Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 16PR0203
Modify comments view for Case # 16PR0203

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 16PR0203 STATUS: PENDING APPROVAL
PROJECT NAME: GROCERY STORE - COGB - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/22/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 00 02/12/16 03/04/16 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 ******** 12/22/16 DLD 706-2031
FIRE DEPT.--: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 COMPLETE 03/03/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 COMPLETE 03/15/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 COMPLETE 03/20/17 CH 717-6042
TRANSPORT.--: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 COMPLETE 03/02/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 AMENDED* 03/10/17 TVM 751-4435
UTILITIES---: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 ******** 05/10/16 WBP 751-4336
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 03 02/23/17 03/16/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : W.B. PAYNE III/748-4336
NAME OF PLAN : LIDL US OPERATIONS GROCERY STORE
ADDRESS : 6024, 6030, 6036 IRONBRIDGE ROAD 23234
SUBMISSION DATE : 2/12/16
PLAN DATED : 1/28/16
REVIEW DATE : 2/29/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. ADD THE UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER (16-0025) TO THE
COVER SHEET AND ALL UTILITIES SHEETS AT A MINIMUM.
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES CONTACT INFORMATION TO THE
PLAN: W.B. PAYNE III, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, 804-751-4336,
PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
3. SHEETS 4-6 INDICATE THERE ARE SEVERAL EXISTING WELLS
AND A SEPTIC DRAINFIELD(S) ON THE SITE. ASSUMING THE WELLS
WILL BE ABANDONED AS PART OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE ADD A NOT
TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN (SHEETS 5-6) INDICATING ALL WELLS
AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS ARE TO BE ABANDONED PER THE APPLICABLE
VDH REGULATIONS.
4. ADD THE AS BUILT DRAWING NUMBER (89-0559) TO THE
EXISTING WATER AND SEWER LINES ON ALL PERTINENT UTILITY
PLAN SHEETS.
5. MODIFY THE EXISTING 8" PVC SEWER LATERAL/STUB
(PROPOSED TIE-IN POINT) ON SHEET 12 BY ADDING THE AS-BUILT
INFORMATION (LENGTH, DEPTH AT THE P/L, SIZE AND MATERIAL)
FROM THE ENCLOSED PDF TO SHEET 12. ADDITIONALLY, ADD THE
EXISTING DOWNSTREAM MH ON THE EAST SIDE OF IRONBRIDGE ROAD
AND LABEL THE RIM (195.10') AND INVERT (186.74')
ELEVATIONS. BE ADVISED THAT ALL WATER AND SEWER AS-BUILT
INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
BY EMAILING SWAVAILABILITY@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR BY VISITING
THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES BUILDING AT 9840 GOVERNMENT
CENTER PARKWAY.
6. IT IS UTILITIES PREFERENCE TO HAVE THE WATER AND SEWER
QUANTITIES LIST PLACED ON THE COVER SHEET IF POSSIBLE.
7. ADD STANDARD DETAIL DES-2 TO THE PLAN.
8. INDICATE ON SHEET 4 WHICH DATUM WAS USED.
9. THE PLAN SHOWS THREE EXISTING WATER METERS (WM)
LOCATED ON PARCELS 7756837226, 7756838309, AND 7756828199.
WILL THESE WM'S/WATER SERVICES BE ABANDONED? IF SO, PLEASE
ADD NOTES TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN INDICATING THE
WM'S/SERVICES ARE TO BE ABANDONED AS PART OF THE PROJECT.
ADDITIONALLY, THE NOTE SHOULD INDICATE THE WATER SERVICES
SHALL BE ABANDONED PER SECTION 3.05 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS.
10. ADD THE METER SIZING FORM TO THE PLAN. PLEASE BE
ADVISED THE FORM THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAG
HAD AN INCORRECT TOTAL FIXTURE VALUE (TFV) LISTED FOR 'WAL
FLUSH VALVE' URINALS (16 FV X 7 FIXTURES = 112 TFV; NOT 16
TFV). PLEASE REVISE THE FORM AND VERIFY THE CORRECT WM
SIZE.
11. THE EXISTING 12" DI WATERLINE AT THE INTERSECTION OF
COGBILL AND IRONBRIDGE ROADS MUST BE EXTENDED SOUTHWEST
ALONG COGBILL (PARCEL 7756822797) TO A POINT PAST THE
PROPOSED ENTRANCE TO THE SITE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AN
OPPORTUNITY FOR FUTURE EXTENSION. THE FACILITIES PLAN
INDICATES A WATERLINE WILL ULTIMATELY BE EXTENDED ALONG
COGBILL ROAD TO CONNECT WITH AN EXISTING 12" WATERLINE
FURTHER SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. THE LINE MUST BE INSTALLED
OUTSIDE THE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY INSIDE A 16' MINIMUM
WIDTH EASEMENT. ALSO, ADDITIONAL EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE REMAINING FRONTAGE OF PARCEL 7756822797 TO THE
SOUTHWEST FOR ULTIMATE FUTURE EXTENSION.
12. RE: COMMENT #11, ADD A FH NEAR THE COGBILL ROAD
ENTRANCE. PLEASE BE ADVISED THE EXTENDED 12" WATERLINE MUS
END WITH A 12" GATE VALVE (GV) INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE F
TEE PLUS ONE ADDITIONAL "STICK" OF 12" DI PIPE PAST THE
VALVE AND A 2" BLOW-OFF (BO). BE SURE TO CALCULATE THE
REQUIRED LENGTH OF RESTRAINT FOR THIS DEAD END AND SHOW TH
RESTRAINED LENGTH AND ALL APPURTENANCES ON THE PROFILE.
13. THE WM AND ALL PROPOSED PUBLIC WATERLINE INSIDE THE
SITE MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN A 16' MINIMUM WIDTH EASEMENT
IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE PROPOSED
SEWER IS PRIVATE AND SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE ANY RIGHTS-
OF-WAY AND EASEMENT. ADD AND LABEL UTILITY EASEMENT WHERE
NECESSARY ON THE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, LABEL THE SEWER LINE
AS "PRIVATE" ON SHEET 12 AND INSTALL CO-5 AT THE PROPERTY
LINE.
14. THIS SITE REQUIRES THE INSTALLATION OF A
SAMPLING/MONITORING MANHOLE (MMH). PROPOSED MH SAN-1 SHOUL
BE LABELED AS A MONITORING MANHOLE AND DETAIL MAN-17 ADDED
TO THE PLAN.
15. RE: COMMENT #14; THOUGH THE MMH IS PRIVATE PLEASE
PROVIDE A SANITARY SEWER PROFILE FROM THE MMH TO THE
EXISTING LATERAL AND MH ACROSS IRONBRIDGE ROAD. SHOW CO-5,
ANY UTILITY CROSSINGS WITH SEPARATION DISTANCES, AND
GROUND/INVERT ELEVATIONS AND LABEL THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
PORTIONS OF THE SEWER.
16. IT IS STATED ON SHEETS 5 AND 6 THAT SEVERAL EXISTING
EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AS PART OF A PROFFERED RIGHT-
OF-WAY DEDICATION. SINCE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION WILL
BE MADE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CHESTERFIELD UTILITIES
RECOMMENDS LEAVING THE EASEMENTS, LISTED AS 16.5' UTILITY
EASEMENT (DB:2046, PG:1694; DB:2315, PG:915; DB:2351,
PG:1737), 16' WATERLINE EASEMENT (DB:2086, PG:864), AND
WATERLINE EASEMENT (DB:2060, PG:1740), IN PLACE IN LIEU OF
VACATION.
17. THE RESTRAINED LENGTHS FOR ALL WATERLINE BENDS,
TRANSITIONS (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL), DEAD-ENDS, ETC.
MUST BE CALCULATED. IT IS CHESTERFIELD UTILITIES
PREFERENCE THAT MECHANICAL THRUST RESTRAINT SYSTEMS (SUCH
AS MEGALUG, FOR EXAMPLE) BE USED; THEREFORE, PLEASE
CALCULATE AND SHOW ALL LENGTHS OF THRUST RESTRAINT ON THE
WATERLINE PROFILES.
18. ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN INDICATING ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES (SUCH AS VALVE BOXES, ARV'S, ETC.) THAT ARE
IMPACTED DURING GRADING OPERATIONS MUST BE ADJUSTED TO
FINAL GRADE PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE.
19. PLAN SHEET 5 INDICATES THERE IS A WM LOCATED 120'
SOUTH OF PARCEL 7756838116 FRONT PROPERTY CORNER. THE
LOCATION IS SHOWN "IN LINE" WITH THE EXISTING WATERLINE.
PER THE 89-0559 AS-BUILT DRAWING, THIS IS ACTUALLY AN AIR
RELEASE VALVE (ARV); PLEASE MODIFY THE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
20. WILL AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM BE INSTALLED AT THIS SITE?
21. ADD STATIONING TO ALL WATERLINES ON THE PLAN VIEW TO
MATCH THE PROFILES.
22. RE: THE PROPOSED 8" WATERLINE CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE
PLAN, BECAUSE THE 12" WATERLINE IN COGBILL ROAD MUST BE
EXTENDED THE 8" WATERLINE WITHIN THE SITE SHOULD BE
RECONFIGURED TO CONNECT TO THE EXTENDED 12" LINE. THIS
WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED OF ANY ASSOCIATED WATER OUTAGES
FOR EXISTING CUSTOMERS ALONG IRONBRIDGE ROAD, I.E. THE
PROPOSED CUT-IN TEE.
23. RE: COMMENT #22, THOUGH THE 8" ONSITE WATERLINE
CONNECTION POINT WILL BE REVISED, PLEASE PROVIDE A SIMILAR
8" WATERLINE STUB TO THE WEST OF THE SITE TO WHAT IS
CURRENTLY SHOWN. THE LINE SHOULD END OUTSIDE OF PAVEMENT
AND HAVE AN 8" GV AND A 2" BO. ADDITIONALLY, THE LENGTH OF
THRUST RESTRAINT MUST BE CALCULATED AND SHOWN ON THE
PROFILE.
24. PER THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WATER AND SEWER
SPECIFICATIONS, DDC'S MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE IN AN
EXTERIOR VAULT; PLEASE RECONFIGURE THE DDC LOCATION. BE
ADVISED THE DDC VAULT IS PRIVATE AND NO MORE THAN HALF THE
VAULT SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
25. LABEL THE "DEDICATED" FH.
26. BE ADVISED THE MATERIAL QUANTITIES TABLE CURRENTLY
INDICATES A TOTAL OF 808' OF 8" DI WATERLINE, WHICH MATCHE
WHAT CAN BE SCALED ON UTILITIES SHEET 12, HOWEVER THE
PROFILE SHOWN ON SHEET 16 SHOWS ONLY 667' OF WATERLINE AND
OMITS THE STORM PIPE CROSSING (STM A-6 TO STM A-5), THE
LAST FH, AND THE TERMINATION POINT OF THE LINE. PROFILES
MUST SHOW THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF WATERLINE. ALSO AS
PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THE LENGTHS OF THRUST RESTRAINT MUST
BE CALCULATED AND LABELED.
27. SHEET 17 MUST BE COMPLETED. FLOW TEST INFORMATION
RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED PER DETAIL DES-5. BE SURE TO LABE
ALL PIPES AND NODES ON THE MAP.
28. PLEASE MAKE REFERENCE ON SHEET 12 TO THE LOCATIONS OF
ALL EXISTING VALVES THAT WILL NEED TO BE CLOSED WHEN
INSTALLING THE 12" WATERLINE EXTENSION.
29. PLEASE REMOVE DETAIL MET-11 FROM THE PLAN AND ADD
DETAIL MET-12 TO SHEET 46.
30. EVEN THOUGH THE SAN-1 MMH WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND
MAINTAINED, CHESTERFIELD UTILITIES RECOMMENDS PROVIDING A
MINIMUM 10' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN THE
OUTER WALL OF THE MMH AND THE PROPOSED 15" RC STORM PIPE.
31. ADD A NOTE STATING ALL PROPOSED CO'S ARE TO COMPLY
WITH DETAIL SEW-11. IT IS NOTED THE SEW-11 DETAIL IS
ALREADY SHOWN ON SHEET 46.
32. REVISE THE PLAN BY INSTALLING ALL GV'S FOR FH'S AT
TEES (OR CROSSES).
33. RE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, SHEET 18, A MINIMUM 10' OF
HORIZONTAL SEPARATION MUST BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN TREES AND
UTILITY APPURTENANCES SUCH AS FH'S AND WM'S. ADDITIONALLY,
TREES CANNOT BE PLANTED WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS. ALL THRE
PROPOSED FH LOCATIONS, AS CURRENTLY SHOWN, HAVE TREES
PLANTED WITHIN 10' AS DOES THE WM; PLEASE REVISE THE TREE
OR UTILITY LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY.
34. SUBMIT A LIGHTING PLAN, WITH THE PROPOSED FH AND WM
LOCATIONS SHOWN, FOR REVIEW.
35. INDICATE ON THE PLAN WHERE THE REQUIRE WATERLINE
DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLIES (JUMPERS) WILL BE LOCATED. BE
ADVISED THAT "JUMPERS" SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF AREAS
TO BE PAVED IF POSSIBLE.
36. ADD THE FOLLOWING DETAILS TO THE PLAN: FIR-03, MAN-11,
WAT-2, AND WAT-6.
37. THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY UTILITIES
CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. PRIOR TO THE
PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, UTILITIES MUST BE I
RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSAL BETWEEN THE
DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES CONTRACTOR AS
WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET FOUND ON THE
"DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TWO ITEMS TO TH
ATTENTION OF BILL PAYNE (PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR BY
CALLING 804-748-4336). THE BID PROPOSAL MUST BE BASED ON
THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT IF THE SITE PLAN I
REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PREPARATION OR
RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE BID PROPOSAL
SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED UTILITIES
CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
38. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
ENCLOSED IN SEPARATE EMAIL: 89-0559 AS BUILT DRAWING.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN : LIDL US OPERATIONS GROCERY STORE
ADDRESS : 6024, 6030, 6036 IRONBRIDGE ROAD 23234
SUBMISSION DATE : 4/25/16
PLAN DATED : 4/15/16
REVIEW DATE : 5/09/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. IT IS NOTED THE PROPOSED WM SIZE IS 2". THE METER
SIZING FORM INDICATES A TFC OF 247.2 FOR THE BUILDING,
WHICH CONVERTS TO A GPM DEMAND OF APPROXIMATELY 65
GPM; NOT 101 GPM AS CURRENTLY SHOWN. UNLESS THERE ARE
OTHER FIXED DEMANDS NOT SHOWN ON THE FORM, A 1 ½" WM
WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS SITE. NOTE THAT UTILITIES
RECOMMENDS A 2" TAP AND SERVICE LINE BE INSTALLED ON
THE PUBLIC SIDE FOR 1 ½" WM'S.
2. RE: OUR RECENT EMAIL CONVERSATIONS, WILL THE PROPOSED
8" WATERLINE CONNECTION TO THE 16" DI WATERLINE ON
IRONBRIDGE ROAD AND THE ASSOCIATED 8" LOOP REMAIN OR
BE REMOVED FROM THE PLAN? IT IS UTILITIES PREFERENCE
THAT THE IRONBRIDGE ROAD CONNECTION AND LOOP BE
REMOVED, AS SHOWN IN THE ENCLOSED SHEET 12 (WITHOUT
LOOP) PDF, UNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY FOR QUANTITY OR
REDUNDANCY REASONS. IF THE LOOP IS TO BE REMOVED,
PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN AND QUANTITIES.
3. PER MY 4/18/16 EMAIL, THE WM AND DDC SHOULD BE SET UP
SIMILARLY AS SHOWN IN THE ENCLOSED WM-DDC VAULT
LOCATION SKETCH. IF ARRANGED IN THIS FASHION, THE
DOMESTIC USAGE WILL HELP TO KEEP THE WATER IN THE FIRE
LINE UP TO THE DDC "TURNED OVER". ADDITIONALLY, THE WM
MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN AN ADEQUATELY SIZED SEGMENT OF
WATER EASEMENT. THE DDC VAULT IS PRIVATE AND SHOULD BE
LOCATED OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL
ALL VALVES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONFIGURATION.
4. THE THREE PROPOSED FH'S LOCATED NEAR THE BUILDING,
INCLUDING THE DEDICATED FH, ARE PUBLIC AND MUST BE
LOCATED WITHIN THE WATER EASEMENT. PLEASE REVISE THE
PLAN BY ADDING APPROPRIATELY SIZED EASEMENT SEGMENTS
AROUND ALL THREE FH'S AND "LEADS". ALSO, SHEET 25
SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY.
5. RE: COMMENT #4, THE SEGMENT OF WATER EASEMENT AROUND
THE RELOCATED FH NEAR THE COGBILL ROAD/IRONBRIDGE ROAD
INTERSECTION IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET 25; PLEASE REVISE.
6. LABEL MH SAN-1 AS A SAMPLING MH (MMH) PER MAN-17 ON
PLAN SHEET 12 AND ON THE PROFILE ON SHEET 15.
7. WITH THE ADDITION OF MH SAN-1 AND CO 4 AT THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF CO 5?
8. REVISE THE NOTE ON SHEET 12, WHICH STATES DOMESTIC W/L
SERVICE FROM THE MAIN TO THE METER TO BE INSTALLED PER
DETAIL MET-11, TO INDICATE INSTALLED PER DETAIL MET-
12. IT IS NOTED THAT DETAIL MET-12 HAS BEEN ADDED TO
SHEET 46.
9. RELOCATE THE 12" GV, SHOWN NEAR THE SITE ENTRANCE ON
COGBILL ROAD, TO THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE FH TEE TO
PREVENT THE FH FROM BEING SHUT OFF WHEN THE LINE IS
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE.
10. RE: COMMENT #35 FROM THE 2/29/2016 UTILITIES REVIEW
LETTER, PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATERLINE
"JUMPER(S)" ON SHEET 12. THE JUMPER IS AN INLINE CHECK
VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL WAT-6 THAT IS INSTALLED AT
OR NEAR THE START POINT OF THE PROPOSED WATERLINE
DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE JUMPER MUST BE SIZED TO ALLOW
THE REQUIRED VOLUME OF WATER FOR THE HIGH FLOW FLUSH
AND WILL REMAIN IN THE LINE UNTIL ALL TESTING HAS BEEN
SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED. THE JUMPER WILL PREVENT
BACKSIPHONAGE OF WATER INTO THE COUNTY'S SYSTEM PRIOR
TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE LINE. THE JUMPER(S) SHOULD BE
LOCATED OUT OF PAVED AREAS IF POSSIBLE.
11. FYI IN THE SHEET TITLE ON SHEET 11, THE WORD
"DRAINAGE" IS MISSPELLED.
12. LABEL THE SIZE OF THE PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL (LINE) ON
SHEET 12 AND INDICATE IT AS "PRIVATE". ADDITIONALLY,
INDICATE SIMILARLY ON THE PROFILE; SHEET 15.
13. SHOW AND LABEL ALL PROPOSED GV'S ON THE WATERLINE
PROFILES AND INDICATE THE REQUIRED THRUST RESTRAINT AS
APPLICABLE.
14. RE: COMMENT #27 FROM THE 2/29/2016 UTILITIES REVIEW
LETTER, ONCE THE FLOW TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED THE
INFORMATION/RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED ON SHEET 17 PER
DETAIL DES-5. PLEASE BE SURE TO LABEL ALL PIPES AND
NODES ON THE MAP.
15. RE: A FORTHCOMING LIGHTING PLAN, PLEASE ENSURE LIGHT
POLES ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE WATER EASEMENT.
16. RELOCATE THE POWER POLE AT APPROXIMATELY WATERLINE STA
15+37 OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT; THEREBY
PROVIDING MORE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE POLE AND THE
PROPOSED 12" WATERLINE. ADDITIONALLY, SHOW THE
PROPOSED GUY WIRE LOCATIONS FOR ALL RELOCATED POLES.
17. HOW WILL PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE BE PROVIDED TO THE
PROPOSED OUTPARCEL SHOWN ON SHEET 13?
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO FORWARD PDF'S OF ANY REVISED PLAN
SHEETS TO ME AT PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV FOR INFORMAL
REVIEW PRIOR TO THE NEXT SUBMITTAL.
AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER
INTO A COUNTY UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF
CONSTRUCTION.
AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SENT
DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
ENCLOSED IN SEPARATE EMAIL:
1. SHEET 12 (WITHOUT LOOP) PDF
2. WM-DDC VAULT LOCATION SKETCH
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
REVIEWER / PHONE #: W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN: LIDL US OPERATIONS GROCERY STORE
ADDRESS: 6024, 6030, 6036 IRONBRIDGE ROAD 23234
SUBMISSION DATE: 11/28/16
PLAN DATED: 11/17/16
REVIEW DATE: 12/6/16
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
COMMENTS: 3RD REVIEW - NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESS:
1.THE METER SIZING FORM (MSF) SHOWN ON SHEET 46 IS A
HENRICO COUNTY FORM. PLEASE REMOVE IT FROM THE PLAN,
COMPLETE A CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FORM (PREVIOUSLY
ENCLOSED), PLACE THE CHESTERFIELD FORM ON SHEET 46, AND
EMAIL A PDF OF THE FORM TO PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV .
PLEASE FILL OUT THE FORM COMPLETELY AND SIGN IT.
ADDITIONALLY, BE ADVISED, WHEN USING THE FIXTURES NOTED ON
THE ERRANT FORM, A COMBINED FIXTURE VALUE OF 174 AND A
DEMAND OF 58 GPM (ROUNDED) WERE OBTAINED ON THE
CHESTERFIELD FORM, WHICH EQUATES TO A 1 ½" SIZE DOMESTIC
WM.
2.IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE VERTICAL TRANSITIONS SHOWN ON THE
WATERLINE A AND WATERLINE C PROFILES MEET THE DEFLECTION
LIMITS SHOWN ON DETAIL WAT-11; THEREFORE, ADD AND LABEL
VERTICAL BENDS AND LIMITS OF RESTRAINT.
3.THERE ARE TWO LIGHT POLES (S1 AND S2) SHOWN LOCATED
WITHIN THE PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT. PLEASE RELOCATE THESE
POLES EITHER TO THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE EASEMENT LINE OR
OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT ALTOGETHER AS PERMANENT STRUCTURES
ARE NOT ALLOWED WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
4.BE ADVISED THAT BECAUSE SIDEWALK AND CONCRETE ISLANDS
WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE WATER EASEMENTS, A UTILITY
LICENSE AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO UTILITIES RELEASING
THE PROJECT TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT JOAN COURSON AT
804-748-1362 OR JOE DUTY AT 804-717-6583 FOR MORE
DETAILS.
5.ADD THE VALUE 173' FOR THE ELEVATION TO NOTE #4 ON
DETAIL DES-2; SHEET 45.
6.THE 8" AND 12" WATERLINE CROSSINGS SHOULD BE ADDED TO
THE APPLICABLE STORM PIPE PROFILES.
7. THERE IS NOT A 2" ARV ON THE PLAN, REMOVE DETAIL
WAT-2 FROM SHEET 47.
8.LABEL THE SEWER AS "PRIVATE" ON THE QUANTITIES TABLE;
SHEET 1.
THE ABOVE NOTED COMMENTS MAY BE RESOLVED BY
SLIPSHEETING THE PLAN AND THEREAFTER MAY BE DEEMED
APPROVABLE BY UTILITIES AT A TABLE REVIEW IF THIS OPTION I
CHOSEN. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT REVISED PDF'S ARE
SUBMITTED TO PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV FOR INFORMAL
REVIEW PRIOR TO A TABLE REVIEW.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER OR SEWER LINES
AND APPURTENANCES MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR
IN DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIE
THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
.
.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES
REVIEWER / PHONE #: W.B. PAYNE III/751-4336
NAME OF PLAN: LIDL US OPERATIONS GROCERY STORE
ADDRESS: 6024, 6030, 6036 IRONBRIDGE ROAD 23234
SUBMISSION DATE: 2/24/17
PLAN DATED: 2/20/17
REVIEW DATE: 3/8/17
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
COMMENTS: 4TH REVIEW - NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESS:
.
1.ADD THE VALUE 173' FOR THE ELEVATION LISTED IN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STANDARD SEWER AND WATER NOTES (NOTE 4) ON SHEETS 12,
12A, AND 13. IT IS NOTED THE 173' ELEVATION HAS ALREADY
BEEN ADDED TO DETAIL DES-2 ON SHEET 45.
.
2.THERE ARE TWO VERTICAL BENDS (VB'S) SHOWN ON THE 8"
WATERLINE A PROFILE, THREE VB'S SHOWN ON THE 8"
WATERLINE B PROFILE, AND TWO VB'S SHOWN ON THE 12"
WATERLINE C PROFILE ON SHEET 16; HOWEVER, THE TABLE OF
QUANTITIES ON SHEETS 1, 12, AND 13 LIST ONLY THREE 45 DEGR
VB'S WITH NO OTHER BENDS OR SIZES/ANGLES LISTED. PLEASE
LABEL THE VB'S ON SHEET 16 AND THEN REVISE THE QUANTITIES
ON ALL PERTINENT SHEETS TO REFLECT THE CORRECT SIZES AND
ANGLES. IT IS IMPORTANT THE QUANTITIES ARE ACCURATE SINCE
CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL BASED UPON THEM MUST BE
SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE CONTRACT INFORMATION.
3. RE: COMMENT #2, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO REMOVE ALL
UNNECESSARY ITEMS FROM THE TABLE OF QUANTITIES WHERE NO
QUANTITIES ARE LISTED; FOR EXAMPLE, THE 8X6" CROSS.
.
4. WHILE LIGHT POLES S1 AND S2 HAVE BEEN RELOCATED OUTSIDE
THE PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT, IT APPEARS POLE S1 IS NOW
LOCATED ON TOP OF A PROPOSED STORM PIPE.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL PUBLIC WATER OR SEWER LINES
AND APPURTENANCES MUST EITHER BE IN RECORDED EASEMENTS OR
IN DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY UTILITIE
.
ONCE THESE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED,
THE PLAN WILL BE APPROVABLE BY UTILITIES AT A TABLE
REVIEW. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT REVISED PDF'S ARE
SUBMITTED TO PAYNEW@CHESTERFIELD.GOV FOR INFORMAL
REVIEW PRIOR TO THE TABLE REVIEW.
.
THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FOUR SETS TOTAL OF THE
APPROVED PLANS MUST BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT FOR OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE: 01/28/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 03/04/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. DEDICATE 60 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG WEST SIDE OF
ROUTE 10, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4A OF CASE
16SN0537);
B. DEDICATE 45 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG NORTH SIDE OF
COGBILL RD, MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4B OF CASE
16SN0537);
2. PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG COGBILL RD FOR THE ENTIRE
PROPERTY FRONTAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONDITION 6F OF CASE
16SN0537.
3. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5' SIDEWALK ALONG ROUTE 10 AND
COGBILLE RD, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY VDOT.
4. PROVIDE 3-LAYER PAVEMENT SECTION FOR ROUTE 10 AND
COGBILL ROAD. PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO
ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON ROADWAY. STANDARD OR HEAVY
DUTY SECTIONS WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT ALONG ROUTE 10 AND MA
NOT ADDRESS VOLUMES ALONG COGBILL RD.
5. DEVELOPER MAY WANT TO CONSIDER PROVIDING 2 OUTBOUND
LANES (LEFT, RIGHT) ALONG THE EXITING SIDE OF THE ACCESS T
HELP ALLEVIATE BACK-UPS INTO THE SITE, ESPECIALLY TO
ADDRESS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/15/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 04/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 05/02/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 10,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4A OF CASE 16SN0537);
B. DEDICATE 45' OF R/W ALONG NORTH SIDE OF COGBILL RD,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4B OF CASE 16SN0537);
THE DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED
WITH JOE DUTY WITH THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IN THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY SECTION.
2. PROVIDE 3-LAYER PAVEMENT SECTION FOR ROUTE 10 AND
COGBILL ROAD. PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO
ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON ROADWAY. STANDARD OR HEAVY
DUTY SECTIONS WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT ALONG ROUTE 10 AND MA
NOT ADDRESS VOLUMES ALONG COGBILL RD.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/17/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 12/02/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. OFF-SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND EASEMENTS ALONG TH
CHURCH FRONTAGE TO ACCOMMODATE THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS;
B. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 10,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4A OF CASE 16SN0537);
C. DEDICATE 45' OF R/W ALONG NORTH SIDE OF COGBILL RD,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4B OF CASE 16SN0537).
2. ADVISORY COMMENT: PROPERTY IS PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED
UNDEVELOPED PART OF ZONED PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO
SHARE THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO COGBILL PER THE ZONING CASE.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE: 02/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/27/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR
REVIEW DATE: 03/02/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: OFF-SITE R/W DEDICATION
ON-SITE R/W, ACCESS ESMT
.
1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. OFF-SITE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND EASEMENTS ALONG TH
CHURCH FRONTAGE TO ACCOMMODATE THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS;
B. DEDICATE 60' OF R/W ALONG WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 10,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4A OF CASE 16SN0537);
C. DEDICATE 45' OF R/W ALONG NORTH SIDE OF COGBILL RD,
MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE (COND 4B OF CASE 16SN0537).
.
2. ADVISORY COMMENT: PROPERTY IS PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED
UNDEVELOPED PART OF ZONED PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO
SHARE THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO COGBILL PER THE ZONING CASE.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----BETH SYKES/717-6836
EMAIL------------------SYKESB@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN----------- GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------16PR0203
ADDRESS----------------5400 COGBILL ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE-------1/28/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------2/3/16
ACCEPTED DATE----------2/12/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------ONE
REVIEW DATE------------3/8/16
RECOMMENDATION---------REVISIONS REQUESTED
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS--REVISIONS REQUESTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--REQUESTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---REQUESTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---REQUESTED
REVIEW COMMENTS:
PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT 10
OLDED SETS AND 1 COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNI
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO C
MENTS, USING THE SPACE BELOW (NOT ON A SEPARATE SHEET) EAC
REVIEW COMMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH COM
NT. BE SURE TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS SHOW THE REQUIRED CH
GES. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE RESPONSE TO ALL DEPARTMENT COMM
TS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETT
TO DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY STAFF
VIEW COMMENTS. CLEARLY LABEL TO WHICH DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMEN
L INFORMATION SHOULD BE ROUTED.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
1. ADD THE ZONING CASE # 16SN0537 TO THE SITE PLAN NOTES.
2. ADD TO THE SITE PLAN NOTES: "PER ZONING CASE 16SN0537,
ES SHALL BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC FROM 11:00 P.M. TO 6:00A.
3. CLARIFY THE CURRENT ZONING (THE SURVEY LEAVES THE IMPRE
ION THAT PART OF THE SITE IS ZONED "R").
4. NOTE THAT THE SITE IS IN THE EMERGING GROWTH DEVELOPMEN
AREA.
5. ADD THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS TO THE SETBA
(ALONG ROAD FRONTAGES) AND BUFFER (ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIA
LABELS.
6. LABEL THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE DRIVE INTO THE REQUIRED B
FER PER ZONING CASE 16SN0537.
7. INSTALL BUMPER BLOCKS AT ENDS OF PARKING SPACES BETWEEN
ANDICAP ACCESS AISLE AND ENTRANCE TO BUILDING. POST SIGN O
FAR SIDE OF SIDEWALK. BOLLARDS IN THE PROPOSED LOCATION GE
DAMAGED QUICKLY AND LOOK BAD.
8. PROVIDE THE FENCE DETAIL TO THE COUNTY AND TO THE CHURC
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
9. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS: CALCULATION, SPECIES, L
HT POLE LOCATIONS, HYDRANT LOCATIONS AND IRRIGATION SLEEVE
10. PER SEC. 19-519(A), PARKING LOTS MUST BE DESIGNED TO I
LUDE 30 S. F. OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING FOR EACH
ARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A CALCULATION FOR THE TOTAL NUMBER
PARKING SPACES TIMES 30 S.F. TO DETERMINE TOTAL LANDSCAPE
REA WITHIN PARKING LOT. (EXAMPLE: 100 PARKING SPACES X 3
S.F. = 3000 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING LOT) LABEL EACH
SLAND WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO INSURE THE MINIMUM REQUIR
ENTS ARE MET.
11. PER SEC. 19-519(B), THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN A PAR
NG LOT SHALL BE 1 PER 200 S.F. OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA
THE PARKING LOT, ROUNDED UP. SHOW THE CALCULATION FOR TO
L NUMBER OF TREES. (EXAMPLE: 3100 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA DIV
ED BY 200 S.F. PER TREE = 15.5 TREES, WHICH IS ROUNDED UP
16 TREES)
12. PER SEC. 19-519(A & B), AT LEAST 50% OF THE TREES SHAL
BE LARGE MATURING TREES THAT ARE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM
IDTH OF 15 FEET AND 250 S.F. IN SIZE. SMALL MATURING TREE
SHALL BE IN ISLANDS WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 9 FEET AND BE
0 S.F. IN SIZE.
13. PER THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, FEDERAL REGULATIONS F
HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES, THE COUNTY CPTED POLICY,
ND COUNTY ORDINANCE SEC. 19-517(B), THE DESIGN OF PARKING
EAS SHALL FULLY CONSIDER AND PLAN TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL CO
LICTS BETWEEN MATURING LANDSCAPING AND THE VISIBILITY AND
CESS TO FIRE HYDRANTS, CLEARANCES TO HIGH POWER TRANSMISSI
LINES, SITE LIGHTING, AND VISIBILITY FOR MOTORISTS EXITIN
PARKING ROWS. SITE LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED TO DETERMINE
AT SUFFICIENT INTERNAL PARKING LOT PLANTING AREA EXISTS TO
EET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 19-519 EXCLUDING ISLANDS WITH
IRE HYDRANTS AND RELATED UTILITY BOXES, AND CONFLICTS WITH
VERHEAD POWER LINES AND SITE LIGHTING. REVIEW STAFF MAY R
UIRE A SEPARATE SHEET DOCUMENTING SIZES OF PROPOSED ISLAND
AND OTHER INTERNAL GREEN SPACES WITHIN PARKING LOTS.
14. PROVIDE CUT SHEETS FOR ALL FIXTURES.
15. SCREEN LOADING AREA PER THE ZONING CASE.
16. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE STATE REGISTERED
ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREP
ING THE PLAN.
17. PER SEC. 19-517(A) AND (B), AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL LAND
APING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF FINAL SIT
PLAN APPROVAL. WHETHER THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS A CONCEPTUAL
R DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE FOLLOWI
:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS. SHOW VDOT SIGHT LINES FROM E
RANCES.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE ORDINANCE
C. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR PLANTING OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT
D. SHOW BMP AREAS AND ADDRESS PER SEC. 19-518(I) IF REQUIR
TO TREAT AS A VISUAL AMENITY.
E. IF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF
L PLANTS AND IDENTIFY EACH AS LARGE OR SMALL DECIDUOUS TRE
, EVERGREEN TREES, MEDIUM SHRUBS, AND SMALL SHRUBS/GROUNDC
ERS. THESE MAY BE KEYED TO A CONCEPTUAL PLANT LIST SHOWIN
THESE PLANT TYPES AND THE QUANTITIES OF EACH.
F. IF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SPECIFY THE
ANTS AND THEIR REQUIRED SIZES FOR EACH OF THE PLANT TYPES
QUIRED PER SEC. 19-518(B).
G. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
1. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
2. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
3. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
4. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR RE
VAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL, GRADING
ND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
H. PER SEC. 19-518(C), THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE REQUI
D TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE COMPOSITION AND M
OF VEGETATION.
I. PER SEC. 19-518(C), DECORATIVE WALLS AND FENCES, HAVIN
AJ. PROVIDE STANDARD COUNTY LANDSCAPE NOTES ON DETAILED LA
SK. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER APPROVAL
F THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE AND IS TRACKED AS
SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED. APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAIN
PRIOR TO TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
18. ALL JUNCTION BOXES MUST BE SCREENED ON AT LEAST THREE
DES WITH SHRUBBERY OR LATTICE.
19. PER SEC. 19-518(E), ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROV
ED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE COUNTY ACCE
S EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS WITHIN 100 FEET OF
LL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS OF
W PLANTINGS. SHOW LOCATION OF HYDRANTS, BIBS OR IRRIGATION
LEEVES.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE CO
RACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CE
AIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WIT
DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION
S SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
20. PER SEC. 19-508.3, SUBMIT A FOOTCANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM
ENEVER A SITE IS ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND DO
MENT THAT THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOO
ANDLES AT THE PROPERTY LINE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
21. PER SEC. 19-264(D)(18), PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF ELEVATIONS
F THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDE
IFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND H
ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTE
ON THE ROOF OR ON THE GROUND. INCLUDE DUMPSTER AND LOADING
CREEN.
22. PER SEC. 19-570(C), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER ROOF
OP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED FROM PU
IC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN INTEGRAL PART O
THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2 AND I-3 DISTRICTS.
OW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED F
SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
23. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS. EXTERIOR LADDER
CESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ADJACE
PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, AND ANY EXTERIOR ACC
S MUST BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO THE ARCHITECTUR
CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. PROVIDE INTERIOR ACCESS THROU
YOUR SPACE, OR A COMMON CONTROL ROOM.
24. PUT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER 16PR0203
THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET
25. PUT NOTE ON PLANS, "ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES ARE TO BE I
TALLED UNDERGROUND INCLUDING ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND CATV.
26. PUT NOTE ON PLANS, "ANY SIGN IN EXCESS OF EIGHT (8) SQ
RE FEET REQUIRES A PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED THROUGH
UILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT." IF A SIGN IS SHOWN ON TH
SITE PLAN, NOTE ON PLAN "SIGNAGE CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL
ROUGH SIGN PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS."
27. SHOW LOCATION OF ALL SOLID WASTE STORAGE AREAS (DUMPST
S/TRASH CANS). ANY SUCH STORAGE AREA WITHIN 100 FEET OF A
R, R-TH, R-MF, OR A DISTRICT SHALL HAVE THE ENCLOSURE CONS
UCTED OF MATERIALS SIMILAR TO THE BUILDING IT SERVES.
28. ANY DUMPSTERS WITHIN 1000 FEET OF AN R, R-TH, R-MF, OR
DISTRICT SHALL HAVE A SIGN PROHIBITING SERVICE BETWEEN 9P
AND 6AM.
29. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE A
LICANT SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT)
O REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES
ENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING DEPART
NT.
ADDITIONALLY, A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT)
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE REQUIRED LA
SCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
THIS COMPLETES THE FIRST REVIEW
**********************************************************
REVIEW DEPARTMENT---------PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE #--------CHRIS HALE / (804) 717-6042
NAME OF PLAN--------------GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER----------16PR0203
ADDRESS-------------------COGBILL & IRONBRIDGE RD
LATEST PLAN DATE----------04/15/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---------04/18/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER----------2
REVIEW DATE---------------05/25/16
RECOMMENDATION------------REVISION REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW--------------NO
PLAT PROCESSING-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-----SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---NOT SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT SUBMITTED
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
COMPLETE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. BELOW EACH COMMENT DESCRIBE HOW YOU
HAVE ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. INDICATE WHICH SHEETS
SHOW THE REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY THE STAFF
REVIEW COMMENTS.
02. ADD A NOTE TO SHEET 7 UNDER ZONING NOTES INDICATING TH
DESIGN DISTRICT: EMERGING GROWTH
03. LABEL THE ROAD FRONTAGE SETBACKS AS SETBACKS AND NOT
BUFFERS. LABEL THE BUFFERS '100 FOOT BUFFER' AND '50 FOOT
BUFFER'.
04. REVIEW 1 COMMENT: LABEL THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE DRIVE
INTO THE REQUIRED BUFFER PER ZONING CASE 16SN0537.
05. INDICATE AND LABEL THE BOLLARDS AT HANDICAP PARKING
SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN.
06. REVIEW 1 COMMENT: PROVIDE A FENCE DETAIL TO THE CHURCH
AND TO THE COUNTY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
07. SETBACK AND BUFFER LENGTHS USED FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAP
CALCULATIONS DO NOT OVERLAP AND EXCLUDE DRIVE AISLES.
REVISE THE LENGTHS AND CALCULATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
SIDE YARD BUFFER NORTH PROPERTY LINE - 470 FEET
FRONT SETBACK IRON BRIDGE ROAD - 308 FEET
08. FOR BUFFER LANDCAPING USE THE TABLE 19.1-263.A.2.B FOR
PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES:
1.5 SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES / 50 LF
1.5 LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES / 50 LF
1.5 EVERGREEN TREES / 30 LF
1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS / 15 LF
GROUNDCOVERS IN BEDS
09. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE C OPTION 2 IS SHOWN FOR THE FRONT
YARD SETBACKS ON IRON BRIDGE AND COGBILL ROADS. OPTION 2
REQUIRES A 3 FOOT UNDULATING BERM (SEE NOTE 4 IN TABLE
19.1-251.B OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE). IF THIS IS NOT THE
INTENT, USE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE C OPTION 1.
10. ON THE SITE PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN, LABEL AREAS WITH
THE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR INTERIOR PARKING LOT
LANDSCAPING.
11. TREES ARE NOT TO CONFLICT WITH UNDERGROUND UTILITY
LINES, STORM PIPES, OR LIGHT POLES. MINIMUM DISTANCE TO
UTILITIES AND STORM PIPES IS 8 FEET FOR LARGE TREES AND 5
FEET FOR SMALL TREES. MINIMUM DISTANCE TO LIGHTPOLES IS 15
FEET FOR LARGE TREES. ADJUST TREE LOCATIONS NOT TO CONFLIC
WITH STORM PIPING WITHIN BIORETENTION ISLANDS AND OTHER
AREAS AS NEEDED.
12. INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING INCLUDES ISLANDS AND
AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE PARKING LOT AND NOT THE
PERIMETER OF THE LOT OR ALONG ENTRANCE DRIVES. TREES
COUNTED FOR INTERIOR LANDSCAPING MUST BE INSIDE THE PARKIN
LOT BOUNDARY.
13. IF FENCING IS REQUIRED AROUND THE LARGE BMP BY
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCING SHOULD
BE SPECIFIED. PROVIDE DETAILS IF FENCING IS REQUIRED.
14. NO IRRIGATION OR HOSE BIBS ARE PROPOSED ON THE
SUBMITTED PLAN. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE, WATERING
AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR PLANT MATERIALS WITH A
REPUTABLE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE COMPANY FOR A MINIMUM OF 3
YEARS (19.1-249.B). PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM
CONTRACT PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
15. PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN AND CUTSHEETS FOR ALL FIXTURES
16. SUBMIT A FOOTCANDLE OUTPUT DIAGRAM WHENEVER A SITE IS
ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND DOCUMENT THAT THE
MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION DOES NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT TH
PROPERTY LINE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
17. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH
ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF
JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR
ON THE GROUND (19.1-27.F). INCLUDE DUMPSTER AND LOADING
SCREEN.
18. PER SEC. 19.1-317.D, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2 AND
I-3 DISTRICTS. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE
FULLY SCREENED.
19. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS. EXTERIOR LADDER
ACCESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM
ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, AND ANY
EXTERIOR ACCESS MUST BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO
THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. PROVIDE
INTERIOR ACCESS THROUGH YOUR SPACE, OR A COMMON CONTROL
ROOM.
20. PRIOR TO RECEIVING AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE APPLICANT
SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT) TO
REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES
IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
**********************************************************
REVIEWER / PHONE #--------CHRIS HALE / (804) 717-6042
NAME OF PLAN--------------GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER----------16PR0203
ADDRESS-------------------COGBILL & IRONBRIDGE RD
LATEST PLAN DATE----------11/17/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---------11/24/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER----------3
REVIEW DATE---------------12/08/16
RECOMMENDATION------------REVISION REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW--------------NO
PLAT PROCESSING-----------NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-----SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT SUBMITTED
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
COMPLETE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. BELOW EACH COMMENT DESCRIBE HOW YOU
HAVE ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. INDICATE WHICH SHEETS
SHOW THE REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY THE STAFF
REVIEW COMMENTS.
02. REVIEW 1 COMMENT: LABEL THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE DRIVE
INTO THE REQUIRED BUFFER PER ZONING CASE 16SN0537. THIS
PERTAINS TO THE 15 FOOT PORTION OF THE ENTRANCE DRIVE
ENCROACHING INTO THE 50 FOOT BUFFER AT THE NORTHERN
PROPERTY LINE, NOT THE COGBILL ENTRANCE.
03. REVIEW 1 COMMENT: PROVIDE A FENCE DETAIL FOR THE FENCE
TO BE LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO THE CHURCH
AND TO THE COUNTY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
04. THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS SHOWN AS 36,185 SF. THE
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR A GROCERY STORE IS
36,170 SF PER CONDITION 3 OF ZONING CASE 16SN0537. REVISE
THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE.
05. FOR BUFFER LANDCAPING USE THE TABLE 19.1-263.A.2.B FOR
PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES:
1.5 SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES / 50 LF
1.5 LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES / 50 LF
1.5 EVERGREEN TREES / 30 LF
1.5 MEDIUM SHRUBS / 15 LF
GROUNDCOVERS IN BEDS
THE TWO 50 FOOT BUFFERS WHERE THIS APPLIES ARE ON THE
NORTHWEST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES. DO NOT USE PERIMETER
LANDSCAPE C IN THE BUFFERS. REVISE THE BUFFER PLANTING
QUANTITIES.
06. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE TREATMENT C IS REQUIRED PER THE
ZONING ORDINANCE WITHIN THE TWO 50 FOOT SETBACKS ON IRON
BRIDGE ROAD AND COGBILL ROAD. THESE ARE CONSIDERED SETBACK
AND NOT BUFFERS. LANDSCAPE C PER TABLE 19.1-251.B CONSISTS
OF:
1 SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE / 30 LF
1 LARGE DECIDUOUS TREE / 50 LF
1 EVERGREEN TREE / 30 LF
1 MEDIUM SHRUB / 10 LF
GROUNDCOVERS IN BEDS
REVISE THE SETBACK PLANTING QUANTITIES.
07. MINIMUM SIZE FOR NON-NATIVE EVERGREEN TREES IS 7 FEET
IN HEIGHT. THE NELLIE STEVENS HOLLIES AND SOUTHERN
MAGNOLIAS AS SPECIFIED DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
19.1-250.D
08. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE ORNAMENTAL FENCING REQUIRED
AROUND THE BMP.
09. NO IRRIGATION OR HOSE BIBS ARE PROPOSED ON THE
SUBMITTED PLAN. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE, WATERING
AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM FOR PLANT MATERIALS WITH A
REPUTABLE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE COMPANY FOR A MINIMUM OF 3
YEARS (19.1-249.B). PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM
CONTRACT PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
10. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH
ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF
JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR
ON THE GROUND (19.1-27.F). INCLUDE DUMPSTER AND LOADING
SCREEN.
11. PER SEC. 19.1-317.D, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2 AND
I-3 DISTRICTS. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE
FULLY SCREENED.
12. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE ROOF ACCESS. EXTERIOR LADDER
ACCESS AND PARAPET OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM
ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, AND ANY
EXTERIOR ACCESS MUST BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER INTEGRAL TO
THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING. PROVIDE
INTERIOR ACCESS THROUGH YOUR SPACE, OR A COMMON CONTROL
ROOM.
13. PRIOR TO RECEIVING AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE APPLICANT
SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT) TO
REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES
IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
14. SHOW ON THE SITE PLAN THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
REMOVED FROM THE CHURCH PROPERTY AND WHERE THEY ARE TO BE
REPLACED ELSEWHERE ON THE CHURCH PROPERTY. COMPLETION OF
REPLACEMENT SPACES WILL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR
BUILDING OCCUPANCY. SINCE ADDITIONAL SPACES FOR THE CHURCH
MAY BE OBTAINED BY RESTRIPING EXISTING ASPHALT OR PAVING
EXISTING GRAVEL AREAS, THIS WORK MAY BE CONSIDERED
MAINTENANCE THAT WOULD NOT FACTOR INTO STORM WATER
TREATMENT CALCULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GROCERY SITE.
CONFIRM STORMWATER COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING.
15. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES, PROVIDE TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT A COPY OF THE PRIVATE CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT
WITH THE ADJACENT SOUTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH PROPERTY.
**********************************************************
REVIEWER / PHONE #--------CHRIS HALE / (804) 717-6042
NAME OF PLAN--------------GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER----------16PR0203
ADDRESS-------------------COGBILL & IRONBRIDGE RD
LATEST PLAN DATE----------02/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE---------02/22/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER----------4
REVIEW DATE---------------03/16/17
RECOMMENDATION------------REVISION REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW--------------YES
PLAT PROCESSING-----------ACCESS AGREEMENT
LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS-----SUBMITTED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS--NOT SUBMITTED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---NOT SUBMITTED
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. RESUBMIT
10 FULL SETS AND ONE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. PROVIDE A
COMPLETE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR ALL DEPARTMENTS TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. BELOW EACH COMMENT DESCRIBE HOW YOU
HAVE ADDRESSED EACH REVIEW COMMENT. INDICATE WHICH SHEETS
SHOW THE REQUIRED CHANGES. PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT CAUSED BY THE STAFF
REVIEW COMMENTS.
02. AN ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR THE 8 REPLACEMENT PARKING
SPACES HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THE CHURCH. COORDINATE WITH
THE CHURCH AND UPDATE THE LOCATION AND LIMITS OF WORK ON
THE PLANS.
03. SHOW THE SURFACE OF THE 8 REPLACEMENT PARKING SPACES A
ASPHALT.
04. PLANT QUANTITIES IN FOR BUFFERS AND SETBACKS HAVE BEEN
CORRECTLY SHOWN IN THE CALCULATION TABLES. ON THE LANDSCAP
PLAN SOME PLANTS WERE NOT LABELED (EVERGREENS IN THE IRON
BRIDGE SETBACK). ALSO SOME LABELS WERE OBSCURED BY OTHER
ANNOTATION (SHRUBS IN THE CHURCH BUFFER). CORRECT LABELING
AND CONFIRM THAT ALL REQUIRED PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
QUANTITIES ARE SHOWN IN THE BUFFERS AND SETBACKS.
05. EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN BUFFERS SHALL BE PRESERVED
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. SHOW THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE, PROPOSED TREELINE WITH TREE PROTECTION, AND
NOTE WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION IS TO PRESERVED IN THE
BUFFER AT THE CHURCH PROPERTY. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON TH
EROSION CONTROL, GRADING, AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
06. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS REASONABLY
DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE BUFFER AREA.
PRESERVED VEGETATION WILL BE INSPECTED AT THE TIME OF
OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO DETERMINE IS SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING IS
REQUIRED. 19.1-247.A.2
07. IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS TO BE CREDITED TOWARD
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDE ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES IN THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATION TABLES.
08. WHERE GROUPINGS OF TREES AND SHRUBS ARE SHOWN WITHIN
TURF AREAS IN SETBACKS AND BUFFERS, SHOW BEDLINES TO
DELINEATE LIMITS OF MULCH AND TURF.
09. NO IRRIGATION OR HOSE BIBS ARE PROPOSED ON THE
SUBMITTED PLAN. THE COUNTY ACCEPTS THE USE OF DROUGHT
TOLERANT SPECIES WITHOUT REQUIRING AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
ADD A NOTE TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT DROUGHT TOLERANT
SPECIES APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAVE BEEN USED
TO ELIMINATE THE IRRIGATION REQUIREMENT.
10. REGULAR WATERING OF PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE NEEDED
DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON AFTER PLANTING FOR PROPER
ESTABLISHMENT AND LONG TERM SURVIVAL.
11. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING WHICH IS REMOVED, BECOMES
UNHEALTHY OR DIES, OR IS POLLARDED SHALL BE REPLACED
DURING THE NEXT PLANTING SEASON. 19.1-249.
12. THESE SPECIES ARE NOT APPROVED AS DROUGHT TOLERANT ON
THE COUNTY APPROVED PLANT MATERIALS LIST: OKAME CHERRY,
CRYPTOMERIA, ITEA, AND SPICE BUSH. SELECT ALL DROUGHT
TOLERANT SPECIES IF NO IRRIGATION IS TO BE USED.
13. SPECIFY A FRUITLESS SWEETGUM VARIETY IN LIEU OF THE
SPECIES TO ELIMINATE SEED POD ISSUES.
14. THE PRIVACY FENCE AT THE CHURCH PROPERTY LINE IS
REQUIRED TO BE VINYL PER ZONING CASE 16SN0537, CONDITION
8.B. UPDATE THE DETAIL. ALSO ADD A NOTE TO THE DETAIL THAT
THE FINISHED OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE WILL FACE THE CHURCH
PROPERTY.
15. COORDINATE HEIGHT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND
PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE ORNAMENTAL FENCING REQUIRED AROUND
THE BMP.
16. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH
ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF
JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR
ON THE GROUND (19.1-27.F). INCLUDE DUMPSTER AND LOADING
SCREEN.
17. PER SEC. 19.1-317.D, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW
THAT UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
18. PRIOR TO RECEIVING AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE APPLICANT
SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF GUARANTEE (COUNTY FORMAT) TO
REPLACE ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS OR POLLARDED TREES
IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE YEAR INSPECTION BY THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
**********************************************************
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 1/28/16
RECEIVED DATE : 2/13/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 3/2/16
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. COORDINATE POINTS BASED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 ARE NOT PRESENT. TWO POINTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
SITE BOUNDARY.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : 04/15/2016
RECEIVED DATE : 04/21/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 05/05/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. COORDINATE POINTS BASED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 ARE INCORRECT. THE LOCATION OF THE POINTS IS
ACCEPTABLE, HOWEVER THE VALUE OF THE NORTHWEST POINT
IS INCORRECT.
2. THE PARCEL BOUNDARY SURVEY IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE
SUPPLY THE METES AND BOUNDS FOR EVERY SEGMENT ALONG
THE TRAVERSE TO INCLUDE CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE FOR
ALL NON-TANGENT CURVES. IF THE PARCEL IS TOO LARGE TO
CONVENIENTLY FIT ON ONE SHEET, A LARGER SCALE DRAWING
OF THE BOUNDARY IS ACCEPTABLE.
3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE NOT INDICATED TO BE NAD83 BEARINGS.
ADD THIS INDICATION TO THE NORTH ARROW.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/17/16
RECEIVED DATE : 11/23/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 12/14/16
ADDRESS : 5400 COGBILL RD
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. STREET ADDRESS LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN. IT CAN BE
LOCATED ON THE BUILDING, ON A SIGN OR AS A PART OF A
MONUMENT SIGN. LOCATION AND MATERIAL USED MUST BE NOTED
ON THE SITE PLAN. IF YOU ARE USING A MONUMENT SIGN, A
DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN MUST BE ON THE SITE PLAN.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
CASE NUMBER : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : 2/20/17
RECEIVED DATE : 2/28/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 3/15/17
ADDRESS : 5400 COGBILL RD
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. STREET ADDRESS LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN. IT CAN BE
LOCATED ON THE BUILDING, ON A SIGN OR AS A PART OF A
MONUMENT SIGN. LOCATION AND MATERIAL USED MUST BE NOTED
ON THE SITE PLAN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0203
NAME OF PLAN:GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
ADDRESS: 5400 COGBILL ROAD
DATE OF REVIEW:3/2/16 REVIEW # 1
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT
SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 16PR0203
NAME OF PLAN:GROCERY STORE - COGBILL RD
ADDRESS: 5400 COGBILL ROAD
DATE OF REVIEW:05/05/2016 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT
SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
2) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
ADDRESS: 6030 IRON BRIDGE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 1/28/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 2/19/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV) IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS SIT
2. ADD A NOTE TO THE UTILITY PLAN STATING:
"THE 4.5 INCH DISCHARGE OF THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL FACE
IN THE DIRECTION INDICATED BY THE ARROW ON THE PLAN."
3. ADD AN ARROW TO THE FIRE HYDRANT INDICATING WHICH
DIRECTION IT SHALL FACE.
4. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
5. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
6. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
7. PROVIDE THE DETAIL FOR THE PLAN AND ELEVATION
(SECTION)VIEW OF THE FIR-3 DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY VAULT
AS PUBLISHED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
ADDRESS: 6030 IRON BRIDGE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/15/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 4/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 4/25/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
COPY ON THE PLAN.
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
2. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
COPY ON THE PLAN.
3. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
COPY ON THE PLAN.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
ADDRESS: 6030 IRON BRIDGE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/17/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/22/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/29/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
COPY ON THE PLAN.
2. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
COPY ON THE PLAN.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GROCERY STORE - COGBILL ROAD
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 16PR0203
ADDRESS: 6030 IRON BRIDGE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 2/20/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/27/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 3/3/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES
SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. REFER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012), SECTION B105 AND THE
COUNTY CODE OF CHESTERFIELD FOR EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED FOR
SPRINKLER PROTECTED BUILDINGS
REFER TO THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B104, B104.1, B104.2 AND B104.3 FOR THE CALCULATIO
PROCESS AND ALLOWANCES. THE CORRECT FORMAT AND CALCULATION
SHEET CAN BE OBTAINED VIA THE INTERNET AT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY- CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMS - DIVISION
OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY
COPY ON THE PLAN.
2. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
COPY ON THE PLAN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
ADDRESS : NW CORNER OF COGBILL AND IRONBRIDGE
ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : JANUARY 28, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2014
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND / OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS
(E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES, GROUND WATER
AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS WILL NO
RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS
DOCUMENTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TH
COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE STORMWATER REGULATION
ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES THAT OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1
2014 MAY USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
SPECIFIED IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO
PERMIT CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT
LISTED UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. A SEPARATE MEETING WITH EE MAY BE WARRANTED DUE TO
DESIGN COMMENTS.
04. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
05. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DETAILED SOILS REPORT, THE MAXIMUM
VELOCITY ALLOWABLE ON BARE EARTH IS 3.5 FPS. VELOCITIE
BETWEEN 3.5 FPS AND 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A JUTE LINING AND
ANY VELOCITIES GREATER THAN 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A
STRUCTURAL LINING OF EITHER RIP RAP OR CONCRETE.
(CL-G&D 5)
06. ALL ROOF WATER AND DOWNDRAINS MUST BE COLLECTED AND
DISCHARGED IN A NON-ERODIBLE MANNER. (CL-G&D 6)
07. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STORM SEWERS, CULVERTS, DROP
INLETS AND APPURTENANCES MUST BE ASSIGNED A STRUCTURE
NUMBER AND LISTED IN TABULAR FORM ON THE PLAN SHEET ON
WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED. (CL-G&D 14)
08. INVERT ELEVATIONS MUST BE SHOWN FOR ALL DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES. (CL-G&D 15)
09. THE THROAT LENGTH FOR ALL CURB DROP INLETS MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 16)
10. INLET SHAPING STD. IS-1 MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE
TABULAR DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR EACH MANHOLE AND DROP
INLET IN WHICH IT WAS USED IN THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
CALCULATIONS. (CL-G&D 17)
11. INLET SHAPING IS RESTRICTED TO PIPE DIAMETERS OF 30"
OR LESS AND TO SITUATIONS WHERE ONE PIPE ENTERS THE
CHAMBER AND ONE PIPE EXITS THE CHAMBER. STORM SEWERS
WITH PIPE DIAMETERS OF 30" AND ABOVE SHALL QUALIFY FOR
THE 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN JUNCTION LOSSES ONLY WHEN
PRE-CAST TEES AND ELBOWS ARE USED. (CL-G&D 18)
12. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR INLET SHAPING
STD. IS-1. IF INLET SHAPING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITHIN THE STANDARD STRUCTURE, THEN DETAILS MUST BE
PROVIDED FOR THE MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO THE
STRUCTURE TO ACCOMPLISH INLET SHAPING. (CL-G&D 19)
13. STEPS STD. ST-1 MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION OF ANY STRUCTURE OVER 4 FEET IN
HEIGHT. (CL-G&D 20)
14. BOOT CONNECTORS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR ALL PLASTIC PIPES THAT TIE
INTO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. (CL-G&D 21)
15. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE
SHOWN. (CL-G&D 27)
16. THE DEED BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER OF ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. (CL-G&D 28)
17. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
18. CLARIFY WHEN THE PROPOSED PARCEL ADJUSTMENT IS TO
OCCUR.
19. ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS SHOW THE EXISTING GAS LINE.
20. SHEET 8:
A) HATCH ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT.
B) PROVIDE LABELS FOR THE BIORETENTION NEAR STRUCTURES
A-5 AND A-11.
C) INCLUDE DESIGN LEVELS IN BMP CALL OUTS.
21. SHEET 10:
A) ENSURE ALL STRUCTURES ARE LABELED AND THE LABELS AR
NOT OVERWRITTEN WITH OTHER TEXT.
B) CLARIFY THE PURPOSE OF THE 15" PIPE BETWEEN
STRUCTURES A18 AND A19.
C) IT APPEARS THAT MANY OF THE STRUCTURES MAY NOT MEET
THE MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PER THE
VDOT ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS. IF DEVIATION FROM
THE STANDARD IS REQUIRED, NOTE THE STRUCTURES AS
MODIFIED AND PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THEIR
MODIFICATION(S).
D) THE CLEANOUT IN THE A9 BIORETENTION APPEARS TO BE O
AN ARC. CLARIFY HOW THIS IS TO OCCUR. IT IS
PREFERRED THAT ANY ANGLE CHANGES OCCUR WITHIN A
CLEANOUT OR OBSERVATION WELL.
E) RELOCATE STRUCTURE A-17 TO THE EAST TO BE
PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE A-16. THIS STORM PIPE
SERVES AS THE OUTFALL FOR THE UNDERGROUND STORMWATE
FACILITY AND THE RELOCATION WILL HELP PREVENT
MAINTENANCE ISSUES BETWEEN THE STORM AND PRIVATE
SANITARY SEWER.
F) IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE THE CLEANOUT AND UNDERDRAINS
ON THE MICROBIORETENTION FACILITIES DUE TO STRUCTUR
LABELS.
G) PROVIDE MORE CURB CUTS FOR THE CURB ISLAND
MICROBIORETENTION IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL
EROSION AND UTILIZE THE FULL AREA OF INFILTRATION.
H) PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC UNDER THE RIP-RAP FOR THE CUR
CUTS.
I) CLARIFY MATERIAL TYPE FOR THE RIP-RAP FOR THE CURB
CUTS.
J) IT APPEARS THAT THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TO THE NORT
MAY NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED COVERAGE OVER THE PIPE.
VERIFY THAT AT LEAST 2' OR HALF DIAMETER OF PIPE
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER) IS PROVIDED IN ALL LOCATIONS
ALONG THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
K) THE RIP-RAP FOR THE CURB CUT NEAR STRUCTURE A-7
SHALL EXTEND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FACILITY.
L) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONVEYANCE SWALE TO TH
NORTHEAST.
M) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS HOW DRAINAGE TOWARD THE WEST I
SATISFYING CONDITION 10.B IN THE PROFFERED
CONDITIONS.
N) THE DUMPSTER PAD WALL APPEARS TO BE WITHIN AN AREA
THAT WILL REQUIRE A BMP EASEMENT. THIS WALL WILL
REQUIRE A LICENSE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO BUILDING
PERMIT. THE WALL IF REMOVED BY THE COUNTY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE BMP AND ITS OUTFALL WILL NOT BE
REPLACED AND WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNE
TO REPLACE.
O) THE WATERLINES BY STRUCTURES A-6 AND B-2 DO NOT
APPEAR TO HAVE 8' OF SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION A
REQUIRED BY THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT BETWEEN THESE
TWO UTILITY LINES.
22. SHEET 11:
A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW CONDITION 10.B
(10-POST TO 2-PRE) IS OBTAINED FOR THE ROAD WIDENIN
ALONG COGBILL ROAD.
B) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE RIP-RAP CHANNEL
RECEIVING WATER FROM THE ROAD WIDENING AND CONVEYIN
TOWARD THE EXISTING DETENTION AREA ALONG COGBILL
ROAD.
23. SHEET 14:
A) PROVIDE PROFILE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
B) THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO STM A-0 TO A-17 PROFILES.
C) THE LENGTH FOR PIPE A-16 TO A-17 DOES NOT MATCH
CALCULATIONS.
D) THE LENGTH AND SIZE FOR PIPE A-14 TO A-13 DOES NOT
MATCH CALCULATIONS.
E) SHOW THE WALL AND ASSOCIATED FOOTING BETWEEN
STRUCTURES A-8 AND A-7.
F) CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO IN PIPES FOR A-7 FROM A-8
G) SHOW THE WATERLINE CROSSING BETWEEN STRUCTURES A-6
AND A-5 AND LABEL SEPARATION.
H) SHOW STRUCTURE A-0 AND EX-1 IN THE EX-2 TO A-8
PROFILE.
I) IT IS RECOMMENDED THE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS BE
REDESIGNED TO ACHIEVE A 0.5% MINIMUM SLOPE TO THE
MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE.
24. SHEET 15:
A) STM C-0 TO C-3 HAS 12" PIPES. 12" PIPE IS ONLY
ALLOWED FOR THE FIRST 50' OF A SYSTEM. THE INCREAS
IN PIPE SIZE HAS TO OCCUR AT A STRUCTURE. PROVIDE
15" MINIMUM AFTER THE FIRST 50'.
B) PIPE LENGTH FOR PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURES B-1 AND B-3
DOES NOT MATCH CALCULATIONS.
25. SHEET 18:
A) LABEL THE SPECIES TYPES FOR ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS.
B) PROVIDE BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE SPECIFIC PLANTIN
NOTES FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
26. SHEET 25:
A) SHOW AND LABEL ALL DRAINAGE AND BMP EASEMENTS.
B) PROVIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR FUTURE STORM SEWER
CONNECTIONS FROM THE OUTPARCELS.
C) SPECIFY THE RIP-RAP CHANNEL TO BE 2' DEEP OF VDOT
CLASS 1 RIP-RAP OVER FILTER FABRIC.
D) SHOW OUTLET PROTECTION INTO THE BASINS.
27. SHEET 34:
A) VERIFY EXISTING STRUCTURES HAVE IS-1 AS INDICATED I
THE CALCULATIONS.
B) WAS UNCLEAR FROM WHERE THE KNOWN Q SHOWN IN THE HGL
AND STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS WAS DERIVED. PROVIDE
CLARIFICATION AND NECESSARY INFORMATION TO REVIEW
CALCULATIONS.
C) THE CA FOR STRUCTURES A-16, B-2, AND B-3 DO NOT
MATCH THE PLANS.
D) SINCE THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM ACTS AS AN OVERFLOW FO
THE BMPS, PROVIDE 100-YEAR HGL CALCULATIONS.
E) THE INLET SPREAD CALCULATIONS INCLUDE STRUCTURE
A-17, WHICH IS A MANHOLE. PLEASE CLARIFY.
F) IN THE INLET SPREAD CALCULATIONS THE CA VALUE FOR
STRUCTURE A-00 DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS.
28. SHEET 49:
A) PROVIDE CN ON PLAN.
B) SHOW THE TIMES-OF-CONCENTRATION FOR THE PROPOSED
SITE.
29. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE WHIC
REQUIRES THE OWNER TO GIVE THE COUNTY INSPECTOR 48
HOURS NOTIFICATION TO SCHEDULE AN ON-SITE PRE-
CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THIS NOTE SHOULD BE THE FIRST STE
IN THE EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE/SEQUENCE OF
CONSTRUCTION. (CL-EC 4)
30. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE CERTIFIED RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER
(CRLD) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
(CL-EC 5)
31. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE VSMP CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OPERATOR
AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR (OR AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.
32. STEPS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
EVENTS FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. (CL-EC 6)
33. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST BE GRAPHICALLY SHOWN ON
THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTED AS WIDE AS THE PROPOSED
PERMANENT ENTRANCE. (CL-EC 9)
34. ALL THE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE
SEDIMENT TRAP(S) MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAIL. (CL-EC 14)
35. SAFETY FENCE (STD. & SPEC 3.01) IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. (CL-EC 15)
36. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
37. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DETAILED SOILS REPORT, THE MAXIMUM
VELOCITY ALLOWABLE ON BARE EARTH IS 3.5 FPS. VELOCITIE
BETWEEN 3.5 FPS AND 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A JUTE LINING AND
ANY VELOCITIES GREATER THAN 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A
STRUCTURAL LINING OF EITHER RIP RAP OR CONCRETE.
(CL-EC 17)
38. THE FOLLOWING NOTES MUST BE ADDED TO THE PLANS:
1. "ALL VEGETATIVE AND STRUCTURAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED
ACCORDING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF
THE VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK AND
VIRGINIA REGULATION 9 VAC 25-840-40." (CL-EC 18)
2. "ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO DRAIN TO APPROVED SEDIMENT
CONTROL MEASURES AT ALL TIMES DURING LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES AND DURING SITE DEVELOPMENT UNTIL FINAL
STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED." (CL-EC 23)
39. THE DETAIL SHOWN FOR GRATE INLET PROTECTION MUST BE
CHANGED TO THE ONE SHOWN ON PLATE 3.07-3 OF STANDARD
AND SPECIFICATION # 3.07. (CL-EC 35)
40. ANY SOIL STOCKPILE AREA MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLANS.
SILT FENCE MUST BE PROVIDED AROUND THE PERIMETER.
(CL-EC 39)
41. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
1. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
3. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
42. SHEET 26:
A) A FILL SLOPE BERM IS CALLED OUT IN THE PHASE 1
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE; HOWEVER, A FILL SLOPE BERM
COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
B) CLARIFY NOTE 8 IN THE PHASE II CONSTRUCTION SEQUENC
TO REQUIRE THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS TO THE BMPS
BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION/CONVERSION.
43. SHEET 27:
A) IT APPEARS SILT FENCE IS BEING PLACED IN ASPHALT.
SILT FENCE REQUIRES TRENCHING. CLARIFY HOW PROPER
PLACEMENT OF THE SILT FENCE IN THE ASPHALT IS TO
OCCUR.
B) SHOW EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS TO INLETS.
C) IT IS RECOMMENDED TO EXTEND THE DIVERSION DIKE FOR
ST-2 TO THE NORTH TO FORCE MORE SEDIMENT-LADEN WATE
INTO THE TRAP.
D) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR THE DIVERSION DIKES.
E) PROVIDE A SEDIMENT TRAP TO THE NORTHWEST.
F) RIP-RAP THE PITS IN THE SEDIMENT TRAPS WITH THE
OUTFALL PIPE.
44. SHEET 28:
A) RIP-RAP THE PITS IN THE SEDIMENT TRAPS WITH THE
OUTFALL PIPE.
B) THE TEMPORARY PIPE UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SHALL BE RCP. CLASS SHALL BE BASED ON THE AMOUNT O
COVER ON THE PIPE. IF LESS THAN A FOOT OF COVER IS
PROVIDED, PIPE MUST BE CLASS V.
C) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREAS TO THE CHECK DAMS TO ENSURE
PROPER CHECK DAM TYPE IS USED.
D) THE DRAINAGE AREA TO THE CULVERTS UNDER COGBILL ROA
IS TOO LARGE FOR THE USE OF CULVERT INLET PROTECTIO
PER THE VESCH.
E) IN THE BIORETENTION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1) STEP 7 REFERS TO BASIN F. PLEASE USE BASIN
LABELS CONSISTENTLY THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SET AND
UPDATE AS REQUIRED.
2) STEP 7 REFERS TO SHEET 15, WHICH IS THE UTILITY
PROFILE SHEETS, UPDATE REFERENCES AS REQUIRED.
3) PROVIDE NOTE THAT THE TRAP SHALL BE EXCAVATED NO
MORE THAN A 1' ABOVE FINAL GRADE OF THE BASIN(S)
4) PROVIDE NOTES FOR PHOTODOCUMENTATION OF THE
INSTALLATION FOR CERTIFICATION PURPOSES.
45. SHEET 29:
A) USE A C-VALUE OF 0.30 FOR MANAGED TURF.
B) THE DRAINAGE AREA AND C-VALUE FOR STM A-0 APPEAR TO
BE TRANSPOSED.
C) SHOW PHASE 1 ESC PRACTICES.
D) PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR CURB CUTS.
E) THE DRAINAGE AREAS SHOWN FOR MANY OF THE CURB
ISLANDS DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE GRADING SHOWN ON
SHEETS 10 AND 11.
F) BREAK UP THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR A-7 TO SHOW THE
DRAINAGE AREA FOR THE DRY SWALE SEPARATELY FROM THE
OVERALL DRAINAGE AREA TO THE BASIN.
G) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR A-12 DOES NOT APPEAR TO
ENCOMPASS THE BASIN.
H) MINIMIZE THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE TO THE MAXIMUM
EXTENT PRACTICABLE, NOTABLY NEAR BASIN A-12.
46. SHEET 30:
A) PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREAS TO C-3 AND C-1.
47. SHEET 31:
A) REMOVE THE GUTTER BUDDY DETAIL. THIS IS NOT A VESC
APPROVED METHOD OF INLET PROTECTION.
B) PROVIDE SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL.
C) REPLACE THE PERMANENT SEEDING TABLE WITH THE TABLE
FOR PIEDMONT REGION.
48. PER ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING POLICY, A STORMWATER
COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS UTILIZING
PART IIB OF THE CURRENT VSMP REGULATIONS. THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE
SHEET(S):
A. THE STORMWATER COMPLIANCE AND STORMWATER OUTFALL TABLE
FOR PART IIB (AVAILABLE ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING WEBSITE UNDER "DOCUMENT AND FORMS").
B. ENERGY BALANCE AND OUTFALL ANALYSIS FOR EACH OUTFALL
FOR THE PROJECT.
C. DELINEATION OF THE SOIL TYPES (INCLUDE HYDROLOGIC SOIL
GROUP) AND THE THREE LAND COVER CONDITIONS
(FORESTED/OPEN SPACE, MANAGED TURF, IMPERVIOUS).
D. NATURAL VEGETATED AREA EASEMENTS FOR AREAS CLAIMED AS
FORESTED/OPEN SPACE IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET THAT IS NO
ENCOMPASSED BY A BMP EASEMENT, RPA, OR WITHIN A
PLANNING BUFFER/TREE SAVE AREA.
E. BMP SIZE, LOCATION, AND GRADING PLAN (1"=20').
F. BMP AND OUTLET STRUCTURE PROFILE AND DETAILS. THE
PROFILE MUST SPECIFY THE TREATMENT VOLUME, 1-YEAR, 2-
YEAR, 10-YEAR, AND 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS
WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE VOLUMES.
G. INCREMENTAL DRAINAGE AREAS TO EACH BMP AND THE LAND
COVER TYPES WITHIN EACH BMP DRAINAGE AREA.
H. DRAINAGE AREA MAP SHOWING:
A) THE DRAINAGE AREA(S) TO WHERE THE SITE OUTFALL(S)
MEET ENERGY BALANCE FOR THE CHANNEL PROTECTION
ANALYSIS AND WHERE THE SITE MEETS 10-YEAR POST TO
10-YEAR PRE FOR FLOOD PROTECTION.
B) WHERE THE SITE IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE ENTIRE
DRAINAGE AREA OR;
C) WHERE THE UNATTENUATED FLOW IS 1% OR LESS THAN THE
FLOW AT THAT POINT OR;
D) WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE AND ITS DOWNSTREAM ARE
REACHES A NATURAL STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM FOR
THE 2-YEAR STORM, AND WHERE THE FLOW FROM THE SITE
AND ITS DOWNSTREAM AREA REACHES A DOCUMENTED
FLOODPLAIN (COUNTY OR FEMA) FOR THE 10-YEAR STORM.
J. PROVIDE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION CALCULATIONS.
K. PROPOSED EASEMENT LOCATIONS.
L. ALL SWM/BMP AREAS THAT ARE TO UTILIZE RUNOFF REDUCTION
IN THE DESIGN SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. IF
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS TO IMPACT THE SWM/BMP AREA THE
COMPOST AMENDMENTS OR UNDERDRAINS SHALL BE USED. THES
AREAS SHALL BE MARKED ON THE PLANS AND IN THE FIELD TO
PREVENT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IMPACTS.
49. VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. (CL-CBPA 10)
50. THE ENTIRE BASIN MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. BEYOND THE 100-YEAR WSE.
OR DOWNSTREAM TOE OF DAM, WHICHEVER APPLIES.
(CL-CBPA 14)
51. A MINIMUM 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
FROM THE SWM/BMP EASEMENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR
FUTURE MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 15)
52. THE EASEMENT ENCLOSING THE BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE
FACILITY MUST BE LABELED "BIORETENTION BMP EASEMENT".
53. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHEET FO
SWM/BMP EASEMENTS AND ACCESS EASEMENTS. (CL-CBPA 16)
54. A MINIMUM 12 FOOT WIDE RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED FROM THE
ACCESS GATE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SWM/BMP FACILITY. TH
SLOPE CANNOT EXCEED 6:1. (CL-CBPA 17)
55. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE 4 FEET OR LESS IN
DEPTH AND ONE ACRE FEET OR LESS IS SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE A SAFETY BENCH OR BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6 FOOT
HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE, HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND
MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH
ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT. (CL-CBPA 18)
56. A PROFILE VIEW MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY WHICH SHOWS ALL THE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION
INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE NECESSARY FOR ITS FUTURE
CERTIFICATION. (CL-CBPA 21)
57. THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUMES FOR WATER QUALITY AND
AND WATER QUANTITY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW O
THE BASIN. (CL-CBPA 22)
58. THE TOP OF THE DAM FOR THE BMP MUST BE AT LEAST 8 FEET
WIDE. DIMENSION AND LABEL IN THE PROFILE VIEW.
(CL-CBPA 23)
59. THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS MUST
BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
60. A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED BETWEEN
THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT AND THE STAGED 100-YEAR
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. (CL-CBPA 27)
61. THE SIDE SLOPES IN SWM/BMP FACILITIES SHALL BE NO
STEEPER THAN THREE TO ONE (3:1). LABEL IN THE PROFILE
VIEW. (CL-CBPA 37)
62. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR CONVERSION OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN INTO A
SWM/BMP FACILITY AFTER THE UPSTREAM AREAS ARE FULLY
STABILIZED. ALL EXISTING SILT MUST BE REMOVED FROM TH
BASIN. (CL-CBPA 39)
63. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN THE EROSION CONTROL
NARRATIVE FOR THE SWM/BMP FACILITY TO BE OBSERVED
BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION. "AS
BUILT" INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE
CERTIFICATION OF THE FACILITY. (CL-CBPA 42)
64. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY DESIGN AND COMPLIANCE:
A) PROVIDE A GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT FOR ALL AREAS
USING INFILTRATION BMP PRACTICES. THE SOILS IN THI
LOCATION INDICATE DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE ANYWHERE
FROM 12-72 INCHES. MANY OF THE BMPS PROPOSED WITH
THIS PROJECT HAVE THEIR MEDIA AND UNDERDRAINS WITHI
THE WATER TABLE. WHILE A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS
SHOWN AS HAVING BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT, IT
WAS PERFORMED IN JULY WHICH WOULD HAVE GROUNDWATER
LOWER THAN CAN BE EXPECTED DURING THE YEARLONG
OPERATIONAL PERIODS OF THESE FACILITIES. THE REPORT
MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF THE SEASONAL
HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE THAT CAN BE EXPECTED IN THIS
AREA WHICH IS SITUATED NEAR WETLANDS AND IS POORLY
DRAINED.
B) PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF OBSERVATION WELLS FOR ALL
STRUCTURES.
C) IN PLAN VIEW, LABEL ALL INVERTS AND TOPS FOR
CLEANOUT STRUCTURES.
D) SINCE THE DRY SWALE IS A LEVEL 2 AND ONLINE, IT MUS
PROVIDE MULTI-CELL TREATMENT PER SPECIFICATION.
E) PROVIDE CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS FOR THE DRY SWALE
SHOWING IT IS NON-EROSIVE FOR THE 2-YEAR, CAPACITY
FOR 10-YEAR, AND MEETS ALL OTHER CONVEYANCE
REQUIREMENTS PER THE SPECIFICATION.
F) PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AND UNDERDRAINS FOR THE FULL
LENGTH OF BIORETENTION A-12. ADDITIONAL ROWS OF
CLEANOUTS SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE ADEQUAT
DRAINAGE IN THE FACILITY UNLESS PERCOLATION TESTING
IS PERFORMED SHOWING ADEQUATE NATURAL INFILTRATION.
G) ENSURE THERE ARE ADEQUATE CONSIDERATIONS TAKEN FOR
THE BUILDING FOUNDATION DESIGN DUE TO THE PROXIMITY
OF THE INFILTRATION PRACTICES.
H) PROVIDE PROFILES FOR ALL BMPS.
I) PROVIDE ADEQUATE PLANTING PLAN SHOWING TREES AND
SHRUBS WITH A TURF COVER FOR THE DRY SWALE.
J) PROVIDE A PLANTING PLAN FOR THE BIO-RETENTION AREAS
K) USE THE REDEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET FOR VRRM.
L) INCLUDE WORK WITHIN VDOT ROW IN THE CALCULATIONS.
M) THE VRRM DRAINAGE AREA TABS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ
WITH THE SHADING AND WAS UNABLE TO VERIFY DRAINAGE
AREAS TO PRACTICES.
N) MICROBIORETENTION HAS A MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA OF
0.50 ACRES WITH 25% IMPERVIOUS. MANY OF THE
DRAINAGE AREAS FOR THESE PRACTICES EXCEED THIS
AMOUNT. ENSURE DRAINAGE AREA LIMITS ARE CONSISTENT
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS.
O) CLARIFY IF THE PROPOSED DESIGN INCLUDES THE
OUTPARCEL'S PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA. IF IT DOES
PROVIDE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THIS AREA ON THE
PLANS. IN ADDITION, INTERIM CALCULATIONS WILL NEED
TO BE PROVIDED SHOWING COMPLIANCE NOT RELIANT UPON
THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.
P) PROVIDE PRETREATMENT FOR ALL FACILITIES AS REQUIRED
BY THE RESPECTIVE SPECIFICATION.
Q) THE PIPE FROM A-25 TO A-17 MUST BE 15".
R) PROVIDE ROUTING CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BMPS. THE
CALCULATIONS SHALL INCLUDE THE 1", 1-,2-,10-,25-,
AND 100-YEAR STORMS.
S) THE CROSS-SECTION FOR THE LEVEL 2 BIORETENTIONS
SHALL SPECIFY A MINIMUM OF 36" OF MEDIA PER
SPECIFICATIONS.
T) THE CROSS-SECTIONS FOR THE PRACTICES SHOULD SHOW TH
PVC AT THE TOP OF THE STONE SUMP WITH FILTER FABRIC
OVER THE UNDERDRAIN. THE UNDERDRAIN SHALL NOT BE
WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC AS THIS CAN LEAD TO
PREMATURE CLOGGING.
U) THE UNDERDRAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A SLOPE OF
0.5% MINIMUM TO PROVIDE CONVEYANCE AND REDUCE
STAGNATION IN THE SYSTEM.
V) PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE
MICROBIORETENTION TO PREVENT HORIZONTAL MIGRATION O
THE MEDIA INTO THE PARKING SUBSTRATE.
W) THE BIORETENTION CROSS-SECTION SHALL PROVIDE CHOKER
LAYER AS REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.
X) THE PONDING FOR BIORETENTION A-14 APPEARS TO BE
1.25'. A MAXIMUM OF 1' IS ALLOWED PER
SPECIFICATION.
Y) THE STRUCTURES SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW APPEAR TO BE VDOT
DI-1; HOWEVER, IN CROSS-SECTIONS THEY ARE SHOWN AS
12" NYOPLAST RISERS. VERIFY STRUCTURES TYPE AND
MODIFY PLANS AS REQUIRED.
Z) THE CROSS-SECTIONS NOTE A MEDIA SPECIFICATION SHOWN
ON SHEET 32. WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE MEDIA
SPECIFICATION. PLEASE PROVIDE.
AA) SPECIFY UNDERDRAIN MATERIAL TYPE.
AB) ENERGY BALANCE CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED A CURSORY
REVIEW DUE TO SIGNIFICANT DESIGN COMMENTS AND
MINIMAL CALCULATIONS PROVIDED.
AC) CLARIFY IF WORK WITHIN ROW IS INCLUDED IN THE ENERG
BALANCE CALCULATIONS.
AD) PROVIDE NOTE THAT MEDIA FOR THE BIORETENTION MUST B
PROVIDED BY VENDOR AND MEET SPECIFICATIONS SET FORT
IN THE BIORETENTION SPECIFICATIONS.
AE) THE RV VALUES HAVE A NOTE OF "PER TABLE 11-C".
CLARIFY TO WHICH TABLE 11-C THIS IS REFERRING.
AF) THE SURFACE AREA FOR LEVEL 2 MICROBIORETENTION SHAL
BE AT LEAST 4% AS SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN TABLES.
IT APPEARS NOT ALL MICROBIORETENTION AREAS MEET THI
REQUIREMENT.
AG) THE RV VALUES USED IN CALCULATING THE BMP RV FOR
IMPERVIOUS WAS 0.90; HOWEVER, THE VRRM LISTS THE RV
FOR IMPERVIOUS AS 0.95. REVISE CALCULATIONS.
AH) THE CALCULATION FORMULA SHOWN FOR DETERMINING
SURFACE AREA APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT.
AI) MICROBIORETENTION ONLY ALLOWS FOR 6" OF PONDING PER
SPECIFICATIONS; HOWEVER, THE CALCULATIONS SHOW THE
USE OF 1' OF PONDING. REVISE.
AJ) THE DA-12 BIORETENTION CALCULATION'S FORMULA DOES
NOT APPEAR TO SHOW THE 1.25TV REQUIREMENT PER
SPECIFICATION. REVISE.
AK) LABEL THE BOTTOM WIDTH OF THE DRY SWALE PRACTICE.
IT SHALL BE BETWEEN 4-8'
AL) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHORTEST FLOW LENGTH
FOR THE BIORETENTION PRACTICES SHOWING A RATIO OF
0.8 OR GREATER.
65. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
66. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
67. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
68. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
69. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
70. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (THIS IS AVAILABLE ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND FORMS WEBPAGE)
71. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
72. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
73. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
74. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
75. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $XXX
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
ADDRESS : NW CORNER OF COGBILL AND IRONBRIDGE
ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : APRIL 15, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : APRIL 22, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : MAY 19, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND / OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS
(E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES, GROUND WATER
AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS WILL NO
RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS
DOCUMENTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TH
COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE STORMWATER REGULATION
ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES THAT OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1
2014 MAY USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
SPECIFIED IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO
PERMIT CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT
LISTED UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
04. IF PARCEL SPLIT OCCURS PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE, IT
MAY REQUIRE LETTERS OF NOTIFICATION FOR OFFSITE WORK
AND OFFSITE EASEMENT RECORDATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
05. SHEET 10:
A) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR MODIFICATION OF INLETS AND
STRUCTURES THAT DO NOT MEET VDOT MINIMUM STANDARDS.
B) IT APPEARS THAT THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TO THE WEST
MAY NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED COVERAGE OVER THE PIPE.
VERIFY THAT AT LEAST 2' OR HALF DIAMETER OF PIPE
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER) IS PROVIDED IN ALL LOCATIONS
ALONG THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
C) THE DUMPSTER PAD WALL APPEARS TO BE WITHIN AN AREA
THAT WILL REQUIRE A BMP EASEMENT. THIS WALL WILL
REQUIRE A LICENSE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO BUILDING
PERMIT. THE WALL IF REMOVED BY THE COUNTY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE BMP AND ITS OUTFALL WILL NOT BE
REPLACED AND WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNE
TO REPLACE.
06. SHEET 11:
A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PG-2A CHANNEL
RECEIVING WATER FROM THE ROAD WIDENING AND CONVEYIN
TOWARD THE EXISTING DETENTION AREA ALONG COGBILL
ROAD.
B) THE OUTLET PROTECTION FROM STRUCTURE C-1 DOES NOT
ALIGN WITH THE PIPE.
C) PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION AT THE END OF THE PG-2A.
07. SHEET 14:
A) PROVIDE PROFILE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
B) SHOW THE WATERLINE CROSSING BETWEEN STRUCTURES A-6
AND A-5 AND LABEL SEPARATION.
C) SPECIFY MATERIAL TYPE FOR DEWATERING PIPE IN THE
DETENTION BASIN.
08. SHEET 18:
A) PROVIDE BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE SPECIFIC PLANTIN
NOTES FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
B) REPLACE THE TWO RED MAPLES NEAR STRUCTURE A-15 WITH
RED OAKS.
C) INCLUDE THE TREES IN THE PLANTING ISLAND IN THE
BIORETENTION PLANTING AREAS.
D) REPLACE THE CHOKEBERRY WITH BUTTONBUSH OR
WINTERBERRY OR EQUIVALENT NATIVE SPECIES.
09. SHEET 20:
A) PROVIDE INFORMATION AND NOTES ON SOIL SUITABILITY
AND TESTING PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION.
10. SHEET 25:
A) PROVIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR FUTURE STORM SEWER
CONNECTIONS FROM THE OUTPARCELS.
B) PROVIDE ACCESS EASEMENTS TO CURB ISLAND BIORETENTIO
AREAS.
C) PROVIDE EASEMENT AND ACCESS TO THE UNDERGROUND
DETENTION PIPES.
11. SHEET 26:
A) PROVIDE NOTES ABOUT FLUSHING SYSTEM FOR SEDIMENT.
12. SHEET 27:
A) PROVIDE SAFETY FENCE AROUND PLANNED BIORETENTION
AREA TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC FROM OVER
COMPACTING THE SOIL.
B) CLARIFY IF ST-1 SHOULD OUTFALL TO THE WESTERN SIDE.
13. SHEET 28:
A) IN THE BIORETENTION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1) CORRECT NOTE 4 TO STATE THE BOTTOM OF THE TRAP
SHALL BE EXCAVATED NO MORE THAN A 1' ABOVE FINAL
BOTTOM GRADE OF THE BASIN(S).
14. SHEET 29:
A) ENSURE THE DRAINAGE LABEL CALL OUTS ARE REFERRING T
THE CORRECT STRUCTURES.
15. SHEET 30:
A) PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR THE PG-2A ALONG
COGBILL.
27. SHEET 34:
A) THE CA FOR STRUCTURE B-3 DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS.
B) IN THE INLET SPREAD CALCULATIONS THE CA VALUE FOR
STRUCTURE A-00 DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS.
C) DUE TO DESIGN COMMENTS FOR THE BMPS, ONLY A CURSORY
REVIEW OF THE STORM CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED.
28. SHEET 49:
A) REMOVE THE MS-4 TABLE.
B) INCLUDE POI #4 IN THE DRAINAGE AREA MAPS.
29. SHEET 51:
A) INCLUDE VDOT STRUCTURE TYPE WITH APPROPRIATE
IDENTIFICATION (THROAT LENGTHS, NOSE TYPES, ETC.) I
THE STRUCTURE TABLE.
30. SHEET 52:
A) THE CURVE NUMBER IN THE ENERGY BALANCE TABLE FOR
POI #1 DOES NOT MATCH PLANS AND ROUTINGS.
B) THE CHANNEL PROTECTION CRITERIA FOR THE OUTFALLS
SHALL BE ENERGY BALANCE.
C) THE CHANNEL AND FLOOD PROTECTION CRITERIA FOR POI #
SHALL BE SHEET FLOW.
31. SHEET 53:
A) INCLUDE ALL BMPS IN THE COMPLIANCE TABLES.
B) PROVIDE THE LATS AND LONGS FOR ALL BMP IN THE TABLE
AND USE DECIMAL DEGREES.
32. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
33. VEHICULAR SAFETY MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG PARKING
SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ADJACENT TO RETENTION AND
DETENTION FACILITIES. THIS APPLIES TO THE DETENTION
BASIN AND THE LARGER BIORETENTION FACILITIES. CG-6
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE VEHICULAR SAFETY.(CL-CBPA 10)
34. THE EASEMENT ENCLOSING THE BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE
FACILITY MUST BE LABELED "BIORETENTION BMP EASEMENT".
35. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES WHICH ARE 4 FEET OR LESS IN
DEPTH AND ONE ACRE FEET OR LESS IS SURFACE AREA MUST
PROVIDE A SAFETY BENCH OR BE ENCLOSED WITHIN A 6 FOOT
HIGH PERIMETER FENCE. A VEGETATIVE BARRIER MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FENCE, HOWEVER A PERFORMANCE BOND
MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE COST AND INSTALLATION OF THE
PLANT MATERIALS. A GATE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED WHICH
ALIGNS WITH THE 20 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT. (CL-CBPA 18)
36. A PROFILE VIEW MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY WHICH SHOWS ALL THE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION
INFORMATION WHICH WILL BE NECESSARY FOR ITS FUTURE
CERTIFICATION. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE CROSS-
SECTIONS PROVIDED(CL-CBPA 21)
37. THE TOP OF THE DAM FOR THE BMP MUST BE AT LEAST 8 FEET
WIDE. DIMENSION AND LABEL IN THE PROFILE VIEW.
(CL-CBPA 23)
38. A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT OF FREEBOARD IS REQUIRED BETWEEN
THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT AND THE STAGED 100-YEAR
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION. IF NO EMERGENCY SPILLWAY IS
PRESENT 2' OF FREEBOARD SHALL BE PROVIDED.(CL-CBPA 27)
39. THE SIDE SLOPES IN SWM/BMP FACILITIES SHALL BE NO
STEEPER THAN THREE TO ONE (3:1). LABEL IN THE PROFILE
VIEW. (CL-CBPA 37)
40. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY DESIGN AND COMPLIANCE:
A) PROVIDE A GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT FOR ALL AREAS
USING INFILTRATION BMP PRACTICES. THE SOILS IN THI
LOCATION INDICATE DEPTH TO THE WATER TABLE ANYWHERE
FROM 12-72 INCHES. MANY OF THE BMPS PROPOSED WITH
THIS PROJECT HAVE THEIR MEDIA AND UNDERDRAINS WITHI
THE WATER TABLE. WHILE A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS
SHOWN AS HAVING BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT, IT
WAS PERFORMED IN JULY WHICH WOULD HAVE GROUNDWATER
LOWER THAN CAN BE EXPECTED DURING THE YEARLONG
OPERATIONAL PERIODS OF THESE FACILITIES. THE REPORT
MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF THE SEASONAL
HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE THAT CAN BE EXPECTED IN THIS
AREA WHICH IS SITUATED NEAR WETLANDS AND IS POORLY
DRAINED.
B) SINCE THE DRY SWALE IS A LEVEL 2 AND ONLINE, IT MUS
PROVIDE MULTI-CELL TREATMENT PER SPECIFICATION.
C) PROVIDE PRETREATMENT FOR ALL FACILITIES AS REQUIRED
BY THE RESPECTIVE SPECIFICATION. THE CURB CUTS INTO
THE BIORETENTION WILL REQUIRE A GRAVEL FLOW SPREADE
OR FOREBAY. THE ROOF DRAINS INTO THE DRY SWALE WIL
REQUIRE A PEA GRAVEL FLOW SPREADER OR SEDIMENT
FOREBAY.
D) THE PIPE FROM A-25 TO A-17 MUST BE 15". A 12"
ORIFICE PLATE CAN BE PROVIDED TO MEET DISCHARGE AND
STORAGE REQUIREMENTS. THE PLATE SHALL BE STAINLESS
STEEL.
E) THE BIORETENTION CROSS-SECTION SHALL PROVIDE CHOKER
LAYER AS REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE CHOKER
LAYER SHOWN IS MISSING THE SAND AND #8 STONE AS
REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATION.
F) THE CROSS-SECTIONS NOTE A MEDIA SPECIFICATION SHOWN
ON THE SHEET. WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE MEDIA
SPECIFICATION. PLEASE PROVIDE.
G) PROVIDE NOTE THAT MEDIA FOR THE BIORETENTION MUST B
PROVIDED BY VENDOR AND MEET SPECIFICATIONS SET FORT
IN THE BIORETENTION SPECIFICATIONS.
H) THE RV VALUES HAVE A NOTE OF "PER TABLE 11-C".
CLARIFY TO WHICH TABLE 11-C THIS IS REFERRING.
I) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHORTEST FLOW LENGTH
FOR THE BIORETENTION PRACTICES SHOWING A RATIO OF
0.8 OR GREATER.
J) PROVIDE AT LEAST A 0.5% SLOPE FOR THE DETENTION
BASIN AND LABEL IN THE PROFILE.
K) ENSURE THE UNDERDRAINS HAVE A MINIMUM 6" STONE
UNDERNEATH AT ALL TIMES TO ENSURE PROPER COMPACTION
AND BEDDING FOR THE PIPE AND REDUCE CLOGGING
POTENTIAL.
L) THE OUTFALL PIPE FOR THE UNDERGROUND DETENTION TO
THE NORTH APPEARS TO BE ABOVE THE INVERT OF THE
DETENTION. THIS WILL LIKELY RESULT IN A PERMANENT
POOL IN THE STRUCTURE. ADJUST THE INVERT OF THE
OUTFALL PIPE.
M) THE PONDING DEPTH PROVIDED IN THE CALCULATIONS DOES
NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE MULCH LAYER AND
RIM ELEVATION ON THE OUTFALL RISERS IN MANY OF THE
BMP CROSS-SECTIONS. ENSURE PROPER PONDING DEPTH IS
BEING CALCULATED.
N) ON SHEET 33 THERE ARE TWO POI #3 IN THE CURVE NUMBE
CALCULATIONS.
O) ROUTING CALCULATIONS:
1) PROVIDE TOTAL POST POI #1 ROUTING WITHOUT
DETENTION.
2) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CURVE NUMBERS USED
IN THE POST ROUTINGS FOR THE VARIOUS DRAINAGE
AREAS WITHIN THE POI 1 WATERSHED.
3) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR THE DRY SWALE DOES NOT
MATCH PLANS. IN ADDITION, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS
FOR THE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION.
4) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR POST A-14, C-1, AND C-3
DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
5) PROVIDE POST TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION CALCULATION
FOR POI #2.
6) THE CURVE NUMBER FOR A-18 AND A-19 DOES NOT
APPEAR TO ACCOUNT FOR MANAGED TURF IN THE AREA.
7) THE BIORETENTION STORAGE AREAS DO NOT APPEAR TO
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE VOID STORAGE IN THE STORAG
AREA CALCULATIONS. REVISE THE STORAGE AREAS.
8) CLARIFY THE DRAINAGE AREAS FOR THE POST POI 1 RO
DA.
9) THE CURVE NUMBER FOR A-26 APPEARS TO DIFFER FROM
OTHER CURVE NUMBERS IN THE ROUTING WITH SIMILAR
LAND USES.
10) THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA FOR POI 1 STORAGE
PIPES DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE SUM OF THE
INDIVIDUAL AREAS DRAINING INTO THE STORAGE
FACILITY.
P) THE ENERGY BALANCE CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE USING
WATERSHED INCHES FROM THE VRRM. THIS APPROACH IS
BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE WATERSHED AREAS
FROM PRE TO POST ARE EQUIVALENT. THIS IS NOT THE
CASE FOR THIS PROJECT. THE ROUTED FLOWS AND VOLUME
SHOULD BE USED IN DETERMINING THE ALLOWED PEAK
DISCHARGES FOR THE ANALYSIS POINTS. IT APPEARS THA
ONLY POI 1 DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENERG
BALANCE AND ADDITIONAL DETENTION MAY BE REQUIRED.
Q) IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET, AREAS OF BIORETENTION AND
DRY SWALE CAN BE CONSIDERED OPEN SPACE.
R) IN THE VRRM SPREADSHEET, AREAS DRAINING TOWARD POI
SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SAME DRAINAGE AREA TAB.
THIS WILL HELP TO REDUCE THE CURVE NUMBER IN POST
DEVELOPMENT.
S) IT IS SUGGESTED TO CONSIDER A DESIGN ALTERNATIVE OF
MEETING ENERGY BALANCE STRICTLY THROUGH THE USE OF
DETENTION AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE AND PURCHASE
OFFSET NUTRIENT CREDITS FOR WATER QUALITY
COMPLIANCE. THIS MAY HELP REDUCE THE OVERALL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST THROUGH THE LIFE OF
THE SITE.
41. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL, DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER'S
ACQUISITION OF THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE
PROVIDED IN A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFSET BROKER
DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIEN
OFFSETS ACQUIRED AND THE ASSOCIATED RATIO OF NITROGEN
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS AT THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
42. NOTE THAT THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS USED FOR WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE MUST BE GENERATED IN THE SAME OR
ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AS DEFINED B
THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS THE SITE.
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS OUTSIDE THE SAME OR ADJACENT
EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE MAY ONLY BE USED IF I
IS DETERMINED THAT NO NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ARE
AVAILABLE WITHIN THE SAME OR ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE. IN SUCH CASES, THE NONPOINT
NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE GENERATED WITHIN THE SAME
TRIBUTARY. PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAP SHOWING THE
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
43. THE CBPA COMPLIANCE NOTE MUST SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF
PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ACQUIRED
AND THE NAME OF THE OFFSET GENERATING FACILITY.
44. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
45. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
46. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
47. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
48. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
49. THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHEET MAY BE PROVIDED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS (THIS IS AVAILABLE ON THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND FORMS WEBPAGE)
50. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
51. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
52. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
53. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
54. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $XXX
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : GROCERY STORE COGBILL ROAD
ADDRESS : NW CORNER OF COGBILL AND IRONBRIDGE
ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 16PR0203
LATEST PLAN DATE : NOVEMBER 17, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND / OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS
(E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES, GROUND WATER
AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS WILL NO
RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS
DOCUMENTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TH
COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE STORMWATER REGULATION
ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES THAT OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1
2014 MAY USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
SPECIFIED IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO
PERMIT CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT
LISTED UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
04. IF PARCEL SPLIT OCCURS PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE, IT
MAY REQUIRE LETTERS OF NOTIFICATION FOR OFFSITE WORK
AND OFFSITE EASEMENT RECORDATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
05. SHOW ALL NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS AND CALCULATIONS,
INCLUDING STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY, FOR THE
ADDITION OF THE PARKING TO REAR OF THE CHURCH.
06. SHEET 08:
A) CLARIFY THE TYPE OF GUARDRAIL PROVIDED FOR THE
VEHICULAR SAFETY.
B) A 6' FENCE IS REQUIRED FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AROUND
THE BMP. IF A 4' FENCE IS DESIRED, THEN AN
EXCEPTION REQUEST WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL.
07. SHEET 12:
A) INDICATE THE PVC CLASS OF THE DEWATERING PIPE.
08. SHEET 14:
A) PROVIDE ELEVATION INFORMATION FOR THE DEWATERING
PIPES.
09. SHEET 18:
A) REPLACE THE CHOKEBERRY WITH BUTTONBUSH OR
WINTERBERRY OR EQUIVALENT NATIVE SPECIES.
10. SHEET 25:
A) CONTINUE THE BMP EASEMENT FROM A-25 TO A-2 AS THIS
IS THE OUTFALL FOR THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
11. SHEET 29A:
A) ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS SHOW MORE OF THE OFFSITE
CONTOURS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CHURCH AND OTHER
AREAS TO THE WEST ALONG THE IMPROVEMENTS TO VERIFY
DRAINAGE AREAS AND C-VALUE..
12. SHEET 32:
A) THE LEVEL 2 BIORETENTION POND SHOULD HAVE 12" OF
STONE UNDER THE INVERT OF THE UNDERDRAIN.
B) THE CHOKER LAYER SHOWN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 2-4" OF
STONE. PROVIDE AND LABEL THE REQUIRED SAND ON TOP
OF THE #8 STONE.
C) THE DRY SWALE CROSS-SECTIONS REFERENCES A MEDIA
SPECIFICATION ON THE SHEET. THE MEDIA SPECIFICATIO
WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SHEET. CLARIFY IF THIS IS T
BE THE SAME MIX AS THE BIORETENTION.
D) THE ELEVATIONS IN THE DETENTION CROSS-SECTION DOES
NOT MATCH THE WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS ON THE CROSS
SECTION ON 32A. VERIFY ELEVATIONS.
13. SHEET 33:
A) CLARIFY STORM USED FOR PG-2A SIZING.
14. SHEET 52:
A) THE ENERGY BALANCE CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE USING
VOLUMES FROM CURVE NUMBER METHOD AND FLOWS FROM
MODIFIED RATIONAL. THE TWO METHODOLOGIES SHOULD NO
BE MIXED.
15. SHEET 53:
A) INCLUDE UNDERGROUND STORAGE IN THE STORMWATER
COMPLIANCE TABLES.
16. THE EASEMENT ENCLOSING THE BIORETENTION AND DRY SWALE
FACILITY MUST BE LABELED "BIORETENTION BMP EASEMENT".
17. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY DESIGN AND COMPLIANCE:
A) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHORTEST FLOW LENGTH
FOR THE BIORETENTION PRACTICES SHOWING A RATIO OF
0.8 OR GREATER.
B) THE PONDING DEPTH PROVIDED IN THE CALCULATIONS DOES
NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TOP
OF THE MULCH LAYER AND THE RIM ELEVATION FOR THE
OUTFALL RISERS IN MANY OF THE BMP CROSS-SECTIONS.
EITHER PROVIDE THE FOOT OF PONDING (1' BETWEEN THE
TOP OF MULCH AND RISER) OR ADJUST THE BIORETENTION
SIZING CALCULATIONS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE LOWER
EFFECTIVE DEPTH AND INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
TREATMENT.
C) THE LEVEL 2 BIORETENTION SHOULD BE MULTI-CELL AND
INCLUDE A PRETREATMENT CELL AND GRASS FILTER STRIP,
GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM, OR GRAVEL FLOW SPREADER.
D) THE C-VALUES USED FOR MANAGED TURF AREAS SHOULD BE
0.30 TO 0.35.
E) LEVEL 2 BIORETENTION SHALL SPECIFY A NON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC WITH FLOW RATE GREATER THAN
110G/MIN/SF AROUND ALL SIDES.
F) PROVIDE PROFILE FOR DRY SWALE.
G) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR CHECK DAM FOR THE DRY SWALE
SPECIFYING MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 12", ARMORING AT
DOWNSTREAM TOE TO PREVENT EROSION, ANCHORING INTO
SIDE SLOPES, CENTER WEIR SIZED FOR THE 10-YEAR
STORM, AND AT LEAST 25-40' BETWEEN CHECK DAMS.
H) PROVIDE NOTE THAT THE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN THE
CHOKER LAYER AND THE RESERVOIR LAYER FOR BOTH THE
BIORETENTIONS AND THE DRY SWALE SHOULD BE OVER TOP
OF THE UNDERDRAINS ONLY AND NOT EXTEND THE FULL
WIDTH OF THE FACILITIES.
I) ROUTING CALCULATIONS:
1) INCLUDE THE DEWATERING PIPES FOR THE UNDERGROUND
STORAGE IN THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE. AS SHOWN
THERE WOULD BE DISCHARGE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE
STORAGE PRIOR TO THE STORAGE DEPTH REACHING THE
12-18" OUTFALLS.
2) THE POI ROUTINGS FOR BOTH PRE AND PROPOSED (AND
THE UNDETAINED POI 1) APPEAR TO BE USING A
DURATION OF 1* TC. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE FOR POIS
2-4 AS IT IS COMPARING SIMILAR ROUTING
ATTRIBUTES; HOWEVER, FOR POI 1, THE SUBAREAS ARE
USING A CALCULATED DURATION OF BETWEEN 2.5*TC TO
5*TC. WHEN THE SUBAREA VOLUMES ARE SUMMATED FOR
AN OVERALL POST POI 1 VOLUME IT LEADS TO A LARGE
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE POI 1 (SUMMATED) AND THE
POI 1 UNDETAINED. THE UNDETAINED IS LESS THAN
HALF OF THE SUMMATED.
THE PEAK DISCHARGE USED IN THE ENERGY BALANCE
CALCULATION COMES FROM THE ROUTED SUBAREAS, BUT
THE RV COMPONENT APPEARS TO BE USING THE
UNDETAINED VOLUME. USING THE UNDETAINED VOLUME
ALLOWS FOR A HIGHER ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE
SITE THAN WOULD BE ALLOWED IF USING THE SUMMATED
AREAS. PROVIDE POI FOR POST AND PRE THAT
ACCOUNTS FOR STORM DURATIONS TO ENSURE A CLOSER
ASSUMPTION OF THE HYDROLOGIC STORM FOR USE IN TH
ENERGY BALANCE EQUATION.
THIS COMMENT MAY WARRANT FURTHER DISCUSSION.
3) THE RUNOFF C-VALUE FOR A-14, C01, C03 SHOULD BE
0.78.
18. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES ON THE PLAN:
BMP CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:
A. AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE FACILITY.
B. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS/DIMENSIONS OF BMP ELEMENTS (INCLUDING,
BUT NOT LIMITED TO: UNDERDRAINS, GRAVEL LAYER,
MEDIA LAYER, MULCH, OUTFALL STRUCTURE, GRAVEL
DIAPHRAGM, UNDERGROUND DETENTION STRUCTURES, ETC.)
C. CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES FOR
STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY (1-, 2-, 10-, AND
100-YEAR, AS APPLICABLE)
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WHICH
COVERS THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION PROCESS
E. THE CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION MUST BE STAMPED
AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, CERTIFIED
LAND SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT.
19. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL, DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER'S
ACQUISITION OF THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE
PROVIDED IN A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFSET BROKER
DOCUMENTING THE NUMBER OF PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIEN
OFFSETS ACQUIRED AND THE ASSOCIATED RATIO OF NITROGEN
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS AT THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
20. NOTE THAT THE NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS USED FOR WATER
QUALITY COMPLIANCE MUST BE GENERATED IN THE SAME OR
ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AS DEFINED B
THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AS THE SITE.
NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS OUTSIDE THE SAME OR ADJACENT
EIGHT DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE MAY ONLY BE USED IF I
IS DETERMINED THAT NO NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ARE
AVAILABLE WITHIN THE SAME OR ADJACENT EIGHT DIGIT
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE. IN SUCH CASES, THE NONPOINT
NUTRIENT OFFSETS MUST BE GENERATED WITHIN THE SAME
TRIBUTARY. PROVIDE A HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAP SHOWING THE
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE OFFSET GENERATING
FACILITY.
21. THE CBPA COMPLIANCE NOTE MUST SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF
PHOSPHOROUS NONPOINT NUTRIENT OFFSETS ACQUIRED
AND THE NAME OF THE OFFSET GENERATING FACILITY.
22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
23. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
24. ALL OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
25. A QUIT CLAIM, SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT, OR
SATISFACTORY COMMITMENT THEREOF BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THE LOCATION WHERE RIGHTS OF WAY WILL CROS
THE PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT
26. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
27. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
28. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
29. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
30. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
31. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE OF $XXX
E. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 16PR0203



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List