BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STD. & SPEC. 3.18 OF THE VESCH FOR ALL PIPES
DISCHARGING INTO THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. A DETAIL MUST
BE SHOWN FOR KEYING CLASS I RIP-RAP INTO THE GROUND AT
LEAST 2 FEET AND PLACING IT OVER FILTER CLOTH.
DIMENSIONS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN VIEW. (CL-CBPA 35
58. THE SIDE SLOPES IN SWM/BMP FACILITIES SHALL BE NO
STEEPER THAN THREE TO ONE (3:1). LABEL IN THE PROFILE
VIEW. (CL-CBPA 37)
59. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR CONVERSION OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN INTO A
SWM/BMP FACILITY AFTER THE UPSTREAM AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED. ALL EXISTING SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM TH
BASIN. (CL-CBPA 39)
60. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR THE SWM/BMP FACILITY TO BE OBSERVED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. "AS
BUILT" INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE
CERTIFICATION OF THE FACILITY. CERTIFICATION IS
REQUIRED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SWM/BMP PERFORMANCE
BOND AND ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (CL-CBPA 42)
======================= CLOSING ========================
61. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
62. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
63. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
64. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (THIS IS AVAILABLE ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND FORMS WEBPAGE)
65. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
66. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
67. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
68. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
69. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
70. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
71. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $2700
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 16PR0244



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List