Thanksgiving Holiday Closings... MORE

Hover here for Site Tools
Site Plan Review Comments
All Site Plan Review Comments for Case # 15PR0197
Modify comments view for Case # 15PR0197

Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List

 
CASE NO: 15PR0197 STATUS: APPROVED - ADMIN
PROJECT NAME: SHOPPES AT HARPERS M - LAST INTERNET UPDATE: 11/22/17
SUBMITTAL TYPE: COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT...REV..ROUTED..RESPONSE..STATUS....DATE...RVW..PHONE
ASSESSOR----: 00 03/18/15 04/08/15 ******** ********
ENVIR.ENGR.-: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** 05/03/16 DLD 706-2031
FIRE DEPT.--: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 COMPLETE 08/25/17 AWB 717-6167
MAPPING/GIS-: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** 08/03/17 AMJ 768-7549
PLANNING----: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** 05/11/16 GWK 706-7691
TRANSPORT.--: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 COMPLETE 08/22/17 SJA 751-4461
UTIL.PLAN.--: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** ********
UTILITIES---: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** 07/20/17 M L 748-1338
UTIL.R.O.W.-: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** ********
VDOT--------: 04 08/15/17 08/22/17 ******** ********
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : RYAN EVANS, P.E./748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPER'S MILL
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 03/20/15
PLAN DATED : 03/15/15
REVIEW DATE : 04/03/15
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
COMMENTS : 1ST REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW :
PLAT PROCESS :
1. SHOW THE COUNTY UTILITIES PROJECT NUMBER 15-0095 ON TH
LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
2. LABEL WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PUBLIC AND WHAT IS
PROPOSED AS PRIVATE ON BOTH PLAN AND PROFILE VIEWS. ALSO,
SEPARATE THE UTILITY QUANTITIES SIMILARLY.
3. OBTAIN THE PERTINENT EXISTING WATER AND SEWER AS-
BUILT INFORMATION FROM THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. ENSURE
THAT THE FIELD SURVEY AND AS-BUILT INFORMATION ACCURATELY
REFLECT THE ON-SITE CONDITIONS AND PRESENT SAID INFORMATIO
ACCORDINGLY ON THE PLANS. CLEARLY LABEL THE EXISTING SIZE,
MATERIAL TYPE, AND COUNTY PROJECT # ON ALL WATER AND SEWER
LINE WITHIN THE PLAN VIEWPORT. INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED
BY EMAILING SWAVAILABILITY@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR AT THE
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT BUILDING.
4.ADD A NOTE THAT BEYOND THE WATER METER IT IS THE
PLUMBER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSTALL THE WATER SERVICE AND
THE WATER SERVICE WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE BUILDING
INSPECTION OFFICE. MARK THE WATER SERVICE BEHIND THE METER
"PRIVATE".
5. PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL THE FIBER OPTIC LINES SHALL BE
LOCATED VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY. REVISE THE PLAN TO
REMOVE THE PENTAGRAM SYMBOL DIRECTING THE CONTRACTOR TO
PERFORM THE FIELD LOCATION. ACCURATELY SHOW THE FIELD
LOCATED LINES ON THE UTILITIES PROFILES AND PROVIDE A NOTE
INDICATING THAT THE FIBER LINES DEPICT THE ACTUAL FIELD
LOCATION.
6. REVISE THE UTILITIES PLAN TO DEPICT THE LINE THICKNESS
OF THE EXISTING 30" WATERLINE AS 2.5' WIDE IN PLAN VIEW.
7. REVISE THE UTILITIES PLAN TO SHOW PROPOSED WATERLINES
AS 4' OFF THE FACE OF CURB, TYPICALLY. FOR EXAMPLE, THE
NORTHERN WATERLINE ALIGNMENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED
ACCORDINGLY.
8. REVISE THE WATERLINE PLAN TO SHOW A 12X12" TEE RATHER
THAN A 90* BEND AT STATION 4+50 WHICH ALLOWS FOR A FUTURE
POSSIBLE CONNECTION BACK INTO HULL STREET. IN ADDITION,
PROVIDE AN EASEMENT ALONG THIS ALIGNMENT TO THE RIGHT OF
WAY LINE.
9. REVISE THE UTILITIES PLAN TO SHOW THE IRRIGATION RPZ
IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE IRRIGATION METER.
10. PROVIDE GATE VALVES ON THE WEST SIDE OF EACH TEE FOR
THE WATERLINE STUBS SERVING THE WAWA SITE.
11. PROVIDE BLOW OFFS ON EVERY WATERLINE STUB.
12. REVISE THE LOCATION OF THE NORTHERN FIRE HYDRANT
EXTENSION INTO THE PAVEMENT OF THE WAWA SITE AND SHOW THE
APPROPRIATE WATERLINE EASEMENT.
13. PROVIDE A NOTE AT THE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING
SANITARY MANHOLE AS A KOR-N-SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL.
14. FIX THE CONFLICTING WATERLINE SIZES ON THE STUB
EXTENDING TO THE WEST OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
15. REVISE THE DOMESTIC METER CONNECTION TO SHOW A 1.5"
CORP STOP AND 1.5" SERVICE LINE. THE SERVICE LINE MAY BE
UPSIZED DOWNSTREAM OF THE METER.
16. SHOW THE UTILITIES QUANTITIES AND PROVIDE A MANHOLE
COORDINATE TABLE ON THE UTILITIES PLAN.
17. THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO A COUNTY
UTILITIES CONTRACT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
PRIOR TO THE PREPARATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT,
UTILITIES MUST BE IN RECEIPT OF THE "ACCEPTED" BID PROPOSA
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY APPROVED UTILITIES
CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE PROJECT'S INFORMATIONAL SHEET
FOUND ON THE "DEVELOPER'S CHECKLIST". PLEASE SEND THOSE TW
ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF JACQUE HYDEN
(HYDENJ@CHESTERFIELD.GOV OR 804-318-8437). THE BID PROPOSA
MUST BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. BE ADVISED THAT I
THE SITE PLAN IS REVISED AND REAPPROVED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PREPARATION OR RECORDATION OF THE UTILITIES CONTRACT, THE
BID PROPOSAL SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY AND A REVISED
UTILITIES CONTRACT MAY BE NECESSARY.
13. AFTER FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBMIT THREE SETS OF
THE APPROVED PLANS DIRECTLY TO THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FO
OUR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E./748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPER'S MILL
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 4/12/16
PLAN DATED : 4/2/16
REVIEW DATE : 4/19/16
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
COMMENTS : 2ND REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : NO
PLAT PROCESS :
1. THE SANITARY SEWER NOTE 4 ON THE COVER SHEET REFERENCE
CONCRETE PIPE, WHICH IS NO LONGER ALLOWED.
2. SHEET C1.1 REFERENCES EXISTING WATER AND SEWER EASEMEN
ON THE PROPOSED PHASE 1 DRIVE, WHICH SHOULD BE PROPOSED
EASEMENTS.
3. ON SHEET C4.1, WE CAN SEE THAT THE PROPOSED WATER LINE
IS RUNNING DIRECTLY UNDER THE MIDDLE OF A ROW OF FUTURE
PARKING SPACES IN THE VICINITY OF STA 2+00 TO 4+00. PLEAS
RELOCATE THE WATER LINE TO EITHER OUTSIDE OF THE PARKING L
OR IN THE CENTER OF THE ROW.
4. ON THE UTILITY PLAN, THE 6 INCH LATERAL COMING FROM TH
MONITORING MANHOLE AND THE MONITORING MANHOLE ITSELF ARE
PRIVATE AND SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED IN AN EASEMENT. THE
LATERAL AND MANHOLE SHOULD BE LABELED AS PRIVATE AND
INDICATED AS SUCH ON THE MATERIAL QUANTITIES LIST.
5. PLEASE DELETE BOTH OF THE 1-INCH AIR RELEASE VALVES,
THEY ARE NOT DESIRED FOR MILD HIGH POINTS SUCH AS THESE.
6. PER COUNTY STANDARDS, THE TEES IN THE NEW ACCESS ROAD
THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITES SHOULD HAVE TWO GATE VALVES EAC
7. THE TEE AT STA 4+50 IS SHOWING A STUBOUT. THIS STUBOU
NEEDS TO HAVE A VALVE, 20 FT STICK OF PIPE, AND PLUG WITH
FLUSHING HYDRANT.
8. THE FIRE HYDRANT OFF STA 11+50 IS SHOWING AN EXTRA VAL
AND A TEE WITH PLUG. WE ARE NOT SURE WHAT THE PURPOSE OF
THIS STUBOUT WILL BE AND SUGGEST THAT A 90 DEGREE BEND BE
USED INSTEAD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE VALVE MUST BE DOWNSTRE
OF THE SERVICES TO AVOID INTERRUPTION SHOULD THE HYDRANT
NEED TO BE REPAIRED.
9. FLIP THE LOCATION OF THE 1.5" WATER ONLY (IRRIGATION)
SERVICE FROM THE DOMESTIC WATER. THIS WILL ALLOW THE
PRIVATE IRRIGATION METER AND RPZ TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE
EASEMENT. THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS PRIVATE O
THE MATERIALS LIST.
10. SHOW ANGLES ON THE MANHOLES TO ALLOW FOR PROPER
ORDERING.
11. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FLOW TEST INFORMATION ON C5.2 IS
NOW OVER 4 YEARS OLD. OUR NORMAL STATEMENT IS THAT THE
INFORMATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED RELIABLE FOR NO MORE THAN
YEAR. PLEASE EMAIL TERRY MAPLES AT MAPLEST@CHESTERFIELD.G
TO REQUEST AN UPDATED FLOW TEST. A QUICK HAND CALCULATION
SUGGESTS THAT THE PRESSURE ON THE REPORT MAY NOT BE CORREC
12. DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS OF THE UPDATED FLOW TEST, IT
MAY BE POSSIBLE TO USE A SMALLER DIAMETER LINE ON SITE TO
OBTAIN THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. REGARDLESS OF THIS OUTCOME
WE REQUEST THAT 12-INCH LINE BE USED FROM STA 0+00 TO THE
TEE AT 4+50 WHICH WILL ALLOW FOR A FUTURE EXTENSION. PLEA
DEDICATE 16 FT EASEMENT PARALLEL TO THE ROW FROM THE
ENTRANCE ROAD TO THE NORTHWESTERN EXTENT OF THE PROPERTY F
A FUTURE WATERLINE EXTENSION BY OTHERS.
14. WHERE IS THE PIPE ENCASEMENT PROPOSED ON THIS PROJECT
IF THERE IS NO PIPE ENCASEMENT, PLEASE REMOVE THE DETAIL
SHEET C5.3.
15. THE WATER METER SIZING FORM IS ON SHEET C5.3 HAS BEEN
CUT OFF. PLEASE SUBMIT A REGULAR LETTER SIZE FORM IN PDF
FORMAT DIRECTLY TO MIKE LARSON AT LARSONM@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
AS THIS FORM REQUIRE SIGNATURE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO NEW
CONSTRUCTION. WE WILL NEED SEPARATE METER SIZING FORMS FOR
THE DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION METERS.
16. ON THE PROFILE SHEET C5.4, CALL OUT THE VERTICAL SCAL
17. IN THREE PLACES ON THE PROFILE, THERE IS A "G. VALVE
CUP" CALLED OUT, IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE CAP? A MORE
APPROPRIATE CALL OUT WOULD BE PLUG AND FLUSHING HYDRANT.
18. WE RECOMMEND DROPPING THE ELEVATION OF THE INVERT ON
3 IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE HAVING A PIPE BEDDED IN FILL AND
ALSO SHALLOW OUT THE 16% SLOPE.
19. SHOW THE INVERT OF THE 6 INCH LATERAL CONNECTION INTO
MH 5.
20. THE THREE STORM SEWER CROSSINGS OF THE WATER LINE ARE
RESULTING IN EXCESSIVELY DEEP WATER MAINS. PLEASE USE
VERTICAL BENDS TO BRING THE PIPE BACK TO NORMAL 3.5 FT
DEPTH. THE EXTENT OF RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE NEEDS TO BE
CALCULATED AND SHOWN ON EACH DIP UNDER THE STORM SEWER.
21. THE IS A 12" GATE VALVE AT APPROXIMATELY STA 10+75 TH
IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PROFILE.
22. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE
DEVELOPER FOR HARPERS MILL (MARK SOWERS) IS PLANNING TO PA
PIEDMONT CONSTRUCTION RELOCATE THE EXISTING BLOW-OFF ON TH
30-INCH MAIN AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE SITE. THIS
RELOCATION WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EASEMENT. PLEASE
COORDINATE WITH MR. SOWERS TO SHOW THE PROPOSED RELOCATION
OF THIS BLOW OFF. .
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E./748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPER'S MILL
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 4/27/17
PLAN DATED : 4/24/17
REVIEW DATE : 5/10/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
COMMENTS : 3RD REVIEW-NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE SHOW THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE NEW IRRIGATION
*ER METER THAT WAS RECENTLY INSTALLED ON THE 12" WATERLINE
TUB OFF HULL STREET RD.
2. A VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SERVICE LINES AND HYDR
T ON THE WAWA SITE SO THAT THE HYDRANT CAN BE ISOLATED
WITHOUT DISRUPTING SERVICE.
3. ON THE MATERIALS LIST, THE IRRIGATION WATER METERS ARE
*TUALLY PUBLIC. THE DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY IS PRIVATE. IN
UDE MANHOLE INSERTS ON THE MATERIALS LIST. EACH PLUG SHOU
ALSO INCLUDE A 2" FLUSHING HYDRANT.
4. THE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE VAULT MUST BE OUTSIDE OF THE PU
IC EASEMENT.
5. WE HAVE A NEW POLICY THAT WILL BE COMING OUT IN THE NE
SPECIFICATION EDITION THAT ALLOWS FOR INTERNAL DOUBLE CHE
VALVES FOR SPRINKLER IF THE EXTENSION OF PRIVATE LINE FRO
THE PUBLIC MAIN IS APPROXIMATELY 50 FT (MINIMIZE DEAD WATE
. THESE ARE PREFERRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR LONG
TERM MAINTENANCE. IF THIS OPTION IS SELECTED, A STANDARD
BURIED GATE VALVE IS REQUIRED AT THE EASEMENT LINE WITH A
*E THAT IT IS THE POINT OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN PRIVATE AND
UBLIC LINE. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE THE FDC TO B
MOUNTED ON THE BUILDING. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH ANTHONY BATT
FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
6. A REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS REQ
RED FOR THE VIRGINIA TIRE FACILITY AND WAWA DOMESTIC FEED
IF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING A
TE IS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS INDICATING IT'S PRESENCE.
7. WE DISCOVERED AN ERROR IN THE WATER MODEL DATA
PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED. TERRY MAPLES HAS SENT A NEW FLOW TES
REPORT SHOWING SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER PRESSURE. THE
CALCULATIONS MAY SUPPORT REDUCING THE PIPE SIZE.
*
8. CALL OUT THE D.I. WATER MAIN IN FILL FROM APPROXIMATEL
*TA 9+25 TO 14+00 AS "CLASS 52".
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER/PHONE # : MIKE LARSON, P.E./748-1338
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPER'S MILL
ADDRESS :
SUBMISSION DATE : 7/18/17
PLAN DATED : 7/14/17
REVIEW DATE : 5/20/17
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
COMMENTS : 4TH REVIEW- APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW : YES
PLAT PROCESS :
1. PLEASE SUBMIT 3 SETS OF PLANS FOR USE DURING CONSTRUCT
N ONCE APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED FROM ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH 1
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE: 03/15/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 03/19/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: ONE
REVIEW DATE: 04/21/15
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WA
ALONG HULL STREET ROAD (100' FROM CENTERLINE) AND OTTERDAL
ROAD (TO ACCOMMODATE OTTERDALE RD PHASE VI AND PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS ON SITE PLAN). R/W SHALL BE DEDICATED, FREE
AND UNRESTRICTED, TO AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COUNTY.
ALSO, ANY EASEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE OTTERDALE ROAD PHASE
VI PLANS ON THE PROPERTY PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT WILL NEE
TO BE DEDICATED AS WELL.
2. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SHOW AND RECORD
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS FROM ROUTE 360 AND OTTERDALE ROAD
ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES (HAMPTON PARK COMMERCIAL
LLC AND TRACT NO. 9, LLC). THESE PROPERTIES WILL BE SERVE
BY THE PROPOSED ACCESS LOCATIONS. PROVIDE A DRAFT OF THE
PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT TO CDOT TO ENSURE A NON-EXCLUSIVE
EASEMENT IS PROVIDED TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR
THE SITE PLAN IN ADDITION TO THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSE
BY THIS SITE PLAN, OTTERDALE ROAD PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS
SHALL BE COMPLETED. THIS INCLUDES SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS AN
WB 360 DUAL LEFT TURN LANES.
REFERENCE OTTERDALE ROAD PHASE VI PLANS ON THE PLAN SHEETS
4. PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG ROUTE 360 FROM THE PROPOSED DRIV
TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. PLANS SHOWS AS FUTURE BUT
SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH THIS PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT.
5. IN LIEU OF PROVIDING SIDEWALK ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT'S
FRONTAGE ALONG OTTERDALE ROAD PER THE SIDEWALK POLICY DUE
TO TOPO ISSUES, PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH/SOUTH
PROPOSED DRIVE FROM ROUTE 360 TO HAMPTON PARK DRIVE (PER
DISCUSSION WITH PLANNING).
6. CDOT RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS:
A. PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO TH
WEST (GILL ESTATE).
B. PROVIDE A PRIVATE DRIVE AISLE CONNECTION TO THE
NORTH/SOUTH DRIVE INTO THE CONVENIENCE STORE FOR 2ND ACCES
7. ADVISORY: WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 9, LLC
PROPERTY, SIDEWALK WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FROM OTTERDALE
ROAD TO THE PROPOSED DRIVE. IF SIDEWALK IS NOT PROVIDED
ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE NORTH/SOUTH DRIVE WITH THIS
PROJECT, IT WILL NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH FUTURE PHASES
FOR THEIR FRONTAGE.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH 1
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/08/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 04/18/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: TWO
REVIEW DATE: 05/02/16
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: R/W DEDICATION, PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
A. DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG ROUTE 360 (100' FROM
CENTERLINE) AND OTTERDALE RD (ACCOMMODATE OTTERDALE PHASE
VI & IMPROVEMENTS ON SITE PLAN). R/W SHALL BE DEDICATED,
FREE & UNRESTRICTED, TO & FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COUNTY.
B. ANY EASEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE OTTERDALE ROAD PHASE
VI PLANS ON THE PROPERTY PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT WILL NEE
TO BE DEDICATED AS WELL.
C. SHOW AND RECORD PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS FROM ROUTE 360
AND OTTERDALE RD ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES (HAMPTO
PARK COMMERCIAL, LLC & TRACT NO.9, LLC). ALL PROPERTIES
WILL BE SERVED BY THE PROPOSED ACCESS LOCATIONS. PROVIDE
DRAFT OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT TO CDOT TO ENSURE A NON-
EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS PROVIDED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
D. RECORD A PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG
OTTERDALE RD THAT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
PLEASE COORDINATE WITH JOE DUTY ON THE AGREEMENT.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, ALL
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED INCLUDING OTTERDALE
ROAD PHASE VI. THIS INCLUDES SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS AND
WB 360 DUAL LEFT TURN LANES.
3. ADVISORY COMMENT: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF HAMPTON PARK
COMMERCIAL, LLC AND TRACT NO.9, LLC PROPERTIES WILL NEED T
PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG OTTERDALE RD & HAMPTON PARK DR.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
EMAIL: ADAMSST@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH 1
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE: 04/24/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 05/02/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: THREE
REVIEW DATE: 05/11/17
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
PLAT PROCESSING: SIDEWALK/PED ESMT, PRIVATE ACCESS ESM
.
1. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, PROVIDE SIDEWALK/PED
EASEMENT FOR OTTERDALE RD SIDEWALK LOCATED OUTSIDE OF
PUBLIC R/W BETWEEN 360 & WAWA ACCESS. EASEMENT SHALL ALLOW
FOR PUBLIC USE BUT PRIVATE MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK.
.
2. PROVIDE A PDF OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH SHARED ACCESS
ESMT (DB 11428 PG 429). IT'S DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE
LIMITS OF ESMT FROM PLAN (C1.2). CDOT REQUESTED THIS ESMT
BE PROVIDED TO MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS TO ENSURE SHARED
ACCESS WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PARCELS.
.
3. ADVISORY COMMENT: UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WILL UTILIZE
ACCESS POINTS PROVIDED BY THIS PLAN TO ADJACENT ROADS &
PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG OTTERDALE RD & HAMPTON PARK DR.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH 1
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE: 07/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 07/24/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FOUR (KIRTLEY)
REVIEW DATE: 07/26/17
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
PLAT PROCESSING: SIDEWALK/PED ESMT, PRIVATE ACCESS ESM
.
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL PENDING SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN
EASEMENT FOR OTTERDALE RD SIDEWALK LOCATED OUTSIDE OF
PUBLIC R/W BETWEEN 360 & WAWA ACCESS. EASEMENT SHALL ALLOW
FOR PUBLIC USE BUT PRIVATE MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK.
.
ADVISORY COMMENT: UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WILL UTILIZE
ACCESS POINTS PROVIDED BY THIS PLAN TO ADJACENT ROADS &
PROVIDE SIDEWALK ALONG OTTERDALE RD & HAMPTON PARK DR.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: CHESTERFIELD TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN
REVIEWER/PHONE#: STEVEN J. ADAMS, P.E. (804)751-4461
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH 1
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE: 08/11/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 08/21/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: FIVE (KIRTLEY)
REVIEW DATE: 08/22/17
RECOMMENDATION: SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL
PLAT PROCESSING: SIDEWALK/PED ESMT
.
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL PENDING SIDEWALK/PEDESTRIAN
EASEMENT FOR OTTERDALE RD SIDEWALK LOCATED OUTSIDE OF
PUBLIC R/W BETWEEN 360 & WAWA ACCESS.
.
ADVISORY COMMENT: UNDEVELOPED PARCELS WILL UTILIZE
ACCESS POINTS PROVIDED BY THIS PLAN & PROVIDE SIDEWALK
ALONG OTTERDALE RD & HAMPTON PARK DR.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT - - PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE # - - AMY SOMERVELL 751-4321
NAME OF PLAN - - - - - SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL
COUNTY SITE PLAN # - - 15PR0197
SUBMITTAL # - - - - - 1
LATEST PLAN DATE - - - 3-22-15
DEP'T REC'D DATE - - - 3-17-15
REVIEW DATE - - - - - 4-13-15
RECOMMENDATION - - - - CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW - - - - - NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN - - - - - - - REQUIRED - NOT SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION / HOSEBIB PLAN - REQUIRED - NOT SUBMITTED
1.PUT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SITE PLAN NUMBER
15PR0197 IN THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH SHEET.
(THIS NUMBER IS IN ADDITION TO THE UTILITIES DEPT
PROJECT NUMBER)
2. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE DUMPSTER SCREEN AND GATES.
3. CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING
SPACES TO 27 (1 PER 200 SQ - 5330/200=26.65 ROUNDED
UP 27 SPACES).
4. IT APPEARS BOLLARDS MAY BE BLOCKING THE
HANDICAP ACCESS TO THE BUILDING - CLARIFY.
5. A.- THE SIDEWALK SHALL CONTINUE ALONG THE
ENTIRE FRONTAGE OF HULL STREET ROAD.
B.- SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED ALONG OTERDALE
ROAD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SIDEWALK
POLICY. IT APPEARS AN EXCEPTION TO THE
SIDEWALK LOCATION HAS BEEN CONSIDERED
BY CDOT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION
ALONG THE INTERNAL DRIVES BACK OUT TO
OTTERDALE ROAD. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITH THE DRIVE/ROAD CONSTRUCTION
MEETING INTENT OF THE SIDEWALK POLICY. (THIS
NOTE IS BASED ON EMAIL CORRESPONDANCE BETWEEN
CDOT AND MARC GREENBERG DATED MAY 13, 2014)
6. PROVIDE DETALIS FOR THE PROPOSED RETAINING
WALL.
7. THE PHASING IS NOT CLEAR WITH THIS PLAN. IT
IS SHOWN AS PHASE 1 AND 2 TO INCLUDE POSSIBLE
FUTURE RETAIL. BE ADVISED IF PHASING THE PROJECT
CLEAR PHASING LINES SHALL BE SHOWN AND ALL
CONSTRUCTION PLAN DOCUMENTATION IS
REQUIRED. THE PHASES SHALL BE
CLEAR AS TO USE AND LAYOUT AS A PHASE
PROJECT STANDS ALONE. PROJECT MARKED AS "FUTURE "
IS NOT REVIEWED OR VESTED IN ANY WAY AND WILL
REQUIRE PLAN SUBMITTAL WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED.
8. HAVE YOU HAD ANY DISSCUSSION WITH THE ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNER, C.R. GILL ESTATE, IN REGARDS TO
SHARED ACCESS (711-669-8204)?
9. THE SIGNAGE SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAN IS NOT
BEING REVIEWED. SIGN PERMITS ARE BY SEPARATE
APPLICATION.
10. IT IS SUPRISING THE PLAN SHOWS ONLY ONE
CONNECTION TO ADJOINING RIVATE DRIVES. HAVE YOU
CONSIDERED MAKING THE SECOND CONNECTION
THROUGH THE "PHASE 2" PARKING AREA?
11. IS THEIR ANY ISSUE WITH THE GRADING OFF
YOUR SITE ONTO GPIN 7136690016 - TRACT NO 9 LLC
12. PROVIDE SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL CORNERS OF THE
HANDICAP PARKING SPACES. SHOW THAT HANDICAP PARKING
DOES NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. SHOW LOCATION
OF HANDICAP PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ON THE GRADING
PLANS FOR FULL REVIEW. ACCESSIBLE ROUTES MUST NOT EXCEED
5% SLOPE WITH A 2.083% CROSS-SLOPE. (ADAAG)
13. ON THE SITE LAYOUT SHEETS SHOW THE PARKING BLOCK
LOCATIONS. PROVIDE PARKING BLOCKS AT EACH HANDICAP PARKING
SPACE AND WHERE NEEDED TO PROVIDE AISLE WIDTH.
LANDSCAPING:
14. GRADING WITHIN THE REQUIRED TREE SAVE AREA
ALONG HULL STREET RD AND OTTERDALE ROADS
WILL REQUIRE A LANDSCAPE PLAN. AS
DISCUSSED, THE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOULD BE
BY HIGGINS & GERSTENMAIER.
A. PER SEC. 19-264(A), THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY
THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR
LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
B. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTING FOR EACH TREE
REMOVED.
15. PER SEC. 19-517(A) AND (B), AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WHETHER THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS
A CONCEPTUAL OR DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL
SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER - SHOW SEPARATE TABULAR CALCULATION OF
REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PLANTINGS FOR EACH YARD AND/OR
BUFFER.
C. IF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF
ALL PLANTS AND IDENTIFY EACH AS LARGE OR SMALL DECIDUOUS
TREES, EVERGREEN TREES, MEDIUM SHRUBS, AND SMALL SHRUBS/
GROUNDCOVERS. THESE MAY BE KEYED TO A CONCEPTUAL PLANT
LIST SHOWING THESE PLANT TYPES AND THE QUANTITIES OF EACH.
D. IF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SPECIFY THE
PLANTS AND THEIR REQUIRED SIZES FOR EACH OF THE PLANT TYPE
REQUIRED PER SEC. 19-518(B).
E. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
LABEL AS SUCH. SEE SEC. 19-518(D) REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TREE PRESERVATION.
F. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL IS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR ACCESS AND/OR UTILITIES THAT RUN
GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK. THESE TREE
SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL, GRADING
AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
G. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS
REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE SETBAC
AREA.
H. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR
REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL,
GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
I. PER SEC. 19-518(C), THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE
COMPOSITION AND MIX OF VEGETATION.
J. PER SEC. 19-518(C), DECORATIVE WALLS AND FENCES,
HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, MAY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS AS DETERMINED
AT TIME OF SITE PLAN OR SCHEMATIC APPROVAL.
K. PROVIDE STANDARD COUNTY LANDSCAPE NOTES ON DETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE AND
IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING.
16. PER SEC. 19-518(E), ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION SYST
FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE
WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE
SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY
DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
LIGHTING:
17. PER SEC. 19-508.3, SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR
ADDITIONALLY ON A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION OF A
EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, THE BUILDING, OR
ON THE GROUND AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR EACH
LIGHT FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
18. PER SEC. 19-508.3, UNLESS A PROJECT IS APPROVED
FOR ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-STYLE LIGHTING, ALL LIGHT FIXTUR
SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHT SOUR
FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH,
TND, OR R-MF DISTRICT OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
ARCHITECTURE;
19. PER SEC. 19-264(D)(18), PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF
RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND
ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF
OR ON THE GROUND.
20. FOR ANY PROJECT WITH MORE THAN ONE BUILDING, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE OVERALL
ARCHITECTURAL THEME. PER SEC. 19-570(A), THE THEME SHALL
DESCRIBE HOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS, COLORS, ARCHITECTURAL
STYLE AND BUILDING SCALE SHALL BE USED TO DEVELOP A
CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR THE PROJECT.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY IS REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS
WITHIN THE PROJECT.
21. PER SEC. 19-570(B), SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING
22. PER SEC. 19-507(C), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2 AND
I-3 DISTRICTS. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE
FULLY SCREENED.
---------------------------------------------------------
REVIEW DEPARTMENT - - PLANNING
REVIEWER / PHONE # - - WHIT KIRTLEY 706-7691
NAME OF PLAN - - - - - SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL
COUNTY SITE PLAN # - - 15PR0197
SUBMITTAL # - - - - - 2
LATEST PLAN DATE - - - 4/8/16
DEP'T REC'D DATE - - - 4/12/16
REVIEW DATE - - - - - 5/10/16
RECOMMENDATION - - - - CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
TABLE REVIEW - - - - - NO
LANDSCAPE PLAN - - - - - - - REQUIRED - NOT SUBMITTED
IRRIGATION / HOSEBIB PLAN - REQUIRED - NOT SUBMITTED
ELEVATIONS - REQUIRE - NOT SUBMITTED
2. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE DUMPSTER SCREEN AND GATES.
6. PROVIDE DETALIS FOR THE PROPOSED RETAINING
WALL.
7. NOTE: THE PORTION OF THE PROJECT MARKED AS "FUTURE "
IS NOT REVIEWED OR VESTED IN ANY WAY AND WILL
REQUIRE PLAN SUBMITTAL WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED.
9. THE SIGNAGE SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAN IS NOT
BEING REVIEWED. SIGN PERMITS ARE BY SEPARATE
APPLICATION. REMOVE SHEETS DET 2
DET 4
10. SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY
ACCESS DRIVE THROUGH PHASE 2. AS PROPSED THE
REQUIRED WIDTH SHALL BE 20 FEET FOR TWO WAY ACCESS.
NOTE: THE REQUIRED WIDTH WILL INCREASE ONCE IMPROVEMENTS
ARE BUILT IN PHASE TO IN ACCORDANCE WITH 19.1-238 (C)
6. REGARDING THE GRADING OFF YOUR SITE ONTO
GPIN 7136690016 - TRACT NO 9 LLC. PROVIDE A LETTER OF
AGREEMENT FROM THE OWNER AND AN EASEMENT ALLOWING FOR
THE OFFSITE GRADING.PROVIDE.
LANDSCAPING:
14. GRADING WITHIN THE REQUIRED TREE SAVE AREA
ALONG HULL STREET RD AND OTTERDALE ROADS
WILL REQUIRE A LANDSCAPE PLAN. AS
DISCUSSED, THE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOULD BE
BY HIGGINS & GERSTENMAIER.
A. PER SEC. 19-264(A), THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY
THE STATE REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NURSERYMAN, OR
LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PREPARING THE PLAN.
B. REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK OR BUFFER
WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SHALL RESULT IN TWO TREES BEING PLANTING FOR EACH TREE
REMOVED.
15. PER SEC. 19-517(A) AND (B), AT LEAST A CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF
FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WHETHER THE PLAN SUBMITTED IS
A CONCEPTUAL OR DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL
SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
A. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
AND SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS.
B. WIDTH OF PERIMETER YARDS AND BUFFERS AND THE
ORDINANCE STANDARD FOR THE PLANTING OF EACH YARD
AND/OR BUFFER - SHOW SEPARATE TABULAR CALCULATION OF
REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PLANTINGS FOR EACH YARD AND/OR
BUFFER.
C. IF A CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF
ALL PLANTS AND IDENTIFY EACH AS LARGE OR SMALL DECIDUOUS
TREES, EVERGREEN TREES, MEDIUM SHRUBS, AND SMALL SHRUBS/
GROUNDCOVERS. THESE MAY BE KEYED TO A CONCEPTUAL PLANT
LIST SHOWING THESE PLANT TYPES AND THE QUANTITIES OF EACH.
D. IF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SUBMITTED, SPECIFY THE
PLANTS AND THEIR REQUIRED SIZES FOR EACH OF THE PLANT TYPE
REQUIRED PER SEC. 19-518(B).
E. SHOW ALL AREAS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND CLEARLY
LABEL AS SUCH. SEE SEC. 19-518(D) REGARDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TREE PRESERVATION.
F. ALL TREES WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
SHALL BE RETAINED UNLESS REMOVAL IS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE VEHICULAR ACCESS AND/OR UTILITIES THAT RUN
GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR THROUGH THE SETBACK. THESE TREE
SAVE AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL, GRADING
AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
G. HEALTHY EXISTING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD PLANTING
REQUIREMENTS SO LONG AS EXISTING VEGETATION IS
REASONABLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE LENGTH OF THE SETBAC
AREA.
H. ANY EXISTING TREES IN SETBACKS THAT ARE APPROVED FOR
REMOVAL SHALL BE SHOWN AS SUCH ON THE EROSION CONTROL,
GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
I. PER SEC. 19-518(C), THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE
COMPOSITION AND MIX OF VEGETATION.
J. PER SEC. 19-518(C), DECORATIVE WALLS AND FENCES,
HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES, MAY REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PLANT MATERIALS AS DETERMINED
AT TIME OF SITE PLAN OR SCHEMATIC APPROVAL.
K. PROVIDE STANDARD COUNTY LANDSCAPE NOTES ON DETAILED
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L. EACH REVIEW OF DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS AFTER
APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN INCURS A RESUBMITTAL FEE AND
IS TRACKED AS A SITE PLAN REVIEW UNTIL APPROVED.
APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING.
16. PER SEC. 19-518(E), ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH A READILY AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY. THE
COUNTY ACCEPTS EITHER YARD HYDRANTS AND/OR HOSE BIBS
WITHIN 100 FEET OF ALL NEW PLANTINGS OR AN IRRIGATION SYST
FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PLANTINGS.
THE COUNTY ALSO ACCEPTS A 3-YEAR CONTINUOUS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT WITH A REPUTABLE LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE COMPANY. CERTAIN AREAS DIFFICULT TO SERVE
WITH WATER MAY BE PLANTED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT NATIVE
SPECIES. INSURE WATER INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED ON UTILITY
DEPARTMENT METER SIZING FORMS.
LIGHTING:
17. PER SEC. 19-508.3, SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR
ADDITIONALLY ON A SEPARATE LIGHTING PLAN THE LOCATION OF A
EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING MOUNTED ON POLES, THE BUILDING, OR
ON THE GROUND AND HAVE THEM KEYED TO CUT SHEETS FOR EACH
LIGHT FIXTURE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
18. PER SEC. 19-508.3, UNLESS A PROJECT IS APPROVED
FOR ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-STYLE LIGHTING, ALL LIGHT FIXTUR
SHALL BE OF A DIRECTIONAL TYPE THAT SHIELDS THE LIGHT SOUR
FROM DIRECT VIEW FROM ANY ADJOINING, A, R, R-TH, MH,
TND, OR R-MF DISTRICT OR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
ARCHITECTURE
19. PER SEC. 19-264(D)(18), PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF
RENDERINGS/ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS WITH ALL BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLORS IDENTIFIED, LOCATIONS OF JUNCTION AND
ACCESS BOXES SHOWN, AND HOW ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED WHETHER IT IS MOUNTED ON THE ROOF
OR ON THE GROUND.
20. FOR ANY PROJECT WITH MORE THAN ONE BUILDING, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE OVERALL
ARCHITECTURAL THEME. PER SEC. 19-570(A), THE THEME SHALL
DESCRIBE HOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS, COLORS, ARCHITECTURAL
STYLE AND BUILDING SCALE SHALL BE USED TO DEVELOP A
CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR THE PROJECT.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY IS REQUIRED BETWEEN BUILDINGS
WITHIN THE PROJECT.
21. PER SEC. 19-570(B), SHOW THAT JUNCTION AND ACCESS
BOXES ARE EITHER SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING
22. PER SEC. 19-507(C), MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER
ROOF-TOP OR GROUND LEVEL, SHALL BE SHIELDED AND SCREENED
FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND DESIGNED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING EXCEPT AS ALLOWED IN I-2 AND
I-3 DISTRICTS. SHOW ALL UNITS IN RELIEF BEHIND PARAPETS
AND/OR WALLS USED FOR SCREENING TO SHOW THAT UNITS ARE
FULLY SCREENED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : NANCY PARKER 751-4319
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 3/2015
RECEIVED DATE : 3/19/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : 4/6/15
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. COORDINATE POINTS BASED ON THE VIRGINIA STATE PLANE
COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 ARE NOT PRESENT. TWO POINTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE
SITE BOUNDARY.
2. THE SITE BOUNDARY SURVEY IS MISSING. PLEASE
SUPPLY METES AND BOUNDS FOR EVERY SEGMENT ALONG THE
TRAVERSE TO INCLUDE CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE FOR ALL
NON-TANGENT CURVES.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: IST / GIS
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
ADDRESS :
LATEST PLAN DATE : 04/08/2016
RECEIVED DATE : 04/13/2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : 04/26/2016
RECOMMENDATION : APPROVED
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : 4/24/17
RECEIVED DATE : 5/5/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 3
REVIEW DATE : 5/22/17
ADDRESS : PENDING
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. WAITING FOR LOCATION AND DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : 7/14/17
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : 7/14/17
RECEIVED DATE : 7/24/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 7/27/17
ADDRESS : PENDING
STATUS : NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. BECAUSE THE STREET NAMING REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT ANY
STREET OR ACCESS ROAD THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO MORE THAN TW
BUILDINGS BE NAMED, PLEASE REQUEST STREET NAMES THROUGH RI
MOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION FOR
THE TWO PROPOSED DRIVES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE AD
ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED FOR LATER PHASES. THE
VA TIRE SHOP AND THE CONVENIENCE STORE WILL BE ADDRESSED E
OFF THE EAST WEST PROPOSED DRIVE.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: GIS + HOUSE NUMBERING
REVIEWER : AMY JOHANSON 768-7549
PROJECT NAME : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
CASE NUMBER : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : 7/14/17
RECEIVED DATE : 7/24/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 4
REVIEW DATE : 7/27/17
ADDRESS : PENDING
STATUS : SUBSTANITALLY APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1. BECAUSE THE STREET NAMING REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT ANY
STREET OR ACCESS ROAD THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO MORE THAN TW
BUILDINGS BE NAMED, PLEASE REQUEST STREET NAMES
THROUGH RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
FOR THE TWO PROPOSED DRIVES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT
BECAUSE ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED FOR LATER PHASES.
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: NANCY PARKER
PHONE NUMBER: 751-4319
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0197
NAME OF PLAN:SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
DATE OF REVIEW:4/6/15 REVIEW # 1
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) NEW UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE REGULATIONS ISSUED
IN FEBRUARY 2015 NO LONGER ALLOW FOR INDIVIDUAL DOOR MAIL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REGULATIONS AND THE EQUIPMENT
THAT MUST BE PROVIDED FOR MAIL DELIVERY.
2) INDICATE WHETHER YOU PLAN TO REQUEST STREET NAMES FOR
THE TWO PROPOSED DRIVES ON THE PLAN.
3) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (4) NEEDS
BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE
PLAN NUMBER 15PR0197 IF THE PROPOSED DRIVES ARE TO BE
NAMED.
4) STREET NAMES MUST BE APPROVED THROUGH RICHMOND
REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION STREET NAME
CLEARINGHOUSE AND/OR CRATER PLANNING DISTRICT
COMMISSION STREET NAME CLEARING HOUSE WITH
VERIFICATION SUBMITTED TO NANCY PARKER PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL.
5) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT
SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
6) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
==========================================================
==========================================================
DEPARTMENT REVIEW: IST / HOUSE NUMBERING SECTION
REVIEWER: AMY JOHANSON
PHONE NUMBER: 768-7549
CASE NUMBER: 15PR0197
NAME OF PLAN:SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PH I
ADDRESS: NO ADDRESSES ASSIGNED YET
DATE OF REVIEW:4/26/16 REVIEW # 2
STATUS: HOUSE NUMBERING NOT APPROVED
PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
CONCERNING THE COMMENTS BELOW.
1) MUST PROVIDE NAMES FOR THE TWO PROPOSED DRIVES
ON THE PLAN.
2) A STREET SIGN FEE OF $150.00 PER INTERSECTION (4) NEEDS
BE PAID TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL SO THAT STREET SIGNS CAN BE
MANUFACTURED. PAYMENT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND REFERENCED TO SITE
PLAN NUMBER 15PR0197 IF THE PROPOSED DRIVES ARE TO BE
NAMED.
3) STREET NAMES MUST BE APPROVED THROUGH RICHMOND
REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION STREET NAME
CLEARINGHOUSE AND/OR CRATER PLANNING DISTRICT
COMMISSION STREET NAME CLEARING HOUSE WITH
VERIFICATION SUBMITTED TO NANCY PARKER PRIOR TO
SUBSTANTIAL APPROVAL.
4) LOCATION OF STREET ADDRESS SIGN IS NOT SHOWN.
(THE ADDRESS CAN BE PART OF YOUR MONUMENT SIGN.
THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE
SIGN. IF YOU ARE USING THE MONUMENT
SIGN FOR THE ADDRESS, A DETAIL OF THE MONUMENT SIGN
NEEDS TO BE ON THE SITE PLAN.)
F
5) SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT THE ADDRESS SIGN IS TO BE
MADE OF. (MATERIAL TO BE MORE DURABLE THAN WOOD).
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PHASE I
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
ADDRESS: 16001 HULL STREET ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 3/15/15
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 3/19/15
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 3/19/15
RECOMMENDATION: NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. ADD A NOTE TO THE UTILITY PLAN STATING:
"THE 4.5 INCH DISCHARGE OF THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL FACE
IN THE DIRECTION INDICATED BY THE ARROW ON THE PLAN."
2. ADD AN ARROW TO THE FIRE HYDRANT INDICATING WHICH
DIRECTION IT SHALL FACE.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PHASE I
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
ADDRESS: 16001 HULL STREET ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/8/16
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 4/15/16
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 1ST REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 4/15/16
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PHASE I
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
ADDRESS: 16001 HULL STREET ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 4/24/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 5/2/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 3RD REVIEW
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. PROVIDE THE DETAIL FOR THE PLAN AND ELEVATION
(SECTION)VIEW OF THE FIR-3 DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY VAULT
AS PUBLISHED BY THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT.
2. PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM
RUN-IN AND STUB UP, INCLUDING ALL APPLICABLE NOTES. SEE:
HTTP://WWW.CHESTERFIELD.GOV/PUBLICSAFETY/FIRE/PLANS.ASP
FOR A COPY OF THE DETAILS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PHASE I
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
ADDRESS: 16001 HULL STREET ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 7/14/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 7/20/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 4TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 7/20/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
REVIEW DEPARTMENT: FIRE
REVIEWER/PHONE#: ANTHONY BATTEN / 717-6167
EMAIL: BATTENA@CHESTERFIELD.GOV
NAME OF PLAN: SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL PHASE I
SITE PLAN NUMBER: 15PR0197
ADDRESS: 16001 HULL STREET ROAD
LATEST PLAN DATE: 8/11/17
DEPT. REC'D. DATE: 8/21/17
SUBMITTAL NUMBER: 5TH REVIEW
REVIEW DATE: 8/25/17
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED
TABLE REVIEW: YES
PLAT PROCESSING: YES
COMMENTS:
1. THE REVISED PLAN IS APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL, PHASE I
ADDRESS : 7500 OTTERDALE ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : MARCH 15, 2015
DEPT. REC'D DATE : MARCH 20, 2015
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 1
REVIEW DATE : APRIL 7, 2015
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND / OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS
(E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES, GROUND WATER
AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS WILL NO
RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS
DOCUMENTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TH
COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE STORMWATER REGULATION
ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES THAT OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1
2014 MAY USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
SPECIFIED IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO
PERMIT CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT
LISTED UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
B. NAME OF RECEIVING CHANNEL/WATERS
C. VAHU6 FOUR DIGIT WATERSHED CODE
04. BOOT CONNECTORS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR ALL PLASTIC PIPES THAT TIE
INTO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. (CL-G&D 21)
05. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ALONG ANY STORMWATER
CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH RECEIVES RUNOFF FROM OFFSITE,
FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR REQUIRES IMPROVEMENTS ON
A DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY OWNER. (CL-G&D 29)
06. A SEPARATE PLAN SHEET MUST BE ADDED WHICH ONLY SHOWS
ALL PROPOSED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY TO BE
DEDICATED. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED.
(CL-G&D 30)
07. IF PHASING IS DESIRED, PHASE LINES MUST BE SHOWN AND
A PHASED EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND NARRATIVE MUST BE
PROVIDED. (CL-G&D 31)
08. BITUMINOUS CURBING (STD. MC-3A) IS REQUIRED ALONG THE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT SEPARATING THE DIFFERENT PHASES OF TH
PROJECT. (CL-G&D 32)
09. DUE TO THE HIGH POSSIBILITY FOR SPILLS OF OIL, GAS,
ANTI-FREEZE, ETC. ALL DRAINAGE FROM THE FUELING AREA
MUST DRAIN TO AN OIL-GRIT SEPARATOR FOLLOWED BY A
STORMFILTER (OR SIMILAR SYSTEM THAT IS DESIGNED TO
REMOVE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS). DESIGN CALCULATIONS MUST B
SUBMITTED AND DETAILS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS FOR BOTH
THE SEPARATOR AND FILTER. (CL-G&D 37)
10. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
11. NOTE THAT THE VSMP PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED TO STAY
ACTIVE TO MEET THE LIMITS OF APPLICABILITY FOR THE
FUTURE PHASES. ANY AREA NOT COVERED UNDER THE VSMP AND
THAT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANDFATHERING
WILL HAVE TO BE DESIGNED FOR PART IIB OF THE CURRENT
STORMWATER STANDARDS.
12. NOTE THAT ANY AREAS LISTED AS FUTURE WERE NOT REVIEWED
WITH THESE PLANS AND WILL NOT BE APPROVED WITH THESE
PLANS.
13. RCP PIPE IS REQUIRED WITHIN ALL PROPOSED DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS.
14. ON SHEET C4.1:
1) PROVIDE TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS FOR THE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL.
2) PROVIDE INVERT INFORMATION FOR STRUCTURES 10A, 10B,
AND 9A.
3) IT APPEARS THAT STRUCTURE 41 IS OVER 12' DEEP. THI
STRUCTURE SHOULD BE A DI-3BB AND REQUIRE VDOT SL-1.
4) LABEL THE PARKING NOT ASSOCIATED WITH PHASE I AS
FUTURE.
5) IT APPEARS THAT STRUCTURE 50 IS OVER 8' DEEP AND
SHOULD BE A DI-3BB, UPDATE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
6) IT APPEARS THAT STRUCTURE 62 IS OVER 8' DEEP AND
SHOULD BE A DI-3BB, UPDATE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
7) STRUCTURES 11 AND 11A APPEAR TO BE MISSING FROM THE
TABLE.
8) IN PLAN VIEW, THE LABEL FOR STRUCTURE 50 APPEARS TO
BE POINTING TO THE PIPE.
9) INCLUDE EXISTING STRUCTURES AND PIPES IN THE TABLE.
15. ON SHEET C4.2:
1) IT APPEARS THAT THE GRADING NEAR THE PROPOSED TURN
LANE AND SIDEWALK FOR ROUTE 360 IS CONVEYING WATER
TOWARD THE ROAD. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT A DITCH OR
OTHER ENGINEERING DESIGN BE PROVIDED BEHIND THE
SIDEWALK TO HELP MINIMIZE THE RUNOFF DISCHARGING
OVER THE SIDEWALK WHICH COULD BE A SAFETY HAZARD.
2) PROVIDE DETAIL ON HOW THE RUNOFF FROM HAMPTON PARK
DRIVE AND THE RIGHT-TURN LANE IS TO BE CONVEYED TO
THE DRAINAGE DITCH ON THE NORTH SIDE. IT IS
SUGGESTED THAT A PG-2 OR OTHER DESIGN BE IMPLEMENTE
TO PREVENT EROSION OF THE DITCH SIDE SLOPE DUE TO
STORMWATER RUNOFF.
3) STRUCTURE 64A DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE STORM SCHEDULE
4) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE MODIFICATION OF STRUCTURE 74
5) SHOW AND LABEL STRUCTURES 20-35, 20-36, 20-17,
20-30, AND 20-29 ON THE PLANS.
6) CLARIFY IF THE VDOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEAR STRUCTUR
80 IS EXISTING OR PROPOSED.
16. ON SHEET C4.3:
1) IN THE PROFILE FOR 1 TO 64, IT APPEARS THAT THE
WATERLINE IS ENCOUNTERED CLOSER TO STRUCTURE 1 THAN
THE SANITARY SEWER; HOWEVER, ON THE PLANS IT SHOWS
THE SANITARY SEWER BEING CLOSER TO STRUCTURE 1.
VERIFY UTILITY LINES AND CLEARANCES.
2) THE RIM ELEVATION OF STRUCTURE 3 DOES NOT MATCH WHA
IS IN THE STRUCTURE TABLE. VERIFY RIM ELEVATIONS.
3) LENGTH OF PIPE 6A DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE
STRUCTURE TABLE. VERIFY LENGTHS.
4) THE INVERT OUT FOR STRUCTURE 9A DOES NOT APPEAR TO
MATCH THE STRUCTURE TABLE. VERIFY INVERTS.
5) THE PIPE GEOMETRY FOR 60A DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY GEOMETRY.
6) THE RIM ELEVATION FOR 61 DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY RIM ELEVATION.
7) THE PIPE GEOMETRY FOR 61A DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY GEOMETRY.
17. ON SHEET C4.4:
1) INDICATE THE TOP OF STRUCTURE FOR STRUCTURE 90.
2) THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 61 AND 62 IS LABELED AS
"X".
3) LABEL THE CLEARANCE OVER THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
WATERLINES.
18. ON SHEET C6.1:
1) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE AREA FOR THE EXISTING CULVERT ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF HAMPTON PARK DRIVE.
2) IT APPEARS DRAINAGE AREA 10 DOES NOT GO THROUGH THE
HIGH POINT OF THE AREA.
3) IT APPEARS THAT DRAINAGE AREAS 2 AND 11 DO NOT
INCLUDE RUNOFF FROM DRAINAGE AREA 02 THAT WOULD BE
ENTERING THE SYSTEM.
4) IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT DRAINAGE AREA 11 INCLUDES
RUNOFF FROM DRAINAGE AREA 10.
5) LABEL DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION FOR THE LARGE AREA
TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROJECT DRAINING TO THE DITCH
RUNNING ALONG OTTERDALE ROAD. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD TO
BE DRAINAGE AREA 64 FOR THIS REVIEW.
6) IN DRAINAGE AREA 64, USE 0.35 FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
AND DESIGN FOR ULTIMATE LAND USE.
7) THE DRAINAGE AREAS FOR 1 AND 4 AND DO NOT APPEAR TO
MATCH THE GRADING SHOWN ON C4.1. VERIFY THE
DRAINAGE AREAS AND SHOW THE PROPOSED GRADING FOR
THIS AREA.
8) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR 05 APPEARS TO HAVE AN INCREAS
IN IMPERVIOUS AREA. PROVIDE SPREAD AND STORMWATER
CALCULATIONS FOR THE STRUCTURE RECEIVING THIS AREA.
9) THE C-VALUE FOR DRAINAGE AREA 61 DOES NOT APPEAR TO
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE IMPERVIOUSNESS OF THE RIP-RAP
CHANNEL.
10) SHOW AND LABEL DRAINAGE AREA 65 ON THE PLAN.
11) PROVIDE TIMES-OF-CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS FOR
TIMES GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES.
19. IF TIMBERING IS REQUIRED ON THE PROJECT, IT SHOULD BE
INCORPORATED INTO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN / NARRATIVE
AND SHOULD NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A
LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE
APPROVED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. (CL-EC 2)
20. A NOTE MUST BE ADDED TO THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
STATING THAT THE VSMP CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OPERATOR
AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR (OR AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE) MUST ATTEND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION
MEETING.
21. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST BE GRAPHICALLY SHOWN ON
THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTED AS WIDE AS THE PROPOSED
PERMANENT ENTRANCE. (CL-EC 9)
22. THE SEDIMENT BASIN(S) MUST BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STD.& SPEC. 3.14 OF THE VESCH. SEDIMENT BASIN
DESIGN CALCULATION SHEETS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL
DESIGN DATA ADDRESSED AND SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
INCLUDED ON THE PLANS. (CL-EC 11)
23. SAFETY FENCE (STD. & SPEC 3.01) IS REQUIRED AROUND ALL
SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SEDIMENT BASINS. (CL-EC 15)
24. A MINIMUM 10' BREAK MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE LOW AREA O
THE SILT FENCE . THE BREAK MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH
STONE TO WITHIN 1' OF THE TOP OF THE SILT FENCE TO
SERVE AS AN OVERFLOW. A DETAIL MUST BE SHOWN.
(CL-EC 16)
25. THE FOLLOWING NOTE(S) MUST BE ADDED TO OR ADJACENT TO
THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: (CL-EC 42)
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
2. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
26. ON SHEET C2.1:
1) AMEND THE NOTE, TO BE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT, PERMISSION TO GRADE OFF-SITE
MUST BE OBTAINED.
2) PROVIDE A 10' WIDE TOP WIDTH FOR THE BASIN.
3) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR THE DIVERSION DIKES.
4) LOCATE THE SOIL STOCKPILE AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE ESC
MEASURES.
5) CONFIRM WITH VDOT THAT A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OFF
OF HULL STREET ROAD IS ACCEPTABLE. IT IS PREFERRED
THE ENTRANCE COME OFF OF HAMPTON PARK DRIVE OR
OTTERDALE DRIVE.
6) CLARIFY HOW THE WATER FROM THE EXISTING RIP-RAP
CHANNEL IS TO ENTER THE SEDIMENT BASIN.
7) PROVIDE FLOW LENGTH CALCULATIONS FOR THE BASIN.
8) IT IS DIFFICULT TO SEE WHERE THE RISER STRUCTURE AN
GRADING ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BASIN DUE TO THE
AMOUNT OF LINEWORK IN THE AREA. ADJUST THE
LINEWEIGHTS/BOLDNESS OF THE LINES OR PROVIDE AN
INSERT DETAIL OF THE BASIN.
9) PROVIDE CULVERT INLET PROTECTION FOR THE 30" RCP TO
THE WEST OF THE PROJECT UNDER HAMPTON PARK DRIVE.
10) PROVIDE CULVERT INLET PROTECTION FOR THE 15" DRIVE
CMP CULVERT ALONG HAMPTON PARK DRIVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST OF THE PROJECT (WEST OF OTTERDALE ROAD).
11) IT APPEARS THERE ARE BENDS IN THE OUTFALL PIPE FOR
THE SEDIMENT BASIN. PROVIDE JUNCTION STRUCTURES A
THESE BENDS OR REMOVE THE BENDS.
12) THE OUTFALL PIPE IS SHOWN TO BE AN HDPE PIPE.
PIPES WITHIN THE EMBANKMENT OF A BASIN MUST BE
O-RING RCP.
27. ON SHEET C2.2:
1) PROVIDE BLANKET AND MATTING ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR
STEEPER.
2) ALONG THE RIGHT-TURN LANE ON HAMPTON PARK DRIVE, IT
APPEARS INLET PROTECTION IS CALLED OUT FOR MANHOLE
STRUCTURES ALONG THE TAPER. VERIFY THESE ARE INDEE
TO BE MANHOLES AND REMOVE THE PROTECTION AS
REQUIRED.
3) PROVIDE BLANKET AND MATTING FOR THE GRADING ON THE
UPSTREAM SIDE OF PIPE 80A.
4) PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURE 74.
5) CLARIFY IF THE EXISTING RIP-RAP DITCH TO THE NORTH
OF THE PROJECT IS TO BE DEMOLISHED.
6) IT APPEARS THAT A FEW PIPES OUTFALLING INTO THE
BASIN HAVE BENDS. PROVIDE JUNCTION STRUCTURES AT
THESE BENDS OR REMOVE THE BENDS.
7) PROVIDE ESC MEASURES FOR THE EAST-BOUND LANE
ROADWORK ALONG HAMPTON PARK DRIVE.
8) SHOW ESC MEASURES FOR THE WATERLINE ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF ROUTE 360.
9) SHOW THE ABOVE MENTIONED WATERLINE ON ALL APPLICABL
PLAN SHEETS.
10) CLARIFY HOW THE TEMPORARY PIPE FOR 6A IS TO BE
FUNCTIONING DURING ESC OPERATIONS AND HOW IT IS TO
BE CONVERTED TO A PERMANENT STRUCTURE. IF THE
TEMPORARY PIPE IS PLASTIC IT WILL REQUIRE A BOOT
CONNECTOR FOR THE STRUCTURE.
28. ON SHEET C2.3:
1) IT APPEARS THROUGHOUT THIS PAGE THERE ARE SEVERAL
REFERENCES TO CHESTERFIELD DPW. CHESTERFIELD DOES
NOT HAVE A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, UPDATE THESE
COMMENTS TO BE TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.
2) UPDATE REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT ESC
REGULATIONS.
3) UPDATE NOTES FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING TO APPLIED WITHI
14 DAYS INSTEAD OF 30 DAYS PER CURRENT REGULATIONS.
29. ON SHEET C2.4:
1) IN THE SEDIMENT BASIN DETAIL, THE PIPE TYPE AND ITS
RESPECTIVE GEOMETRY DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT I
SHOWN ON SHEET C2.1. VERIFY PIPE PARAMETERS AND
UPDATE THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
2) THE SEDIMENT BASIN CALCULATIONS FOR DRY STORAGE
ELEVATION DOES NOT MATCH THE DETAIL.
3) THE SIZING OF THE BASIN DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE USING
THE 25% LARGER PONDING VOLUMES REQUIRED IN THE UPPE
SWIFT CREEK.
4) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BASIN ON THE DESIGN
SHEETS CONTAINED WITHIN THE VESCH.
30. SHEET 2.6 CONTAINS NUMEROUS REFERENCES TO HENRICO
COUNTY AND ITS DEPARTMENT AND INSPECTORS. UPDATE THES
REFERENCES TO THE PROPER CHESTERFIELD DEPARTMENT AND
INSPECTORS.
31. ON SHEET C6.2:
1) SPECIFY VDOT CLASS I RIP-RAP, 2' DEEP WITH FILTER
FABRIC FOR ALL OUTLET PROTECTION AT A MINIMUM.
2) PROVIDE N-VALUES USED IN THE DITCH CALCULATIONS.
3) SECTION D-D APPEARS TO BE A TRIANGULAR DITCH IN PLA
VIEW. VERIFY DITCH GEOMETRY.
4) THE TD FOR 5-5 DOES NOT MATCH DRAINAGE AREA.
5) PROVIDE 2-YEAR FLOWS FOR 2-2.
32. DUE TO THE COMMENTS ON THE DRAINAGE AREAS, PROFILES,
AND PLANS, A CURSORY REVIEW OF THE DRAINAGE
CALCULATIONS WERE PERFORMED.
33. IN THE SPREAD CALCULATIONS AN INTENSITY OF 4 IN/HR CAN
BE USED FOR THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND 6.5 IN/HR FOR
THE CHECK STORM.
34 A CBPA COMPLIANCE SHEET(S) IS REQUIRED. (CL-CBPA 3)
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON
THE SHEET(S):
1. THE CBPA/MS-4 COMPLIANCE TABLE. (SEE APPENDIX D OF TH
CHESAPEAKE BAY CHAPTER IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERIN
REFERENCE MANUAL) (CL-CBPA 3A)
2. PERCENT IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS/ASSUMPTIONS.
(CL-CBPA 3G)
3. INCREMENTAL DRAINAGE AREAS TO EACH BMP, THE IMPERVIOUS
AREA WITHIN EACH DRAINAGE AREA, AND THE PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS AREA OF EACH BMP DRAINAGE AREA. (CL-CBPA 3H
4. PROPOSED EASEMENT LOCATIONS. (CL-CBPA 3I)
35. THE ENTIRE BMP MUST BE ENCLOSED WITHIN AN SWM/BMP
EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS 8 FT. AROUND THE BMP.
(CL-CBPA 14)
36. A MINIMUM 20' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED
FROM THE SWM/BMP EASEMENT TO A PUBLIC RIGHT-0F-WAY FOR
FUTURE MAINTENANCE. (CL-CBPA 15)
37. THE EASEMENT ENCLOSING THE FILTERRA MUST BE LABELED
"FILTERRA BMP EASEMENT". THIS SHOULD ONLY BE LABELED A
A FILTERRA BMP EASEMENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. TH
PLAT SHOULD BE LABELED AS A BMP EASEMENT.
38. METES AND BOUNDS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHEET FO
SWM/BMP EASEMENTS AND ACCESS EASEMENTS. (CL-CBPA 16)
39. THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUMES FOR WATER QUALITY AND
AND WATER QUANTITY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW O
THE SWM FACILITY. (CL-CBPA 22)
40. THE 2, 10, AND 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS MUST
BE SHOWN FOR ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES ON THE PLAN AND
PROFILE VIEWS. (CL-CBPA 24)
41. PERFORATIONS IN THE RISER MUST BE PRECAST, NOT FIELD
MADE. PLEASE ADD A NOTE TO THE RISER DETAIL.
(CL-CBPA 26)
42. A DETAIL MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN SHOWING THE
METHOD OF SECURING THE METAL TRASH RACK / ANTI VORTEX
DEVICE TO THE CONCRETE WEIR WALL. (CL-CBPA 31)
43. ON SHEET C7.1:
1) IN THE PHASE 1 AREA CALCULATIONS, INCLUDE THE ROAD
WORK IN THE CALCULATIONS.
2) CLARIFY IF THE OVERALL AREA CALCULATIONS' WATER
QUALITY IS BEING COVERED BY THIS PROJECT.
44. ALL WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SATISFIED ON-
SITE SINCE THIS PROJECT IS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK. OFF-SITE NUTRIENT
CREDITS AND USE OF A PRO-RATA WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
45. DUE TO THE UNFAMILIARITY WITH THE JELLYFISH PRODUCT BY
THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BMP TEAM AND THE FACT THIS WIL
BE A COUNTY MAINTAINED BMP, JELLYFISH SYSTEM WILL NOT
BE ACCEPTED FOR USE IN WATER QUALITY AT THIS TIME.
PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR THIS
PROJECT.
46. PROVIDE A FULL SET OF ROUTING CALCULATIONS FOR THE
REQUIRED DESIGN STORMS.
47. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
48. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
49. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
50. ANY UTILITY RELOCATIONS MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND NARRATIVE.
(CL-USC 5)
51. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
52. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
53. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
54. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
55. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
56. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
57. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
58. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
59. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
60. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. COPIES OF THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
(VSMP) REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE PAID RECEIPT
E. COPY OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) TO BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLETENESS.
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================
==========================================================
==========================================================
REVIEW DEPARTMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
REVIEWER/PHONE # : DUSTIN DUNNAGAN / 706-2061
NAME OF PLAN : SHOPPES AT HARPERS MILL, PHASE I
ADDRESS : 7500 OTTERDALE ROAD
SITE PLAN NO. : 15PR0197
LATEST PLAN DATE : APRIL 08, 2016
DEPT. REC'D DATE : APRIL 13, 2016
SUBMITTAL NUMBER : 2
REVIEW DATE : MAY 03, 2016
RECOMMENDATION : NOT APPROVED
TABLE REVISION : NO
PLAT PROCESSING : NO
01. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY
WITH AND / OR ACQUIRE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND / OR
STATE PERMITS IN RELATIONSHIP TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS
(E.G. VSMP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES, GROUND WATER
AND AIR QUALITY) FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS WILL NO
RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. WETLANDS
DOCUMENTATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT PRIO
TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
(CL-XX #) REPRESENTS A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMENT -
SECTION AND COMMENT NUMBER
02. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014, ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA
STORMWATER REGULATIONS BECAME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TH
COUNTY FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY. ADDITIONALLY, NEW STATE STORMWATER REGULATION
ALSO BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JULY 1, 2014. LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES THAT OBTAINED A VSMP PERMIT PRIOR TO JULY 1
2014 MAY USE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
SPECIFIED IN PART II C (9VAC25-870-93 ET SEQ) FOR TWO
PERMIT CYCLES. PROJECTS GRANDFATHERED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF 9VAC25-870-48 MAY FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT
LISTED UNDER PART IIC FOR ONE PERMIT CYCLE. ALL OTHER
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
PART IIB (9VAC25-870-62 TO 9VAC25-870-92).
03. APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN BY THE PRIVATE UTILITY
COMPANY IN RELATION TO ITS EASEMENT AND FACILITIES
THEREIN MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
04. NOTE THAT THE VSMP PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED TO STAY
ACTIVE TO MEET THE LIMITS OF APPLICABILITY FOR THE
FUTURE PHASES. ANY AREA NOT COVERED UNDER THE VSMP AND
THAT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANDFATHERING
WILL HAVE TO BE DESIGNED FOR PART IIB OF THE CURRENT
STORMWATER STANDARDS.
05. NOTE THAT ANY AREAS LISTED AS FUTURE WERE NOT REVIEWED
WITH THESE PLANS AND WILL NOT BE APPROVED WITH THESE
PLANS.
06. DUE TO THE COMMENTS ON THE DRAINAGE AREAS, PROFILES,
AND PLANS, A CURSORY REVIEW OF THE DRAINAGE
CALCULATIONS WERE PERFORMED.
** COMMENTS NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED WITH THIS REVISION **
03. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET:
A. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FOR THE PROJECT SITE (IN
DEGREES, MINUTES, SECONDS, TO THE NEAREST 15 SECONDS)
04. BOOT CONNECTORS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE TABULAR
DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION FOR ALL PLASTIC PIPES THAT TIE
INTO A CONCRETE STRUCTURE. (CL-G&D 21)
09. DUE TO THE HIGH POSSIBILITY FOR SPILLS OF OIL, GAS,
ANTI-FREEZE, ETC. ALL DRAINAGE FROM THE FUELING AREA
MUST DRAIN TO AN OIL-GRIT SEPARATOR FOLLOWED BY A
STORMFILTER (OR SIMILAR SYSTEM THAT IS DESIGNED TO
REMOVE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS). DESIGN CALCULATIONS MUST B
SUBMITTED AND DETAILS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS FOR BOTH
THE SEPARATOR AND FILTER. (CL-G&D 37)
13. RCP PIPE IS REQUIRED WITHIN ALL PROPOSED DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS. NOTE THAT IF CSP IS TO BE USED FOR THE
UNDERGROUND STORAGE, AN EXCEPTION WILL NEED TO BE
SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING.
14. ON SHEET C4.1:
16. ON SHEET C4.3:
1) IN THE PROFILE FOR 1 TO 64, IT APPEARS THAT THE
WATERLINE IS ENCOUNTERED CLOSER TO STRUCTURE 1 THAN
THE SANITARY SEWER; HOWEVER, ON THE PLANS IT SHOWS
THE SANITARY SEWER BEING CLOSER TO STRUCTURE 1.
VERIFY UTILITY LINES AND CLEARANCES.
5) THE PIPE GEOMETRY FOR 60A DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY GEOMETRY.
6) THE RIM ELEVATION FOR 61 DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY RIM ELEVATION.
7) THE PIPE GEOMETRY FOR 61A DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH
THE PLANS. VERIFY GEOMETRY.
17. ON SHEET C4.4:
3) LABEL THE CLEARANCE OVER THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
WATERLINES.
18. ON SHEET C6.1:
1) PROVIDE A DRAINAGE AREA FOR THE EXISTING CULVERT ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF HAMPTON PARK DRIVE.
5) LABEL DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION FOR THE LARGE AREA
TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROJECT DRAINING TO THE DITCH
RUNNING ALONG OTTERDALE ROAD. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD TO
BE DRAINAGE AREA 64 FOR THIS REVIEW.
6) IN DRAINAGE AREA 64, USE 0.35 FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
AND DESIGN FOR ULTIMATE LAND USE.
8) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR 05 APPEARS TO HAVE AN INCREAS
IN IMPERVIOUS AREA. PROVIDE SPREAD AND STORMWATER
CALCULATIONS FOR THE STRUCTURE RECEIVING THIS AREA.
11) PROVIDE TIMES-OF-CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS FOR
TIMES GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES. NOTE THE PARAMETERS
FOR THE CALCULATIONS MUST BE INCLUDED.
26. ON SHEET C2.1:
7) PROVIDE FLOW LENGTH CALCULATIONS FOR THE BASIN.
28. ON SHEET C2.3:
2) UPDATE REFERENCES TO THE MOST RECENT ESC
REGULATIONS.
30. SHEET 2.6 CONTAINS NUMEROUS REFERENCES TO HENRICO
COUNTY AND ITS DEPARTMENT AND INSPECTORS. UPDATE THES
REFERENCES TO THE PROPER CHESTERFIELD DEPARTMENT AND
INSPECTORS.
31. ON SHEET C6.2:
1) SPECIFY VDOT CLASS I RIP-RAP, 2' DEEP WITH FILTER
FABRIC FOR ALL OUTLET PROTECTION AT A MINIMUM.
5) PROVIDE 2-YEAR FLOWS FOR 2-2.
44. ALL WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SATISFIED ON-
SITE SINCE THIS PROJECT IS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK. OFF-SITE NUTRIENT
CREDITS AND USE OF A PRO-RATA WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
** NEW COMMENTS**
07. PROVIDE AN EXISTING CONDITION PLAN.
08. SHEET C0.1:
A) THE VA HU6 SHOULD BE JA41.
B) THE MS-19 TABLE SHOWS THE SITE USING SITUATION G.
VARIANCE SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED.
09. SHEET C1.2:
A) PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
B) PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE CONCRETE DITCH CONVEYING
SITE WATER THROUGH THE DOWNSTREAM PROPERTY.
10. SHEET C2.1:
A) SHOW AND LABEL MH93 THAT IS TO BE REMOVED PER THE
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
B) FOR THE BASIN OUTFALL, THE CONCRETE PIPE SHALL
CONVEY THE FLOW TO THE DISCHARGE LOCATION. USE OF
HDPE ON THE SLOPE OR WITHIN THE EMBANKMENT WILL NOT
BE APPROVED.
C) PROVIDE MINIMIZED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FOR
INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER ESC MEASURES ONLY.
D) THERE APPEARS TO BE AN ERRANT CONTOUR LINE TO THE
NORTHWEST OF THE BASIN THAT CUTS THROUGH THE OTHER
CONTOURS PERPENDICULARLY.
E) PROVIDE SUPER SILT FENCE FOR THE BOUNDARY OF THE
PROJECT INSTEAD OF REGULAR SILT FENCE.
F) PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR THE STOCKPILE AND
BASIN.
G) PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE
STOCKPILE.
H) PROVIDE SILT FENCE BREAKS IN THE SILT FENCE AROUND
THE STOCKPILE.
11. SHEET C2.2:
A) IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDE THE
INSTALLATION OF THE OIL/GRIT SEPARATOR.
B) THERE APPEARS TO BE A DIVERSION DIKE THAT FLOWS
UPHILL NEAR STRUCTURE 62 TOWARD THE BASIN. CLARIFY
C) PROVIDE PERMANENT SEEDING AND MULCHING.
D) THE DRAINAGE AREA FOR INLET 4 APPEARS TO EXCEED THE
AMOUNT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION IN THE VESCH.
PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE SEDIMENT TRAPPING.
E) PROVIDE FILL DIVERSIONS WITH TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAINS
FOR THE ACCESS ROAD TO THE SOUTH OF THE RETAINING
WALL UNTIL THE CURB AND GUTTER IS INSTALLED.
F) THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION OVERLAPS THE TEXT FOR
THE LEGEND, OBSCURING THE TEXT.
12. SHEET C2.3:
A) CLARIFY TO WHICH DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING THE ESC
PLAN NOTES PERTAIN.
B) IN NOTE 3 OF THE ESC PLAN NOTES, THE PHONE NUMBER
LISTED DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. REVISE.
C) IN NOTE 21 OF THE ESC PLAN NOTES, CLARIFY TO WHICH
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING THE NOTE PERTAINS.
13. ON SHEET C2.5, THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE APPEARS IN A
DIFFERENT PLACE THAN IN THE ESC PLAN SHEETS. CLARIFY.
14. ON SHEET C3.1, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONCRETE SLAB.
15. SHEET C4.1:
A) THE CALLOUT AND STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR 64A INDICATE
IT IS A RIP-RAP DITCH; HOWEVER, THE HATCHING AND
CALCULATIONS ON C6.2 INDICATE A CONCRETE LINE DITCH
CLARIFY.
B) REMOVE DEMOLISHED PIPES FROM THE SHEET.
C) LABEL EXISTING STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE TO REMAIN
AND INCLUDE IN STRUCTURE SCHEDULE.
D) NOTE THAT A LICENSE AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR
THE ASPHALT AND CURB ABOVE THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE.
E) STRUCTURE 60 IS LABELED AS A STORM FILTER IN THE
STRUCTURE SCHEDULE; HOWEVER, IN PLAN VIEW IT APPEAR
TO BE A DI-7 RECEIVING DISCHARGE FROM THE DITCH.
CLARIFY.
F) THERE ARE TWO 61A LABELED IN PLAN VIEW. CLARIFY.
G) THE CONNECTION OF THE SITE STORM SEWER TO THE
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SHALL OCCUR AT A JUNCTION.
H) CLARIFY THE TOP OF WALL DIFFERENT OF ALMOST 13' NEA
THE STORMFILTER.
I) STRUCTURES 9, 10, AND 63 WILL REQUIRE VDOT SL-1
SINCE THEY ARE OVER 12' IN HEIGHT.
J) THE LENGTH OF PIPE IN THE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR 10
DOES NOT MATCH PLAN AND PROFILE VIEW.
K) STRUCTURE 62 APPEARS TO BE OVER 10' IN HEIGHT AND
WILL NEED TO BE A DI-3BB.
L) COMPLETE THE STRUCTURE INFORMATION FOR THE
STORMFILTER IN THE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE.
M) THE DETAIL SHEET REFERENCE FOR STRUCTURE 9 DOES NOT
APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT. CLARIFY.
N) PROVIDE STRUCTURE NUMBER FOR FILTERRA AND ITS
OUTFALL PIPE. INCLUDE IN SCHEDULE.
16. SHEET C4.2:
A) PROVIDE STRUCTURE NUMBER FOR FILTERRA AND ITS
OUTFALL PIPE. INCLUDE IN SCHEDULE.
B) PROVIDE RIP-RAP OUTLET PROTECTION FOR THE PIPE
DISCHARGING INTO THE DITCH AT 0% GRADE.
C) PIPE 73A APPEARS IN LOCATIONS TO HAVE LESS THAN 1'
OF COVER. PROVIDE 2' OF COVER OR INCREASE PIPE
CLASS.
D) STRUCTURE 80 DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET VDOT MINIMUM
HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. CLARIFY.
E) FOR THE CURB ALONG HULL STREET ROAD, PROVIDE FOR
PG-2A OR OTHER TREATMENT TO CONVEY THE CURB AND
GUTTER SECTION TO THE DITCH SECTION.
17. SHEET C4.3:
A) PROVIDE PROFILE FOR 60 AND 60A.
B) THE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE
DOES NOT MATCH CALCULATIONS.
C) THE STORAGE APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPE.
CLARIFY.
D) STRUCTURE 11 APPEARS TO BE DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE
10 IN PROFILE VIEW. IN PLAN VIEW STRUCTURE 11
CONNECTS TO STRUCTURE 2. CLARIFY.
E) STRUCTURE 12A IS NOT IN PLAN VIEW OR IN THE
STRUCTURE SCHEDULE.
F) LABEL THE STRUCTURE NUMBER FOR THE STORM FILTER.
G) PIPE GEOMETRY FOR PIPE 62A DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
H) STRUCTURE TYPE FOR 61 DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
I) PIPE SLOPE FOR 63A DOES NOT MATCH PLANS.
18. SHEET C4.4:
A) STRUCTURE TOP FOR STRUCTURE 92 DOES NOT MATCH PLANS
B) STRUCTURE 11 APPEARS DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE 93.
THIS DOES NOT MATCH PLAN VIEW.
19. SHEET C6.1:
A) PROVIDE DITCH SECTION AND CALCULATION FOR DITCH
UPSTREAM OF STRUCTURE 61.
B) INDICATE WHICH DRAINAGE AREAS ARE BASED ON FUTURE
BUILDOUT.
20. SHEET C6.2:
A) DRAINAGE INFORMATION FOR SECTIONS 5-5 AND 6-6 DO NO
APPEAR TO MATCH THE PLANS.
B) VERIFY THE DITCH SECTIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE TO VDOT.
TYPICALLY A 4:1 FORE SLOPE AND A 2:1 BACK SLOPE ARE
REQUIRED AT MINIMUM.
21. SHEET C6.3:
A) THE STORM INLET REPORT AND THE INTENSITY STORM INLE
REPORT DO NOT INCLUDE THE SAME INLETS. CLARIFY.
B) THE FOLLOWING INLETS THROAT LENGTHS DO NOT MATCH TH
PLANS: 1, 11, 90, 41. VERIFY THROAT LENGTHS.
C) THE FOLLOWING INLET'S DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION DO
NOT MATCH THE PLANS: 1, 2, 4, 90.
22. SHEET C6.4:
A) CLARIFY IF THE DISCHARGE FROM STRUCTURE 10 IS THE
ROUTED DISCHARGE.
B) THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE PLAN
BUT ARE INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS: 7, 31, 31A, 42,
51, 93A OUT.
C) THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURES' DRAINAGE AREA AND TIME OF
CONCENTRATION INFORMATION DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS:
1, 2, 20, 60, 61, 70, 90, 91.
23. SHEET C7.1:
A) SINCE THIS PROJECT IS TO NOT USE PHASING, RELABEL
ITEMS LABELED AS PHASE 2 TO FUTURE OR ULTIMATE.
B) THE IMPERVIOUS AREA DO NOT APPEAR TO SHOWN DO NOT
APPEAR TO MATCH THE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA.
C) PROVIDE OFFSITE REDUCED IMPERVIOUS BMP EASEMENTS FO
OFFSITE AREAS USED TO LOWER THE PERCENTAGE OF
IMPERVIOUS.
D) THE ONSITE PROJECT AREA IN CALCULATIONS DOES NOT
APPEAR TO MATCH THE MAPS.
24. SHEET C7.2:
A) THE OFFSITE PHASE AREA OF THE INDIVIDUAL AREAS DO
NOT ADD UP TO THE CALL OUT.
B) CLARIFY HOW THE OFFSITE AREAS SHOWN DIFFER FROM SOM
OF THE SITE AREAS SHOWN ON PREVIOUS SHEET.
25. PROVIDE BMP DETAILS ON SHEET C7.3.
26. SHEET C8.1:
A) THE ROUTED DISCHARGES DO NOT MATCH THE ROUTINGS.
B) THE DA 1 DRAINAGE AREAS DO NOT MATCH BETWEEN THE
PROPOSED CONDITION CALCULATIONS AND THE DITCH
CALCULATIONS.
27. SHEET C8.2:
A) IN THE UNDERGROUND DETENTION DETAILS, PROVIDE FOR
LOCATIONS OF INSPECTION PORTS AND/OR CLEANOUTS.
B) CLARIFY THE GRADE/SLOPE THE UNDERGROUND DETENTION I
TO BE INSTALLED ON.
C) IN THE JB-1 DETAIL:
1) THE OUTFALL PIPE (9A) SIZE DOES NOT MATCH THE
STRUCTURE SCHEDULE.
2) THE ORIFICE SHOWN IN TOP VIEW APPEARS TO BE ONE
ORIFICE; HOWEVER, IN SECTION VIEW IT IS LABELED
AS TWO ORIFICES. CLARIFY.
28. IN THE ROUTINGS:
A) CLARIFY IF THE TAILWATER CONDITION FROM THE 15"
OUTFALL PIPE IS ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE BMP DISCHARGE.
IT APPEARS THIS OUTFALL WOULD RESTRICT THE 10 AND
100-YEAR STORM.
B) MANY OF THE PAGES ARE CUT-OFF/TRUNCATED IN THE
ROUTING BOOK.
C) STORAGE VOLUMES AND DISCHARGE RATES DO NOT MATCH TH
PLANS.
29. A BMP MAINTENANCE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,500 PER
IMPERVIOUS ACRE IS REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT. (CL-USC 1)
30. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OTHER THAN THE
MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE VIRGINIA EROSION AN
SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK WILL BE REQUIRED IF IT IS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH MEASURES ARE NECESSARY FOR
PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND/OR
WATER RESOURCES. (CL-USC 3)
31. ENHANCED PERIMETER PROTECTION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.
(SUPER SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS SIZED 25
PERCENT LARGER THAN MINIMUM STANDARDS, ETC.) (CL-USC 4
32. ANY UTILITY RELOCATIONS MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND NARRATIVE.
(CL-USC 5)
33. FOR SITES OVER FIVE ACRES, A MONTHLY EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REPORT FROM THE CRLD MUST BE SUBMITTE
TO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BY THE FIRST OF EACH
MONTH. (CL-USC 6)
34. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO PROVIDE ONE
ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND OBTAIN AN "APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION" STAMP ON TWO ADDITIONAL SETS FOR THE
OWNER TO KEEP ON-SITE.
35. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNER(S) ALLOWING FOR GRADING ON THE PROPERTY AS
PROPOSED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE
PERMIT.
36. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS INCLUDING STORMWATER /
BMP DRAINAGE EASEMENTS MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
37. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A
SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT BMP MUST
BE POSTED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. (COUNTY CODE
PART II, CHAPTER 8, SEC. 8-16)
38. THE BMP MUST BE CERTIFIED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE BMP
PERFORMANCE BOND AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
39. THE RISER AND BARREL PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEDIMENT
BASIN MUST BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND
DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
40. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT, A COPY
OF THE AUTOCAD FILE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CAROLE
CLIBORNE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. THE AUTOCAD
FILE MUST BE SAVED AS A .DWG OR .DXF IN AUTOCAD VERSIO
2009 OR EARLIER AND REFERENCED DIRECTLY TO THE VIRGINI
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE IN THE NAD83
DATUM. THE AUTOCAD FILE MAY BE SUBMITTED ON A CD, DVD
OR VIA EMAIL AND MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH THE SITE
PLAN NAME, SITE PLAN NUMBER, ENGINEERING FIRM AND CAD
FILE PREPARER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER. THE FILE MUST
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING, EACH CLEARLY LABELED IN SEPARAT
LAYERS:
A. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT;
B. PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS;
C. ROADS;
D. SIDEWALKS;
E. ALL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREAS AND/OR WATERS OF THE
U.S./STATE; AND
F. FLOODPLAINS.
THE FILE MUST BE APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT.
41. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS
A PREREQUISITE TO A BUILDING PERMIT.
42. A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
AND THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS ISSUANCE:
A. SUBSTANTIAL OR FULL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
B. A VDOT LAND USE PERMIT
C. A LETTER MUST BE RECEIVED FROM A QUALIFIED WETLANDS
EXPERT STATING:
1.THERE ARE NO WETLANDS IMPACTED ON THIS PROJECT, OR
2.ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND PERMITS HAVE
BEEN ACQUIRED (COPIES OF THE PERMITS MUST BE SUBMITTED
D. COPIES OF THE VIRGINIA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
(VSMP) REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND FEE PAID RECEIPT
E. COPY OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) TO BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLETENESS.
F. POSTING OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SURETY
(AMOUNT TO BE APPROVED BY EE)
==========================================================

Modify comments view for case # 15PR0197



Go to Case Selection Form or Go to Project List