Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 15PR0233
Modify comments view for Case # 15PR0233

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 15PR0233 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: GREENWICH WALK @ FOX - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/20/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: MULTI-FAMILY
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 ******** 01/05/17 CBH 776-7836
FIRE DEPT.--: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 COMPLETE 03/03/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 COMPLETE 03/09/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 COMPLETE 03/14/17 JJD 717-6191
TRANSPORT.--: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 COMPLETE 02/22/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 AMENDED* 02/28/17 M L 748-1338
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 04 02/17/17 03/10/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : RYAN EVANS, P.E./748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : FOX CREEK GREENWICH WALK PH2
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 06/23/15
PLAN DATED : 06/12/15
REVIEW DATE : 07/09/15
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. SHOW THE COUNTY UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER 15-0198 ON TH
LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. LABEL WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PUBLIC AND WHAT IS PROPOS
AS PRIVATE ON BOTH PLAN AND PROFILE VIEWS. ALSO, SEPARATE
THE UTILITY QUANTITIES SIMILARLY.
3. OBTAIN THE PERTINENT EXISTING WATER AND SEWER AS-
BUILT INFORMATION FROM THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. ENSURE TH
THE FIELD SURVEY AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION ACCURATELY REFLE
THE ON-SITE CONDITIONS AND PRESENT SAID INFORMATION
ACCORDINGLY ON THE PLANS. CLEARLY LABEL THE EXISTING SIZE,
MATERIAL TYPE, AND COUNTY PROJECT # ON ALL WATER AND SEWER
LINE WITHIN THE PLAN VIEWPORT. INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED
BY EMAILING SWAVAILABILITY@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR AT THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT BUILDING. **ESPECIALLY FOR THE UTILIT
TS**
4.WILL THERE BE IRRIGATION ON THE SITE? IF AN
IRRIGATION METER IS USED, SUBMIT AN IRRIGATION METER
SIZING FORM. OTHERWISE, INCLUDE HOSE BIBS OR ON THE
DOMESTIC METER SIZING FORM OR INDICATE WHAT OTHER APPROVED
METHOD IS PROPOSED.
5. PROVIDE BLOW OFFS AT THE WATERLINE STUBS (TYP).
6. PROVIDE WATER OR SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS, AS NECESSAR
AND SHOW THEM ON THE UTILITIES PLAN.
7. DARKEN THE EXISTING UTILITIES WITH A DARKER, DASHED LI
TYPE.
8. ENSURE 10' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN
WATER/SEWER LINES. REFER TO SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS FOR AN EXAMP
BUT THERE ARE A FEW PLACES. EITHER SEPARATE THE LINES 10'
ENSURE THEY POSSESS GREATER THAN 18" VERTICAL DIFFERENCE I
ELEVATION.
9. REFER TO THE STANDARD DETAIL WAT-11 FOR THE MAXIMUM
DEFLECTION ANGLES FOR WATERLINE DEFLECTIONS. THERE APPEAR
BE NUMEROUS DEPICTIONS OF DEFLECTIONS EXCEEDING THE MAXIMU
ALLOWANCES ON THE PROFILES. REVIEW THE PROFILES AND PROVID
VERTICAL BENDS OR REDUCED DEFLECTION ANGLES AS APPROPRIATE
10. FOR WATERLINES IN FILL AREAS, REVISE THE MATERIAL TYP
FROM PVC TO MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED JOINT DIP. FOR
SEWERLINES IN FILL AREAS, REVISE THE MATERIAL TYPE TO
DUCTILE IRON AND ENSURE ANY MANHOLES ARE FOUNDED ON THE
ORIGINAL GRADE.
11. SHOW THE STORM SEWER ON THE UTILITY PLAN IN SOUTHWALK
HEIGHTS.
12. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF JACQUE HYDEN
(HYDENJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR 804-318-8437). THE BID PROPOSA
MUST BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT I
THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
13. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF T
APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR OU
USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : JAMIE BLAND / 751-4439
NAME OF PLAN : FOX CREEK GREENWICH WALK PH2
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 10/15/15
PLAN DATED : 10/12/15
REVIEW DATE : 11/04/15
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. ADD WAT-11 DETAIL.
2. SHEET C3.0: SANITARY SEWER NOTE #3. EXISTING MH 8 AND
MH 9 ARE NOT LOCATED ON PLAN SHEET. REVISE NOTE ON PLAN
SHEET.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON/748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : FOX CREEK GREENWICH WALK PH2
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 2/8/16 (CORRECTED PRINTING)
PLAN DATED : 12/31/15
REVIEW DATE : 2/12/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. UPDATE THE MATERIALS LIST TO SHOW RESTRAINED JOINT DI
PIPE, A FLUSHING HYDRANT AND THE TOTAL VERTICAL FEET OF
MANHOLE.
2. WE COULD NOT FIND A VERTICAL BENCHMARK ON THE PLANS.
3. ON SHEET 3.1, PLEASE CALL OUT COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER 15-
0111 FOR THE UTILITIES FROM PHASE 1.
4. A REVIEW OF THE ENGINEERS RESPONSE FROM THE INITIAL
SUBMITTAL STATED THAT IRRIGATION METERS ARE PENDING,
PLEASE LET US KNOW IF THEY ARE PLANNED AS IT IS BETTER
FOR OUR INSPECTORS TO KNOW ABOUT IT AHEAD OF TIME. SINCE
THESE ARE COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS, A COMPANION METER IS NOT
ALLOWED. A SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER WOULD BE REQUIRED
WHICH UNLIKE A COMPANION METER MUST BE IN AN EASEMENT.
5. PLEASE IDENTIFY IN SOME WAY ON SHEET C3.1 WHICH WATER
SERVICE LINES ARE INTENDED TO BE 1" AND WHICH ONES ARE
5/8".
6. PLEASE RELOCATE THE HYDRANT AT SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS AND
HALLOWELL RIDGE JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED DROP
INLET.
7. PROVIDE A 2-INCH FLUSHING HYDRANT WITH THE PLUG ON
HALLOWELL RIDGE.
8. INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH VALVES ARE TO BE SHUT OFF
FOR THE PURPOSE OF TYING INTO THE PLUGS.
9. LABEL THE FUTURE WATER AND SEWER LINES AS "FUTURE".
10. A STUBOUT INTO MH 22 IS NOT DESIRED. EITHER ELIMINATE
THIS PIPE OR PLACE A MANHOLE AT THE UPSTREAM END WITH NO
INVERTS. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID WITH A 0.52% SLOPE IF
POSSIBLE.
11. THERE IS ONLY ONE MANHOLE ANGLE SHOWN FOR MH 22 AND
NONE SHOWN FOR MH 23. THESE ARE IMPORTANT FOR ORDERING
THE MANHOLE CORRECTLY.
12. ON SHEET C4.0, INDICATE THE INVERT FOR THE 6" LATERAL
INTO MH 23 TO MATCH CROWNS WITH THE 8" INVERT OUT.
13. CALL OUT THE CONNECTION INTO MH-3 BY KOR-N-SEAL.
14. THE PROPOSED EASEMENT NEAR MH-3 SHOULD BE LABELED AS
"VARIABLE WIDTH".
15. DUE TO THE DEPTH, SHOW 12" OF STONE ABOVE THE SEWER
PIPE FROM MH-22 TO MH-3.
16. ON SHEET C4.0, SHOW THE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND TEES ON
THE WATERLINE PROFILE.
17. CALL OUT THE MINIMUM COVER OF 3.5' FOR THE WATER LINE
ON THE SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS PROFILE.
18. INDICATE 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCE FOR EACH OF THE
WATERLINE CROSSINGS OF THE PROPOSED STORM SEWER.
19. THE VERTICAL TRANSITION OF THE WATER MAIN BETWEEN
STATION 23+00 AND 23+60 WILL REQUIRE VERTICAL BENDS AS
SHOWN. PLEASE LABEL THE BENDS AND SHOW THE APPROPRIATE
LENGTH OF RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE ON THE PROFILE. OR AS AN
OPTION, THE WATER CAN BE INSTALLED DEEPER SO THAT THERE
IS LESS DEFLECTION REQUIRED.
20. SHOW THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT TEES ON THE PROFILE.
21. SHOW COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER 15-0111 FOR THE PHASE 1
SEWER ON THE PROFILE.
22. CALL OUT THE DISTANCE OR THE STATIONING FOR THE
PROPOSED MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED DI WATER MAIN. WE
RECOMMEND INCREMENTS OF 18' OR 20'.
23. ON SHEET C4.2, SHOW THE 8" X 8" TEE AND GATE VALVE ON
THE PROFILE. IN ORDER FOR THIS VALVE TO BE UTILIZED FOR
ISOLATION OF THE PLUG WHEN THE NEXT PHASE IS PERFORMED,
THE WATER MAIN WILL NEED TO BE RESTRAINED, PLEASE SHOW
THE EXTENT OF RESTRAINT ON THE PROFILE.
24. WITH REGARDS TO THE UTILITY CONTRACT DISCUSSED IN THE
PREVIOUS COMMENTS, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT JACQUE HYDEN IS
NO LONGER COMPILING CONTRACTS. PLEASE SUBMIT THE UTILITY
CONTRACTOR BID AND DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST TO THE PLAN
REVIEWER MIKE LARSON, LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON/748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : FOX CREEK GREENWICH WALK PH2
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 11/15/16
PLAN DATED : 9/30/16
REVIEW DATE : 11/21/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW- RE-APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
PLEASE SUBMIT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE FINAL PLANS ONCE ALL
THER DEPARTMENTS HAVE APPROVED THIS REVISION DIRECTLY TO T
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
.
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON/748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : FOX CREEK GREENWICH WALK PH2
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 2/17/16
PLAN DATED : 2/14/17
REVIEW DATE : 2/27/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
COMMENTS : 5TH REVIEW- RE-APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
.
PLEASE SUBMIT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE FINAL PLANS ONCE ALL
THER DEPARTMENTS HAVE APPROVED THIS REVISION DIRECTLY TO T
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE: 06/12/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 06/17/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 07/02/15
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. REVISE GREENWICH VILLAGE PHASING PLAN (DATED 7/12/12 AN
SIGNED BY CDOT ON 7/24/12) TO ADDRESS THE REVISED PHASING
OF VILLAGE SQUARE PKY PER ZONING CASE 12SN0226.
THE DEVELOPER WILL NEED TO REVISE THE PHASING PLAN TO
ADDRESS THE CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE SQUARE PKY PHASE 2.
PHASE 2 WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMIT FOR MORE THAN 100 LOTS/UNITS.
B. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENT DEDICATION FOR PROPOSED
STATE MAINTAINED ROADWAYS. A PERFORMANCE BOND WILL BE
REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.
2. CDOT REQUEST THE DEVELOPER DEDICATES RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
EASEMENTS ALONG OTTERDALE ROAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
OTTERDALE-WOOLRIDGE CDA PLANS. PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS HOW
THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED. THE RW AND ESMT NEEDED WILL
IMPACT THE FUTURE SECTION ALONG OTTERDALE RD.
3. NOTE ON THE PLAN WHICH ROADS ARE TO BE PUBLIC (STATE
MAINTAINED) AND PRIVATE.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/12/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/20/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 10/26/15
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. REVISE GREENWICH VILLAGE PHASING PLAN (DATED 7/12/12 AN
SIGNED BY CDOT ON 7/24/12) TO ADDRESS THE REVISED PHASING
OF VILLAGE SQUARE PKY PER ZONING CASE 12SN0226.
THE DEVELOPER WILL NEED TO REVISE THE PHASING PLAN TO
ADDRESS THE CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE SQUARE PKY PHASE 2.
PHASE 2 WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMIT FOR MORE THAN 100 LOTS/UNITS.
B. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENT DEDICATION FOR PROPOSED
STATE MAINTAINED ROADWAYS.
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/30/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 12/31/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 02/24/16
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIO
FOR THE PROPOSED STATE MAINTAINED ROADS AS SHOWN ON THE
PLAN.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BULDING PERMITS FOR A CUMULATIVE TOTA
OF MORE THAN 100 LOTS/UNITS FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREE
DEVELOPMENT, TWO (2) LANES OF VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY SHALL
BE COMPLETED PER SITE PLAN CASES 08PR0289 AND 08PR0290 (PE
APPROVED TRANSPORTATION PHASING PLAN DATED 10/28/15).
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/03/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/16/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR
REVIEW DATE: 11/22/16
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS PENDING RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIO
FOR THE PROPOSED STATE MAINTAINED ROADS AS SHOWN ON THE
PLAN.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BULDING PERMITS FOR A CUMULATIVE TOTA
OF MORE THAN 100 LOTS/UNITS FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREE
DEVELOPMENT, TWO (2) LANES OF VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY SHALL
BE COMPLETED PER SITE PLAN CASES 08PR0289 AND 08PR0290 (PE
APPROVED TRANSPORTATION PHASING PLAN DATED 10/28/15).
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE: 02/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 02/22/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FIVE
REVIEW DATE: 02/22/17
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
.
ADVISORY COMMENT: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BULDING PERMITS FOR
A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF MORE THAN 100 UNITS FOR GREENWICH
WALK AT FOX CREEK DEVELOPMENT, TWO LANES OF VILLAGE SQUARE
PKY SHALL BE COMPLETED PER SITE PLAN CASES 08PR0289 &
08PR0290 (TRANSPORTATION PHASING PLAN DATED 10/28/15).
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEWER / PHONE #-JEFF DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL--DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK
PHASE 2 (PHASE 2A & 2B)
SITE PLAN NUMBER-15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE-02/14/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE-- 02/16/2017
SUBMITTAL NUMBER--FIVE
REVIEW DATE------03/13/2017
RECOMMENDATION-NOT APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN- NOT APPROVED SEE
COMMENT #5
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS-REQUESTED SEE COMMENTS
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS---REQUESTED SEE COMMENTS
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN---REQUESTED SEE COMMENTS
REVIEW COMMENTS:
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED
PLANS. RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF
THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS USING
THE SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO
REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
03. PUT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER
15PR0233 IN THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
04. SHEET C1.0: THE "PARKING REQUIRED OF 1.5 PARKING
SPACES FOR HOUSING RESTRICTED FOR OLDER PERSONS IS
INCORRECT. THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT IS 1.2 SPACES
FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. PLEASE REVISE ON PLANS.
05. THE 16' DRIVEWAY WIDTH SHOWN ON THE PLANS
SERVING UNITS WITH A SHARED DRIVEWAY DO NOT
MEET ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. FOR DRIVES SERVING
15 OR FEWER VEHICLES AND WHEN PARKING IS NOT PROVIDED
ON EITHER SIDE, THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR TWO-WAY DRIVES
IS 20 FEET. REVISE ALL SHEETS AND ON SHEET C3.1 SHOW
DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS. ENSURE OTHER PHASES SHOWN
ON PLAN ARE REVISED. SEC. 19-514(B) (3)
06. SHEET C1.0: ON PLAN PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO
THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES THAT
WILL BE LOCATED INSIDE GARAGES. IF ALL SPACES INSIDE
ADD NOTE THAT READS "ALL 64 PARKING SPACES WILL
BE LOCATED INSIDE GARAGES.
07. SHEET C3.1: IDENTIFY WHICH UNITS WILL
INCLUDE GARAGES AND IDENTIFY THE NUMBER OF COVERED
PARKING SPACES THAT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH UNIT.
08. TO ENSURE ADEQUATE ACCESS IS PROVIDED FOR EACH
COVERED PARKING SPACE, A 16' WIDE DOUBLE DOOR WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR ALL UNITS WITH TWO COVERED PARKING SPACES.
IF ONLY ONE COVERED PARKING SPACE IS PROVIDED AT MINIMUM
A 9' FOOT WIDE GARAGE DOOR WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
09. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS THAT
INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE GARAGE DOORS IN RELATION
TO THE EXTERIOR PARKING SPACES AND CAN BE RELATED TO
INTERIOR ROADS. ENSURE WIDTH OF GARAGE DOORS
ARE NO LESS THAN 9' FEET WIDE TO ACCOMMODATE THE
PARKING OF A SINGLE MOTOR VEHICLE TO BE COUNTED AS A
COVERED PARKING SPACE AND AT MINIMUM A 16' WIDE
DOUBLE DOOR FOR ALL UNITS WITH TWO COVERED PARKING
SPACES.
10. ANY UNCOVERED PARKING SPACE WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN
DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
WIDTH OF NINE FEET AND A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18 FEET.
THE LOCATION OF EXTERIOR PARKING SPACES MAY NOT BLOCK
ACCESS TO ANY COVERED PARKING SPACES AND MAY NOT
ENCROACH INTO SHARED DRIVEWAY AISLES. SEC. 19-514(A)
11. PER SEC. 19-509(C), PARKING WITHIN A GARAGE
OR COVERED SPACE MAY BE COUNTED TOWARD PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES. CONVERSION OF
SUCH GARAGE OR COVERED SPACE IS PROHIBITED UNLESS
SUFFICIENT OFF-STREET PARKING IS PROVIDED.
12. PER SEC. 19-510(A) (3), PARKING OF RECREATIONAL
EQUIPMENT IS PROHIBITED IN R-TH, R-MF, AND
TND DISTRICTS UNLESS A COMMON STORAGE AREA IS
PROVIDED THAT IS SCREENED FROM VIEW, AND SPACES
ARE NOT COUNTED AS ANY OF THE TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING
FOR THE OTHER USES ON SITE.
13. SHOW PAVEMENT OR CONCRETE DESIGN DETAIL FOR
DRIVEWAYS. SEC. 19-514(D) (1)
14. PUT NOTE ON PLANS, "ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES ARE
TO BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND INCLUDING ELECTRIC,
TELEPHONE AND CATV."
15. IDENTIFY THE DEVELOPMENT AREA OF THE COUNTY
WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED (EMERGING GROWTH AREA).
16. LABEL ON THE PLAN ANY SETBACK EXCEPTIONS
ALLOWED PER THE ZONING CASE.
17. PER SEC. 19-505(B), MAKE SURE ALL SETBACKS
FROM PUBLIC ROADS ARE MEASURED FROM THE ULTIMATE
RIGHT OF WAY. LABEL THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
AND THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY ON ALL PUBLIC
ROADS ON THE SITE PLAN, EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE
AND EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY IS THE SAME.
18. ARE THE PROPOSED ROADS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS
OR PRIVATE DRIVES?
19. SHEET C1.O: UNDER GENERAL NOTE 13, PLEASE
CORRECT THE TYPO SHOWN AS 12SH0226 TO 12SN0226.
20. THE FOLLOWING WAS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE FIRST
SUBMITTAL AS REQUIRED UNDER CASE 12SN0226: THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH CASE 12SN0226
REQUIRES ALL BUILDINGS INCLUDING ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
SHALL COVER NO MORE THAN 70% OF THE PROPERTY. IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIRST SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, A PLAN
SHALL BE SUBMITTED THAT DIVIDES THE PROPERTY INTO
TRACKS AND DESIGNATES THE PERMITTED PARCEL COVERAGE
ON EACH TRACK THIS PLAN MAY BE MODIFIED THROUGHOUT
THE LIFE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROVIDED THE OVERALL
PARCEL COVERAGE LIMITATIONS ARE NOT EXCEEDED. SUBMIT
PLAN THAT MEETS THIS REQUIREMENT. (REF. SECTION J.
OF TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013
APPROVED UNDER CASE12SN0226).
21. PER THE DIRECTION OF KIRK TURNER, THE RESIDENTIAL
MIXED USE PLAN SHOWING ALL UNITS FOR THE OVERALL
PROJECT KEYED TO ELEVATIONS WILL NOT BE NECESSARY.
THE RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE PLAN NEED ONLY
SHOW UNITS UNDER REVIEW FOR EACH PHASE WITH
AN UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL ARCHITECTURAL
REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT
DATED NOVEMBER 15. 2013 SHALL BE MET. FOR
THIS PHASE SUBMIT A RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE PLAN
FOR UNITS 63 THROUGH 93. BECAUSE THE PROJECT
IS BEING SUBMITTED IN PHASES, KEEP IN MIND THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES THAT DETACHED UNITS
WITH THE SAME ELEVATIONS MAY NOT BE LOCATED
ADJACENT TO, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM, OR DIAGONALLY
ACROSS FROM EACH OTHER ON THE SAME STREET. THIS
REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO UNITS ON DIFFERENT
STREETS BACKING UP TO EACH OTHER. REFERENCE
GENERAL CONDITION I. A. OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT
DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013, APPROVED WITH ZONING
CASE 12SN0226.
22. SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL
OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS.
23. SHOW PROPOSED HEIGHT FOR EACH BUILDING.
ENSURE YOU ARE CALCULATING HEIGHT AS DEFINED BY
SEC. 19-301 OF COUNTY ORDINANCE BUILDING HEIGHT:
A VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE "GRADE" LEVEL TO THE
HIGHEST POINT OF THE COPING OF A FLAT ROOF OR TO THE
DECK LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF OR TO THE AVERAGE HEIGHT
OF THE HIGHEST GABLE OF A PITCH OR HIP ROOF.
24. PROVIDE GROSS SQUARE-FOOTAGE FLOOR AREA FOR EACH
UNIT.
25. SHEETS C3.1: PER THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT,
FRONT LOADED GARAGES SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO STREET
THAN THE FRONT FAçADE OF THE DWELLING UNIT. FOR EACH
UNIT, LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE GARAGE. ALSO, IT APPEARS
THAT WHERE THERE MAY POSSIBLY BE GARAGES, THE GARAGE
PROTRUDES PAST THE FRONT FAçADE OF DWELLING UNITS
80, 84, 88, 92 & 93.
26. SHEETS C3.1: SHOW CLOSEST DIMENSION BETWEEN
EACH DETACHED UNIT. PLAN ONLY SHOWS CLOSEST DIMENSION
FOR SOME OF THE UNITS. PER THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT THE
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN DETACHED UNITS SHALL BE
TEN (10) FEET.
27. SHEET C3.1: UNITS 79 THROUGH 93 SHOWS
LINES PROTRUDING OUT BEYOND THE FRONT AND REAR OF
THE UNITS. IDENTIFY ON PLANS WHAT THESE ARE.
COVERED PORCHES, ENCLOSED PORCHES, DECKS ETC.).
IF THESE BUMP OUTS ARE PARTS OF THE BUILDING OR
ATTACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ENSURE THEY ARE
SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AND MEET
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
28. FOR EACH UNIT OR PRODUCT, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF
FOUR SIDED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS
WITH ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED,
LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND
HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER
IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE GROUND .
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013. APPROVED UNDER
CASE 12SN0226). (SEC. 19-264(D) (18)
29. PER SEC. 19-570(B), SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE
BUILDING.
30. PER SEC. 19-507(C), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF
BEHIND PARAPETS AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO
SHOW THAT UNITS ARE FULLY SCREENED.
31. SHEETS C1.5 THROUGH C1.8. THE PLANS
SUBMITTED SHOWING THE APPROVED MINUTES OF
THE APPLICABLE ZONING CASES DO NOT INCLUDE THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH CASE 12SN0226.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REVISED
MAY 16, 2006 ASSOCIATED WITH CASE 06SN0215SHOWN
IS NOT THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT. THE
"TEXTUAL STATEMENT" DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013,
APPROVED UNDER ZONING CASE 12SN0226 CONDITION 1
IS THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT AND SUPERSEDES
ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENTS. INCLUDE
A COPY OF THIS "TEXTUAL STATEMENT" ON THE SETS OF
PLANS, AND ENSURE THE PLANS ADDRESS ALL REQUIREMENTS.
32. SHEET C1.2: FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS
15242 VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY (TAX ID 713-673-7633)
PER SEC. 19-500, ADD THE FOLLOWING LABEL: "COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATES THE PROPERTY FOR MEDIUM HIGH RESIDENTIAL.
NO BUFFER OR SETBACK REDUCTIONS ARE ALLOWED."
33. CLEARLY SHOW COMMON AREAS ON THE SITE PLAN.
34. PLEASE BE AWARE BOTH PASSIVE AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIE
ARE REQUIRED PER CONDITION 3. A, B, C, D & E OF ZONING CAS
12SN0226.
35. CASH PROFFERS ARE REQUIRED PER CONDITION 4 OF ZONING
CASE 12SN0226.
36. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT ADDRESS CONDITION 5. OF ZONING
CASE12SN0226 REGARDING AGE RESTRICTION. REVISE PLANS
BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED NOTE: AGE RESTRICTION.
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY THE VIRGINIA FAIR
HOUSING LAW, THE FEDERAL FAIR HOUSING ACT, AND SUCH
OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LEGAL REQUIREMENT
ALL DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO "HOUSING FOR OLD
PERSONS" AS DEFINED IN THE VIRGINIA FAIR HOUSING LAW
AND NO PERSONS UNDER 19 YEARS OF AGE SHALL RESIDE THEREIN.
37. SUBMIT DOCUMENTS DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH
CONDITION 7 OF CASE 12SN0226 PERTAINING TO THE VIRGINIA
CONDOMINIUM ACT AND THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
RESPONSIBILITIES OF MAINTENANCE OF ALL COMMON AREAS,
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. THE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION SHALL BE PART OF THE FOXCREEK HOMEOWNER'S
ASSOCIATION. ALSO, ENSURE HOA DOCUMENTS MEET ALL
REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE SEC. 19-559.
38. SHEET C3.0: SHOW DIMENSION OF SIDEWALKS AND ENSURE
ADEQUATE SIDEWALK WIDTH IS MAINTAINED ADJACENT TO THE
MAILBOX KIOSK TO ALLOW FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY.
39. THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES FRONT WALKS SHALL BE
PROVIDED TO EACH DWELLING UNIT AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM
OF 4' FEET WIDE. THE FRONT WALKS SHOWN ON UNITS 79 THROUGH
94 ARE LESS THAN 4' FEET WIDE. REVISE ALL SHEETS SHOWING
FRONT WALKS MEETING A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 4' FEET FOR
ALL UNITS AND SHOW DIMENSION. (REF. TEXTUAL STATEMENT
DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013 III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. 3. APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226).
40. SHEET C3.1: THE FRONT WALK FOR UNIT 86 IS NOT CLEARLY
SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE DARKEN BOUNDARY LINE OF FRONT WALK
AND SHOW THAT THE FRONT WALK MEETS A 4' MINIMUM WIDTH.
41. SHEET C3.1: THE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW A HARDSCAPED
DRIVEWAY PROVIDING ACCESS FROM THE ROAD (SOUTHWALK
HEIGHTS) TO UNIT 79. PLEASE REVISE ALL SHEETS TO SHOW A
HARDSCAPED DRIVEWAY WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF
20' FEET SERVING UNIT 79 OR REMOVE UNIT 79 FROM PHASE 2.
ANY CHANGES TO THE BOUNDARIES OF PHASE 2 NEED TO BE
REVISED ON ALL SHEETS INCLUDING THE MASTER LAYOUT.
42. REVISE PLANS TO EXTEND THE ROAD (SOUTHWALK
HEIGHTS) TO PROVIDE ROAD FRONTAGE FOR UNIT 79.
43. THE DRIVEWAY FOR UNIT 93 CONSISTS OF PAVEMENT
RATHER THAN CONCRETE. REVIEWER RECOMMENDS CHANGING
TO CONCRETE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OTHER DRIVEWAYS
IN PHASE 2.
44. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT TWO COPIES O
LANDSCAPE PLANS TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CONDITIONS OF CASE 12SN0226 AND THE COUNTY ORDINANCE.
(REF. COUNTY ORDINANCE AND TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED
NOVEMBER 15, 2013 APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226).
SHOW ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING UTILITIES, STORM SEWE
EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY, FIRE HYDRANT AND VAULT LOCATI
AND SITE LIGHTING (IF SITE IS TO BE LIT). THIS PLAN MUST B
TO SCALE. THE PLAN MUST INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF PERIMETER
YARDS AND BUFFERS AND APPROPRIATE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS F
EACH YARD OR BUFFER, BMP AREAS AND ANY OTHER LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENTS. THE PLAN MUST SHOW THE LAYOUT OF EXISTING AN
PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS WITH THE PLAN SIZES,SPECIFIC PLA
SPECIES, COUNTY REQUIRED NOTES AND DETAILS AND ANY SPECIFI
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE. (CL D.4)
45. (NOTE: REFERENCE SEC. C - SETBACKS AND BUFFERS - REVIE
COMMENT 1 PRIOR TO DEVELOPING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. COUNTY
STANDARDS FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE LABELED ON THE SITE PLA
WITHIN THE SETBACK AND BUFFER AREAS.)
1. PER SEC. 19-264(A), THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL
IDENTIFY THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
NURSERYMAN, OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE
PLAN. SHOW THE NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND FAX
NUMBERS, AND CONTACT FOR THE FIRM PREPARING THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN.
2. PER SEC. 19-517(A) AND (B), AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE
OF FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WHETHER THE PLAN
SUBMITTED IS A CONCEPTUAL OR DETAILED LANDSCAPE
PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS. SHOW VDOT SIGHT LINES
FROM ENTRANCES.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE ORDINANCE
STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD AND/OR BUFFER -
SHOW SEPARATE TABULAR CALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND
PROPOSED PLANTINGS FOR EACH YARD AND/OR BUFFER.
C. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR PLANTING OF INTERIOR PARKING LOT
AREAS (SEE SEC. D - PARKING - REVIEW COMMENTS 15-20).
D. SHOW BMP AREAS AND ADDRESS PER SEC. 19-518(I) IF REQUIR
O TREAT AS A VISUAL AMENITY.
E. IF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF
ALL PLANTS AND IDENTIFY EACH AS LARGE OR SMALL DECIDUOUS
TREES, EVERGREEN TREES, MEDIUM SHRUBS, AND SMALL SHRUBS/
GROUNDCOVERS. THESE MAY BE KEYED TO A CONCEPTUAL
PLANT LIST SHOWING THESE PLANT TYPES AND THE QUANTITIES
OF EACH.
F. IF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SPECIFY THE
PLANTS AND THEIR REQUIRED SIZES FOR EACH OF THE PLANT
TYPES REQUIRED PER SEC. 19-518(B).
G. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
LABEL AS SUCH. SEE SEC. 19-518(D) REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TREE PRESERVATION.
1. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF
WAY SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL IS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR ACCESS AND/OR UTILITIES THAT
RUN GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK.
THESE TREE SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION
CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
2. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD
PLANTING REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION
IS REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE
SETBACK AREA.
3. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR
BUFFER WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTING
FOR EACH TREE REMOVED
4. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED
FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION
CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
H. PER SEC. 19-518(C), THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE
COMPOSITION AND MIX OF VEGETATION.
I. PER SEC. 19-518(C), DECORATIVE WALLS AND FENCES,
HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, MAY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS AS
DETERMINED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN OR SCHEMATIC APPROVAL.
J. PROVIDE STANDARD COUNTY LANDSCAPE NOTES ON DETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN
K. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE
AND IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY
OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
46. SHEET L1.0: REMOVE NOTE 18 FROM STREET TREE LANDSCAPIN
PLAN. THE PLANT MATERIAL TYPE, SIZE AND/OR QUANTITY NEEDS
TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
47. SHEET L1.0: TWO OF THE PROPOSED LITTLE LEAF LINDEN TRE
ADJACENT TO THE MAIL KIOSK APPEAR TO BE ENCROACHING
INTO THE SIDEWALK AND OR LOCATED IN AN AREA NOT APPROPRIAT
TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES. RELOCATE THESE
TWO TREES TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO
UNIT 94.
48. SHEETS L1.0: THE TWO PROPOSED CRAPE MYRTLES
SHOWN CLOSEST TO THE CORNER OF LIEGE HILL AND
AND HALLOWELL RIDGE APPEARS TO BE CONFLICTING
WITH THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE. ADJUST PLAN
SO TREES DO NOT ENCROACH. ALSO, SOME OF THE STREET
TREES LOCATED ADJACENT TO UNITS 89 AND 93 APPEAR
TO BE WEDGE BETWEEN THE STORM WATER LINE AND FRONT
WALK. PLEASE RELOCATE.
49. SHEETS L1.0: STREET TREES NEED TO BE LOCATED
A MINIMUM OF 5' FEET FROM SIDEWALKS AND 8' FEET
FROM DRIVEWAYS TO PREVENT FUTURE DAMAGE TO SIDEWALKS
AND DRIVEWAYS BY ROOT SYSTEM. PLEASE ADJUST PLAN.
50. THE PROPOSED CRAPE MYRTLE TREES SHOWN ADJACENT TO
UNITS 63, 67, 71 & 75 LOCATED IN BETWEEN THE FRONT
WALKS AND DRIVEWAY DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT ROOM
STREET TREES NEED TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5'
FEET FROM SIDEWALKS AND 8' FEET FROM DRIVEWAYS
TO PREVENT FUTURE DAMAGE TO SIDEWALKS
AND DRIVEWAYS BY ROOT SYSTEM.
51. PRIOR TO RECEIVING A TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT,
A FORM OF SURETY (BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT) IN AN
AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE COST OF COMPLETING THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE SURETY SHALL ALSO COVER
AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 50% OF THE TOTAL INSTALLATION
COST FOR REPLACEMENT OF ALL UNHEALTHY OR DEAD PLANTS
OR POLLARDED TREES IDENTIFIED BY THE ONE-YEAR INSPECTION
BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. REFERENCE SECTION 19-518 (F)
52. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF AN IRRIGATION PLAN COMPLYING
WITH COUNTY ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND TEXTUAL
STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS. PER SEC. 19-518(E), ALL
LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A READILY
AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER
YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS WITHIN 100 FEET OF
ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ALL AREAS
OF NEW PLANTINGS. (REF. COUNTY ORDINANCE AND TEXTUAL
STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013 APPROVED UNDER
CASE 12SN0226).
53. THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES SODDED
YARD AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. PLEASE SHOW THIS BEING
ACCOMPLISHED ON IRRIGATION PLAN. (REF. COUNTY
ORDINANCE AND TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED
NOVEMBER 15, 2013 APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226).
54. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE METHOD AND
LOCATION OF SOLID WASTE STORAGE AREAS. IN OUR STAFF/
DEVELOPER MEETING APPLICANTS ENGINEER MENTIONED
THAT EACH UNIT WILL HAVE SEPARATE TRASH SERVICE AND
GARBAGE CONTAINERS WILL BE SCREENED BY BEING STORED
INSIDE INDIVIDUAL GARAGES. IF SOLID WASTE STORAGE AREA
WILL BE LOCATED IN INDIVIDUAL GARAGES, LABEL
THE UNIT NUMBERS THAT WILL BE UTILIZING THIS
METHOD OF STORAGE/SCREENING. FOR ANY UNITS NOT
UTILIZING INDIVIDUAL GARAGES, LABEL THE UNIT NUMBERS
AND ON SITE PLAN SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SOLID WASTE
STORAGE AREAS PAD AND PROVIDE A TYPICAL DETAIL
SHOWING METHOD OF SCREENING ON ALL SIDES. REF.
EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE FROM REVIEWER DATED
4/15/2015. (SEC. 19-503) (CL B.7)
55. PER REVIEWERS EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH
ENGINEER DATED 4/15/15, MANUFACTURER CUT
SHEETS FOR BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTS ATTACHED TO
DWELLING UNITS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED UNTIL TIME
OF BUILDING PERMIT. HOWEVER, IN CONJUNCTION
WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL, MANUFACTURER CUT SHEETS
AND A LIGHTING PLAN ARE REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED
STREET LIGHTS AND YARD LIGHTS. PER SEC. 19-508.3,
SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR ADDITIONALLY ON
A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION OF ALL EXTERIOR
SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, OR ON THE GROUND
AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR EACH LIGHT
FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
56. INDICATE PROPOSED SITE AREA LIGHTING ON THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN. PROPOSE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED TO PREVENT PLANT
MATERIAL AT MATURE SIZES FROM INTERFERING WITH
LIGHT FIXTURES. (REF SEC 19-571 (B)
57. PROVIDE CATALOGUE CUT SHEETS FOR EACH EXTERIOR
LIGHT FIXTURE PROPOSED.
58. PER SEC. 19-508.3, UNLESS A PROJECT IS APPROVED
FOR ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-STYLE LIGHTING, ALL LIGHT
FIXTURES SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS
THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY
ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH, TND, OR R-MF DISTRICT
OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF -WAY.
59. PROPERTY CONDITION REQUIRES THAT OPEN SPACE RECREATION
BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT INDICATE THESE
AREAS ON THE SITE PLANS.
60. WHERE ALLEY'S OR DRIVES ARE PROVIDED WHICH ARE NOT
MAINTAINED BY VDOT, THEY SHALL BE SHOWN AS OPEN
SPACE OR, IF APPROVED BY THE DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION, IN AN
EASEMENT CONTROLLED AND MAINTAINED BY A HOMEOWNERS'
ASSOCIATION AS SPECIFIED IN SEC. 19-559.
61. ARE THERE ANY CHIMNEYS OR DIRECT VENT FIREPLACES
PROPOSED ON ANY OF THE UNITS? IF YES, PLEASE MAKE SURE
THEY COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS AS SHOWN IN THE
APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013
UNDER CASE 12SN0226.
62. ON EACH UNIT SHOW AND LABEL BUMP-OUT OF ANY
CHIMNEY OR DIRECT VENT FIREPLACES THAT WILL BE LOCATED ON
THE BUILDING FAçADE AND SHOW ON ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS.
63. SHEET C1.1: LABEL THE REQUIRED BUFFER ADJACENT TO
OTTERDALE ROAD AS "50' BUFFER W/ 1.5 X C PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING".
64. SHEET C1.1: WITHIN THE 50' SETBACK ADJACENT TO THE
EXISTING FOX CREEK SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A
OF CASE 12SN0226, LABEL "PERIMETER LANDSCAPE C"
ON PLANS. FOR THE 50' SETBACK ADJACENT TO PRIMROSE
@ FOXCREEK LABEL AS "1.5 X PERIMETER LANDSCAPE C".
65. SHEET C1.1: IT APPEARS SOME OF THE ATTACHED UNITS
SHOWN FOR PHASE 5 ON THE MASTER LAYOUT ARE NOT
MEETING THE REQUIRED SETBACKS AS OUTLINED IN THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT 8. G APPROVED WITH CASE 12SN0226.
PLEASE REVISE AND LABEL REQUIRED SETBACK AND SHOW
SETBACK LINE. REVISE ALL SHEETS.
66. SHEET C1.1: THE 6' WIDE ASPHALT WALKS GENERALLY
SHOWN NEAR THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT
APPEARS TO TERMINATE AT THE BMP. ARE THERE PLANS TO
CONTINUE THE PATH AROUND THE REMAINDER OF THE BMP?
PLEASE SEE CONDITION 3 OF ZONING CASE 12SN0226
ADDRESSING RECREATIONAL AMENITIES.
67. PLEASE SHOW SETBACK DIMENSIONS BETWEEN ALL UNITS
FOR PHASE 2.
68. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT STEMS FROM
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM
THE REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED REVISIONS
##########################################################
##########################################################
##########################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----JEFF DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL------------------DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN----------- GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE------- 12/30/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------ 02/08/16
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCAPE PLAN REC'D.VIA EMAIL 12/7/15-NO
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------THREE
REVIEW DATE------------ 02/17/16
RECOMMENDATION---------RECOMMEND SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL ONLY
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCPAE PLAN: NOT APPROVED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS- NOT- APPROVED
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS-RESPONSE FROM DEVELOPER-NONE PROPO
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- NOT APPROVED-SEE COMMENT
REVIEW COMMENTS:
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED
PLANS. RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF
THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. IF THE
NEXT REVIEW IS ELIGIBLE FOR A TABLE REVIEW
HI-LIGHT ALL CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL
ON THREE OF THE FULL SETS OF PLANS.
02. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROOF
READ ALL SHEETS TO ENSURE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO
BE SHOWN ON PLANS HAS NOT BEEN OMITTED.
03. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO
DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
SUBMIT SIX COPIES OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
SO EACH DEPARTMENT HAS A COPY TO CONDUCT A
REVIEW.
04. PLEASE INCLUDE A SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL FEE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $350.00 WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL.
05. NOTE: SHEETS C1.1 C1.3, C1.4, C3.0:
PER REVIEWERS DISCUSSION WITH GREG ALLEN AND
DARIN SMOUSE ON 11/12/15, THE CONFIGURATION
OF THE 50' BUFFER ADJACENT TO OTTERDALE ROAD WILL BE
FINALIZED WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF PHASE SIX TO ALLOW
THE DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH CDOT ON
TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.
06. NOTE: PER GREG ALLEN'S EMAIL DATED NOVEMBER
4, 2015, THE IRRIGATION PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED AT
TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR EACH PHASE.
PLEASE ENSURE THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET
BOTH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND THE TEXTUAL
STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013 APPROVED
UNDER CASE 12SN0226) REQUIRING ALL FRONT YARDS
TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED. INSURE WATER INFORMATION
IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
07. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAIL DATED 1/27/16,
THE BUILDERS BOOK LANDSCAPE POD PLANS MAY
BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
SUBMITTAL. LANDSCAPE POD PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH ZONING CASE
12SN0226. ALSO, PLEASE SEE REVIEW COMMENTS
INCLUDED BELOW.
08. NOTE: NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE RELEASED
UNTIL FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS GRANTED AND IRRIGATION
AND POD LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE APPROVED.
09. SHEETS C1.1, C1.4, C1.10 & C1.1:
IN REGARDS TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 7:
THE PLANS SHOW THE GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD SERVING
THE BMP AS "EXISTING". HOWEVER, IS THE 4' GRAVEL
WALK ON THE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD EXISTING OR
PROPOSED? CLEARLY LABEL 4' GRAVEL WALK AS EXISTING
OR PROPOSED ON ALL PLAN SHEETS THAT SHOW THIS PATH.
THE 4' WIDE GRAVEL WALK/PATH SHOWN IS ENCROACHING
OFFSITE INTO LOT 17 SECTION 2 PRIMROSE AT FOX CREEK.
PROVIDE AN EXECUTED EASEMENT AGREEMENT FROM
THE PROPERTY OWNER ALLOWING FOR THIS ENCROACHMENT
AND LABEL THE DEED BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER ON PLANS.
IF PROPERTY OWNER WILL NOT GRANT EASEMENT SHIFT
LOCATION OF 4' GRAVEL PATH SO PATH DOES NOT ENCROACH
INTO LOT 17. REVIEWER IS UNABLE TO APPROVE
SITE PLAN SHOWING THIS PASSIVE RECREATION AMENITY
ENCROACHING ONTO AN ADJACENT PROPERTY
WITHOUT AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS WILL BE NEED
TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF PHASE 5 BUT
WILL NOT AFFECT REVIEWER'S RECOMMENDATION OF
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL FOR PHASE 2.
10. SHOW BOTH HORIZONTAL SCALE AND GRAPHIC SCALE
ON SHEETS C1.10 AND C1.11.
11. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE WALKING TRAIL SHOWN
ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BMP AND SUBDIVISION WILL
NEED TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF A PHASE SINCE THIS
IS PART OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF CLARIFICATION THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITH PHASE 2 SINCE THE PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF PHASE 2.
12. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE APPROVAL OF THE
LOCATIONS AND DESIGN OF THE
CLUSTER BOX UNITS.
13. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL,
PLEASE SUBMIT REVISED DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE
VIRGINIA CONDOMINIUM ACT AND THE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF MAINTENANCE OF ALL
COMMON AREAS, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.
PLANNING IS OK NOT INCLUDING TAX I.D NUMBER
713-673-1820 WITH THE GREENWICH WALK
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION PROVIDED THERE IS AN
UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS PARCEL WILL BE INCLUDED AS
PART OF THE DECLARATION PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR ANY PHASE THAT INCLUDES THIS PARCEL OR ANY
PORTION OF THIS PARCEL.
ONE CONCERN IS THE LANGUAGE SHOWN ON PAGE 2
UNDER RECITALS SECTION C & SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATION (II) DESCRIBING THE ADDITIONAL AREA
KNOWN AS GREENWICH WALK AND FURTHER DESCRIBED ON
EXHIBIT A WILL BE SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND GIVES THE
RIGHTS TO OWNERS TO SUBDIVIDE INTO LOTS. THE PROJECT
IS NOT A LOT SUBDIVISION NOR DO THE CONDITIONS OF ZONING
ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO BE A LOT SUBDIVISION. MY CONCERN
IS THIS LANGUAGE MAY BE AMBIGUOUS TO SOMEONE SUCH
AS A PROSPECTIVE CONDO OWNER NOT FAMILIAR WITH
COUNTY ZONING AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS.
PLANNING REQUESTS THE DEVELOPER FILE A CORRECTION
OMITTING ANY LANGUAGE REGARDING THE SUBDIVISION OF THE
PROPERTY INTO LOTS. THIS NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED
PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. (REFERENCE EMAIL
FROM JAMES DOPP TO DARIN SMOUSE AND ROB ROBINSON
SENT ON NOVEMBER 19, 2015. PLEASE SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
BUILDERS BOOK POD LANDSCAPE PLANS
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE ATTACHED
AND DETACHED PODS MAY BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY AND
ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE BUNDLED WITH THE SETS OF
24" X 36" SITE PLANS THAT INCLUDE THE STREET TREE
LANDSCAPING PLAN. PLEASE MAKE SURE THE PLANS ARE
LEGIBLE AND KEY EACH PLANT SPECIES TO A PLANTING SCHEDULE.
THE ILLUSTRATIONS SUBMITTED NEED TO BE ENLARGED SO
THE PLANTINGS SHOWN CAN BE MORE EASILY IDENTIFIED.
ALSO, THE PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY SHOW THE MINIMUM 4'
FOOT WIDE FOUNDATION PLANTING BEDS.
2. PLANNING RECOGNIZES THE DEVELOPER MAY WANT TO PROVIDE
FLEXIBILITY WITH THE TYPE OF PLANT SPECIES INSTALLED. FOR
EXAMPLE, THE DEVELOPER MAY WANT TO PROVIDE BUILDERS
A CHOICE OF THREE DIFFERENT SUPPLEMENTAL FLOWERING TREES.
IF THIS IS THE CASE, KEY EACH PLANT TYPE TO A PLANTING
SCHEDULE. ENSURE PLANTINGS ARE AN ACCEPTABLE PLANT
SPECIES FROM THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANT MATERIAL
LIST. IF DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR PLANT SPECIES WILL NOT BE
ALLOWED, IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE PLANT SPECIES ON EACH
LAYOUT AND KEY EACH SPECIES TO A PLANTING SCHEDULE.
3. ADD A GENERAL NOTE THAT READS: "STREET TREES ARE TO
BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED "STREET
TREE LANDSCAPING PLAN" SHOWN ON SHEETS L1.0 AND
L1.1 OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN."
4. THE SHEET TITLED "MINIMUM PLANT SIZES" DOES NOT PROVIDE
REQUIRED PLANTING DETAILS FOR EACH TYPE OF PLANTING
(DECIDUOUS TREE GUYING DETAIL, MULTI-STEM TREE DETAIL,
CONIFER AND EVERGREEN TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL,
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL, FOUNDATION PLANTING BED
DETAIL). PLEASE REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
AND APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
5. PROVIDE THE EIGHT STANDARD CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
LANDSCAPE NOTES WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.
6. ATTACHED AND DETACHED UNITS: PLEASE DESIGN THE LANDSCA
PLAN TO MEET CONDITION B.4 AND C.4 OF THE APPROVED
TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRING THE FOLLOWING: FRONT
FOUNDATION PLANTING BED: FOUNDATION PLANTING
IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ENTIRE FRONT FAçADE OF ALL UNITS, AN
SHALL EXTEND ALONG ALL SIDES FACING A STREET. FOUNDATION
PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING FROM THE UNIT FOUNDATION. PLANTING BEDS
SHALL BE DEFINED WITH A TRENCHED EDGE OR SUITABLE
LANDSCAPE EDGING MATERIAL. PLANTING BEDS SHALL INCLUDE
MEDIUM SHRUBS SPACED A MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET
APART. UNIT CORNERS SHALL BE VISUALLY SOFTENED
WITH VERTICAL ACCENT SHRUBS (4'-5') OR SMALL EVERGREEN
TREES (6'-8') AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
7. OVERALL THIS IS A VERY TIGHT CONSTRUCTION SITE. IDENTIF
ON PLANS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR BREAKING UP COMPACTED
SOILS AROUND THE HOMES WITH TOPSOIL APPLIED IN
PLANTING BEDS AND SODDED AREAS. IN ADDITION THE
PLANTING BED DETAIL NEED IDENTIFY MULCHING REQUIREMENTS
AS WELL.
TYPICAL 4 POD DETACHED HOME LAYOUT
1. THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES THAT FRONT LOADED
GARAGES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ANY CLOSER TO
THE STREET THAN THE FRONT FAçADE OF THE DWELLING
UNIT. THE FOOTPRINT OF THE TWO BOTTOM UNITS SHOWING
FRONT LOADED GARAGES FOR THE DETACHED UNITS DO NOT
MEET THIS CONDITION. PLEASE REVISE FOOTPRINTS SO
GARAGE DOES NOT PROTRUDE PAST THE FRONT FAçADE.
2. LABEL THE FOUR DECIDUOUS TREES SHOWN AS "STREET TREES".
3. ADD FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLAN: "STREET TREES
ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED
"STREET TREE LANDSCAPING PLAN" SHOWN ON SHEETS L1.0
AND L1.1 OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN".
4. LABEL THE SUPPLEMENTAL TREE FOR EACH
UNIT AS "SUPPLEMENTAL FLOWERING TREE" AND
ENSURE THE LOCATION OF THE FLOWERING TREE IS
LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT YARD OF EACH UNIT.
SEE C.2. OF TEXTUAL STATEMENT CASE 12SN0226.
5. IDENTIFY THE SUPPLEMENTAL FLOWERING TREE SPECIES
ON THE PLANTING SCHEDULE. FLOWERING TREES
SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CALIPER OF 2" MEASURED AT
BREAST HEIGHT (4'-10" ABOVE GROUND) AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING. REF: TEXTUAL STATEMENT C.2. OF CASE
12SN0226.
6. UNIT CORNERS SHALL BE VISUALLY SOFTENED WITH
VERTICAL ACCENT SHRUBS (4'-5') OR SMALL EVERGREEN
TREES (6'-8') AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. ON DETACHED
LAYOUT PLAN LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE ACCENT SHRUBS
OR SMALL EVERGREEN SHRUBS ON ALL CORNERS OF EACH
UNIT AND IDENTIFY EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANTING
SCHEDULE.
7. FOUNDATION PLANTING: IDENTIFY AND SHOW THE MINIMUM
WIDTH OF THE PLANTING BEDS AND METHOD USED TO DEFINE
THE PLANTING BEDS. THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES PLANTING BEDS
SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE FROM THE UNIT FOUNDATION.
PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE DEFINED WITH A TRENCHED EDGE OR
SUITABLE LANDSCAPE EDGING MATERIAL.
8. PLANTING BEDS SHALL INCLUDE MEDIUM
SHRUBS SPACED A MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET APART.
IDENTIFY THE MEDIUM SHRUBS ON THE LAYOUT AND KEY
PLANT SPECIES ON PLANTING SCHEDULE.
9. THE TWO DETACHED REAR UNITS SHOWN
DO NOT ACHIEVE A FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG THE
ENTIRE FRONT FAçADE. PLEASE REVISE TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT
C.4.
10. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLAN: "EXCEPT FOR THE FOUNDA
PLANTING BED, ALL FRONT YARDS SHALL BE SODDED AND IRRIGATE
11. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLAN: "FOUNDATION PLANTING
IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ENTIRE FRONT FAçADE OF ALL UNITS, AN
SHALL EXTEND ALONG ALL SIDES FACING THE STREET."
TYPICAL ATTACHED TOWNHOME LAYOUT A &B
1. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLAN: "ALL CONTIGUOUS
YARD AREAS ALONG ATTACHED BUILDING FRONTS AND ALL
SIDE YARDS THAT FACE A STREET SHALL BE SODDED AND IRRIGATE
2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE ON PLAN: "FOUNDATION PLANTING
IS REQUIRED ALONG THE ENTIRE FRONT FAçADE OF ALL UNITS, AN
SHALL EXTEND ALONG ALL SIDES FACING THE STREET."
3. FOUNDATION PLANTING: IDENTIFY AND SHOW THE MINIMUM
WIDTH OF THE PLANTING BEDS AND THE METHOD USED TO
DEFINE THE PLANTING BEDS. THE ZONING CASE REQUIRES PLANTIN
BEDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE FROM THE UNIT
FOUNDATION. PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE DEFINED WITH A
TRENCHED EDGE OR SUITABLE LANDSCAPE EDGING MATERIAL.
4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL INCLUDE MEDIUM
SHRUBS SPACED A MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET APART.
IDENTIFY THE MEDIUM SHRUBS ON THE LAYOUT AND KEY
PLANT SPECIES ON PLANTING SCHEDULE.
5. UNIT CORNERS SHALL BE VISUALLY SOFTENED WITH
VERTICAL ACCENT SHRUBS (4'-5') OR SMALL EVERGREEN
TREES (6'-8') AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. ON ATTACHED
LAYOUT PLAN IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE
ACCENT SHRUBS OR SMALL EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND MINIMUM
HEIGHT REQUIREMENT PER THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT AND
IDENTIFY EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANTING SCHEDULE.
THE PLAN ONLY IDENTIFIES THE LOCATION OF THE SMALL EVERGRE
TREES ON THE REAR CORNERS BUT DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE MINIMU
HEIGHT. THE FRONT CORNERS OF EACH END UNIT DO NOT IDENTIFY
THE TYPE OF PLANTING AND MINIMUM HEIGHT.
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
PLEASE BE ADVISED THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE
PREVIOUS REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON
SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS. FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT
UPON APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS. DARIN SMOUSE
AND JACK WILSON MET WITH GREG ALLEN, JEFF DOPP AND
DARLA ORR ON DECEMBER 17, 2015 TO DISCUSS ARCHITECTURAL
REQUIREMENTS. COUNTY STAFF WILL FURTHER DISCUSS WITH
KIRK TURNER IN JANUARY 2016 TO DETERMINE IF AN
INTERPRETATION TO THE CONDITIONS OF ZONING WILL BE
APPROPRIATE OR IF AMENDING THE ZONING CASE WILL BE
REQUIRED.
1. WHILE THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE
DETACHED UNITS ARE ATTRACTIVE, THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT
COMPLY WITH THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT OF ZONING CASE
12SN0226. TO ACHIEVE THE DESIGN FEATURES SHOWN
AND TO ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN YOUR DESIGN, YOU MAY
WANT TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO AMEND THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT,
PLEASE DESIGN THE UNITS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
2. CONDITION 5 OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES THE FRONT
FAçADE ON A MINIMUM OF 60% (6 IN 10) OF THE DETACHED
UNITS SHALL BE BRICK OR STONE MASONRY. THE ELEVATIONS
SUBMITTED DO NOT ACHIEVE THIS REQUIREMENT AND SHOW
MULTIPLE FACING MATERIALS INSTEAD. WITHIN EACH PHASE
AND SUB-PHASE, A MIXTURE OF UNITS ACHIEVING THE 6 IN
10 REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED. REVIEWER
NEEDS A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE DEVELOPER
IS GOING TO ACHIEVE MEETING THIS CONDITION. (REFERENCE
CONDITION D3 & 5)
3. CONDITION 5B REQUIRES BRICK SILLS SHALL BE PROJECTED AN
BRICK HEADS AT OPENINGS SHALL BE TRADITIONAL JACK ARCHES,
CIRCULAR ARCHES OR SOLDIER COURSES. PLEASE DESIGN ALL
ELEVATIONS THAT HAVE BRICK SILLS AND BRICK HEADS AT
OPENINGS TO MEET THIS CONDITION.
4. PLEASE BE AWARE OF CONDITION D3 OF THE TEXTUAL
STATEMENT REQUIRING DETACHED UNITS WITH THE
SAME ELEVATIONS MAY NOT BE LOCATED ADJACENT
TO, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM, OR DIAGONALLY ACROSS
FROM EACH OTHER ON THE SAME STREET. THIS
REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO UNITS ON
DIFFERENT STREETS BACKING UP TO EACH OTHER.
TO BETTER COMMUNICATE THIS REQUIREMENT
WITH POTENTIAL BUILDERS, REAL ESTATE AGENTS
AND HOME BUYERS, LABEL ON EACH MASTER
ELEVATION AND SITE PLAN THE FOLLOWING NOTE:
"PER CASE 12SN0226 TEXTUAL STATEMENT D.3.,
DETACHED UNITS WITH THE SAME ELEVATIONS MAY
NOT BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM,
OR DIAGONALLY FROM EACH OTHER ON THE SAME
STREET. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO UNITS
ON DIFFERENT STREETS BACKING UP TO EACH OTHER."
5. THE SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED DO NOT
MEET THE INTENT OF CONDITION 4 OF THE TEXTUAL
STATEMENT PROHIBITING STEPPING THE SIDING DOWN
BELOW THE FIRST FLOOR LEVEL ON ANY ELEVATION OF THE
UNIT. THE INTENT OF THIS CONDITION IS TO PROVIDE
A CONTINUATION OF THE MASONRY FROM THE FRONT
ELEVATION TO THE SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS AND
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION BETWEEN MATERIALS. ON ALL
ELEVATIONS PROVIDE A CONTINUATION OF THE MASONRY
WATER TABLE ALONG ALL SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS.
6. ON ALL ELEVATIONS ENSURE NO PORTION OF THE SLAB
OR FOUNDATION IS EXPOSED.
7. CONDITION 5 OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT LIMITS THE
TYPE OF ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR FAçADE MATERIALS.
THE ELEVATIONS SHOWING BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING,
VERTICAL SIDING AND SHAKE SIDING ARE NOT LISTED
AS ACCEPTABLE EXTERIOR FAçADE MATERIALS. PLEASE
REFERENCE CONDITION 5 OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT
FOR A LIST OF APPROVED MATERIALS AND REVISE ELEVATIONS.
8. CONDITION 5A OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT LIMITS THE
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FACING MATERIALS ON ANY ONE
FAçADE OF ANY UNIT TO THREE (3) FACING MATERIALS.
SOME OF THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HAVE FOUR (4)
FACING MATERIALS OF WHICH THREE OF THE MATERIALS
CONSISTING OF BOARD AND BATTEN, VERTICAL AND
SHAKE SIDING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS.
PLEASE REVISE ALL ELEVATIONS TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
9. PER CONDITION 5C, CEMENTITIOUS AND VINYL SIDING
IS PERMITTED IN TRADITIONAL WIDE BEADED STYLES
ONLY WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH DROP. PREMIUM
QUALITY VINYL IS DEFINED AS VINYL SIDING WITH A
MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS OF .044". THE
ELEVATIONS DO NOT "CALL OUT" THE SIZE, THICKNESS
AND MATERIAL FOR THE HORIZONTAL SIDING. PLEASE
"CALL OUT" THIS INFORMATION ON ALL ELEVATIONS
AND SUBMIT A SAMPLE AND MANUFACTURES
SPECIFICATION SHEET FOR THE HORIZONTAL SIDING.
10. CONDITION 5E OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES
ALL EXTERIOR FACADES WHICH FACE A PUBLIC STREET
SHALL HAVE A FORMAL ARRANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
OF ELEMENTS INCLUDING DOORS, WINDOWS, AND TRIM
AND MAY INCLUDE PORCHES, COLUMNS, CORNICES AND
TRIM. THE SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED DO
NOT ACHIEVE THIS DESIGN. REVIEWER UNDERSTANDS
THAT THESE ELEVATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN DESIGNED FOR
FACADES NOT FACING A PUBLIC STREET. PLEASE SUBMIT
DETAILED ELEVATIONS MEETING CONDITION 5E FOR ANY
UNIT THAT WILL HAVE FACADES OTHER THAN THE FRONT
FAçADE FACING A PUBLIC STREET. ALSO, ENSURE THE
ELEVATIONS ACHIEVE THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONDITION
6A OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRING THAT
VARIED ROOF DESIGNS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE USED
ON BUILDING SECTIONS ACROSS THE FRONT FAçADE AND
REAR FACADES OF BUILDINGS THAT FACE A STREET.
11. THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW COMPOSITE SHINGLES.
CONDITION 6B OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT REQUIRES
THAT ROOFING MATERIAL SHALL BE DIMENSIONAL
ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES WITH A MINIMUM 30
YEAR WARRANTY. ALL FLASHING SHALL BE COPPER
OR PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM (BRONZE OR BLACK).
PLEASE REVISE ALL ELEVATIONS TO "CALL OUT" THESE
MATERIALS AND SUBMIT A SHINGLE SAMPLE TO
REVIEWER THAT INCLUDES MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
12. THE SIDE AND REAR ELEVATIONS INCLUDING THE ROOF-LINES
SUBMITTED FOR EACH PRODUCT ARE INCOMPLETE AND DO
NOT SHOW OR LABEL THE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS.
IN ADDITION, MANY OF THE LABELS ARE NOT LEGIBLE.
PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILED ELEVATIONS FOR ALL FOUR
SIDES CLEARLY IDENTIFYING ALL MATERIALS AND ENSURE
THE LABELING IS LEGIBLE.
13. PLEASE SUBMIT A MANUFACTURER'S SAMPLE AND SPEC
SHEET FOR THE PROPOSED STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF MATERIAL. PRODUCT MUST BE OF A HIGH QUALITY
MATERIAL CONSISTING OF A KYNAR FINISH.
14. TEXTUAL STATEMENT 7A REQUIRES ALL FRONT ENTRY
STOOPS AND PORCHES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A
CONTINUOUS MASONRY FOUNDATION WALL. PLEASE
REVISE ALL ELEVATIONS TO CLEARLY SHOW AND LABEL
THE MASONRY TREATMENT.
15. CONDITION 7A OF THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT
REQUIRES ALL FRONT STEPS SHALL BE MASONRY TO MATCH
THE FOUNDATION. MANY OF THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED
DO NOT SHOW THIS. PLEASE REVISE ALL ELEVATIONS TO
CLEARLY SHOW MASONRY TREATMENT.
16. COLUMNS SUPPORTING ROOFS OF PORCHES, PORTICOS AND
COVERED STOOPS ON STREET FACING FACADES, SHALL BE
MASONRY PIERS, TAPERED ROUND (TUSCAN OR DORIC)
COLUMN, OR SQUARE BOX COLUMNS A MINIMUM OF 8"
SQUARE AS APPROPRIATE TO THE CHARACTER OF THE UNIT.
ON ALL ELEVATIONS CLEARLY "CALL OUT" THE MATERIAL,
STYLE AND SIZE OF ALL COLUMNS. REFERENCE 7A OF THE
APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
17. THE FLOOR PLANS FOR THE ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED FOR
THE DETACHED UNITS SHOW OPTIONAL PRE-FAB GAS
FIREPLACES. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS
52 & 53 DOES NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESS
REVIEWER'S COMMENTS. IDENTIFY ON EACH ELEVATION
IF CHIMNEYS, METAL FLUES OR DIRECT VENT FIREPLACES
WILL BE UTILIZED AND DESIGN THE ELEVATIONS TO MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS PER TEXTUAL STATEMENT 8. A. & B.
18. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR THE ATTACHED UNITS HAVE
NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED FULL SITE
PLAN APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS.
19. TEXTUAL STATEMENT K STATES THAT FRONT LOADED
GARAGES SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO THE STREET
THAN THE FRONT FAçADE OF THE DWELLING UNIT.
PLEASE BE SURE THAT ANY OF THE ELEVATIONS
SHOWN THAT DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT MAY
NOT BE ORIENTED FACING ANY STREET.
20. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE ATTACHED
UNITS PLEASE MAKE SURE THE ELEVATIONS ARE DESIGNED
TO ADDRESS PREVIOUS COMMENT 15 THAT STATES: "THANK
YOU FOR ADDRESSING PREVIOUS COMMENT #17
IDENTIFYING THE "BUMP OUTS" FOR UNITS 26 THROUGH
42 ALONG THE ELEVATIONS FACING VILLAGE SQUARE
PARKWAY AS OPTIONAL BEDROOM AND GREAT ROOM
EXTENSIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED ARCHITECTURAL
ELEVATIONS SHOWING EACH UNIT WITH AND WITHOUT
THIS OPTIONAL EXTENSION. PLEASE ENSURE ELEVATIONS
COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF ZONING. REVIEWER
IS CONCERNED THAT THESE OPTIONAL "BUMP OUTS" MAY
NOT COMPLY WITH 5. E. OF THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT
REQUIRING EXTERIOR FACADES WHICH FACE A PUBLIC
STREET HAVE A FORMAL ARRANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION.
ALSO, AS PREVIOUSLY COMMENTED ENSURE WIDTH OF
EACH GARAGE DOOR IS NO LESS THAN 9' FEET WIDE TO
ACCOMMODATE THE PARKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
AND BE COUNTED AS A COVERED PARKING SPACE.
21. PER PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS: FOR EACH UNIT
OR PRODUCT, PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF FOUR SIDED
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH
ALL BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED,
LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND ACCESS BOXES SHOWN,
AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED
WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF OR ON THE GROUND.
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT.
DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013. APPROVED UNDER CASE
12SN0226). (SEC. 19-264(D) (18)
THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT SPECIFIC COMMENTS ARE IN ADDITION
TO THE ABOVE COMMENTS REGARDING ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS:
22. ON THE COLOR AND MATERIALS SCHEME "PACKET",
IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE SIZE AND THICKNESS OF THE
PROPOSED AMHERST VINYL.
23. DELRAY MODEL MASTER - THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWN ON
THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE DELRAY IS THE REVERSE OF THE
FOOT PRINT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FOR UNITS 45 AND 49.
PLEASE ENSURE THE UNIT WILL BE ABLE TO COMPLY WITH
TEXTUAL STATEMENT 5. E. REQUIRING EXTERIOR FACADES
WHICH FACE A PUBLIC STREET SHALL HAVE A FORMAL
ARRANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF ELEMENTS
INCLUDING DOORS, WINDOWS AND TRIM AND MAY
INCLUDE PORCHES, COLUMNS, CORNICES AND TRIM.
24. DELRAY HERITAGE -IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE EXTERIOR
MATERIALS FOR THE DORMERS.
25. DELRAY BUNGALOW A & B AND EUROPEAN A- LABEL THE
MASONRY AS BRICK OR STONE ON EACH ELEVATION.
BUNGALOWS A & B SHOW DISSIMILAR MASONRY
MATERIALS ON THE FRONT AND SIDE ELEVATIONS.
PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS SO THE CONTINUATION OF
THE MASONRY IS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES.
26. DELRAY BUNGALOW A & B- THE FRONT PORCH COLUMNS
SHOWN ON THE RIGHT ELEVATIONS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH
THE COLUMNS SHOWN ON FRONT ELEVATION. THE COLUMN
BASE, TAPERED SHAFT CAPITAL AND STONE BASE NEEDS TO
MATCH THE FRONT ELEVATION. ALSO, LABEL THE STYLE OF
COLUMN SHOWN. TUSCAN OR DORIC COLUMNS ARE REQUIRED
PER CONDITION 7A.
27. DELRAY EUROPEAN A- IDENTIFY AND LABEL THE STYLE OF
COLUMN SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS.
28. THE "PRESCOTT" - ON ALL ELEVATIONS, LABEL THE HEADER
MATERIAL.
29. PRESCOTT HERITAGE B-SUBMITTED AS A FRONT ELEVATION
RENDERING. SUBMIT FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILED 4 SIDED
ELEVATIONS.
30. PRESCOTT EUROPEAN A - THE BRICK SHOWN ABOVE THE
ARCH EYEBROW WINDOW SHOWN ON THE FRONT ELEVATION
IS REQUIRED TO CONSIST OF A TRADITIONAL JACK ARCH
OR CIRCULAR ARCH. SEE CONDITION 5B OF TEXTUAL
STATEMENT.
31. SAVANNAH (ALL MODELS) - EXTEND THE MASONRY SO THE
FOUNDATION/SLAB IS NOT EXPOSED.
32. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED WITH PHASE 1
AND WERE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL OF PHASE 2.
BASED ON DESIGN CONSULTANTS RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, IT
APPEARS THE SAME ELEVATIONS FOR PHASE 1 WILL BE USED
FOR PHASE 2. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THIS IS THE CASE. ALSO,
AS EACH PHASE IS APPROVED, PLANNING WILL REQUIRE TWO FULL
SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR EACH PHASE TO STAMP
FOR APPROVAL.
33. ANY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT PLAN, WHETHER IT STEMS FROM
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR AN ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUESTED
BY THE APPLICANT, MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM
THE REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS, RESULTING IN REQUIRED REVISIONS
NOTE: PLANS WERE PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED ON 12/31/15 AS
A THIRD SUBMITTAL. . HOWEVER, DUE TO PRINTER ERROR ON
APPLICANTS END, THE PLANS WERE MISSING SUBSTANTIAL
INFORMATION. AS A COURTESY, PLANNING ALLOWED
APPLICANT THE OPTION OF EITHER COUNTING THE 12/31/15 AS A
SUBMITTAL OR RESUBMITTING COMPLETE PLANS SO APPLICANT
WOULD NOT INCUR A $350.00 RESUBMITTAL FEE. APPLICANT
CHOSE TO RESUBMIT COMPLETE PLANS THAT WERE RECEIVED
ON 02/08/16 AS A THIRD SUBMITTAL.
##########################################################
##########################################################
REVIEWER / PHONE #-----JEFF DOPP/717-6191
EMAIL------------------DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN------- GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER-------15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE------- 12/30/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE------ 02/08/16
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCAPE PLAN REC'D.VIA EMAIL 12/7/15-
NOT APPROVED-SEE COMMENTS..
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------FOUR
REVIEW DATE------------ 12/15/16
RECOMMENDATION---------APPROVAL OF CIVIL DRAWINGS
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCPAE PLAN: APPROVAL REQUIRED
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS- APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS--RESPONSE FROM DEVELOPER-NONE
PROPOSED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
NOTE: THIS SUBMITTAL WITH A REVISION DATE OF 09/30/16
REPLACES A PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLAN WITH A REVISION
DATE OF 03/02/16 THAT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY APPROVED ON 0
2/16/16.
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED
PLANS. RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF
THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. IF THE
NEXT REVIEW IS ELIGIBLE FOR A TABLE REVIEW
HI-LIGHT ALL CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL
ON THREE OF THE FULL SETS OF PLANS.
02. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROOF
READ ALL SHEETS TO ENSURE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO
BE SHOWN ON PLANS HAS NOT BEEN OMITTED.
03. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO
DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
SUBMIT SIX COPIES OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
SO EACH DEPARTMENT HAS A COPY TO CONDUCT A
REVIEW. PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IF THIS IS NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
04. PLEASE INCLUDE A SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL FEE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $350.00 WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL.
05. NOTE: SHEETS C1.1 C1.3, C1.4, C3.0:
PER REVIEWERS DISCUSSION WITH GREG ALLEN AND
DARIN SMOUSE ON 11/12/15, THE CONFIGURATION
OF THE 50' BUFFER ADJACENT TO OTTERDALE ROAD WILL BE
FINALIZED WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF PHASE SIX TO ALLOW
THE DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH CDOT ON
TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.
06. NOTE: PER GREG ALLEN'S EMAIL DATED NOVEMBER
4, 2015, THE IRRIGATION COVERAGE PLAN MAY BE
SUBMITTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR
EACH PHASE. PLEASE ENSURE THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS
DESIGNED TO MEET BOTH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND
THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013
APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226) REQUIRING ALL FRONT
YARDS TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED.INSURE WATER INFORMATION
IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
07. NOTE: NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE RELEASED
UNTIL FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS GRANTED AND IRRIGATION
COVERAGE AND POD LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE APPROVED.
08. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAILS DATED 1/27/16, &
12/14/16. THE BUILDERS BOOK LANDSCAPE POD PLANS
MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
SUBMITTAL. LANDSCAPE POD PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH ZONING CASE
12SN0226. ALSO, PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW
COMMENTS.
09. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAIL DATED 12/14/16,
SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER WILL INCLUDE A CONDITION
REQUIRING THAT ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
10. NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE WALKING TRAIL SHOWN
ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BMP AND SUBDIVISION WILL
NEED TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF A PHASE SINCE THIS
IS PART OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF CLARIFICATION THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITH PHASE 2 SINCE THE PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF PHASE 2.
##########################################################
##########################################################
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCAPE PLAN REC'D.VIA EMAIL 12/7/15-NO
APPROVED SEE COMMENT.
SUBMITTAL NUMBER-------FOUR (AMENDED)
REVIEW DATE------------ 12/15/16
RECOMMENDATION---------NO
TABLE REVIEW-----------NO
STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN STATUS- APPROVED
BUILDER BOOK POD LANDSCPAE PLAN: APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR T
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS- APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
LIGHTING PLAN/CUTSHEETS- DEVELOPER RESPOSE-NONE PROPOSED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN--- APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
NOTE:THIS SUBMITTAL WITH A REVISION DATE OF 9/30/16 REPLAC
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLAN WITH A REVISION DATE OF 03/02/16
THAT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY APPROVED ON 02/16/16.
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN AMENDED AND
SUPERSEDE PREVIOUS COMMENTS DATED 12/19/16.
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED
PLANS. RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF
THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. IF THE
NEXT REVIEW IS ELIGIBLE FOR A TABLE REVIEW
HI-LIGHT ALL CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL
ON THREE OF THE FULL SETS OF PLANS.
02. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS, PLEASE PROOF
READ ALL SHEETS TO ENSURE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO
BE SHOWN ON PLANS HAS NOT BEEN OMITTED.
03. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO
DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
SUBMIT SIX COPIES OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
SO EACH DEPARTMENT HAS A COPY TO CONDUCT A
REVIEW. PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IF THIS IS NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
04. PLEASE INCLUDE A SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL FEE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $350.00 WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL.
05. NOTE: SHEETS C1.1 C1.3, C1.4, C3.0:
PER REVIEWERS DISCUSSION WITH GREG ALLEN AND
DARIN SMOUSE ON 11/12/15, THE CONFIGURATION
OF THE 50' BUFFER ADJACENT TO OTTERDALE ROAD WILL BE
FINALIZED WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF PHASE SIX TO ALLOW
THE DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH CDOT ON
TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.
06. NOTE: PER GREG ALLEN'S EMAIL DATED NOVEMBER
4, 2015, THE IRRIGATION COVERAGE PLAN MAY BE
SUBMITTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR
EACH PHASE. PLEASE ENSURE THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS
DESIGNED TO MEET BOTH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND
THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013
APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226) REQUIRING ALL FRONT
YARDS TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED. INSURE WATER INFORMATION
IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
07. NOTE: NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE RELEASED
UNTIL FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS GRANTED AND IRRIGATION
COVERAGE AND POD LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE APPROVED.
08. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAILS DATED 1/27/16, &
12/14/16. THE BUILDERS BOOK LANDSCAPE POD PLANS
MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
SUBMITTAL. LANDSCAPE POD PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH ZONING CASE
12SN0226. ALSO, PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW
COMMENTS.
09. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAIL DATED 12/14/16,
SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER WILL INCLUDE A CONDITION
REQUIRING THAT ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
10. NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE WALKING TRAIL SHOWN
ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BMP AND SUBDIVISION WILL
NEED TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF A PHASE SINCE THIS
IS PART OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF CLARIFICATION THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITH PHASE 2 SINCE THE PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF PHASE 2.
11. PLEASE BE ADVISED REVIEWER IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO
APPROVE SITE PLAN UNTIL PENDING ZONING CASE 16SN0691
IS FINALIZED.
##########################################################
##########################################################
EMAIL--DOPPJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN-GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK
PHASE 2 (PHASE 2A & 2B)
SITE PLAN NUMBER-15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE-02/14/2017
DEPT. REC'D. DATE-- 02/16/2017
SUBMITTAL NUMBER--FIVE
REVIEW DATE------03/13/2017
RECOMMENDATION-NOT APPROVAL
TABLE REVIEW-----------YES
STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN- NOT APPROVED SEE
COMMENT #5
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS. APPROVAL REQUIRED
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
SUBMIT SIX COPIES OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTSD PRIOR TO
SO EACH DEPARTMENT HAS A COPY TO CONDUCT A
REVIEW. PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEWPER-
NONE PROPOSED
IRRIGATION/HOSEBIB PLAN-APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
.
01. PUT A REVISION DATE ON THE RESUBMITTED
PLANS. RESUBMIT 12 FULL SETS & 1 COPY OF
THE SITE PLAN SHEET TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR NEXT REVIEW. IF THE
NEXT REVIEW IS ELIGIBLE FOR A TABLE REVIEW
HI-LIGHT ALL CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL
ON THREE OF THE FULL SETS OF PLANS.
.
02. PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
USING THE SPACE BELOW EACH COMMENT TO
DESCRIBE HOW YOU HAVE ADDRESSED EACH
REVIEW COMMENT. NOTE ON WHAT SHEET
EACH REQUESTED CHANGE IS PROVIDED.
PROVIDE A TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO
DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS NOT
CAUSED BY STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS.
(CL X.X REPRESENTS CHECKLIST ITEM #)
SUBMIT SIX COPIES OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
SO EACH DEPARTMENT HAS A COPY TO CONDUCT A
REVIEW. PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IF THIS IS NOT INCLUDED WITH RESUBMITTAL.
.
03. PLEASE INCLUDE A SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL FEE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $350.00 WITH YOUR NEXT SUBMITTAL.
.
04. PLEASE BE ADVISED, YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
SUBMITTED WERE FOR THE INCORRECT REVIEW. RESPONSE
TO COMMENTS FOR REVIEW #3 THAT WERE COMPLETED
BACK IN FEBRUARY 2016. INSTEAD, RESPONSE TO
COMMENTS FOR REVIEW #4 COMPLETED IN DECEMBER
2016.COMMENTS AND EMAILED ON JANUARY 4, 2017.
.
05. SHEET L1.0: REVISE LOCATION OF TWO STREET TREES
SHOWN IN FRONT OF UNIT 73. ONE TREE SHOWS THE TRUNK
IN THE DRIVEWAY AND ONE TREE IS TOO CLOSE TO THE
WALKWAY. IF NEEDED, REMOVE THE ONE TREE ALTOGETHER
LOCATED WITHIN DRIVEWAY.
.
06. UNITS 71, 74, 75, 78, 79, 82, 83 & 86: ZONING
CONDITION REQUIRES A MINIMUM 4' WIDE PLANTING
BED FROM THE UNIT FOUNDATION ALONG THE FRONT OF
ALL UNITS. THE PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO ACHIEVE THIS
MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIREMENT BETWEEN THE
FOUNDATION AND WALKWAYS AND THE FOUNDATION AND
DRIVEWAYS. PLEASE REVISE AND DIMENSION. PLEASE
MAKE SURE ON ALL UNITS, THE GRADING PLAN WILL
BE CONDUCIVE TO THESE REQUIRED PLANTING BEDS.
.
07. UNITS 61-64 & 69: PLEASE DIMENSION FOOTPRINT.
.
08. YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ARE FROM THE
INCORRECT COMMENTS. YOU HAVE RESPONDED TO
THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS FROM FEBRUARY 2016.
THE LAST REVIEW COMMENTS WERE FOR REVIEW
NUMBER FOUR SENT OUT ON JANUARY 4, 2017.
.
09. NOTE: SHEETS C1.1 C1.3, C1.4, C3.0:
PER REVIEWER'S DISCUSSION WITH GREG ALLEN AND
DARIN SMOUSE ON 11/12/15, THE CONFIGURATION
OF THE 50' BUFFER ADJACENT TO OTTERDALE ROAD WILL BE
FINALIZED WITH THE SUBMITTAL OF PHASE SIX TO ALLOW
THE DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH CDOT ON
TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.
10. NOTE: PER GREG ALLEN'S EMAIL DATED NOVEMBER
4, 2015, THE IRRIGATION COVERAGE PLAN MAY BE
SUBMITTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR
EACH PHASE. PLEASE ENSURE THE IRRIGATION PLAN IS
DESIGNED TO MEET BOTH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND
THE TEXTUAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2013
APPROVED UNDER CASE 12SN0226) REQUIRING ALL FRONT
YARDS TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED. INSURE WATER INFORMATION
IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
.
11. NOTE: NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE RELEASED
UNTIL FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS GRANTED AND IRRIGATION
COVERAGE AND POD LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE APPROVED.
.
12. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAILS DATED 1/27/16, &
12/14/16. THE BUILDERS BOOK LANDSCAPE POD PLANS
MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
SUBMITTAL. LANDSCAPE POD PLANS WILL NEED TO BE
DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE
TEXTUAL STATEMENT APPROVED WITH ZONING CASE
12SN0226. ALSO, PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW
COMMENTS.
.
13. NOTE: PER JEFF DOPP'S EMAIL DATED 12/14/16,
SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER WILL INCLUDE A CONDITION
REQUIRING THAT ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY PLANNING PRIOR TO
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
.
14. NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE WALKING TRAIL SHOWN
ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING BMP AND SUBDIVISION WILL
MUST BE INCLUDED AS PART OF A PHASE SINCE THIS
IS PART OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF CLARIFICATION THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
WITH PHASE 2 SINCE THE PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF PHASE 2.
##########################################################
##########################################################
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE I
PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 6/12/15
RECEIVED DATE : 6/18/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 7/10/15
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE II
PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 10/12/15
RECEIVED DATE : 10/15/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 11/3/15
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE II
PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 12/30/15
RECEIVED DATE : 1/3/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 2/1/16
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE II
PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 12/30/15
RECEIVED DATE : 2/9/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 2/17/16
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : GREENWICH WALK @ FOX CREEK, PH. 2
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/3/16
RECEIVED DATE : 11/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 5
REVIEW DATE : 12/8/16
ADDRESS : NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : GREENWICH WALK @ FOX CREEK, PH. 2
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 2/14/17
RECEIVED DATE : 2/21/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 6
REVIEW DATE : 3/9/17
ADDRESS : PENDING
STATUS : APPROVED
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0233
NAME OF PLAN: FOX GREEN GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
DATE OF REVIEW:7/10/15 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (2) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL SITE APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 15PR0233.
2) THE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY IN PHASE 1 BETWEEN LEWISHAM DR
AND SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS MUST BE NAMED BECAUSE IT HAS
FRONTAGE FOR THE TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS.
3) IN PHASE 3 AND PHASE 6 THE STREET NAME TRUEHEART RUN
SHOULD BE RENAMED BECAUSE THERE IS AN EXISTING SUB-
DIVISION IN CHESTER CALLED TRUEHEART HEIGHTS AND THE
NAME TRUEHEART HERE MAY CAUSE CONFUSION.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0233
NAME OF PLAN: FOX GREEN GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
DATE OF REVIEW:11/3/15 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (2) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL SITE APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 15PR0233.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0233
NAME OF PLAN: FOX GREEN GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
DATE OF REVIEW: 2/1/16 REVIEW # 3
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (2) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL SITE APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 15PR0233.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0233
NAME OF PLAN: FOX GREEN GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
DATE OF REVIEW: 2/17/16 REVIEW # 4
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (2) NEEDS
TO BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL SITE APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE PLAN
NUMBER 15PR0233.
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0233
NAME OF PLAN: FOX GREEN GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED
DATE OF REVIEW: 3/9/16 REVIEW # 4
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING APPROVED
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 6/12/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 6/17/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 6/17/15
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: NO
PLAT PROCESSING: NO
COMMENTS:
1. ADD THE NOTE TO THE GENERAL NOTES SECTION OF THE PLAN
AND TO THE LANDSCAPING PLANS.
"NO LANDSCAPING OF ANY TYPE SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN A
THREE FOOT RADIUS OF ANY FIRE HYDRANT, FIRE PUMP TEST
HEADER, FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTION,
FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDPIPE CONNECTION OR FIRE SUPPRESSION
CONTROL VALVE. LANDSCAPING IN THE AREA OF FIRE HYDRANTS,
FIRE PUMP TEST HEADERS, FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER
SYSTEM CONNECTIONS OR FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDPIPE
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE OF THE TYPE THAT WILL NOT ENCROACH
ON THE REQUIRED THREE FOOT CLEAR RADIUS ON MATURITY OF
THE LANDSCAPING"
2. PROVIDE COMPUTER GENERATED WATER FLOW TEST DATA,
PROVIDED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT, VERIFYING THE REQUIRED WATER FLOW FOR FIRE
PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE AT THE SITE. THE WATERFLOW TEST
RESULTS AND GRAPH SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR ALL BUILDINGS, WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, IS 1500
GPM (SPRINKLER PROTECTED OR NON-SPRINKLER PROTECTED) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (2012) -
SECTION B105.2 AND TABLE B105.1.
3. SHOW THE NODE MAP AND RESULTS TABLE FOR THE PROPOSED
OR EXISTING HYDRANTS ON SITE SHOWING THE MAXIMUM FIRE
FLOW CAN BE ACHIEVED. WHEN MULTIPLE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
USED THE COMBINED FLOW MUST BE SIMULTANEOUS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 10/12/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 10/15/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 2ND REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 10/16/15
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/30/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 1/05/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 1/08/15
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 12/31/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/10/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 2/18/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 11/3//15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 11/17/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 5TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 11/18/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0233
ADDRESS: 7311 OTTERDALE ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 2/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 2/23/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 6TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 3/3/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
ADDRESS : NE CORNER OF OTTERDALE ROAD AND
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 06/12/2015 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 07/17/2015
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 07/14/2015
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE DRAINAGE AREAS FOR THE STRUCTURES IN LIEGE
HILL (PROPOSED WITH PHASE 1).
04. THE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR STORM PIPE 80 AND THE SB3
OUTFALL PIPE MUST SPECIFY 2' THICK RIPRAP OVER FILTER
FABRIC. REVISE THE OUTLET PROTECTION DETAIL.
05. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DETAILED SOILS REPORT, THE
MAXIMUM VELOCITY ALLOWABLE ON BARE EARTH IS 3.5 FPS.
VELOCITIES BETWEEN 3.5 FPS AND 4.0 FPS REQUIRE A
JUTE LINING AND ANY VELOCITIES GREATER THAN 4.0 FPS
REQUIRE A STRUCTURAL LINING OF EITHER RIP RAP OR
CONCRETE. (CL-G&D 5) PROVIDE DITCH CALCULATIONS FOR
ALL DRITCHES AND SWALES.
06. ALL ROOF WATER AND DOWNDRAINS MUST BE COLLECTED AND
DISCHARGED IN A NON-ERODIBLE MANNER. (CL-G&D 6)
07. A VDOT STANDARD ENDWALL IS REQUIRED ON ALL
MULTI-LINE STRUCTURES, STRUCTURES WITH DIAMETERS
30" AND LARGER, AND WHEN THE STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED
ON A SLOPE OF 15% OR GREATER. (CL-G&D 7) THIS APPLIES
TO STORM PIPE 80.
08. THE 100-YEAR STORM HGL ESCAPES EVERY GRATE INLET WITHI
THE PHASE 2 LIMITS BY SEVERAL FEET. THE RESIDENTIAL
UNITS MUST BE PROVIDED 100-YEAR STORM PROTECTION. THE
100-YEAR STORM MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE SYSTEM.
IF THE 100-YEAR STORM CAN BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE
DITCHES, THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF EACH UNIT MUS
BE SPECIFIED A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ABOVE THE HIGHEST
100-YEAR STORM ELEVATION WITHIN THE ADJACENT DITCHES.
09. CONSIDER EXTENDING STORM SEWER BEHIND THE CONDOMINIUM
UNITS AND PICKING UP RUNOFF VIA YARD DRAINS TO REDUCE
THE MAINTENANCE AND POSSIBILITY OF STANDING WATER
WITHIN THE DITCHES.
10. PROVIDE THE PROFILE FOR STORM PIPE 80.
11. PROVIDE THE PROFILE FOR THE SB3 OUTFALL INTO REGIONAL
BMP WBC-10.
12. LABEL PHASE 2 ON THE METES AND BOUNDS PLAN (SHEET
C1.3).
13. BITUMINOUS CURBING (STD. MC-3A) IS REQUIRED ALONG THE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT SEPARATING THE DIFFERENT PHASES OF TH
PROJECT. (CL-G&D 32) THIS APPLIES TO BOTH ENDS OF
HALLOWELL RIDGE.
14. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO LEIGE
HILL. THE LOCATION OF THE ENTRANCE AT THE END OF
SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS WILL IMPACT THE OUTFALL INSTALLED
WITH PHASE 1 AND WILL REQUIRE NAVIGATION AROUND THE
EXISTING POND AND THE STOCKPILE AREA FROM THE PHASE 1
CONSTRUCTION.
15. ALL SILT FENCE ON THE PROJECT MUST BE SUPER SILT FENCE
LABEL ON THE EROSION CONTROL PHASE 1 PLAN (SHEET C2.0)
16. SPECIFY SUPER SILT FENCE ADJACENT TO THE ENTIRE
DOWNSTREAM LENGTH OF HALLOWELL RIDGE.
17. PROVIDE A NOTE IN THE PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF GREENWICH
WALK PHASE 1 ARE IN GOOD CONDITION PRIOR TO LAND
DISTURBANCE.
18. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
19. ENSURE THAT THE DIVERSION DIKE IS SHOWN IN A LOCATION
THAT POSITIVELY DRAINS THE RUNOFF.
20. PROVIDE A NOTE TO SEED AND STRAW THE DIVERSION DIKE
UPON ITS INSTALLATION.
21. THE SEDIMENT BASIN(S) MUST BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STD.& SPEC. 3.14 OF THE VESCH. SEDIMENT BASIN
DESIGN CALCULATION SHEETS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL
DESIGN DATA ADDRESSED AND SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
INCLUDED ON THE PLANS. (CL-EC 11)
22. THE SEDIMENT BASIN SIZING DOES NOT APPEAR TO ACCOUNT
FOR THE PORTION OF GREENWICH WALK PHASE 1 THAT WILL
BE CONVEYED TO SB3.
23. CONSTRUCTION OF SB3 ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING STOCKPILE
AT THE EAST END OF THE PROJECT WILL MAKE STABILIZATION
OF THE SLOPE DIFFICULT. CONSIDER REGRADING THE
STOCKPILE AND SPECIFY PERMANENT SEEDING ALONG THE
DISTURBED PORTIONS.
24. CLARIFY IF SB3 IS TO REMAIN AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION OF
GREENWICH WALK PHASE 2 IS COMPLETE.
25. REVISE NOTE 7 IN THE EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE (SHEET
C2.2) AND NOTE ES-1 (SHEET C2.3) TO REFERENCE VIRGINIA
REGULATION 9 VAC 25-840-40.
26. AN MS-19 ANALYSIS MUST BE PERFORMED AT EACH POINT OF
CONCENTRATED DISCHARGE AND AT THE DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY
LINE. THE LOCATION OF EACH ANALYSIS MUST BE SHOWN AND
LABELED ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS. (CL-EC 28)
27. PROVIDE THE MS-19 SITUATIONS TABLE ON THE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS LISTING EACH ANALYSIS POINT. THE FOLLOWING
LOCATIONS MUST BE ANALYZED FOR MS-19:
A. THE OUTFALL OF STORM PIPE 80
B. THE OUTFALL OF SB3 INTO WBC-10
C. THE OUTFALL OF WBC-10
28. THE DETAIL SHOWN FOR GRATE INLET PROTECTION MUST BE
CHANGED TO THE ONE SHOWN ON PLATE 3.07-3 OF STANDARD
AND SPECIFICATION # 3.07. (CL-EC 35)
29. THE SANITARY SEWER LINE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE FUTUR
PORTION OF HALLOWELL RIDGE APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED WITH
THIS PROJECT (SHEET C3.1). IF SO, THE OFF-SITE UTILIT
LINE(S) MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SHEETS WITH SUPER SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE.
(CL-EC 38)
30. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
A. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
B. AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, TWO
STANDARD SIGNS MUST BE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. THESE SIGNS SHOULD STATE EITHER
"CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AHEAD" OR "TRUCKS ENTERING
HIGHWAY". (CL-EC 42E)
C. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42F)
D. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA MUST BE FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
(SURVEY LOCATED) WITH OPTIC ORANGE SAFETY FENCE PRIOR
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-EC 42G)
31. A PERENNIAL FLOW DETERMINATION/WETLAND DELINEATION
CONFIRMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER QUALITY
SECTION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE NEXT
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. (CL-CBPA 2)
32. CLARIFY AREA 11 AND AREA 12 NOTED ON THE CBPA
COMPLIANCE PLAN SHEET. THESE AREAS ARE NOT INCLUDED
IN THE WBC-10 DRAINAGE AREA PLAN.
33. ENSURE THE CBPA CALCULATIONS CORRESPOND WITH THE WATER
QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPROVED MAY 30, 2013.
34. RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA (RPA) LIMITS MUST BE
ESTABLISHED FROM ALL PERENNIAL WATER BODIES AND THE
ASSOCIATED CONNECTED AND CONTIGUOUS WETLANDS.
(CL-CBPA 5)
35. THE REQUIRED LINE TYPE FOR RPA DESIGNATION MUST INCLUD
THE LETTERS "---RPA---RPA---". (CL-CBPA 7)
36. THE LIMITS OF THE RPA MUST BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLA
SHEETS, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND THE
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPLIANCE SHEET(S). (CL-CBPA 8)
37. ALL POINTS OF CONCENTRATED INFLOW TO THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY MUST TIE INTO THE BASIN AT THE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE OR BELOW. IF THE OUTFALL IS SUBMERGED, A
MINIMUM OF 3 FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE INVERT OF TH
INFLOW STRUCTURE AND THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN.
(CL-CBPA 12)
38. REVISE THE STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO ENSURE THAT
TREES ARE NOT PLACED WITHIN 8 FEET OF ANY STORM SEWER
PIPE OR STRUCTURE.
39. CONDOMINIUM AND APARTMENT PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP
MAINTENANCE FEE OF $100/UNIT. PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-USC 2)
40. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
41. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
42. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
43. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
44. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
45. CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE OF
$100/UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
46. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
47. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
48. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
49. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
50. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
C. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
COVERAGE LETTER
D. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
E. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
ADDRESS : NE CORNER OF OTTERDALE ROAD AND
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 10/12/2015 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 10/15/2015
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 11/30/2015
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. ON SHEET C5.0, IN THE PLAN VIEW, THE DRAINAGE AREA
LABELS FOR STRUCTURES 67 AND 47 ARE SWITCHED.
04. PROVIDE REVISED 100-YEAR STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS TO
VERIFY THAT THE HGL IS NOT AFFECTING THE PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL UNITS. ENSURE THE HGL IS ACCOUNTED FOR
IN THE 100-YEAR DITCH CALCULATIONS.
05. AS REQUESTED WITH PHASE I, CONNECT ROOF DOWNSPOUTS
DIRECTLY TO STORM STRUCTURES OR YARD DRAINS TO REDUCE
THE MAINTENANCE AND POSSIBILITY OF STANDING WATER
WITHIN THE DITCHES. CONSIDER REVISING THE GRADING PLA
TO REDUCE DITCHES BETWEEN THE CONDOMINIUM UNITS. DITC
GRADES AND UNIT ELEVATIONS MAY REQUIRE CERTIFICATION T
ENSURE PROPERTY PROTECTION.
06. PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR STRUCTURE 93A ON THE STRUCTURE
TABLE ON SHEET C3.3.
07. STRUCTURE 81 IS LABELED AS AN ES-1 ON THE STRUCTURE
TABLE ON SHEET C3.3. REVISE THIS TO EW-1.
08. SHOW/LABEL EW-1 STRUCTURE 81 ON THE PROFILE SHEET
(SHEET C4.3).
09. EXTEND THE PROFILE FOR STORM PIPE 80 TO SHOW THE
RECEIVING CHANNEL PROPOSED GRADES.
10. AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, PROVIDE THE PROFILE FOR THE
SB3 OUTFALL INTO REGIONAL BMP WBC-10. BEGIN THE
PROFILE AT THE RISER AND ENSURE THAT EXISTING AND
PROPOSED GRADES ARE SHOWN.
11. CORRECT NOTE 10 IN THE PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIO
ON SHEET C2.2 TO REFERENCE LEIGE HILL INSTEAD OF
SOUTHWALK HEIGHTS.
12. REVISE NOTE 3 IN THE PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
(SHEET C2.2) TO CORRECT "REORDERED" TO "RECORDED".
13. THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE DOES NOT ADDRESS DEWATERING
OR DRAINING AND SUBSEQUENT FILLING OF THE EXISTING
POND/WETLANDS ONSITE. VERIFY IF THE REQUIRED AMOUNT O
FILL MATERIAL CAN BE OBTAINED FROM WITHIN THE LIMITS O
DISTURBANCE.
14. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ON LEIGE HILL IS IN CONFLICT
WITH THE DRIVEWAY FOR UNITS 60 - 62 IN PHASE I.
15. ADD THE FOLLOWING TO THE END OF NOTE 6 IN THE PHASE 1
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: "CORRECT ANY DEFICIENCIES
AS REQUIRED TO BRING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO
PROPER OPERATING CONDITION."
16. THE CALCULATIONS FOR SB3 SHOW THAT A BAFFLE IS
REQUIRED. SHOW AND LABEL THE BAFFLE IN PLAN VIEW ON
THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AND PROVIDE THE BAFFLE
DETAIL ON SHEET C2.2.
17. THE OUTFALL OF SB3 INTO WBC-10 FALLS UNDER SITUATION G
WHICH REQUIRES AN MS-19 VARIANCE REQUEST TO BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY EE PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL
18. PROVIDE RUNOFF CALCULATIONS FOR MS-19 SECTION 2.
19. REVISE THE CBPA TABLE ON THE CBPA SHEET TO REFLECT THE
IMPERVIOUS AREA OF 3.92 ACRES FOR PHASE 2. THE TOTAL
IMPERVIOUS COVER SHOULD ALSO BE CORRECTED TO 17.45% FO
AREA 3.
20. THE FOLLOWING COMMENT APPLIES TO THE SB3 OUTFALL INTO
THE EXISTING WBC-10 BMP FACILITY:
ALL POINTS OF CONCENTRATED INFLOW TO THE SWM/BMP
FACILITY MUST TIE INTO THE BASIN AT THE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE OR BELOW. IF THE OUTFALL IS SUBMERGED, A
MINIMUM OF 3 FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE INVERT OF TH
INFLOW STRUCTURE AND THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN.
(CL-CBPA 12)
21. REVISE THE STREET TREE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO ENSURE THAT
TREES ARE NOT PLACED WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE
EASEMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF LEIGE HILL AND
HALLOWELL RIDGE (ADJACENT TO UNIT 78).
22. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
23. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
24. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
25. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
26. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
27. CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE OF
$100/UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
28. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
29. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
30. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
31. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
32. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
C. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
COVERAGE LETTER
D. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
E. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
F. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED
G. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
H. CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE OF
$100/UNIT
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
ADDRESS : NE CORNER OF OTTERDALE ROAD AND
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 12/30/2015 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 02/10/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 02/25/2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : YES
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES ON THE COVER SHEET AND
ON THE GRADING PLAN SHEETS (C1.0, C3.2, AND C3.3):
"BUILDING CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. FINE GRADING & INDIVIDUAL UNIT DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
2. ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS FROM DOWNSPOUT TO RD STUB
PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER (SEE RD STUBS LABELED "RD"
ON PLAN).
3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, DESIGN, COUNTY APPROVAL &
INSTALLATION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT.
4. FINAL LANDSCAPING/SODDING/SEEDING PER BUILDER
BOOK."
04. PROVIDE THE ROOF DRAIN STRUCTURES AND PIPE INFORMATION
ON THE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE (SHEET 3.4).
05. CORRECT THE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE AS FOLLOWS:
A. STRUCTURE 79 IS AN ENDWALL
B. STRUCTURE 80 IS A MANHOLE
C. REMOVE ALL SEPARATE LISTINGS OF FUTURE STRUCTURES FROM
THE SCHEDULE
D. STRUCTURE 104 REQUIRES VDOT STEPS (ST-1)
E. SPECIFY BOOT CONNECTORS FOR STRUCTURES 67, 70, 73,
102, 99, 96, AND 93
F. ADD EXISTING STRUCTURE 74 TO THE SCHEDULE AND
SPECIFY A BOOT CONNECTOR
06. LABEL SEDIMENT BASIN 3 ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SHEETS.
07. THE OUTFALL OF SB3 INTO THE FLOODPLAIN/RIPARIAN
CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AREA FALLS UNDER SITUATION E,
WHICH REQUIRES AN MS-19 VARIANCE REQUEST TO BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY EE PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL
08. THE FLOWMASTER CALCULATIONS FOR THE OUTFALL CHANNEL
FROM STRUCTURE 79 USE A MANNING'S N ROUGHNESS OF 0.05,
WHICH IS MORE ASSOCIATED WITH A LINED CHANNEL. SPECIF
JUTE LINING OR REVISE THE DITCH CALCULATIONS.
09. NOTE 15 IN THE PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION (SHEET
C2.2.) SHOULD STATE THAT THE BARREL PIPE WILL CONNECT
TO STRUCTURE 103 AND 103 WILL HAVE A TEMPORARY MANHOLE
TOP.
10. REVISE NOTE 5 IN THE PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
(SHEE C2.2) TO STATE: "THE RISER, OUTFALL PIPE, AND
OUTFALL STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT BASIN
MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANC
PERMIT."
11. SPECIFY BLANKET AND MATTING ALONG THE FILL AND CUT
SLOPES ADJACENT TO HALLOWELL RIDGE AND SOUTHWALK
HEIGHTS.
12. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE LOCATION OF THE
SEDIMENT BASIN WILL AFFECT THE BUILDING PADS FOR UNITS
77, 93, AND 94, AS WELL AS THE FULL INSTALLATION OF
HALLOWELL RIDGE. REMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN WILL
NOT BE AUTHORIZED BY THE EE INSPECTOR UNTIL ALL
UPSTREAM AREAS WHICH DRAIN TO THE BASIN ARE STABILIZED
13. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
14. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
15. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
16. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
17. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO RECORDATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
18. ALL ONSITE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANC
OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
19. CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE OF
$100/UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
20. THE RISER, OUTFALL PIPE, AND OUTFALL STRUCTURES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
21. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
22. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
23. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
24. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
C. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
COVERAGE LETTER
D. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
E. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
F. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED
G. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
H. CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRE A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE OF
$100/UNIT
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
ADDRESS : NE CORNER OF OTTERDALE ROAD AND
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 03/02/2016(ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 03/16/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 03/16/2016
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : N/A
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. THE MS-19 VARIANCE REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR
THE MS-19 SECTION 1 AT THE OUTFALL OF STRUCTURE 79.
THIS IS BASED ON THE FLOWMASTER CALCULATIONS PROVIDED
WHICH SHOW A 10-YEAR FLOW VELOCITY OF 1.75 FPS ALONG
THE JUTE MATTING-LINED OUTFALL CHANNEL INTO THE
EXISTING 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AND NON-RPA RCMA. THE
WIDE OUTFALL CHANNEL BOTTOM WILL ENCOURAGE SHEET FLOW
DISCHARGE INTO THE NATURAL CHANNEL.
A COPY OF THESE APPROVAL COMMENTS AND THE MS-19
VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE
SWPPP PACKAGE ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
04. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE LOCATION OF THE
SEDIMENT BASIN WILL AFFECT THE BUILDING PADS FOR UNITS
77, 93, AND 94, AS WELL AS THE FULL INSTALLATION OF
HALLOWELL RIDGE. REMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN WILL
NOT BE AUTHORIZED BY THE EE INSPECTOR UNTIL ALL
UPSTREAM AREAS WHICH DRAIN TO THE BASIN ARE STABILIZED
05. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
06. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
07. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
08. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
09. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO RECORDATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
10. ALL ONSITE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANC
OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
11. THE RISER, OUTFALL PIPE, AND OUTFALL STRUCTURES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
12. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
13. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
14. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
15. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT (VSMP)
COVERAGE LETTER
C. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) BOOK
D. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
E. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FOR GREENWICH WALK AT FOX
CREEK PHASE 1 MUST BE ISSUED
F. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : CATHY HILL, P.E. / 768-7836
NAME OF PLAN : GREENWICH WALK AT FOX CREEK PHASE 2
ADDRESS : NE CORNER OF OTTERDALE ROAD AND
VILLAGE SQUARE PARKWAY
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0233
LATEST PLAN DATE : 11/03/2016 (ENGINEER'S STAMP)
DEPT. REC'D DATE : 11/16/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 5
REVIEW DATE : 01/04/2017
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : N/A
PLAT PROCESSING : YES
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS,
SURFACE WATERS (E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITES, GROUND WATER AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL
OF THESE PLANS WILL NOT RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR
RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS DOCUMENTATION MUST BE
RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE
STORMWATER REGULATIONS ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON
JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THAT
OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2014 MAY
USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA SPECIFIED
IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO PERMIT
CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER NEW
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. THE MS-19 VARIANCE REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR
THE MS-19 SECTION 1 AT THE OUTFALL OF STRUCTURE 79.
THIS IS BASED ON THE FLOWMASTER CALCULATIONS PROVIDED
WHICH SHOW A 10-YEAR FLOW VELOCITY OF 1.75 FPS ALONG
THE JUTE MATTING-LINED OUTFALL CHANNEL INTO THE
EXISTING 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AND NON-RPA RCMA. THE
WIDE OUTFALL CHANNEL BOTTOM WILL ENCOURAGE SHEET FLOW
DISCHARGE INTO THE NATURAL CHANNEL.
A COPY OF THESE APPROVAL COMMENTS AND THE MS-19
VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE
SWPPP PACKAGE ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
04. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE LOCATION OF THE
SEDIMENT BASIN WILL AFFECT THE BUILDING PADS FOR UNITS
69, 85, AND 86, AS WELL AS THE FULL INSTALLATION OF
HALLOWELL RIDGE. REMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT BASIN WILL
NOT BE AUTHORIZED BY THE EE INSPECTOR UNTIL ALL
UPSTREAM AREAS WHICH DRAIN TO THE BASIN ARE STABILIZED
05. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
06. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
07. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
08. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
09. A CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND MUST BE PROVIDED FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PRIO
TO RECORDATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
10. ALL ONSITE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANC
OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
11. THE RISER, OUTFALL PIPE, AND OUTFALL STRUCTURES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
12. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
13. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT HAS ALREADY BEEN ISSUED FOR
THIS PROJECT.
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 15PR0233



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List