Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 16PR0206
Modify comments view for Case # 16PR0206

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 16PR0206 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: MOORE'S LAKE APARTME - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/20/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: MULTI-FAMILY
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 01 06/10/16 06/24/16 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 COMPLETE 11/29/16 CBH 776-7836
FIRE DEPT.--: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 COMPLETE 11/22/16 AWB 717-6167
HOUSE NUMBER: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 ******** 06/24/16 AMJ 768-7549
MAPPING/GIS-: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 COMPLETE 11/23/16 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 COMPLETE 11/28/16 WST 768-7566
TRANSPORT.--: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 COMPLETE 11/23/16 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 AMENDED* 11/23/16 WBP 751-4336
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 03 11/17/16 11/28/16 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, P.E./748-1863
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APTS OFFSITE RD & UTILITY
PLAN
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY AND OTHERS
SUBMISSION DATE : 2/18/16
PLAN DATED : 2/16/16
REVIEW DATE : 3/8/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UTILITIES PROJECT 16-0046 NUMBER SHALL BE PLACED ON
THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE COMPLETE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THIS SET OF PLANS AND THOSE FOR ALL CONNECTING
PROJECTS. LABEL BOTH CONNECTING EXISTING WATERLINES WITH
PROJECT NUMBER.
3. PROVIDE AND/OR INDICATE LOCATION OF MISS UTILITY NOTE.
4. PROVIDE LEGEND OF SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS,
OTHER UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, EXISTING AND PROPOSED GROUND,
AND PAVEMENT PROFILE ON COVER SHEET.
5. LABEL PRIVATE OR PUBLIC UTILITIES ON MATERIALS LIST.
6. REVISE STANDARD SEWER AND WATER NOTE #13 TO INDICATE
AN ELEVATION OF 95 FEET.
7. PROVIDE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL BAR SCALE ON EACH PLAN
AND PROFILE SHEET.
8. PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTIFICATIONS TO ALL ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNERS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY DESIGN AND/OR
SURVEYING WORK. COORDINATE WITH APPLICABLE ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNERS IN REGARDS TO ANY POSSIBLE IMPACTS
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROPERTY ACCESS.
9. PROVIDE STATIONING ON UTILITY PLAN SHEETS FOR ALL
PROPOSED LINES. LABELING ACCORDINGLY.
10. PROVIDE TOTAL DOMESTIC DEMAND AND METER SIZE ON ALL
METER SIZING FORMS.
11. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES PROPOSED IN ANY
WATER OR SEWER EASEMENT. THIS INCLUDES ALL PROPOSED STORM
SEWERS, ETC. VERIFY ALL FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER OVER
PROPOSED LINES.
12. SHOW AND LABEL CLEARLY ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS
ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE RECORDATION INFORMATION FOR EXISTIN
13. ADD VERTICAL BENCH MARKS WITH THE VERTICAL DATUM
IDENTIFIED ON UTILITY PLAN SHEETS.
14. VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM SEWER LINES,
GAS, TELEPHONE, POWER, AND OTHER UTILITY LINES WHICH CROSS
OR RUN PARALLEL TO THE SEWER OR WATER MAINS , ARE SHOWN
WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SEPARATIONS GIVEN.
15. LABEL ALL ROAD NAMES ON UTILITY PLAN SHEETS.
16. PROVIDE ANGLE OF PROPOSED WATERLINE CROSSING TO STORM
SEWER NEAR CONNECTION TO EXISTING 12" WATERLINE. VERIFY AL
SEPARATION DISTANCES.
17. LABEL ALL EXISTING WATER AND SEWER TO BE DEMOLISHED OR
ABANDONED. ADD "TO BE ABANDONED PER VDH REQUIREMENTS" NOTE
TO EXISTING WELL ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET.
18. LABEL PROPOSED AND EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS ON
UTILITY PROFILES SHEETS.
19. PROVIDE SEWER PROFILE BETWEEN PROPOSED MANHOLES 9 AND
8.
20. VERIFY IF ANY HORIZONTAL BORING IS PROPOSED IN THIS
PROJECT.
21. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO STREAM CROSSINGS AND/OR STORM
SEWER OUTLETS. IF APPLICABLE PROVIDE ELEVATIONS OF THE
STREAM BED AND 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION AND NORMAL WATER
ELEVATIONS.
22. PROVIDE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING AND
PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS.
23. LABEL REFERENCE DISTANCES FROM PROPOSED WATERLINE TO
RIGHT OF WAY, OTHER UTILITY LINES, FACE OF CURB, ETC. ON
UTILITY PLAN SHEET AS APPLICABLE. MOVE PROPOSED WATERLINE
OUTSIDE OF PROPOSED OR FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER.
24. ADD A NOTE "ALL SALVAGEABLE ITEMS ARE TO BE RETURNED
TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES AS
DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR."
25. INDICATE IF ANY IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS PROPOSED.
26. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO VALVES FOR TEES AND THREE
VALVES FOR CROSSES. VERIFY ALL EXISTING VALVES ARE SHOWN
AND EXACT DISTANCES TO EXISTING VALVES AT BOTH WATERLINE
TIE-IN CONNECTION POINTS.
27. VERIFY THAT NO LIGHT POLES OR TREES LOCATED WITHIN A
WATER OR SEWER EASEMENT.
28. VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO POWER POLES IN THE UTILITY
EASEMENT AND THAT THE OVERHEAD LINES DO NOT CREATE A
CONFLICT OR HAZARD DURING CONSTRUCTION. LABEL LOCATION OF
EXISTING POWER POLES ON UTILITY PLAN SHEETS.
29. SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING WATERLINE ON UTILITY PLAN AND
PROFILE SHEET WITH PROJECT NUMBER. VERIFY PROPOSED TAPPING
SLEEVE AND VALVE OR CUT-IN TEE WITH MINIMAL DISRUPTION OF
SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
30. VERIFY IF THERE ARE ANY LOW OR HIGH POINTS IN THE
PROPOSED WATERLINE. IF A LOW POINT IN THE WATERLINE A
FLUSHING HYDRANT MAY BE REQUIRED PER DETAIL WAT-3 AND AT A
HIGH POINT AN AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DETAIL WAT-1.
31. PROVIDE SIMULTANEOUS FLOW TEST INFORMATION RESULTS ON
WATER FLOW INFORMATION AS PER DES-5 ON PLAN SHEETS.
32. PROVIDE HYDRANTS ON SAME SIDE AS WATERLINE.
33. CLEARLY DELINEATE LIMITS OF SANITARY SEWER ABANDONMENT
ON PLANS AND PROVIDE NOTES ON HOW TO BE PERFORMED.
34. CLEARLY DELINEATE LIMITS OF WATERLINE ABANDONMENT ON
PLANS AND PROVIDE NOTES ON HOW TO BE PERFORMED. ADD NOTE T
REFER TO PART 4, SECTION 3, ITEM # 3.06 AND 3.07 FOR WATER
SERVICE AND WATERLINE ABANDONMENT.
35. PROVIDE SEWER HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS.
36. VERIFY GROUND COVERAGE OVER PROPOSED SEWER PIPE MEETS
MINIMUM CRITERIA OF 6 FT UNDER ROADS AND 3.5 FT IN
EASEMENTS.ALSO VERIFY THAT NO SEWER LINE IS GREATER THAN
14' IN DEPTH.
37. PROVIDE DEFLECTION ANGLES AT ALL MANHOLES SHOWN ON
PLANS.
38. VERIFY THAT ALL MANHOLES ARE DESIGNED TO AN ELEVATION
6" ABOVE THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION.
39. VERIFY MANHOLE SPACING DOES NOT EXCEED 400 LINEAR FT.
40. SHOW AND LABEL VALVES TO BE USED FOR CUT-OFF DURING
TIE-IN. CALCULATE AND LABEL DISTANCE FROM EXISTING VALVES
TO PROPOSED CONNECTION ON UTILITIES PLAN SHEET.
41. PROVIDE THRUST PROTECTION AT ALL BENDS, TRANSITIONS,
AND END OF LINES. CALCULATE AND LABEL LENGTH OF ALL
RESTRAINT JOINT PIPE SYSTEMS INCLUDING AT EXISTING PIPE
ENDS. CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL ON PROFILE SHEET.
42. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF LINNETTE VASQUEZ
(VASQUEZL@CHESTERFIELD.GOV). THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASE
ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLA
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PREPARATION OR
RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE BID PROPOSAL
SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED UTILITIES
CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
43. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE ONE APPROVED SET FROM PLANNING (4 TOTAL
SETS).
44. CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL LIMITS OF PROPOSED EASEMENTS.
45. CLEARLY SHOW ALL PROPOSED WATER, SEWER, ROAD, AND
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON SAME PLAN SHEET TO VERIFY CROSSINGS
AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. DARKEN AND LABEL ALL PROPOSED
STORM AND ROAD ITEMS.
46. VERIFY THAT A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET HORIZONTAL
SEPARATION DISTANCE IS PROVIDED BETWEEN SEWER LINES, SEWER
LATERALS AND WATER METERS OR FLUSHING HYDRANTS AND BETWEEN
SEWER LINE AND STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. ANALYZE DISTANCE
BETWEEN PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
AS WELL AS ALL SEPARATION DISTANCES BETWEEN LATERALS.
47. ADD NOTE TO EXISTING MANHOLE TO BE CORE DRILLED AND
KOR-N-SEAL GASKET IS TO BE INSTALLED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED
FOR TIE-IN.
48. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF A 20 FOOT EASEMENT FOR ALL
PROPOSED SEWER LINES OUTSIDE OF ROW THAT ARE GREATER THAN
10 FEET DEEP.
49. VERIFY THAT ALL PIPES BETWEEN MANHOLES ARE OF LIKE
MATERIAL AND CLASS.
50. PROVIDE PROFILES OF ALL WATERLINES INCLUDING PROPOSED
LINES CROSSINGS.
51. PLEASE NOTE THAT JUMPER IS NOT REMOVED UNTIL WATER
ACCEPTANCE INTO THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN ACHIEVED.
52. NOTE THAT ALL OFF SITE EASEMENTS NEED TO BE OBTAINED
BEFORE PLAN APPROVAL.
53. FIELD VERIFY SEWER AT TIE IN POINT. LABEL INFORMATION
OBTAINED AS FIELD VERIFIED ON PROFILE SHEETS. ADD NOTE TO
PLANS THAT THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO FIELD VERIFY THE
INVERTS OF ALL EXISTING MANHOLES, GAS LINES, OTHER UTILITY
LINES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
54. PROVIDE EASEMENTS AROUND DOMESTIC METERS AS MUCH
DISTANCE AS POSSIBLE FROM PRIVATE VAULT BOX.
55. FOR MH #5 ENSURE THAT THE MANHOLE IS NO GREATER THAN
12" ABOVE GROUND ELEVATION AT ANY TIME.
56. VERIFY IF DROP MANHOLES ARE NEEDED WHICH SHOULD BE
AVOIDED WHENEVER POSSIBLE. DROP MANHOLES SHALL ONLY BE USE
WHEN THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE INCOMING SEWER LINE
EXCEEDS THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE OUTGOING SEWER BY 2
FEET OR MORE. IF DISTANCE IS LESS THE PIPE NEEDS TO BE
LOWERED TO THE APPROPRIATE INVERT ELEVATION AT THE BASE OF
THE MANHOLE. CLEARLY SHOW ALL CONNECTING PIPES ON PROFILES
57. VERIFY MAXIMUM DEFLECTION VERTICAL ANGLE FOR BOOT
CONNECTION FOR SEWER LINES GREATER THAN 15% IN SLOPE.
58. PROVIDE A TEMPORARY 4" BLOW OFF AT TIE IN LOCATION TO
WATERLINE OUTSIDE OF ROADWAY. CLEARLY LABEL ON PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS ON VOLUME II PLANS.
59. CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL ON VOLUME 1 ALL LINES AND
STRUCTURES BEING PROPOSED UNDER VOLUME 2 ON ALL PLAN AND
PROFILE SHEETS. CHANGE SEW LABEL TO MH LABEL FOR ALL
PROPOSED MANHOLES.
60. PROVIDE EXACT VERTICAL SEPARATION DISTANCES AT ALL
CROSSINGS BETWEEN STORM AND SEWER. A MINIMUM OF 18"
CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS OFFSITE ROAD
AND UTILITY PLAN (VOLUME 1) [16-0046]
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
SUBMISSION DATE : 6/10/16
PLAN DATED : 6/01/16
REVIEW DATE : 6/23/16 (EXPEDITED)
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME 1:
1. ADD A TEXT TAG SHOWING THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE
REQUIRED WATERLINE JUMPER(S) AND ADD THE WAT-6 DETAIL
TO THE PLAN.
2. DUE TO THE POTENTIAL FOR A DELAY BETWEEN THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE VOLUME 1 UTILITIES AND THE VOLUME
2 UTILITIES, WILL MH'S 8 AND 12 HAVE UNFINISHED
INVERTS, FINISHED INVERTS, OR BE CORE DRILLED AT THE
TIME OF THE ONSITE CONSTRUCTION? PLEASE CLARIFY ON THE
PLAN.
3. A VERTICAL BEND SHOULD BE ADDED FOR THE WATERLINE
TRANSITION AT STA 11+94 OR THE WATERLINE MAY BE
LOWERED BETWEEN STA'S 11+00 AND 12+00.
4. CLARIFY THE VERTICAL WATERLINE TRANSITION AT STA 21+07
BASED UPON THE PROPOSED GRADES AS SHOWN. BASED UPON
THE PROFILE, IS THE WATERLINE STILL IN CONFLICT WITH
ANOTHER PIPE? SINCE CLASS 52 DI WATERLINE IS PROPOSED,
CAN THE PIPE BE INSTALLED OVER THE STORM PIPE AT THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED SEPARATION (18")? OBVIOUSLY,
UTILITIES WOULD PREFER NOT HAVING TO MAINTAIN A 12"
WATERLINE APPROXIMATELY 14.5' DEEP. SECONDLY, THE
TRANSITION AS SHOWN DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE
DEFLECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR DI PIPE PER DETAIL WAT-11
AND SHOULD BE REVISED AS NECESSARY.
5. RE: THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #41 IN THE PREVIOUS
UTILITIES REVIEW LETTER, WHERE ARE THE RESTRAINED
JOINT LENGTH CHARTS LOCATED - THRUST CHART, SHEET C-4?
IN LIEU OF CHARTS OR TABLES, UTILITIES NOW REQUIRES
THE LENGTHS OF RESTRAINT BE ADDED TO THE WATERLINE
PROFILES, SIMILAR TO THE RESTRAINT NOTE CURRENTLY
SHOWN ON SHEET C-23. THUS IF THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO
USE AN ACCEPTABLE MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYSTEM, SUCH AS
EBAA IRON MEGALUG, THE LENGTH OF RESTRAINT HAS ALREADY
BEEN CALCULATED AND SHOWN. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT
UTILITIES PREFERS MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN LIEU
OF THRUST BLOCKING. LENGTHS OF RESTRAINT MUST BE
CALCULATED AND PROVIDED AS APPLICABLE FOR ALL
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL OFFSETS AND BENDS PLUS TEES,
REDUCERS, AND DEAD ENDS. IN LIEU OF SPECIFYING A
RESTRAINED LENGTH FOR INDIVIDUAL FITTINGS, A NOTE MAY
BE ADDED TO THE PROFILES STATING ALL BENDS (FITTINGS)
ARE TO BE RESTRAINED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS.
6. REMOVE THE FOLLOWING NON-APPLICABLE DETAILS: MET-1,
MET-3, MAN-10, AND MAN-17 AND ADD THE FOLLOWING: DES-
2, WAT-3, WAT-6, AND WAT-11.
7. MANHOLE (MH) INSERTS ARE NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL MH'S
EXCEPT SAMPLING (MMH'S) MANHOLES. ADD A NOTE TO THE
PLAN INDICATING MANHOLE INSERTS ARE REQUIRED AND
SPECIFY THE PARSONS PMI3SE MANHOLE INSERT W/ VALVE,
GASKET, AND STRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL. ADDITIONALLY, ADD
THE INSERTS TO THE QUANTITIES.
8. PROVIDE A PROFILE FOR THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE
FROM MH-11 TO MH-12.
9. LABEL SHEETS C-17 THROUGH C-19 AS "SITE AND UTILITY
LAYOUT".
10. WATER NOTE #2 ON SHEET C-1 SHOULD INCLUDE REFERENCE TO
CLASS 52 DI PIPE IN CONFORMANCE WITH AWWA
SPECIFICATIONS.
GENERAL:
11. MODIFY WATER NOTE #12 (SHEET C-1) ON BOTH VOLUMES TO
ALLOW THE USE OF MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYSTEMS.
12. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
13. PRIOR TO RELEASE TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTION, A COPY
OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROVAL LETTER AND/
OR ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL
AGENCIES' APPROVAL LETTERS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
14. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
15. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION.
16. PRIOR TO THE NEXT SUBMITTAL, REVISED PLAN SHEETS IN
PDF VERSION MAY BE EMAILED FOR INFORMAL REVIEW.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS (VOLUME 2)
[16-0103]
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
SUBMISSION DATE : 6/10/16
PLAN DATED : 6/01/16
REVIEW DATE : 6/23/16 (EXPEDITED)
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME 2:
1. ADD TEXT TAGS TO SHEETS C-24 THROUGH C-27 TO REFERENCE
THE PROPOSED WATER AND/OR SEWER EASEMENTS AND SPECIFY
THE WIDTH (VARIABLE, 16', ETC.). IT IS NOTED THESE
EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C-47.
2. THE 1 ½" DOMESTIC WATER METERS (WM) MUST BE INSTALLED
IN CARSON 1730-24 VAULTS PER MET-7; THEREFORE, ADD
DETAILS MET-7 (1 OF 2) AND (2 OF 2) TO THE PLAN.
3. REMOVE THE FOLLOWING NON-APPLICABLE DETAILS: MET-1,
MET-3, MAN-17, AND MAN-10 AND ADD THE FOLLOWING: DES-
2, MET-7 (BOTH 1 AND 2), MET-12, WAT-6, AND WAT-11
4. RAISE THE 8" WATERLINES SHOWN ON PROFILES A, B, AND D
TO A MAXIMUM 4' "TO TOP OF PIPE" DEPTH AND PROVIDE
CLASS 52 RESTRAINED JOINT DI PIPE FOR ALL AREAS THE
PIPE WILL BE IN FILL.
5. REMOVE THE VERTICAL TRANSITION AT STA 14+56 AND
INSTALL THE 8" WATERLINE ABOVE THE STORM PIPE BY
PROVIDING A 6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE USING ONE FULL JOINT
OF CLASS 52 DI PIPE. THE DI PIPE MUST BE CENTERED
DIRECTLY OVER THE STORM PIPE.
6. RE: THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, WATER NOTE #2 ON SHEET C-1
SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO REFERENCE CLASS 52 DI IN
CONFORMANCE WITH AWWA SPECIFICATIONS.
7. ADD A NOTE TO THE SEWER LINE PROFILE ON SHEET C-36
THAT THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MATCH THE CROWN OF THE
EXISTING 12" SEWER LINE WITH THE CROWN OF THE PROPOSED
10" LINE AT THE TIE-IN MH.
8. MH DROPS ARE SHOWN AT MH'S 1, 2, AND 3. AS UTILITIES
PREFERS TO AVOID DROP MH'S, REVISE THE PROFILES AND
MATCH MH INVERTS BY PROVIDING A STANDARD 0.1' DROP.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT DUE TO POTENTIAL MANUFACTURER'S
LIMITATIONS FOR THE FLEXIBLE RUBBER BOOT CONNECTORS
FOR SLOPES EXCEEDING 10 DEGREES, A BEND MAY NEED TO BE
INSTALLED (SEE ENCLOSED DETAIL). IF THIS TYPE OF
INSTALLATION IS NECESSARY, NOTES SHOULD BE ADDED TO
THE PROFILE SPECIFYING THE NECESSARY BEND AND THE
ENCLOSED DETAIL SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE PLAN.
9. THE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE THAT AN EXTRA FOOT OF STONE
BE PLACED OVER THE PIPE WHEN THE COVER OVER THE LINE
IS BETWEEN 14 AND 20'. GRAPHICALLY SHOW THE EXTRA FOOT
OF STONE ON THE PROFILE FOR ALL PIPE WHERE THE COVER
EXCEEDS 14' BETWEEN MH'S 2 AND 10.
10. MANHOLE (MH) INSERTS ARE NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL MH'S
EXCEPT SAMPLING (MMH'S) MANHOLES. ADD A NOTE TO THE
PLAN INDICATING MANHOLE INSERTS ARE REQUIRED AND
SPECIFY THE PARSONS PMI3SE MANHOLE INSERT W/ VALVE,
GASKET, AND STRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL. ADDITIONALLY, ADD
THE INSERTS TO THE QUANTITIES.
11. ALL SEWER LINES AND MH'S SHOWN UPSTREAM (EAST) OF MH-
12 SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS "PRIVATE" ON BOTH PLAN AND
PROFILE. THIS INCLUDES MH'S 12A, 13, AND 14.
ADDITIONALLY, MODIFY THE PROPOSED EASEMENT TO EXCLUDE
THESE LINES AND MH'S.
12. A MAINLINE RP BACKFLOW (BFP) DEVICE IS REQUIRED FOR
EACH BUILDING. PLEASE ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN
INDICATING THE SIZE RP AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
EACH.
13. MANHOLE RIM ELEVATIONS MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 12"
ABOVE FINAL GRADE IN AREAS NOT NORMALLY MAINTAINED BY
PROPERTY OWNERS; THEREFORE, GRAPHICALLY SHOW ON THE
PROFILES FOR ALL APPLICABLE MH'S OR ADD A NOTE
INDICATING SAME TO EACH MH ON THE PROFILE.
14. LABEL THE DEDICATED FH'S FOR EACH BUILDING'S DDC.
15. THE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE THAT SANITARY SEWER
INSTALLED IN AREAS OF FILL BE CLASS 52 DI PIPE WITH
MH'S FOUNDED ON ORIGINAL GROUND. RE: THE SEWER 12A TO
14 PROFILE, MH-14 MUST BE INSTALLED ON ORIGINAL
GROUND.
GENERAL:
16. MODIFY WATER NOTE #12 (SHEET C-1) ON BOTH VOLUMES TO
ALLOW THE USE OF MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYSTEMS.
17. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
18. PRIOR TO RELEASE TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTION, A COPY
OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROVAL LETTER AND/
OR ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL
AGENCIES' APPROVAL LETTERS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
19. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
20. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION.
21. PRIOR TO THE NEXT SUBMITTAL, REVISED PLAN SHEETS IN
PDF VERSION MAY BE EMAILED FOR INFORMAL REVIEW.
ENCL: STEEP SLOPE MANHOLE CONNECTION DETAIL (VIA EMAIL)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS OFFSITE ROAD
AND UTILITY PLAN VOLUME I 16-0046
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, PE /751-1863
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
SUBMISSION DATE : 9/16/16
PLAN DATED : 9/14/16
REVIEW DATE : 10/05/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME 1:
1. REVISE ALL MANHOLES TO BE LABELED WITH A "MH" INSTEAD
OF "STR" LABEL. REVISE ON PROFILE SHEETS #C-24 AND
C-25.
2. REVISE DES-2 DETAIL, NOTE # 4 TO STATE "AT OR BELOW
THE 270 FT CONTOUR" ON SHEET #C-4.
3. REVISE SEWER PROFILE SLOPE OR INVERT ELEVATIONS
BETWEEN MH 11 AND 12 TO CORRESPOND ON SHEET # C-25.
4. THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT A TABLE REVIEW
WITH THESE CHANGES MARKED UP OR SHEETS REVISED.
GENERAL:
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
2. PRIOR TO RELEASE TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTION, A COPY
OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROVAL LETTER AND/
OR ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL
AGENCIES' APPROVAL LETTERS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
3. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
4. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, PE /751-1863
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS VOLUME II
16-0103
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
SUBMISSION DATE : 9/16/16
PLAN DATED : 9/14/16
REVIEW DATE : 10/5/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 3ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME II:
1. ADD EXISTING MANHOLE #3 LABEL ON PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEETS.
2. REVISE DES-2 DETAIL, NOTE # 4 TO STATE "AT OR BELOW
THE 270 FT CONTOUR" ON SHEET #C-4.
THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT A TABLE REVIEW
WITH THESE CHANGES MARKED UP OR SHEETS REVISED.
GENERAL:
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
2. PRIOR TO RELEASE TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTION, A COPY
OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROVAL LETTER AND/
OR ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL
AGENCIES' APPROVAL LETTERS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
3. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
4. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, PE /751-1863
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS OFFSITE ROAD
AND UTILITY PLAN VOLUME I 16-0046
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY AND
OTHERS
SUBMISSION DATE : 11/21/16
PLAN DATED : 11/1/16
REVIEW DATE : 11/23/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW-APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME I GENERAL:
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
2. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
3. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF
THE APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : LINNETTE VASQUEZ, PE /751-1863
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS VOLUME II
16-0103
ADDRESS : 12217 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY AND
OTHERS
SUBMISSION DATE : 11/21/16
PLAN DATED : 11/1/16
REVIEW DATE : 11/23/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW-APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
VOLUME II GENERAL:
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER/SEWER LINES
MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR DEDICATED
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIES.
2. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID
PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED
UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S
INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S
CHECKLIST". THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN
IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
THE BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A
REVISED UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
3. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLAN MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR STAMPING AND USE DURING CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE: 02/16/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/19/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 03/07/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
THE APARTMENTS, THE LOCAL LOOP ROAD SHALL BE STATE ACCEPTE
OR DEVELOPER/OWNER SHALL PROVIDE A PERFORMANCE BOND TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. BOTH OPTIONS REQUIRE THE RIGHT
OF-WAY FOR THE LOOP ROAD TO BE DEDICATED.
STATE ACCEPTANCE OF THE LOOP ROAD INCLUDES EXISTING
REDWATER RIDGE ROAD. DEVELOPER/OWNER WILL NEED TO ADDRESS
PUNCH LIST ITEMS FOR VDOT ACCEPTANCE OF ROADWAY.
2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A PHASING PLAN SHALL B
SUBMITTED BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER AND APPROVED BY THE
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ZONING CASE 07SN0386 CONDITION
10). PHASING PLAN IS TO IDENTIFY PHASING OF ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS NOTED IN CONDTION 9 OF SAME ZONING CASE.
AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, THIS PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT WILL
NEED TO ADDRESS CONDITIONS 9A, 9D (EVALUATE ULTIMATE R/W
NEEDS), 9I (3-LANE SECTION NOW, EVALUATE ULTIMATE R/W NEED
FOR 5 LANE SECTION), 9K, 9L, AND 9M.
3. PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. DEDICATE 60 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG EAST SIDE OF
ROUTE 1, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 8A OF CASE
07SN0386);
B. DEDICATE 35 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF
OSBORNE RD, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 8B);
C. ACCESS EASEMENTS, ACCEPTABLE TO CDOT, SHALL BE RECORDED
ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO ENSURE FUTURE SHARED CROSS ACCESS
WITH TAX ID 801-656-2576 AND 798-658-0445 (COND 7A).
PREVIOUSLY, OWNER/DEVELOPER HAS INDICATED 2A AND 2B (R/W
DEDICATIONS) WERE COMPLETED. PLEASE PROVIDE DEED BOOK &
PAGE NUMBERS OF DEDICATIONS TO ENSURE R/W DEDICATION
CONDITOINS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
4. VOLUME I, APARTMENT LAYOUT
A. WHAT IS THE PLANNED SIGNAGE AND MARKING PLAN FOR THE
INTERNAL PRIVATE INTERSECTION SOUTH OF BUILDING 2. THIS
INTERSECTION APPEARS IT WILL NEED EXTENSIVE PAVEMENT
MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS.
B. SOUTH ACCESS, CDOT WOULD RECOMMEND RELOCATING THE
DUMPSTER PAD AWAY FROM THE ACCESS LOCATION TO MINIMIZE
VEHICULAR AND PEDISTRIAN CONFLICTS.
5. VOLUME II, TYPICAL SECTION 72' R/W (ULTIMATE), REVISE
12' TO 24' ON RIGHT SIDE OF SECTION. PROVIDE A VDOT ROAD
CLASSIFICATION ON THE PLAN FOR DESIGN PARAMETERS. THIS IS
NOT A COUNTY THOROUGHFARE PLAN ROADWAY.
6. PER ZONING CASE 07SN0386 CONDITION 6, A MAXIMUM DENSITY
WAS ESTABLISHED. UPON APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN, THE REMAININ
DENSITY AVAILABLE WILL BE 250,000 SF OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL,
250,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE, AND 570,000 SF OF SHOPPING CENTER
OR EQUIVALENT DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY CDOT.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE: 06/01/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 06/08/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 06/20/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
MOORES LAKE DR SHALL BE STATE ACCEPTED OR A PERFORMANCE
BOND SHALL BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TO
ENSURE STATE ACCEPTANCE. BOTH OPTIONS REQUIRE THE R/W FOR
THE MOORES LAKE DR TO BE DEDICATED.
STATE ACCEPTANCE OF MOORES LAKE DR INCLUDES REDWATER RIDGE
RD. DEVELOPER/OWNER WILL NEED TO ADDRESS PUNCH LIST ITEMS
FOR VDOT ACCEPTANCE OF REDWATER RIDGE RD.
2. REPEATE COMMENT: PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A
PHASING PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER &
APPROVED BY CDOT (ZONING CASE 07SN0386 CONDITION 10).
PHASING PLAN IS TO IDENTIFY PHASING OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
NOTED IN CONDTION 9 OF ZONING CASE.
THIS PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO ADDRESS CONDITIONS
9A, 9D (EVALUATE ULTIMATE R/W NEEDS), 9I (3-LANE SECTION
NOW, EVALUATE ULTIMATE R/W NEEDS FOR 5 LANE SECTION), 9K,
9L, & 9M.
3. PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 1, MEASURE
FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 8A OF ZONING CASE);
B. ACCESS EASEMENTS, ACCEPTABLE TO CDOT, SHALL BE RECORDED
ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO ENSURE FUTURE SHARED CROSS ACCESS
WITH TAX ID 801-656-2576 AND 798-658-0445 (COND 7A). ACCES
EASEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN NOTED OR SHOWN ON PLAN SUBMITTALS
AND IS UNCLEAR WHAT IS PROPOSED TO ADDRESS CONDITION.
4. OFFSITE ROAD PLAN (VOLUME I):
A. NOTE MOORES LAKE DR ROAD CLASSIFICATION.
B. PROVIDE H/C RAMP FROM SIDEWALK END TO REDWATER RIDGE RD
C. ADDRESS THE NAMING OF MOORES LAKE DR AND REDWATER RIDGE
RD WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. IT'S UNCLEAR HOW THE
NAME CHANGE WILL BE ADDRESSED.
5. PER CONDITION 6 OF CASE 07SN0386, A MAXIMUM DENSITY WAS
ESTABLISHED. UPON APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN, THE REMAINING
DENSITY AVAILABLE WILL BE 250,000 SF OF LT INDUSTRIAL,
250,000 SF OF WAREHOUSE, & 570,000 SF OF SHOP CENTER, OR
EQUIVALENT DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY CDOT.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE: 09/14/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 09/19/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 10/07/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
MOORES LAKE DR SHALL BE STATE ACCEPTED OR A PERFORMANCE
BOND SHALL BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TO
ENSURE STATE ACCEPTANCE. BOTH OPTIONS REQUIRE THE R/W FOR
THE MOORES LAKE DR TO BE DEDICATED.
STATE ACCEPTANCE OF MOORES LAKE DR INCLUDES REDWATER RIDGE
RD. DEVELOPER/OWNER WILL NEED TO ADDRESS PUNCH LIST ITEMS
FOR VDOT ACCEPTANCE OF REDWATER RIDGE RD.
2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A PHASING PLAN SHALL B
SUBMITTED BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER & APPROVED BY CDOT (ZONIN
CASE 07SN0386 CONDITION 10). CDOT PROVIDED COMMENTS ON A
DRAFT PHASING PLAN AND PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER & DEVELOPE
ON 9/19/16. NO PHASING PLAN WAS PROVIDED WITH SITE PLAN
SUBMITTAL.
3. PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 1, MEASURE
FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 8A OF ZONING CASE);
B. ACCESS EASEMENTS, ACCEPTABLE TO CDOT, SHALL BE RECORDED
ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO ENSURE FUTURE SHARED CROSS ACCESS
WITH TAX ID 801-656-2576 AND 798-658-0445 (COND 7A). ACCES
EASEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN NOTED OR SHOWN ON PLAN SUBMITTALS
AND IS UNCLEAR WHAT IS PROPOSED TO ADDRESS CONDITION.
REVIEWING PLAN, PRIVATE NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT ARE
STILL NOT NOTED ON PLANS. THERE ARE 2 EASEMENTS GOING TO
ADJACENT PROPERTIES BUT THEY ARE NOT NOTED AND IT DOES NOT
SHOW THE FULL EXTEND OF EASEMENT GOING TO ONE OF THE
PROPERTIES.
4. ADVISORY COMMENT: FUTURE WIDENING OF REDWATER RIDGE AT
ROUTE 1 MAY REQUIRE OFF-SITE R/W ACQUISITION BY DEVELOPER
TO ACCOMMODATE THE ULTIMATE 6-LANE SECTION. THIS WILL
LIKELY IMPACT NEXT PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
5. ADVISORY COMMENT: FUTURE WIDENING OF MOORES LAKE DRIVE
AT THE TROLLINGWOOD INTERSECTION MAY REQUIRE A RAISED
MEDIAN BETWEEN THE EAST AND WESTBOUND LANES. FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN DO NOT ACCOMMODATE. THIS MAY RESULT IN
ADDITIONAL R/W DEDICATION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE LANES
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/01/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/18/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR
REVIEW DATE: 11/23/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A PHASING PLAN SHALL B
SIGNED & SUBMITTED BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER & APPROVED /
ACCEPTED BY CDOT (CASE 07SN0386 COND 10). THIS ITEM IS
STILL OUTSTANDING AND NO APPROVAL CAN BE ISSUED UNTIL THIS
IS EXECUTED.
2. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE:
A. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 1, MEASURE
FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 8A OF ZONING CASE);
B. ACCESS EASEMENTS, ACCEPTABLE TO CDOT, SHALL BE RECORDED
ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO ENSURE FUTURE SHARED CROSS ACCESS
WITH TAX ID 801-656-2576 AND 798-658-0445 (COND 7A). ACCES
EASEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN NOTED OR SHOWN ON PLAN SUBMITTALS
AND IS UNCLEAR WHAT IS PROPOSED TO ADDRESS CONDITION.
NO SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL PLANS ARE CLEAR
AS TO WHERE ACCESS EASEMENT ARE BEING PROVIDED.
ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE STILL NOT SHOWN OR LABELED. PROVIDE
AN EXHIBIT SHOWING PROPOSED EASEMENTS. DRAFT ACCESS
EASEMENT AGREEMENT SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO CODT TO ENSURE A
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS PROVIDED TO THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,
MOORES LAKE DR SHALL BE STATE ACCEPTED OR A PERFORMANCE
BOND SHALL BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TO
ENSURE STATE ACCEPTANCE. BOTH OPTIONS REQUIRE THE R/W FOR
THE MOORES LAKE DR TO BE DEDICATED.
STATE ACCEPTANCE OF MOORES LAKE DR INCLUDES REDWATER RIDGE
RD. DEVELOPER/OWNER WILL NEED TO ADDRESS PUNCH LIST ITEMS
FOR VDOT ACCEPTANCE OF REDWATER RIDGE RD.
4. ADVISORY COMMENT: FUTURE WIDENING OF REDWATER RIDGE AT
ROUTE 1 MAY REQUIRE OFF-SITE R/W ACQUISITION BY DEVELOPER
TO ACCOMMODATE THE ULTIMATE 6-LANE SECTION. THIS WILL
LIKELY IMPACT NEXT PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
5. ADVISORY COMMENT: FUTURE WIDENING OF MOORES LAKE DRIVE
AT THE TROLLINGWOOD INTERSECTION MAY REQUIRE A RAISED
MEDIAN BETWEEN THE EAST AND WESTBOUND LANES. FUTURE
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN DO NOT ACCOMMODATE. THIS MAY RESULT IN
ADDITIONAL R/W DEDICATION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE LANES
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----BETH SYKES/717-6836
EMAIL------------------SYKESB@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------MOORES LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0203
ADDRESS---------------- 12111 MOORES LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------2/16/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------2/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------ONE
REVIEW DATE------------3/8/16
RECOMMENDATION---------CURSORY - NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-REVISIONS REQUESTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS-
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS-PROVIDE CUT SHEETS
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN-IRRIGATION APPROVED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT 10
OLDED SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLAN
NG DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO
OMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW (NOT ON A SEPARATE SHEET) E
H REVIEW COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH C
MENT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS SHOW THE REQUIRED
ANGES. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE RESPONSE TO ALL DEPARTMENT CO
ENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LE
ER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY STAF
REVIEW COMMENTS. CLEARLY LABEL TO WHICH DEPARTMENT SUPPLEM
TAL INFORMATION SHOULD BE ROUTED.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
1. PER THE 3/9/16 MEETING, APPLICANT WILL SEEK CUPD WAIVER
O EXCEED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS PER FLOOR.
2. SHEET C-19, V.1: SHOW HOW HANDICAP PARKING GARAGE GETS
CESS TO THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
3. LABEL THE FRONT SETBACK ALONG THE ROAD WITH THE REQUIRE
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING.
4. ADD THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER 16PR0206 T
THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
5. INSTALL BUMPER BLOCKS AT ENDS OF PARKING SPACES BETWEEN
ANDICAP ACCESS AISLE AND ENTRANCE TO BUILDING SO THAT CARS
O NOT ENCROACH INTO HANDICAP PEDESTRIAN PATH.
6. COVER SHEET: NOTE THE DENSITY.
7. SHOW THE 100-FOOT BUFFER REQUIRED PER ZONING CASE 07SN0
6, CONDITION 13. A.
8. SHOW THE 75-FOOT BUFFER REQUIRED ALONG THE WESTERN PROP
TY LINE OF TAX NUMBER 800-658-9359 PER ZONING CASE 07SN038
CONDITION 13.C.
9. THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY CASH PROFFERS OF $15,600 (IF PA
PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2007) PER DWELLING UNIT IN EXCESS OF 312
WELLING UNITS PER ZONING CASE 07SN0386, CONDITION 5.
10. CLARIFY IF ANY UNITS ARE SENIOR HOUSING, OR AFFORDABLE
OUSING PER ZONING CASE 07SN0386, CONDITION 5.
11. PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURE FOR THE STORAGE BUILDING.
12. PER THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT, LOADING AREAS SHALL BE ORIE
ED AWAY OR SCREENED FROM THE DWELLING UNITS. SHOW HOW THIS
EQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED.
13. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER TEXTU
STATEMENT. SHOW THE USABLE AREA, CLUBHOUSE, HARDSCAPED A
S WITH BENCHES, PLAZAS, COURTYARDS, NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, TO
LOTS, TRAILS, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND THE FOCAL POINT.
14. PER SEC. 19-519(A), PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED TO I
LUDE 30 S. F. OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING FOR EACH
ARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A CALCULATION FOR THE TOTAL NUMBER
PARKING SPACES TIMES 30 S.F. TO DETERMINE TOTAL LANDSCAPE
REA WITHIN PARKING LOT. (EXAMPLE: 100 PARKING SPACES X 3
S.F. = 3000 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING LOT) LABEL EACH
SLAND WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO INSURE THE MINIMUM REQUIR
ENTS ARE MET.
15. PER SEC. 19-519(B), THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN A PAR
NG LOT SHALL BE 1 PER 200 S.F. OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA
THE PARKING LOT, ROUNDED UP. SHOW THE CALCULATION FOR TO
L NUMBER OF TREES. (EXAMPLE: 3100 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA DIV
ED BY 200 S.F. PER TREE = 15.5 TREES, WHICH IS ROUNDED UP
16 TREES)
16. PER SEC. 19-519(A & B), AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES SHAL
BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM
IDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL MATURING TREE
SHALL BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 9 FEET AND BE
0 S.F. IN SIZE.
17. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS F
HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED POLICY,
ND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19-517(B), THE DESIGN OF PARKING
EAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL CO
LICTS BETWEEN MATURING LANDSCAPING AND THE VISIBILITY AND
CESS TO FIRE HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO HIGH POWER TRANSMISSI
LINES, SITE LIGHTING, AND VISIBILITY FOR MOTORISTS EXITIN
PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED TO DETERMINE T
T SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING LOT PLANTING AREA EXISTS TO
ET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19-519 EXCLUDING ISLANDS WITH
RE HYDRANTS AND RELATED UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICTS WITH
ERHEAD POWER LINES AND SITE LIGHTING. REVIEW STAFF MAY RE
IRE A SEPARATE SHEET DOCUMENTING SIZES OF PROPOSED ISLANDS
ND OTHER INTERNAL GREEN SPACES WITHIN PARKING LOTS.
18. PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL ISLANDS COUNTED TOWA
S THE REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA.
19. PER SEC. 19-264(A), THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY
E STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR LAN
CAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
20. SHOW THE FIRE HYDRANTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
21. SHOW THE LIGHT POLES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
22. ALL GROUND MOUNTED JUNCTION AND HOT BOXES MUST BE SCRE
ED ON AT LEAST THREE SIDES WITH SHRUBBERY OR LATTICE.
23. THE STORAGE BUILDING SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRIM
Y BUILDINGS.
24. SHOW THAT WALL-MOUNTED JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES ARE E
HER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING.
25. PER SEC. 19-570(C), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER ROOF
OP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED FROM PU
IC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN INTEGRAL PART O
THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS AN
OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE FULLY S
EENED.
26. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS. EXTERIOR LADDER
CESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACE
PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, AND ANY EXTERIOR ACC
S MUST BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO THE ARCHITECTUR
CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. PROVIDE INTERIOR ACCESS THROU
YOUR SPACE, OR A COMMON CONTROL ROOM.
27. APARTMENT PROJECTS NEED TO LIST THE NUMBER OF 1, 2 AND
BEDROOM UNITS.
28. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE A
LICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT)
O REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES
ENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING DEPART
NT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED LA
SCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL/768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0206
ADDRESS----------------12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------6/1/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------6/8/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------THREE
REVIEW DATE------------6/23/16
RECOMMENDATION---------REVISIONS REQUESTED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-- REVISIONS REQUESTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT 10
FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW (NOT ON A
SEPARATE SHEET) EACH REVIEW COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU
HAVE ADDRESSED EACH COMMENT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH
SHEETS SHOW THE REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE
RESPONSE TO ALL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY
CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
CLEARLY LABEL TO WHICH DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
SHOULD BE ROUTED.
1. PER TEXTUAL STATEMENT, SPECIFY THE RECREATIONAL
AMENITIES WITHIN EACH OF THE THREE (3) COURTYARDS
ALSO INDICATE THE AREA REQUIRED FOR EACH SPACE PER
ZONING EXHIBIT A. 10% TOTAL RECREATION AREA AT MINIMUM
DENSITY OF 38.5 ACRES IS REQUIRED, OR 3.85 ACRES.
FOR EXAMPLE: COURTYARD AT BUILDING 2= 0.46 AC.,
BENCHES AND POND OVERLOOK AREA= 0.29 AC.,
AND SO ON FOR EACH AREA
2. SUBMIT ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS CONSISTENT WITH ZONING
EXHIBIT B.
3. PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE 30 SQ. FT. OF
INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING FOR EACH PARKING
SPACE. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET C-44 ARE
DEFICIENT. STAFF COUNTED 698 OPEN SPACES FOR THE THREE
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, AND LANDSCAPING COVERAGE HAS BEEN
CALCULATED BASED ON 437 SPACES, OR 13,110 SQ. FT. THIS
NEEDS TO BE RE-CALCULATED AND LANDSCAPING PROVIDED
BASED ON THE NEW PERCENTAGE OF PARKING.
4. AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES SHALL BE LARGE MATURING
TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 15
FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL MATURING TREES SHALL
BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 9 FEET AND BE
150 S.F. IN SIZE. THERE IS A TREE MISSING FROM ONE OF
THE LANDSCAPING ISLANDS ON SHEET C-43, WHICH APPEARS
TO BE THE LOCATION OF A TRANSFORMER. ALSO, THE CRAPE
MYRTLES SHOULD ALL BE RELOCATED TO THE SMALL ISLANDS,
AND THE WHITE OAKS SHOULD ALL BE RELOCATED TO THE
LARGER ISLANDS (THE 10-FOOT WIDE ISLANDS. THE WHITE
OAKS IN THE ISLAND BESIDE THE ENTRANCE ON SHEET C-40
SHOULD BE MOVED MORE TO THE CENTER OF THE ISLAND.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL/768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0206
ADDRESS----------------12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------9/14/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------9/14/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------3
REVIEW DATE------------10/4/16
RECOMMENDATION---------REVISIONS REQUESTED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--REVISIONS REQUESTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS-REQUESTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW (NOT ON A
SEPARATE SHEET, TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
COMMENT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS SHOW THE
REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE RESPONSE TO
ALL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES
TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
CLEARLY LABEL TO WHICH DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SHOULD BE ROUTED.
1. 216 SQ. FT. IS COUNTED TOWARDS REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
ON SHEET C-43 AROUND THE TRANSFORMER, HOWEVER THERE
ISNT ANY LANDSCAPING SHOWN. THE TRANSFORMER NEEDS TO
AT LEAST BE SCREENED WITH SHRUBBERY ON THREE (3)
SIDES.
2. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON SHEETS C-41
AND C-43 THAT ARE LESS THAN 150 SQ. FT. REQUIRED BY
SEC. 19.1-253.B. OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
3. ADD ZONING CASE #16SN0719 TO SHEET C-1.
4. THE BREAK-DOWN OF UNITS PER EACH BUILDING ADDS UP TO
412 UNDER NOTE #11 ON SHEET C-1. PER ZONING CASE
#07SN0386 AND #16SN0719, DENSITY IS STATED AT 385
UNITS.
5. PROVIDE CUT-SHEETS SHOWING SITE LIGHTING DESIGN AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
6. PROVIDE A SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
7. SITE LIGHTING FOR SECTION 2 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE
BEEN PROVIDED WITH THIS PLAN SUBMITTAL, AND LIGHTING
APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM THE SOUTHERN PARKING LOT
IN SECTION 2.
8. INDICATE WHETHER OR NOT THERE WILL BE ANY SENIOR
HOUSING UNITS INCLUDED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. THIS
CAN BE ADDED AS A NOTE ON SHEET C-1.
9. REGARDING YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT #6, COLOR
ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING OFFICE ON
SEPTEMBER 15TH. DO THEY NOT MATCH THE FLOORPLANS FOR
THIS CURRENT SITE PLAN?
10. IN YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT #3, IT IS STATED
THERE ARE 291 OPEN PARKING SPACES IN SECTION 2. I
BELIEVE YOU MEANT 261 OPEN SPACES?
PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE
APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY
FORMAT) TO REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR
POLLARDED TREES IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED
LAND SCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
****** THIS COMPLETES THE 3RD REVIEW. **************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----STEVE TUGWELL/768-7566
EMAIL------------------TUGWELLS@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-----------MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0206
ADDRESS----------------12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------11/1/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------11/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------4
REVIEW DATE------------11/28/16
RECOMMENDATION---------SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--RECEIVED
LIGHTING PLAN-RECEIVED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW (NOT ON A
SEPARATE SHEET, TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
COMMENT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS SHOW THE
REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE RESPONSE TO
ALL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES
TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
CLEARLY LABEL TO WHICH DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SHOULD BE ROUTED.
1. THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #7 SAYS THAT A SITE
LIGHTING PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR SECTION 2
AND TO SEE SHEET C-40, HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION
DOESN'T APPEAR TO BE ON SHEET C-40. PLEASE
CLARIFY AND ADVISE.
2. PLEASE POINT OUT WHERE IT IS CLEARLY STATED THAT
ALL SITE LIGHTING WILL BE OF A DOWNWARD
DIRECTIONAL AND BE FULL-CUTOFF DESIGN.
NOTES:
PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE
APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY
FORMAT) TO REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR
POLLARDED TREES IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED
LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
COLOR ARCHITECTURALS FOR BUILDING #3 WILL BE REQUIRED PRIO
TO FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
****** THIS COMPLETES THE 4TH REVIEW. **************
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : MOORES LAKE APARTMENTS
PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 2/16/16
RECEIVED DATE : 2/18/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 3/8/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. COORDINATE POINTS BASED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 ARE NOT PRESENT. TWO POINTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
SITE BOUNDARY.
2. THE SITE BOUNDARY SURVEY IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE
SUPPLY METES AND BOUNDS FOR EVERY SEGMENT ALONG THE
PERIMETER TO INCLUDE CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE
FOR ALL NON-TANGENT CURVES.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : MOORES LAKE APARTMENTS
PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 6/1/16
RECEIVED DATE : 6/13/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 6/24/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. I DON'T SEE WHERE THE COORDINATE POINTS WERE ADDED
TO THE SITE BOUNDARY. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PAGE
NUMBER ON WHICH THEY WERE ADDED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS / HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 9/14/16
RECEIVED DATE : 9/19/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 10/4/16
ADDRESS : NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. WHEN THE STREET SIGN FEE HAS BEEN PAID TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PLEASE EMAIL A COPY OF THE
RECEIPT TO JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/1/16
RECEIVED DATE : 11/21/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 11/23/16
ADDRESS : NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
STATUS : APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. WHEN THE STREET SIGN FEE HAS BEEN PAID TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PLEASE EMAIL A COPY OF THE
RECEIPT TO JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0206
NAME OF PLAN:MOORES LAKE APARTMENTS
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
DATE OF REVIEW:3/8/16 REVIEW # 1
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE MAIL BOX KIOSKS OR CLUSTER
BOXES ON THE PLAN SHEET OR INDICATE IN WHICH BUILDING THEY
ARE LOCATED.
2) FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS, A FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT OF EACH
BUILDING, OR STYLE OF BUILDING, MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
SITE PLAN SO THAT UNIT ADDRESSES CAN BE ASSIGNED.
3) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (1) NEEDS
BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED
TO SITE PLAN NUMBER 16PR0206 WITH NOTIFICATION OF PAYMENT
SENT TO IST/GIS HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION. YOU MUST SIGN TH
NORTHERN INTERSECTION OF REDWATER RIDGE RD AND
JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
4) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
NORTHERN INTERSECTION OF REDWATER RIDGE RD AND
JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY., A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0206
NAME OF PLAN:MOORES LAKE APARTMENTS
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
DATE OF REVIEW:6/24/16 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (1) NEEDS
BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED
TO SITE PLAN NUMBER 16PR0206 WITH NOTIFICATION OF PAYMENT
SENT TO JOHANSONA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV . YOU MUST SIGN THE
NORTHERN INTERSECTION OF REDWATER RIDGE RD AND
JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
ADDRESS: 12111 MOORES LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 2/16/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 2/22/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE CODE MODIFICATION REQUEST LETTER AND THE CODE
MODIFICATION APPROVAL LETTER THAT REFERENCES THE SINGLE
ACCESS TO THE APARTMENTS NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AND COPIED
TO THE PLANS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
ADDRESS: 12111 MOORES LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 6/10/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 6/13/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 6/13/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE CODE MODIFICATION REQUEST LETTER AND THE CODE
MODIFICATION APPROVAL LETTER THAT REFERENCES THE SINGLE
ACCESS TO THE APARTMENTS NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AND COPIED
TO THE PLANS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
ADDRESS: 12111 MOORES LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 9/14/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 9/21/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 9/22/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0206
ADDRESS: 12111 MOORES LAKE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/01/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/22/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
VOLUMES 1 & 2
ADDRESS : 12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
2500 REDWATER RIDGE ROAD
12217, 12159, 12001, 12011, 12007,
12013 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 02/16/2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 02/18/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 03/08/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED WET POND DESI
ARE FORTHCOMING.
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
04. A BENCHMARK MUST BE SHOWN WITH REFERENCE TO
MEAN SEA LEVEL. (CL-GENERAL 11)
05. VOLUME I -
CORRECT THE SHEET INDEX FOR SHEET C-6 TO "STORM
SCHEDULE".
06. VOLUME I -
REVISE THE TITLE FOR SHEET C-6 TO "STORM SCHEDULE".
07. VOLUME II -
CORRECT THE SHEET INDEX FOR SHEET C-5 TO "STORM
SCHEDULE".
08. VOLUME II -
REVISE THE TITLE FOR SHEET C-5 TO "STORM SCHEDULE".
09. USE THE 10-YEAR WSE OF THE POND AS THE OUTLET WSE FOR
STRUCTURES 15B AND 113 IN THE HGL CALCULATIONS.
10. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
INLET SHAPING IS RESTRICTED TO PIPE DIAMETERS OF 30" O
LESS AND TO SITUATIONS WHERE ONE PIPE ENTERS THE
CHAMBER AND ONE PIPE EXITS THE CHAMBER. STORM SEWERS
WITH PIPE DIAMETERS OF 30" AND ABOVE SHALL QUALIFY FOR
THE 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN JUNCTION LOSSES ONLY WHEN
PRE-CAST TEES AND ELBOWS ARE USED. (CL-G&D 18)
THIS APPLIES TO STRUCTURES 37, 51, 15B, AND 15.
11. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR INLET SHAPING
STD. IS-1. IF INLET SHAPING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITHIN THE STANDARD STRUCTURE, THEN DETAILS MUST BE
PROVIDED FOR THE MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO THE
STRUCTURE TO ACCOMPLISH INLET SHAPING. (CL-G&D 19)
12. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
SAFETY SLABS (STD. SL-1) MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE
TABULAR DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION OF ANY STRUCTURE OVER
12 FEET IN HEIGHT.
13. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AT THE NOSE OF AL
RADIAL CURB AND AT ALL APPRECIABLE BREAKS IN HORIZONTA
OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. (CL-G&D 22)
14. VOLUME I -
AN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW STORM PIPE TO CONVEY
RUNOFF UNDER A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. REVISE THE
PIPE LAYOUT FOR 89 TO 89B TO HAVE THE PIPE RUN UNDER
THE BUILDING NOT LOCATED DIRECTLY UNDER RESIDENTIAL
UNITS.
15. VOLUME I -
CLARIFY WHY GRADING/DISTURBANCE IS PROPOSED IN THE
LOW BETWEEN BUILDING 2 AND THE RPA (TO THE NORTHEAST).
16. VOLUME I -
CLARIFY HOW RUNOFF IS COLLECTED AND CONVEYED TO
STRUCTURE 75 FROM THE ELLIPTICAL PATIO AREA.
ADDITIONALLY, THE SYMBOL ON THE PLANS FOR
STRUCTURE 75 IS A DROP INLET, BUT THE STORM SCHEDULE
CALLS OUT A MANHOLE.
17. VOLUME II -
ON SHEET C-9:
A. CORRECT THE C-VALUE LABELS FOR THE DRAINAGE AREAS.
B. CORRECT THE LABEL FOR THE DRAINAGE AREA TO STRUCTURE
129.
C. LABEL THE DRAINAGE AREAS FOR THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
AREAS REFERENCING PROJECTS 06PR0364 AND 07PR0357.
18. VOLUME II -
PROVIDE A SECONDARY DRAINAGE AREA SHEET WHICH SHOWS
THE ULTIMATE DRAINAGE PATTERNS FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF
THE PROPOSED ROAD.
19. VOLUME II -
CLARIFY IF STUB PIPES WILL BE INSTALLED AT STRUCTURES
47, 45, 43, 41, AND 37, UNDER THE SIDEWALK.
20. VOLUME I -
DRY GUTTER IS REQUIRED WHERE RUNOFF FLOWS AWAY FROM TH
FACE OF CURB. THESE AREAS MUST BE CROSS-HATCHED AND A
DETAIL PROVIDED ON THE PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRY
GUTTER. (CL-G&D 23)
21. VOLUME I -
THE SYMBOL USED FOR DRY GUTTER ON THE PLAN VIEW MUST B
SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE DETAIL FOR ITS CONSTRUCTION.
(CL-G&D 24)
22. VOLUME II - ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN. (CL-G&D 27)
23. VOLUME II - DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ALONG ANY
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH RECEIVES RUNOFF FRO
OFFSITE, FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR REQUIRES
IMPROVEMENTS ON A DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY OWNER.
(CL-G&D 29)
24. VOLUME II -
A SEPARATE PLAN SHEET MUST BE ADDED WHICH ONLY SHOWS
ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
DEDICATED. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
(CL-G&D 30)
25. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
A STREET SIGN FEE OF $75 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
26. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
27. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
ENSURE ALL TREES PROPOSED IN THE LANDSCAPING PLAN ARE
LOCATED AT LEAST 8 FEET AWAY FROM ANY STORM SEWER OR
STRUCTURE.
==== EROSION CONTROL ====
28. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
DUE TO THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE SITE,
THE DEMOLITION PLAN CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED UNTIL
PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE.
29. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITY (ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE)
LINES ARE INDICATED TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE, WHILE
OTHERS ARE TO BE REMOVED. ENSURE THE NOTES INDICATE
THE APPROPRIATE ACTION. ABANDONING SOME UTILITY
LINES IN PLACE ALONG THE STEEP SLOPES ADJACENT TO
THE RPA WILL REDUCE THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND
THE AMOUNT OF (RE)STABILIZATION REQUIRED.
30. TO ENCOMPASS THE DISTURBANCE FOR ALL THE
DEMOLITION (AS SHOWN IN VOLUME I AND VOLUME II):
A. REVISE THE LIMITS OF LAND DISTURBANCE,
B. REVISE THE PLACEMENT OF PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL
PERIMETER MEASURES,
C. REVISE THE SEDIMENT TRAP DRAINAGE AREAS AND DESIGN,
D. REVISE THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
31. VOLUME II -
REVISE THE SEDIMENT TRAP TABLE IN SHEET C-16
AS NECESSARY.
32. VOLUME II -
SHOW THE FULL LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE AREA TO THE
SEDIMENT BASIN.
33. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
CLARIFY THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION, AND ENSURE THE
PLANS REFLECT THE ORDER OF EVENTS. THE SEDIMENT BASIN
SHOWN IN VOLUME II SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED BEFORE
DISTURBANCE FOR THE PROPOSED WORK SHOWN IN VOLUME I.
SWITCH THE LABELS OF THE VOLUMES TO AVOID CONFUSION.
34. VOLUME II -
A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE VSMP CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OPERATOR
AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR (OR AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.
35. THE FOLLOWING NOTES MUST BE ADDED TO THE PLANS:
A. VOLUME II -
"ALL VEGETATIVE AND STRUCTURAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED
ACCORDING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF
THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK AND
VIRGINIA REGULATION 9 VAC 25-840-40." (CL-EC 18)
B. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
"THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF
ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NECESSARY TO
PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION AS DETERMINED BY THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT". (CL-EC 24)
36. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF EROSION CONTROL MINIMUM
STANDARD # 1, (SEE THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL LAW AND REGULATIONS FOR FY 2013) MUST BE ADDED
TO THE PLANS AND ALL OTHER NOTES WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT
MUST BE ADJUSTED OR REMOVED. (CL-EC 25)
37. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
NOTES A THRU E OF MINIMUM STANDARD 16 MUST BE PROVIDED
ON THE PLANS. (CL-EC 36)
38. VOLUME I -
ON SHEETS C-11 AND C-12, SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE
ALONG THE ENTIRE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ADJACENT TO
THE RPA. SILT FENCE IS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE RUN OF
SUPER SILT FENCE IN SOME LOCATIONS.
39. VOLUME I -
ON SHEET C-13, SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE ALONG THE
ENTIRE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ADJACENT TO THE RPA.
40. VOLUME I -
ON SHEET C-14, SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE ON BOTH SIDES
OF THE DISTURBANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SANITARY SEWER
LINE EXTENSION WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE RPA.
41. VOLUME II -
ANY SOIL STOCKPILE AREA MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLANS.
SILT FENCE OR SUPER SILT FENCE (IF ADJACENT TO RPA)
MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE PERIMETER. (CL-EC 39)
42. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
BLANKET AND MATTING MUST BE SPECIFIED ON ALL EXPOSED
SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER THAT ARE 5 FEET OR GREATER IN
HEIGHT.
43. VOLUME II -
A 10-FOOT BENCH SHALL BE PROVIDED EVER 15 VERTICAL FEE
ON SIDE SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER. THIS APPLIES TO THE
PROPOSED BERM ALONG THE RING ROAD.
44. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
B. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
C. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
D. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42F)
E. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA MUST BE FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
(SURVEY LOCATED) WITH OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY FENCE PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42G)
==== CBPA ====
45. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
REVISE THE CBPA NOTE ON THE COVER SHEET TO CLARIFY THE
METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE VSMP REGULATIONS AND WHA
TECHNICAL CRITERIA OF THE REGULATIONS IS MET (PART IIB
OR PART IIC, TYPE OF BMP).
46. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
PROVIDE THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY STORMWATER COMPLIANCE
AND STORMWATER OUTFALL TABLES (FOUND ON THE COUNTY'S
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING WEBPAGE, UNDER "DOCUMENTS AN
FORMS") ON THE COVER SHEETS.
47. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
AS OF THIS REVIEW, THE RPAD FOR THIS PROJECT HAS NOT
BEEN APPROVED. ENSURE THAT THE APPROVED RPA LIMITS
ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
48. VOLUME I -
SIGNAGE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL RPA AND NATURAL
VEGETATED AREAS TO REMAIN OR TO BE ESTABLISHED.
49. VOLUME II -
THE EROSION CONTROL AND CBPA COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) MUST
SPECIFY THE PLACEMENT OF PLASTIC OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY
FENCE (STD. & SPEC. 3.01 OF THE VESCH) ALONG THE RPA
LIMITS. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA AND PLACEMENT OF THE
SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE SURVEY LOCATED. (CL-CBPA 9)
50. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. (CL-CBPA 10)
51. VOLUME II -
THE ENTIRE BASIN MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. BEYOND THE 100-YEAR WSE.
OR DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER APPLIES.
(CL-CBPA 14)
52. VOLUME II -
A MINIMUM 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
FROM THE SWM/BMP EASEMENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY FOR
FUTURE MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 15)
53. VOLUME II -
METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHEET FO
SWM/BMP EASEMENTS AND ACCESS EASEMENTS. (CL-CBPA 16)
54. VOLUME II -
A MINIMUM 12 FOOT WIDE RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED FROM THE
ACCESS GATE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. TH
SLOPE CANNOT EXCEED 6:1. (CL-CBPA 17)
55. VOLUME II -
THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS MUST
BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
56. VOLUME II -
PERFORATIONS IN THE RISER MUST BE PRECAST, NOT FIELD
MADE. PLEASE ADD A NOTE TO THE RISER DETAIL.
(CL-CBPA 26)
57. VOLUME II -
A DETAIL MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHOWING THE
METHOD OF SECURING THE METAL TRASH RACK / ANTI VORTEX
DEVICE TO THE CONCRETE RISER PIPE. (CL-CBPA 31)
58. VOLUME I AND VOLUME II -
PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR THE SWM/BMP FACILITY TO BE OBSERVED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. "AS
BUILT" INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE
CERTIFICATION OF THE FACILITY. CERTIFICATION IS
REQUIRED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE SWM/BMP PERFORMANCE
BOND AND ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. (CL-CBPA 42)
==== CLOSING ====
THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO VOLUME I AND VOLUME II:
59. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
60. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
61. IF APPLICABLE, A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE
PROVIDED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGH
OF WAY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT
FOR THIS PROJECT.
62. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
63. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
64. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
65. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
66. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
67. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
68. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
69. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
G. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $75 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
VOLUMES 1 & 2 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
COMMENTS
ADDRESS : 12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
2500 REDWATER RIDGE ROAD
12217, 12159, 12001, 12011, 12007,
12013 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 02/16/2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 02/18/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 03/14/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
THESE COMMENTS PERTAIN TO THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN
01. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
02. SHOW HOW THE OUTFALL OF STRUCTURES 115 AND 117 MEET
CHANNEL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS.
03. SHOW THE SITE CONTOURS ON THE CBPA PLAN TO VERIFY
DRAIANGE AREA LIMITS. ALTERNATELY, SEPARATE
OVERALL PRE AND POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAPS
CAN BE PROVIDED.
04. THE TC VALUES FOR THE POST-DEVELOPED CONDITION OF
DRAINAGE AREAS DA-2, DA-3, AND DA-4 SEEM HIGH FOR THE
SHAPE AND SIZE OF EACH DRAINAGE AREA.
05. DA-5 IS SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE PRE-DEVELOPMENT
CBPA MAP AS A 6.89-ACRE AREA, BUT NOT SHOWN ON THE
POST-DEVELOPMENT MAP. VERIFY IF THIS AREA IS
CONVEYED TO THE PROPOSED WET POND.
06. THE VRRM SITE DATA TAB CALCULATIONS USE AN AREA OF
17.3 ACRES FOR BOTH PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPMENT
CONDITIONS FOR AN AREA LABELED "DA-5", WHILE ANOTHER
SITE DATA TAB LABELED "DA-6" IS PROVIDED AND USES
A DRAINAGE AREA OF 6.89 ACRES (WHICH MATCHES THE
DA-5 DRAINAGE AREA ON THE CBPA PLAN. IT APPEARS THAT
THE 17.3-ACRE AREA IS THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA
APPROVED WITH SITE PLAN 06PR0364). LABEL THE PLANS
WITH THE 17.3-ACRE DRAINAGE AREA TO AVOID CONFUSION.
07. LABEL THE TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA TO THE CREEK ON THE CBPA
PLAN SHEET FOR THE EXISTING CONDITION AS 80.82 ACRES.
08. PROVIDE THE "D.A. A" TAB PRINTOUT IN THE CALCULATIONS
FOR DA-1.
09. IN ACCORDANCE TO 4VAC50-20-30 AND 4VAC50-20-50, A
REGULATED DAM (IMPOUNDING STRUCTURE) IS CLASSIFIED
AS EITHER:
A. 25 FEET OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND CREATES A MAXIMUM
IMPOUNDING CAPACITY OF 15 ACRE-FEET OR GREATER, OR
B. 6 FEET OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND CREATES A MAXIMUM
IMPOUNDING CAPACITY OF 50 ACRE-FEET OR GREATER.
THE DAM FOR THE PROPOSED WET POND WILL BE A
REGULATED STRUCTURE AND MUST OBTAIN A CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
AND RECREATION (DCR).
10. LABEL THE BMP TYPE (LEVEL 2 WET POND) ON THE PLANS.
11. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED BASIN WILL BE LOCATED
IN AN AREA THAT HAS MOSTLY HSG SOILS A AND B.
PER VA DEQ STORMWATER DESIGN SPEC. NO. 14, SPECIFY A
LINER ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE POND TO ENSURE A
CONSTANT WATER LEVEL IS MAINTAINED FOR THE
PERMANENT POOL.
12. THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE THROUGH THE POND SHOULD BE AT
LEAST 0.5% TO 1% TO PROMOTE POSITIVE FLOW.
13. NOTES ON SHEETS C-30 AND C-30A INDICATE A LOW FLOW
OUTLET FROM THE FOREBAY TO THE CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
IS PROPOSED AT ELEVATION 109.0, AND A HIGH FLOW OUTLET
FROM THE FOREBAY TO THE MAIN POND IS PROPOSED AT
ELEVATION 110.0. ENSURE THE GRADING ON SHEET C-30A
CLEARLY SHOWS THE TWO SPILLWAYS.
14. PROVIDE THE FLOW PATH AND CALCULATIONS WHICH SHOW
A LENGTH-TO-WIDTH RATIO OF AT LEAST 3:1 OR A RATIO
OF SHORTEST FLOW PATH TO OVERALL LENGTH OF AT LEAST
0.8.
15. THE PERMANENT POOL OF THE WET POND AT ELEVATION 110.0
PROVIDES A CONSTANT SUBMERGENCE OF THE CONSTRUCTED
WETLANDS UNDER 1 - 2 FEET OF WATER. PROVIDE A
LANDSCAPING PLAN THAT SPECIFIES PLANTS WHICH CAN
WITHSTAND THIS DEPTH OF WATER.
16. PROVIDE A PLANTING PLAN/LAYOUT FOR THE AQUATIC BENCH
PLANTINGS. ENSURE THE SPECIFIED PLANTS CAN ALSO
WITHSTAND BEING SUBMERGED UNDER 6 - 12 INCHES OF
WATER.
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
VOLUMES 1 & 2
ADDRESS : 12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
2500 REDWATER RIDGE ROAD
12217, 12159, 12001, 12011, 12007,
12013 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 06/01/2016 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 06/10/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 06/29/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME I:******
03. ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. CORRECT THE NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS ON THE
TO: "JAMES RIVER/PROCTOR'S CREEK".
B. PROVIDE THE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER ON-SITE (NOT
INCLUDING CURRENT OR FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY).
04. A BENCHMARK MUST BE SHOWN WITH REFERENCE TO
MEAN SEA LEVEL. (CL-GENERAL 11)
05. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AT THE NOSE OF AL
RADIAL CURB AND AT ALL APPRECIABLE BREAKS IN HORIZONTA
OR VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. (CL-G&D 22)
06. ON SHEET C-5, REMOVE THE NOTE BELOW THE STORM SUMMARY
REGARDING IS-1 (INLET SHAPING).
07. ON SHEET C-9, PROVIDE THE C-VALUE LABELS FOR THE
DRAINAGE AREAS TO STRUCTURES 129 AND 131A.
08. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS FOLLOWS:
A. ON SHEET C-28, MOVE THE RIVER BIRCH OUTSIDE OF THE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR STORM STRUCTURE 129.
B. ON SHEET C-29, MOVE THE RIVER BIRCH OUTSIDE OF THE
EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE EXISTING 30"
DIAMETER RCP.
09. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $75 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
10. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
--- EROSION CONTROL ---
11. SHOW EXISTING CONTOURS ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN ON
SHEETS C-6 THROUGH C-8.
12. SHOW ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE ALONG THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE
OF THE AREAS TO BE DEMOLISHED ON SHEETS C-6 THROUGH
C-8. SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO
THE RPA.
13. SHEETS C-6 THROUGH C-8 INCLUDE A NOTE THAT STATES:
"LIMITS OF EX. WATER AND SANITARY LINES TO BE ABANDONE
WITH A LEADER LINE. HOWEVER, THE LEADER LINE DOES
NOT POINT TO ANYTHING. ENSURE ALL LINE LAYERS ARE
TURNED ON.
14. REVISE NOTE 23 ON SHEETS C-10 THROUGH C-15 TO STATE:
"A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE LOOP ROAD PRIOR TO RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION."
--- CBPA ---
15. AS OF THIS REVIEW, THE RPAD FOR THIS PROJECT HAS NOT
BEEN APPROVED. CONTACT THE WATER QUALITY DIVISION OF
OUR DEPARTMENT REGARDING FURTHER DOCUMENTATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RPAD. ENSURE THAT THE APPROVED
RPA LIMITS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
16. SHOW THE 1, 2, 10, AND 100-YEAR WSE IN PLAN VIEW
ON SHEET C-30.
17. THE AREA OF THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION OF
THE WET POND MUST BE COUNTED AS IMPERVIOUS COVER
IN THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. REVISE
SHEET C-32 AND THE VRRM SPREADSHEET AS NECESSARY.
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME II:******
18. ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. CORRECT THE NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS ON THE
TO: "JAMES RIVER/PROCTOR'S CREEK".
B. PROVIDE THE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER ON-SITE (NOT
INCLUDING CURRENT OR FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY).
19. ON SHEET C-6, REMOVE THE NOTE BELOW THE STORM SUMMARY
REGARDING IS-1 (INLET SHAPING).
20. WITH REGARD TO THE STORM SEWER PIPE WHICH CONVEYS
RUNOFF FROM THE COURTYARD WITHIN BUILDING 3 TO THE
REMAINDER OF THE SYSTEM: PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL,
A LETTER MUST BE PROVIDED FROM THE OWNER WHICH
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: 1) STORM SEWER UNDER BUILDINGS IS
NOT A COMMON PRACTICE WITHIN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,
2) MAINTENANCE OF THE STORM SEWER WILL BE ENTIRELY THE
OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY, 3) FUTURE PROBLEMS WITH THE
STORM SEWER MAY AFFECT THE BUILDING ABOVE THE STORM
SEWER, AND 4) ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION SUPPORT WILL BE
REQUIRED ABOVE THE STORM SEWER.
21. PROVIDE A DETAIL SHOWING ADDITIONAL BUILDING SUPPORT
ABOVE THE STORM SEWER THROUGH BUILDING 3.
22. SHOW THE PROPOSED GRADES FOR THE "POND OVERLOOK AREA"
ON THE GRADING PLAN.
23. EXTEND PIPE 16 AND PULL STORM SEWER MANHOLE 15B HIGHER
UP THE BMP SLOPE TO PREVENT INUDATION BELOW THE 10-YEA
STORM.
24. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $75 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
25. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
--- EROSION CONTROL ---
26. REVISE NOTE 17 ON SHEETS C-11 THROUGH C-16 TO STATE:
"A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF THE LOOP ROAD PRIOR TO RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION."
27. INCLUDE PROPOSED GRADING FOR THE "POND OVERLOOK
AREA" IN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ON SHEET C-14.
--- CBPA ---
28. AS OF THIS REVIEW, THE RPAD FOR THIS PROJECT HAS NOT
BEEN APPROVED. CONTACT THE WATER QUALITY DIVISION OF
OUR DEPARTMENT REGARDING FURTHER DOCUMENTATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RPAD. ENSURE THAT THE APPROVED
RPA LIMITS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
29. CLARIFY WHERE THE RPA SIGNS ARE SHOWN. PROVIDE AN
RPA SIGN DETAIL ON THE DETAIL SHEET.
30. SPECIFY GUARDRAIL (OR OTHER VEHICULAR PROTECTION)
ALONG THE DRIVE AISLE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER
PAD ADJACENT TO THE BMP.
31. SPECIFY GUARDRAIL (OR OTHER VEHICULAR PROTECTION)
ALONG THE DRIVE AISLE ADJACENT TO THE BMP BETWEEN
THE PARKING SPACES AND THE CG-12 ENTRANCE TO THE
"POND OVERLOOK AREA"
32. THE AREA OF THE NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION OF
THE WET POND MUST BE COUNTED AS IMPERVIOUS COVER
IN THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. REVISE
SHEET C-52 AS NECESSARY.
--- CLOSING ---
THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO VOLUME I AND VOLUME II:
33. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
34. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
35. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR T
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WA
PRIOR TO DEDICATION OF THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
36. DEDICATION OF THE LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IS A
PREREQUISITE FOR ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS
PROJECT.
37. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
38. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
39. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
40. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
41. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
42. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
43. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
44. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
G. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $75 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
VOLUMES 1 & 2
ADDRESS : 12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
2500 REDWATER RIDGE ROAD
12217, 12159, 12001, 12011, 12007,
12013 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 09/14/2016 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 09/16/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 10/11/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : YES
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME I:******
03. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
04. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
--- EROSION CONTROL ---
05. SPECIFY SILT FENCE ALONG THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE
AREAS TO BE DEMOLISHED ON SHEETS C-6 THROUGH C-8.
SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO THE RPA.
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME II:******
06. A DETAIL SHOWING ADDITIONAL BUILDING SUPPORT ABOVE THE
STORM SEWER THROUGH BUILDING 3 MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR
TO RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR BUILDING 3.
07. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
08. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
--- EROSION CONTROL ---
09. ADJUST THE SILT FENCE/SUPER SILT FENCE IN THE VICINITY
OF THE "POND OVERLOOK AREA" TO ACCOUNT FOR THE PROPOSE
GRADING.
10. SPECIFY SILT FENCE ALONG THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE
AREAS TO BE DEMOLISHED ON SHEETS C-7 AND C-8.
SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO THE RPA.
11. ON SHEET C-14, IN THE INSET SHOWING THE DISTURBANCE FO
THE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, REFERENCE THE RPA SEED M
ON SHEET C-17 FOR THE DISTURBANCE PROPOSED WITHIN THE
RPA.
--- CBPA ---
12. THE GUARDRAIL DETAIL IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET
OF EITHER VOLUME 1 OR 2. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE
GUARDRAIL IN THE PLANS.
--- CLOSING ---
THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO VOLUME I AND VOLUME II:
13. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
14. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR T
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WA
PRIOR TO DEDICATION OF THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
15. DEDICATION OF THE LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IS A
PREREQUISITE FOR ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS
PROJECT.
16. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
17. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
18. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
19. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
20. BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
21. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
22. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
23. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
24. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
G. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : MOORE'S LAKE APARTMENTS
VOLUMES 1 & 2
ADDRESS : 12111 MOORE'S LAKE ROAD
2500 REDWATER RIDGE ROAD
12217, 12159, 12001, 12011, 12007,
12013 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0206
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/01/2016 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 11/17/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 11/28/2016
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : N/A
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME I:******
03. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
04. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
******THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS PERTAIN TO VOLUME II:******
05. A DETAIL SHOWING ADDITIONAL BUILDING SUPPORT ABOVE THE
STORM SEWER THROUGH BUILDING 3 MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR
TO RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR BUILDING 3.
06. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
07. STREETLIGHTING:
A. STREETLIGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE DEVELOPER'S
EXPENSE AT ANY AND ALL ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. LIGHTING SHALL BE
PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THIS PARAGRAPH REGARDLESS OF
ANY OTHER LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS, E.G., PARKING LOT
LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, OR TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTING.
B. IN ADDITION TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION COST OF ANY SUC
LIGHT(S), THE DEVELOPER SHALL PAY TO THE COUNTY AN
OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF FIVE
YEARS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR EACH REQUIRED
STREETLIGHT INSTALLED BASED UPON THE SUPPLYING
UTILITY'S MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SAME PER LIGHT AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION, PLUS A $50 ADMINISTRATION FEE. REFER TO
THE STREETLIGHT POLICY FOR ACCEPTABLE LIGHTING
TYPES/STYLES (FOUND IN APPENDIX B OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING REFERENCE MANUAL).
C. ADDITIONAL, NON-REQUIRED STREETLIGHTS, BEYOND ANY
SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED IN PARAGRAPH A. ABOVE, SHALL BE
COST ESTIMATED, FUNDED, AND OPERATED AT THE DEVELOPER'
EXPENSE. NON-REQUIRED LIGHTING SHALL BE STRICTLY
LIMITED TO INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS WHERE ROADS ARE
IDENTIFIED AS INTEDED TO BE ACCEPTED INTO AN MAINTAINE
THROUGH THE STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. SUCH NON-
REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR
FUTURE INCLUSION INTO THE COUNTY STREETLIGHT PROGRAM.
D. PAYMENT OF THE OPERATIONAL OFFSET FEE, AS DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WILL BE REQUIRED AT A TIME NOT LATER THAN PLAN
APPROVAL. PAYMENT FOR THE COSTS OF STREETLIGHT
INSTALLATION AND THE $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE
REQUIRED AT TIME OF RECEIPT OF THE PROJECT COST FROM
THE SUPPLYING UTILITY.
--- CLOSING ---
THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO VOLUME I AND VOLUME II:
08. NOTE THAT IN CASE 07SN086, PROFFERED CONDITION 3 STATE
THE FOLLOWING: "IF ANY OF THE EXISTING PONDS ON THE
PROPERTY REMAIN, THE DAMS SHALL BE RETROFITTED AND
CERTIFIED. IF ANY OF THE EXISTING PONDS ON THE PROPER
ARE USED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, THE POND(S) SHALL
BE RETROFITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE
REQUIREMENTS FOR BMP BASINS."
THIS CONDITION IS STILL APPLICABLE AND WILL BE REQUIRE
UPON FULL BUILDOUT OF THE PROPERTY (AS SHOWN IN
EXHIBIT A OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ZONING CASE).
09. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
10. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR T
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WA
PRIOR TO DEDICATION OF THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY.
11. DEDICATION OF THE LOOP ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IS A
PREREQUISITE FOR ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THIS
PROJECT.
12. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
13. AS-BUILT BMP INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
BMP FACILITY AS PART OF ITS FUTURE CERTIFICATION.
14. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
15. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND.
16. BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
17. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
18. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
19. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
20. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $4500
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
G. A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150 PER ROAD INTERSECTION MUST B
PROVIDED
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 16PR0206



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List